(112 days)
The SurgiQuest AirSeal® iFS System is intended for use in diagnostic and/or therapeutic endoscopic procedures to distend a cavity by filling it with gas, to establish and maintain a path of entry for endoscopic instruments and to evacuate surgical smoke. It is indicated to facilitate the use of various laparoscopic instruments by filling the abdominal cavity with gas to distend it, by creating and maintaining a gas sealed obstruction-free instrument path and by evacuating surgical smoke. This instrument is used to insufflate the rectum and colon to facilitate endoscopic observation, diagnosis and treatment. The trocar of the AirSeal® iFS System is indicated for use with or without visualization.
The SurgiQuest AirSeal® iFS System (cleared as AirSeal® Optical Trocar & Cannula System with integrated Insufflator DPIS 2000) consists of the following major components: (1) a trocar, (2) a cannula, (3) tube sets, and (4) a micro-processor controlled insufflation, recirculation and filtration unit (the "AirSeal® iFS"). The cannula, trocar and tube sets are sterile, single-use products. The AirSeal® iFS System is an active medical device, nonsterile and reusable and is intended to insufflate a body cavity. The AirSeal® iFS System is designed to function in one of three (3) separate modes of operation: (a) Insufflation Mode; (b) AirSeal Mode; or (c) Smoke Evacuation Mode. The device contains software. The device is designed for use in hospitals and clinics.
The provided text describes the SurgiQuest AirSeal® iFS System, a laparoscopic insufflator. Here's a breakdown of the requested information, based solely on the provided document:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The document does not explicitly present a table of acceptance criteria with corresponding device performance metrics in the format typically used for AI/ML device evaluations (e.g., sensitivity, specificity, accuracy against a threshold). Instead, it discusses the device's adherence to various engineering and quality standards, and the results of a bench test demonstrating "substantial equivalence."
However, we can infer some "performance" from the bench test mentioned:
| Acceptance Criterion (Inferred from study goal) | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|
| Substantial equivalence in performance for insufflation in a small cavity (compared to predicate device) | The engineering in-vitro bench test "demonstrates conclusively that there is substantial equivalence in performance" between the AirSeal® iFS System and the Olympus High Flow Insufflation Unit UHI-4 when tested in a small cavity. |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
- Sample Size for Test Set: Not applicable in the context of this document. The study described is an "engineering in-vitro bench test," not a human clinical trial or a dataset of patient cases.
- Data Provenance: Not applicable. The "data" comes from an in-vitro bench test, not from patient data (e.g., country of origin, retrospective/prospective).
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts
- This information is not provided in the document, as the "ground truth" for an engineering bench test is typically defined by the physical parameters being measured and the established performance of a predicate device, rather than expert consensus on medical images or diagnoses.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
- Not applicable. Adjudication methods like 2+1 or 3+1 are used for establishing ground truth in clinical data (e.g., image interpretation), which is not the nature of the described engineering bench test.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done, and the Effect Size of How Much Human Readers Improve with AI vs. Without AI Assistance
- No. This document does not mention an MRMC study. The device described is a physical medical device (laparoscopic insufflator), not an AI-powered diagnostic or therapeutic tool that would assist human readers in interpreting medical cases.
6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done
- Not applicable. The AirSeal® iFS System is a physical device with embedded software for its operation, but it is not an "algorithm only" device in the sense of an AI/ML diagnostic or predictive algorithm. Its performance is evaluated through engineering tests, not standalone clinical performance as an AI algorithm.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
- For the described engineering bench test, the "ground truth" or reference for comparison appears to be the performance of a legally marketed predicate device (Olympus High Flow Insufflation Unit UHI-4) in a controlled in-vitro environment, as well as adherence to various industry standards (IEC for electrical safety, ISO for sterilization, biocompatibility, etc.). The goal was to demonstrate "substantial equivalence" to this predicate.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
- Not applicable. The device described is a physical medical device. It does not involve a "training set" in the context of machine learning algorithms.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
- Not applicable. There is no training set for this type of device.
Summary of the Study Discussed:
The document primarily describes an engineering in-vitro bench test (Engineering Test No. 0206151530 01) comparing the SurgiQuest AirSeal® iFS System with its predicate device, the Olympus High Flow Insufflation Unit UHI-4. This test was conducted in a "small cavity" to demonstrate substantial equivalence in performance for the purpose of maintaining pneumorectum. The study concluded that the AirSeal® iFS System is "safe and effective in creating and maintaining pneumorectum" and that its performance is "substantially equivalent" to the predicate. The document also lists adherence to numerous ISO and IEC standards for various aspects of the device (sterilization, biocompatibility, electrical safety, etc.).
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the seal of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The seal features the department's name encircling a symbol. The symbol is a stylized representation of a human figure, composed of three overlapping profiles, suggesting a sense of community and care. The text reads 'DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA'.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
March 20, 2015
SurgiQuest, Inc. Mr. Daniel Donovan Sr. Director, Quality & Regulatory Affairs 333 Quarry Road Milford, Connecticut 06460
Re: K143404
Trade/Device Name: SurgiQuest AirSeal iFS System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 884.1730 Regulation Name: Laparoscopic Insufflator Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: HIF, GCJ Dated: February 4, 2014 Received: February 25, 2015
Dear Mr. Donovan,
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug. and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical devicerelated adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in
{1}------------------------------------------------
the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours, Jennifer R. Stevenson -S For Binita S. Ashar, M.D., M.B.A., F.A.C.S. Director Division of Surgical Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known)
Device Name SurgiQuest AirSeal® iFS System
Indications for Use (Describe)
The SurgiQuest AirSeal® iFS System is intended for use in diagnostic and/or therapeutic endoscopic procedures to distend a cavity by filling it with gas, to establish and maintain a path of entry for endoscopic instruments and to evacuate surgical smoke. It is indicated to facilitate the use of various laparoscopic instruments by filling the abdominal cavity with gas to distend it, by creating and maintaining a gas sealed obstruction-free instrument path and by evacuating surgical smoke. This instrument is used to insufflate the rectum and colon to facilitate endoscopic observation, diagnosis and treatment. The trocar of the AirSeal® iFS System is indicated for use with or without visualization.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) |
|---|
| ------------------------------------------------- |
[X] Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
510(k) SUMMARY OF SAFETY & EFFECTIVENESS (Content in accordance with 21 CFR §807.92)
| Submitter: | SurgiQuest, Inc.333 Quarry RoadMilford, CT 06460 |
|---|---|
| Contact Person: | Daniel DonovanSr. Director., Quality & Regulatory AffairsPhone: (203) 713-1925Fax: (203) 799-2401e-mail: ddonovan@surgiquest.com |
| Date Prepared: | November 14, 2014 |
| Trade Name: | Trade Name: AirSeal® iFS System(Original FDA Clearance as "SurgiQuest AirSeal® OpticalTrocar & Cannula System with integrated Insufflator DPIS2000", [K103692]. |
| Common Name: | Disposable Endoscopic Trocar and Cannula;Carbon Dioxide Insufflator for Laparoscopy |
| Classification Name: | Endoscope and accessories under 21 C.F.R. 876.1500;Laparoscopic Insufflator under 21 C.F.R. 884.1730 |
| Regulatory Class: | II |
| Product Code: | GCJ and HIF |
| Predicate Devices: | "SurgiQuest AirSeal® Optical Trocar & Cannula Systemwith integrated Insufflator DPIS 2000"SurgiQuest, Inc., K103692(Primary Predicate)"Olympus High Flow Insufflation Unit UHI-4"Olympus Medical Systems, Corp., K122180(Second Predicate) |
{4}------------------------------------------------
The SurgiQuest AirSeal® iFS System (cleared as AirSeal® Device Description: Optical Trocar & Cannula System with integrated Insufflator DPIS 2000) consists of the following major components: (1) a trocar, (2) a cannula, (3) tube sets, and (4) a micro-processor controlled insufflation, recirculation and filtration unit (the "AirSeal® iFS"). The cannula, trocar and tube sets are sterile, single-use products.
The AirSeal® iFS System is an active medical device, nonsterile and reusable and is intended to insufflate a body cavity. The AirSeal® iFS System is designed to function in one of three (3) separate modes of operation: (a) Insufflation Mode; (b) AirSeal Mode; or (c) Smoke Evacuation Mode. The device contains software. The device is designed for use in hospitals and clinics.
The AirSeal® iFS System has been developed in accordance with 21 CFR 820, ISO 13485:2012 & ISO 14971:2012 is tested in accordance with IEC 60601-1, General Requirements for Medical Electrical Equipment -Part 1: General Requirements for Safety and IEC60601-1-2, Medical Electrical Equipment - Part 1-2: General Requirements for for Safety - - Collateral Standard: Electromagnetic Compatibility - Requirements and Tests.
Gamma sterility validation for sterile modules has been performed in accordance with ISO 11137 Sterilization of health care products - Radiation, Part 1 - Part 3 and Sterilization of Healthcare Products: Radiation Sterilization - Substantiation of 25kGY as a Sterilization Dose - Method VD Max. ETO sterility validation has been performed ISO 11135-1, Sterilization of health care products -Ethylene Oxide - Part 1: Requirements for the development, validation, and routine control of a sterilization process for medical devices; and ISO 10993-7, Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices - Part 7: Ethylene Oxide sterilization residuals. Residual ethylene oxide (EO) and ethylene chlorohydrin (ECH) data shows that the limit of EO < 5 mg / 10 days and ECH < 5 mg / 10 days that remain on the tube set will not be exceeded. A sterility assurance level (SAL) is ≤ 10t achieved.
Package and product integrity were tested in accordance with ISO11607-1, Packaging for Terminally Sterilized Medical Devices and ASTM-F-1980-02, Standard for Accelerated Aging of Sterile Medical Device Packages.
{5}------------------------------------------------
ISO 11137 -2, Sterilization of health care products --Radiation -- Part 2: Establishing the sterilization dose.
Finally, biocompatibility testing has been performed on the cannula, the optical trocar, the blunt tipped trocar including fixation device and the AirSeal® filtered tube sets in accordance with ISO 10993-5, Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices - Part 5: Tests for InVitro Cytotoxicity; ISO 10993-10, Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices - Part 10: Tests for Irritation and Delayed Type Hypersensitivity; and ISO 10993-5:2009, Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices - Part 12: Sample Preparation and Reference Material.
The AirSeal® iFS System is intended for use in diagnostic Intended Use: and/or therapeutic endoscopic procedures to distend a cavity by filling it with gas, to establish and maintain a path of entry for endoscopic instruments and to evacuate surgical smoke.
Indications for Use: The SurgiQuest AirSeal® iFS System is intended for use in diagnostic and/or therapeutic endoscopic procedures to distend a cavity by filling it with gas, to establish and maintain a path of entry for endoscopic instruments and to evacuate surgical smoke. It is indicated to facilitate the use of various laparoscopic instruments by filling the abdominal cavity with gas to distend it, by creating and maintaining a gas sealed obstruction-free instrument path and by evacuating surgical smoke. This instrument is used to insufflate the rectum and colon to facilitate endoscopic observation, diagnosis and treatment. The trocar of the AirSeal® iFS System is indicated for use with or without visualization.
The Indications for Use is not identical to the Predicate device in that the subject device (which is also the primary predicate) is not indicated for surgical harvesting of the saphenous vein. The indication change is to add only the diagnosis and treatment of the rectum and colon. These differences in Indication for Use do not affect the safety and effectiveness or alter the therapeutic use of the device in the indication for trans-anal minimally invasive surgery.
{6}------------------------------------------------
Substantial Equivalence:
The AirSeal® iFS System is substantially equivalent to the AirSeal® DPIS 2000 (K103692) and the Olympus High Flow Insufflation Unit UHI-4 insufflator (K122180). The proposed device has similar technological characteristics (operating principle, electrical characteristics, mechanical characteristics, communication characteristics, material). The device has the same intended use as the Predicate Device. In addition, the AirSeal® iFS System and the Predicate Devices use the same or similar basic operating principles, i.e., they function to distend a cavity to facilitate minimally invasive surgery. (Note: the AirSeal® iFS System is unchanged in intended use and operating principle) Bench test results demonstrate that the AirSeal® iFS System is safe and effective in creating and maintaining pneumorectum.
An engineering in-vitro bench test was conducted to compare the performance of the subject (The AirSeal® iFS System) and the predicate (Olympus High Flow Insufflation Unit UHI-4) insufflator devices in a small cavity. (Engineering Test No. 0206151530 01). The test demonstrates conclusively that there is substantial equivalence in performance.
§ 884.1730 Laparoscopic insufflator.
(a)
Identification. A laparoscopic insufflator is a device used to facilitate the use of the laparoscope by filling the peritoneal cavity with gas to distend it.(b)
Classification. (1) Class II (performance standards).(2) Class I for tubing and tubing/filter kits which include accessory instruments that are not used to effect intra-abdominal insufflation (pneumoperitoneum). The devices subject to this paragraph (b)(2) are exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 884.9.