K Number
K142670
Date Cleared
2014-10-22

(33 days)

Product Code
Regulation Number
872.6660
Panel
DE
Reference & Predicate Devices
AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
Intended Use

Vericore zirconia blanks are made from pre-sintered zirconium dioxide intended to be used with many CAD/CAM or manual milling machines. Vericore zirconia blanks are biocompatible and designed to fabricate;

  • Zirconia Substructures .
  • -Restorations (Including inlays, onlays, and veneers)
  • . Crown Framework in the Anterior and Posterior regions
  • . Bridge Framework in the Anterior and Posterior regions
Device Description

Vericore Zirconia Blanks is a device made from pre-sintered zirconia powder. It is available in various shades, shapes, and sizes to accommodate the customers CAD/CAM or manual milling equipment/strategies and is not machine specific. Vericore Zirconia Blanks are made from a biocompatible zirconia powder. It is intended to be used by professionals for the fabrication of dental restorations.

AI/ML Overview

The provided text is a FDA 510(k) premarket notification for a dental device, "Vericore Zirconia Blanks". This document focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device rather than presenting a study of a device's performance against specific acceptance criteria in a clinical setting. Therefore, most of the requested information regarding acceptance criteria, sample sizes, expert involvement, and ground truth establishment for a clinical study is not available in the provided text.

However, I can extract information related to the bench testing conducted.

Here's a breakdown of the available information:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

TestAcceptance CriteriaReported Device Performance
Flexural StrengthIn accordance with ISO 6872"all tests passed"
Chemical SolubilityIn accordance with ISO 6872"all tests passed"
Density(Not specified, but results were recorded)"results are recorded in the proposed labeling"

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)

  • Sample Size: Not specified for the bench tests.
  • Data Provenance: Not specified, but generally, bench testing data for medical devices would originate from the manufacturer's testing facilities (likely in the USA, given the applicant's address). The tests are prospective in nature as they are conducted for this specific submission.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)

  • Not applicable. Bench testing does not typically involve human experts for establishing ground truth as it measures material properties based on established standards.

4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

  • Not applicable. Bench testing does not involve adjudication.

5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

  • No, an MRMC comparative effectiveness study was not done. This document is for a physical dental material, not an AI-powered diagnostic device.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done

  • No, a standalone performance study was not done. This document is for a physical dental material, not an algorithm.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)

  • For the bench tests (Flexural Strength, Chemical Solubility, Density), the "ground truth" is based on established international standards (ISO 6872) for material properties.

8. The sample size for the training set

  • Not applicable. This is a physical dental material, not a machine learning algorithm, so there is no "training set."

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

  • Not applicable. There is no training set for a physical dental material.

In summary, the provided document details the regulatory submission for a dental material (Vericore Zirconia Blanks). The "study" described refers to bench testing to ensure the material meets specified physical and chemical properties according to international standards (ISO 6872). It does not involve a clinical study with human subjects, expert readers, or AI performance metrics.

§ 872.6660 Porcelain powder for clinical use.

(a)
Identification. Porcelain powder for clinical use is a device consisting of a mixture of kaolin, felspar, quartz, or other substances intended for use in the production of artificial teeth in fixed or removable dentures, of jacket crowns, facings, and veneers. The device is used in prosthetic dentistry by heating the powder mixture to a high temperature in an oven to produce a hard prosthesis with a glass-like finish.(b)
Classification. Class II.