(123 days)
Not Found
No
The summary describes iterative reconstruction software for metal artifact reduction, which is a traditional image processing technique, and does not mention AI, ML, or related concepts.
No
Explanation: The device is a software option for CT systems designed to reduce metal artifacts in images. It does not directly treat or diagnose a medical condition in a patient; rather, it improves the quality of diagnostic images.
No
The device is a software option for CT systems designed to reduce metal artifacts in CT images, which improves image quality. It is a tool for image processing and reconstruction, not a device that directly diagnoses a medical condition or disease.
No
The device is described as a software option for Siemens Computed Tomography X-ray systems and is a modification to a previously cleared CT system. While the submission focuses on the software, it is intrinsically linked to and operates on a hardware platform (the CT system) and is not a standalone software device.
Based on the provided text, this device is not an IVD (In Vitro Diagnostic).
Here's why:
- IVD Definition: In vitro diagnostics are tests performed on samples taken from the human body, such as blood, urine, or tissue, to detect diseases, conditions, or infections.
- Device Function: The iMAR software is described as "iterative reconstruction software designed to reduce metal artifacts in CT images." It processes images generated by a CT scanner, which is an imaging modality that produces images of the inside of the body without taking samples.
- No Mention of Samples: The text does not mention the device analyzing any biological samples. Its function is solely related to processing and improving the quality of medical images.
Therefore, the iMAR software falls under the category of medical imaging software, not an in vitro diagnostic device.
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
iMAR is Siemens' iterative reconstruction software designed to reduce metal artifacts in CT images. It is a user-selected option, to be used with conventional reconstruction methods (WFBP or iterative reconstruction) on Siemens.
The amount of metal artifact reduction and corresponding improvement in image quality depends on a number of factors including: composition and size of the metal object, patient size, anatomical location and clinical practice.
If is recommended to perform reconstructions with iMAR enabled, in addition to conventional reconstruction without iMAR.
Product codes
JAK
Device Description
iMAR (Metal Artifact Reconstruction) SW is a new software option, for Siemens Computed Tomography X-ray systems with the Somaris platform operating system. The iMAR software is designed to reduce metal artifacts caused by large and/or dense metal objects in computed tomography images. This submission includes the following device modifications:
-
- New optional iMAR Software
-
- A new specific Indication for Use Statement
-
- Inclusion of a product Claims List
The iMAR software is based on a modification to the predicate device, previously cleared SOMATOM Definition AS Open using "MARIS" (Metal Implant Reduction in Image Space) VA46 (K130901) computed tomography system cleared under Premarket Notification K130901 on 01/02/2014.
Mentions image processing
Yes
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found
Input Imaging Modality
CT
Anatomical Site
Not Found
Indicated Patient Age Range
Not Found
Intended User / Care Setting
Not Found
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Non-clinical tests (integration and functional), including bench testing were conducted for the iMAR Software during product development. The Risk Analysis was completed and risk control implemented to mitigate identified hazards. The test results show that all of the software specifications have met the acceptance criteria. Evaluation of clinical images was conducted and judged acceptable by a certified radiologist.
Summary of Performance Studies (study type, sample size, AUC, MRMC, standalone performance, key results)
The modifications described in this premarket notification are supported with software verification/validation. Verification and Validation testing of the device was found acceptable to support claims of substantial equivalence. Non-clinical tests (integration and functional), including bench testing were conducted for the iMAR Software during product development. The Risk Analysis was completed and risk control implemented to mitigate identified hazards. The test results show that all of the software specifications have met the acceptance criteria. Siemens claims conformance to a signed statement of conformance to the following six (6) performance standards: 60601-1; 2005; 60601-2-44; 2009; 60601-1-6: 2006: 14971:2010: 62304 Ed. 1.0 2006. and PS 3.1 - PS3.18. Software Documentation for a Moderate Level of Concern software per FDA's Guidance Document "Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices" issued on May 11, 2005 is also included as part of this submission. The performance data demonstrates continued conformance with special controls for medical devices containing software. Evaluation of clinical images was conducted and judged acceptable by a certified radiologist.
Key Metrics (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, etc.)
Not Found
Predicate Device(s): If the device was cleared using the 510(k) pathway, identify the Predicate Device(s) K/DEN number used to claim substantial equivalence and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text. List the primary predicate first in the list.
Reference Device(s):
Not Found
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information for the subject device only (e.g. presence / absence, what scope was granted / cleared under the PCCP, any restrictions, etc).
Not Found
§ 892.1750 Computed tomography x-ray system.
(a)
Identification. A computed tomography x-ray system is a diagnostic x-ray system intended to produce cross-sectional images of the body by computer reconstruction of x-ray transmission data from the same axial plane taken at different angles. This generic type of device may include signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, component parts, and accessories.(b)
Classification. Class II.
0
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" around the perimeter. Inside the circle is an abstract symbol that resembles three human profiles facing to the right, stacked on top of each other.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
January 16, 2015
Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. % Ms. Eve Davis Regulatory Affairs Specialist 51 Valley Stream Parkway MALVERN PA 19355
Re: K142584
Trade/Device Name: iMAR (iterative Metal Artifact Reduction) Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.1750 Regulation Name: Computed tomography x-ray system Regulatory Class: II Product Code: JAK Dated: December 19, 2014 Received: December 22, 2014
Dear Ms. Davis:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
1
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638 2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Robert A Ochs
Robert Ochs. Ph.D. Acting Director Division of Radiological Health Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
2
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration
Indications for Use
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: January 31, 2017 See PRA Statement below.
510(k) Number (if known) K142584
Device Name iMAR (iterative Metal Artifact Reduction)
Indications for Use (Describe)
iMAR is Siemens' iterative reconstruction software designed to reduce metal artifacts in CT images. It is a user-selected option, to be used with conventional reconstruction methods (WFBP or iterative reconstruction) on Siemens.
The amount of metal artifact reduction and corresponding improvement in image quality depends on a number of factors including: composition and size of the metal object, patient size, anatomical location and clinical practice.
If is recommended to perform reconstructions with iMAR enabled, in addition to conventional reconstruction without iMAR.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
2 Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
_ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
FOR FDA USE ONLY
Concurrence of Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) (Signature)
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
FORM FDA 3881 (1/14)
3
Image /page/3/Picture/0 description: The image shows the word "SIEMENS" in a sans-serif font. The letters are a light blue color. There is a black line underneath the word.
510(k) Summary: iMAR (iterative Metal Artifact Reconstruction) Software
| Company: | Siemens Medical Systems USA, Inc. |
|---|---|
| 51 Valley Stream Parkway Malvern, PA 19355 |
Date Prepared: December 11, 2014
This 510(k) summary of safety and effectiveness information is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of SMDA 1990 and 21 CFR § 807.92.
- General Information: Importer / Distributor: Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. 51 Valley Stream Parkway Malvern, PA 19355 Establishment Registration Number: 2240869
Location of Manufacturing Site SIEMENS AG Healthcare Siemensstrasse 1 D-91301 Forchheim, Germany Establishment Registration Number: 3004977335
2. Contact Person:
Eve Davis Regulatory Affairs Specialist Siemens Medical Solutions USA. Inc. 51 Valley Stream Parkway, D-02 Malvern, PA 19355 Phone: (610) 219-7133 Fax: (610) 448-1787 Email: eve.davis@siemens.com
3. Device Name and Classification:
| Trade Name: | iMAR (iterative Metal Artifact Reconstruction) SW |
|---|---|
| Classification Name: | Computed Tomography X-Ray System |
| Classification Panel: | Radiology |
| Classification Regulation: | 21 CFR §892.1750 |
| Device Class: | Class II |
| Product Code: | JAK |
4. Legally Marketed Predicate Devices:
| Trade Name: | SOMATOM Definition AS Open using MARIS (VA46) |
|---|---|
| 510(k) #: | K130901 |
| Clearance Date: | January 2, 2014 |
| Classification Name: | Computed Tomography X-ray System |
| Classification Panel: | Radiology |
| CFR Section: | 21 CFR §892.1750 |
| Device Class: | Class II |
| Product Code: | JAK |
| Recall Information: | This predicate device has not been the subject of any design related recalls. |
4
SIEMENS
5. Device Description:
iMAR (Metal Artifact Reconstruction) SW is a new software option, for Siemens Computed Tomography X-ray systems with the Somaris platform operating system. The iMAR software is designed to reduce metal artifacts caused by large and/or dense metal objects in computed tomography images. This submission includes the following device modifications:
-
- New optional iMAR Software
-
- A new specific Indication for Use Statement
-
- Inclusion of a product Claims List
The iMAR software is based on a modification to the predicate device, previously cleared SOMATOM Definition AS Open using "MARIS" (Metal Implant Reduction in Image Space) VA46 (K130901) computed tomography system cleared under Premarket Notification K130901 on 01/02/2014.
The modified subject device the iMAR Software is within the same classification requlation with a specific indication for use from the primary predicate device: however, the intended use and the general Indication for Use Statement for Siemens' Computed Tomography X-ray system remains the same.
We believe these modifications are eligible for the Traditional 510(k) process since it has the same fundamental scientific technology. Intended use and general Indication for Use as the predicate device system. The new specific Indication for Use statement is supported with non-clinical testing. Documentation is provided to support a claim of substantial equivalence to Siemens' primary predicate device the SOMATOM Definition AS Open using MARIS VA46 (K130901).
6. Indication for Use:
iMAR is Siemens' iterative reconstruction software designed to reduce metal artifacts in CT images. It is a user-selected option, to be used with conventional reconstruction methods (WFBP or iterative reconstruction) on Siemens CT systems.
The amount of metal artifact reduction and corresponding improvement in image quality depends on a number of factors including: composition and size of the metal object, patient size, anatomical location and clinical practice.
It is recommended to perform reconstructions with iMAR enabled in addition to conventional reconstruction without iMAR.
7. Summary of Technological Characteristics of the Subject Device as Compared to the Predicate Device:
The iMAR Software is designed to reduce metal artifacts caused by large and/or dense metal objects in computed tomography images. The primary predicate device, the SOMATOM Definition AS Open using MARIS (VA46), was 510(k) cleared with the MARIS software which also reduces metal artifacts in scanned images. The subject device (iMAR) is comparable in general Computed tomography indication for use, same intended use, design, material, functionality,
5
Image /page/5/Picture/1 description: The image shows the word "SIEMENS" in a sans-serif font. The letters are a light blue color. There is a black line underneath the word.
technology, energy source and is considered substantially equivalent to the commercially available Siemens' SOMATOM Definition AS Open using MARIS (VA46).
The components of the subject device have many of the same technological characteristics as the components from the predicate device. There are several technological characteristics that differ slightly, as show below. The iMAR Software is designed to reduce metal artifacts caused by large and/or dense metal objects in computed tomography images. The predicate device has the MARIS feature which reduces metal artifact in images.
| Property | Subject Device: iMAR | Predicate Device:
SOMATOM Definition AS
Open using MARIS (VA46) |
|--------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Physical effects
corrected | beam hardening, scatter,
undersampling and photon
starvation | beam hardening |
| Corrections
applied in | projection domain and image
domain | projection domain and image
domain |
| User- controllable
settings | pre-defined parameter sets
optimized for a range of
different clinical situations | 5 strength levels |
Subject and Predicate Device Compared Technological Characteristics
Testing and validation is complete. Test results show that the subject device, the iMAR Software, is comparable to the predicate device and therefore is substantially equivalent.
The modifications of the subject device, the iMAR Software, do not alter the intended use or fundamental scientific technology from the 510(k) cleared predicate device, the SOMATOM Definition AS Open using MARIS (VA46).
8. Performance Testing:
The modifications described in this premarket notification are supported with software verification/validation. Verification and Validation testing of the device was found acceptable to support claims of substantial equivalence. Non-clinical tests (integration and functional), including bench testing were conducted for the iMAR Software during product development. The Risk Analysis was completed and risk control implemented to mitigate identified hazards. The test results show that all of the software specifications have met the acceptance criteria.
Siemens claims conformance to a signed statement of conformance to the following six (6) performance standards: 60601-1; 2005; 60601-2-44; 2009; 60601-1-6: 2006: 14971:2010: 62304 Ed. 1.0 2006. and PS 3.1 - PS3.18.
Software Documentation for a Moderate Level of Concern software per FDA's Guidance Document "Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices" issued on May 11, 2005 is also included as part of this submission. The performance data demonstrates continued conformance with special controls for medical devices containing software.
6
SIEMENS
Evaluation of clinical images was conducted and judged acceptable by a certified radiologist.
9. General Safety and Effectiveness Concerns:
The device labeling contains instructions for use and any necessary cautions and warnings, to provide for safe and effective use of the device.
Risk management is ensured via a hazard analysis which is used to identify potential hazards. These potential hazards are controlled during software development, and verification and validation testing. To minimize electrical, mechanical, and radiation hazards, Siemens adheres to recognized and established industry practice and standards.
10. Conclusion as to Substantial Equivalence:
The predicate device was cleared based on non-clinical supportive information. The subject device bench testing, Verification and validation testing, and the evaluation of clinical images demonstrate that the iMAR Software performs as intended. The non-clinical test data and evaluation of clinical images demonstrate that the iMAR device performance is comparable to the predicate device that is currently marketed for the same intended use.
In summary Siemens is of the opinion that iMAR does not introduce any new potential safety risk and is substantially equivalent to the MARIS functionality of the predicate device.