(91 days)
The Hemedex Cranial Bolt is designed to achieve cranial access and to introduce and secure one to four sensors in place for intracranial monitoring.
The QFlow 500™ Titanium Bolt Quad Lumen Kit is used to achieve cranial access and to introduce and secure up to four sensors in place for intracranial monitoring. The kit contains a cranial bolt, drill bit, scalpel, sensor introducer with stylet, Touhy Borst fittings and connectors. The cranial bolt contains four lumens with its primary materials being titanium, polyphenylsulfone, polyvinyl chloride and polycarbonate. The primary materials of the sensor introducer are polyether block amide and polycarbonate. The primary materials of the other components in the kit are stainless steel, titanium nitride, acrylonitrile butadiene styrene, polyphenylsulfone, polyvinyl chloride and polycarbonate.
Here's a breakdown of the acceptance criteria and study information based on the provided document:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
This device is not an AI/ML powered device, The current response contains information derived from the provided document.
| Test | Acceptance Criteria (Predetermined Specification) | Reported Device Performance (Hemedex QFlow 500™ Titanium Bolt Kit, Quad Lumen) |
|---|---|---|
| Torque required to insert the cranial bolt | Not explicitly stated (implied to be easy) | 7 - 8 in-lbs maximum torque required. In comparative testing, required 38% to 64% less in-lbs of torque to fully insert compared to predicate/reference devices. |
| Axial tension required to pull the cranial bolt out | Greater than 40 lbf | Greater than 40 lbf. In comparative testing, the Hemedex Quad Lumen Bolt pull out force was greater than 40 lbf, whereas predicate and reference devices could not reach this threshold without incurring damage. |
| Torque required to tighten the Touhy Borst compression cap to seal the sensors | Less than 1 in-lb torque required | Less than 1 in-lb torque required. |
| Tension required to pull the sensors out of the Touhy Borst | Not explicitly stated (implied to be secure) | Approximately 1.3 lbf. |
| Leak testing | No leaking at 185 mm Hg pressure for 14 days | No leaking at 185 mm Hg pressure for 14 days. In comparative testing, the Hemedex Quad Lumen Bolts incurred less leaking at increasing intervals of insertion replicating different skull thicknesses at 185 mm Hg pressure. |
| Axial tensile strength of the "pig tails" | Not explicitly stated (implied to be strong) | 19 - 37 lbf depending on pigtail diameter. |
| Axial tensile strength of the introducer | Not explicitly stated (implied to be acceptable) | 3.7 - 4.4 lbf. |
| Axial tensile strength of the pigtail extension | Not explicitly stated (implied to be strong) | 16.6 - 20.6 lbf. |
| Drill bit dimensional and cutting functionality | Burr hole diameter 0.209" | Burr hole diameter 0.209". Easily cut through bone. Depth collars remained secure. In comparative testing, the Hemedex drill bit meets specification. Predicate (K002765) and reference device specifications are unknown for diameter. All tested drill bits easily cut through bone; depth collars remained secure. |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
The document describes bench testing, which typically involves laboratory-controlled experiments rather than human or animal subjects. Therefore, the concept of "sample size used for the test set" in the context of human data or "data provenance" (country of origin, retrospective/prospective) as it relates to clinical data is not applicable here. The tests were performed on the device components themselves.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts
Not applicable. The ground truth for this type of performance testing (mechanical and functional bench tests) is based on engineering specifications and physical measurements, not expert human interpretation.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
Not applicable. This is not a study involving human adjudication of results; it's a series of physical and mechanical bench tests performed according to engineering protocols.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done
No, an MRMC comparative effectiveness study was not done. This device is a mechanical cranial bolt, not an AI/ML system that would involve human readers interpreting output.
6. If a Standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done
Not applicable. This device is a physical medical device, not an algorithm, so "standalone performance" in the context of AI is not relevant. The performance tests described are standalone in the sense that they evaluate the device's physical properties and function without human interaction beyond operating the test equipment.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
The ground truth for the bench testing was based on:
- Predetermined Engineering Specifications: These are quantifiable targets for mechanical properties (e.g., torque, tension, leak rates, dimensions).
- Measurable Physical Properties: Direct measurements of the device's behavior under specific test conditions (e.g., actual torque required, actual pull-out force, actual leakage).
- Comparison to Predicate Devices: Performance was also evaluated relative to the performance of existing legally marketed predicate devices (K032337, K002765) and a reference device (K992591) to demonstrate substantial equivalence or improvement.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
Not applicable. This device is a physical medical device, not an AI/ML algorithm that requires a "training set."
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
Not applicable. As there is no training set, there is no ground truth establishment for it.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features a stylized depiction of an eagle or bird-like figure with three heads in profile, representing health, humans, and services. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" is arranged in a circular fashion around the emblem.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
October 10, 2014
Hemedex Inc. Dean Honkonen VP, Regulatory Affairs and Quality Assurance 222 3rd St Suite 0123 Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142
Re: K141869 Trade/Device Name: OFlow 500 Titanium Bolt Kit, Quad Lumen Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.1620 Regulation Name: Intracranial Pressure Monitoring Device Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: GWM, HBG Dated: July 8, 2014 Received: July 14, 2014
Dear Mr. Honkonen,
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical devicerelated adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in
{1}------------------------------------------------
the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Carlos L. Pena -S
Carlos L. Peña, PhD, MS Director Division of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K141869
Device Name QFlow 500 Titanium Bolt Kit, Quad Lumen
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Hemedex Cranial Bolt is designed to achieve cranial access and to introduce and secure one to four sensors in place for intracranial monitoring.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
HEMEDEX QFLOW 500™ TITANIUM BOLT KIT
510K Summary
Submitter's Name and Address
Hemedex, Inc. 222 Third Street, Suite 0123 Cambridge, MA 02142
Date
October 9, 2014
Contact Person
Dean Honkonen VP, Regulatory Affairs and Quality Assurance Telephone (617) 577-1759 Fax (617) 577-9328
Name of Device
| Proprietary Name: | QFlow 500™ Titanium Bolt Kit, Quad Lumen |
|---|---|
| Common Name: | Intracranial Bolt |
| Classification Name: | Intracranial pressure monitoring device |
| Product Codes: | GWM, HBG |
| Regulations: | 882.1620, 882.4300 |
| Class: | II |
| Panel: | Neurology |
Statement of Substantial Equivalence
The QFlow 500™ Titanium Bolt Kit is substantially equivalent in intended use, function and design to the Hemedex Single and Dual Lumen Cranial Bolts (K032337), as well as the Integra Licox Brain Monitoring System, PN IM1, IM2, IM3 (K002765).
{4}------------------------------------------------
Purpose
This submission covers design changes to predicate device cranial bolt K032337 that adds two lumens to the dual lumen bolt for a total of four lumens. New kit components are added to accommodate the additional sensors and for ease of use.
Device Description
The QFlow 500™ Titanium Bolt Quad Lumen Kit is used to achieve cranial access and to introduce and secure up to four sensors in place for intracranial monitoring. The kit contains a cranial bolt, drill bit, scalpel, sensor introducer with stylet, Touhy Borst fittings and connectors. The cranial bolt contains four lumens with its primary materials being titanium, polyphenylsulfone, polyvinyl chloride and polycarbonate. The primary materials of the sensor introducer are polyether block amide and polycarbonate. The primary materials of the other components in the kit are stainless steel, titanium nitride, acrylonitrile butadiene styrene, polyphenylsulfone, polyvinyl chloride and polycarbonate.
Indications for Use
The Hemedex Cranial Bolt is designed to achieve cranial access and to introduce and secure one to four sensors in place for intracranial monitoring.
The QFlow 500™ Titanium Bolt Quad Lumen indications for use differ from predicate devices K032337 and K002765, in that the Quad Lumen Bolt allows for one to two additional sensors to be inserted. This difference does not change the use of the device as it is still used to introduce and secure sensors in place for intracranial monitoring. The Quad Lumen Bolt improves safety and effectiveness as in cases were more than two sensors are to be placed in a patient, only one burr hole of 5.3 mm in diameter is necessary. Currently, in the case where the physician decides to place four sensors, two burr holes must be drilled for the placement of two dual lumen bolts, or a three lumen bolt combined with a single lumen bolt. Two burr holes drilled into the patient's skull increase the risk of infection and trauma to the patient. Predicate device K002765, Integra Licox Brain Monitoring System, allows for up to three devices to be inserted through one burr hole, requiring a second burr hole and single lumen bolt to be inserted, thus increasing the risk to the patient.
{5}------------------------------------------------
Comparison of Technological Characteristics
| Hemedex Quad LumenIntracranial Bolt | HemedexIntracranial BoltK032337 | Integra Licox Brain OxygenMonitoring SystemK002765 (P/N IM1, IM2, IM3) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indicationsfor Use | The Hemedex Cranial Bolt isdesigned to achieve cranialaccess and to introduce andsecure one to four sensors inplace for intracranialmonitoring. | The Hemedex Single andDouble Lumen Bolts aredesigned to achieve cranialaccess and to introduce andsecure a sensor in place forintracranial monitoring. | The Licox measuresintracranial oxygen andtemperature and is indicatedas an adjunct monitor of trendsof these parameters, indicatingthe perfusion status of cerebraltissue local to the sensorplacement. Licox systemsvalues are relative within anindividual and should not beused as the sole basis fordecisions as to diagnosis ortherapy. It is intended toprovide data additional to thatobtained by current clinicalpractice in cases wherehypoxia or ischemia are aconcern. |
| Components | Titanium BoltBolt wingCompression fitting (cap,body, gasket and washer)Luer tubesCap, Non-vented, Male LuerLockExtension fittingStyletIntroducerDrill bitHex wrenchScalpel | Stainless steel Bolt with wingshapeCompression fitting (cap,grommet and washer)Piercing deviceCap, Non-vented, Male LuerLockSealing WasherStylet | Stainless steel BoltBolt wingCompression fitting (cap,grommet and washer)Luer tubesStyletIntroducerDrill BitHex WrenchPiercing needle |
| Configuration | Quadruple Lumen | Single and Double Lumen | Single, Double & Triple lumen |
| Bolt SizeLength | 4.7 |
{6}------------------------------------------------
Performance Testing
Bench testing was conducted to demonstrate that this device meets the requirements of its intended use and meets the specified performance criteria. Bench testing performed was as follows:
| Test | Results | Conclusion |
|---|---|---|
| Torque required to insertthe cranial bolt | 7 - 8 in-lbs maximumtorque required | Easily inserted. Met thepredetermined specification |
| Axial tension required topull the cranial bolt out | Greater than 40 lbf | Acceptably secured in thebone. Met the predeterminedspecification |
| Torque required to tightenthe Touhy Borstcompression cap to sealthe sensors | Less than 1 in-lb torquerequired | Easy to secure the sensors.Met the predeterminedspecification |
| Tension required to pull thesensors out of the TouhyBorst | Approximately 1.3 lbf | Sensors secure. Met thepredetermined specification |
| Leak testing | No leaking at 185 mm Hgpressure for 14 days | Easily meets thepredetermined sealingspecifications |
| Axial tensile strength of the"pig tails" | 19 - 37 lbf depending onpigtail diameter | Strong connections. Met thepredetermined specification |
| Axial tensile strength of theintroducer | 3.7 - 4.4 lbf | Acceptable. Met thepredetermined specification |
| Axial tensile strength of thepigtail extension | 16.6 - 20.6 lbf | Strong connections. Met thepredetermined specification |
| Drill bit dimensional andcutting functionality | Burr hole diameter 0.209"Easily cut through bone | Easy to create the correctsize burr hole. Strongconnections. Met thepredetermined specification |
Bench testing was also conducted to demonstrate that this device is substantially equivalent or better than predicate devices K032337, K002765 and a reference device
{7}------------------------------------------------
K992591. The tests selected assess the performance of the devices with regards to their interaction with the patient and user. Bench testing performed was as follows:
| Test | Results | Conclusion |
|---|---|---|
| Torque requiredto insert thecranial bolt | The Hemedex Quad Lumen Bolt required38% to 64% less in-lbs of torque to fullyinsert, depending on the predicate orreference device | Substantially equivalentor better than thepredicate & referencedevices |
| Axial tensionrequired to pullthe cranial boltout of the skull | The Hemedex Quad Lumen Bolt pull outforce was greater than 40 lbf.The predicate and reference devicescould not reach the 40lbf thresholdwithout incurring damage. | Substantially equivalentor better than thepredicate & referencedevices |
| Leak testing | The bolts were tested at increasingintervals of insertion replicating differentskull thicknesses at 185 mm Hg pressure.In all cases the Hemedex Quad LumenBolts incurred less leaking. | Substantially equivalentor better than thepredicate & referencedevices |
| Drill bitdimensional andcuttingfunctionality | The Hemedex Burr hole diameter 0.209"meets specification. Predicate (K002765)and reference device specifications areunknown.All the tested drill bits easily cut throughbone.Depth collars remained secure. | Substantially equivalentto the predicate &reference devices |
Conclusion
The Hemedex QFlow 500™ Titanium Bolt Kit, Quad Lumen is substantially equivalent to or better than the predicate devices.
§ 882.1620 Intracranial pressure monitoring device.
(a)
Identification. An intracranial pressure monitoring device is a device used for short-term monitoring and recording of intracranial pressures and pressure trends. The device includes the transducer, monitor, and interconnecting hardware.(b)
Classification. Class II (performance standards).