K Number
K141663
Manufacturer
Date Cleared
2014-07-22

(29 days)

Product Code
Regulation Number
884.6160
Panel
OB
Reference & Predicate Devices
AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
Intended Use

The Eeva™ Dish is intended to be used to hold human oocytes and embryos during handling and culture.

Device Description

The Eeva Dish is a round dish with an outer diameter of 38 mm; the inner diameter of the dish is 35mm. The dish is provided with a lid. The interior of the dish contains a large central ring approximately 10mm in diameter, which contains 12 smaller, round microwells, each intended to hold a single human oocyte or embryo. The device allows for the segregation of embryos while they are immersed in the same drop of culture media The microwells are 350 microns in diameter and 134 microns deep, which creates sufficient room for handling of human oocytes and embryos with a pipette. The center ring has a tapered wall to stabilize and minimize embryo movement in the microwells. The dish also contains three smaller outer rings, approximately 8mm in diameter each, that are intended to hold media drops for rinsing oocytes or embryos. The center and three outer rings can each hold 100ul of media. The dish is constructed of virgin polystyrene and is non-pyrogenic and non-embryotoxic. The dish is single use only and is packaged with 3 units per sterile pouch, 12 pouches per corrugated cardboard shipping carton.

AI/ML Overview

Here's an analysis of the Eeva™ Dish's acceptance criteria and the supporting study, based on the provided 510(k) summary:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

The device in question (Eeva™ Dish, 12-microwell configuration) is a modification of a previously cleared predicate device (Eeva™ Petri Dish, 16- and 25-microwell configurations). As such, the acceptance criteria are generally aligned with demonstrating "substantial equivalence" to the predicate, particularly in terms of safety and performance for its intended use. The performance criteria largely mirror those established for the original predicate device and testing aims to show the new design doesn't negatively impact these metrics.

Acceptance Criterion (for Substantial Equivalence to Predicate)Reported Device Performance (Eeva™ Dish, 12-Microwell)
Indications for Use: Intended to hold human oocytes and embryos during handling and culture.Matches predicate via "Same" (page 1)
Principles of Operation / Conditions of Use: Microwell tissue culture dish for use in IVF procedures performed by qualified professionals.Matches predicate via "Same" (page 2)
Dish and Lid Materials: 100% virgin polystyrene.Matches predicate via "Same" (page 2)
Shelf-life: 6-months.Matches predicate via "Same" (page 2)
Sterilization: Gamma irradiation to an SAL of 10-6.Matches predicate via "Same" (page 2)
Packaging: Dish packaged as 3 units in a sterile, nylon, film-to-film pouch.Matches predicate via "Same" (page 2)
Pyrogenicity Testing: Non-pyrogenic (≤ 20 EU/Device) as tested by Limulus Amoebocyte Lysate (LAL) testing.Non-pyrogenic (page 2)
Embryotoxicity Testing: Non-embryotoxic, with ≥ 80% of embryos developing to expanded blastocyst stage within 96 hours (tested by 1-Cell Mouse Embryo Assay (MEA)).Non-embryotoxic (page 2)
Dish Dimensions: Minor differences demonstrated to not raise new safety/effectiveness questions.Dish Inside Diameter: 35mm (Same as predicate) (page 3)
Dish Outside Diameter: 38mm (Predicate: 39mm) (page 3)
Dish Height: 11mm (Same as predicate) (page 3)
Central Ring Dimensions: Minor differences demonstrated to not raise new safety/effectiveness questions.Diameter: 10mm (Predicate: 9mm/7mm) (page 3)
Height: 2.5mm (Predicate: 0.5mm) (page 3)
Walls: Beveled (Predicate: Straight) (page 3)
Volume: 100µL (Predicate: 80µL/50µL) (page 3)
Outer Rings Dimensions: Minor differences demonstrated to not raise new safety/effectiveness questions.Diameter: 8mm (Predicate: 7mm) (page 3)
Height: 2.5mm (Predicate: 0.5mm) (page 3)
Volume: 100µL (Predicate: 50µL) (page 3)
Microwell Dimensions: Minor differences demonstrated to not raise new safety/effectiveness questions.Number: 12 microwells (Predicate: 16/25) (page 3)
Shape & Size: Circle, 350 microns (Predicate: Square, 300x300, 250x250) (page 3)
Depth: 134 microns (Predicate: 150/100 microns) (page 3)
Packaging Integrity: Validated.Non-clinical testing indicated (page 4)
Shipping Validation: Validated.Non-clinical testing indicated (page 4)
Sterilization Validation: Validated.Non-clinical testing indicated (page 4)
Shelf Life Verification: Verified.Non-clinical testing indicated (page 4)
Lab Equipment Compatibility Verification: Verified.Non-clinical testing indicated (page 4)
Usability Verification: Verified.Non-clinical testing indicated (page 4)

Study Details:

The provided document describes a non-clinical testing program conducted on the Eeva™ Dish with 12 microwells to support a determination of substantial equivalence to the predicate devices. The study is a set of tests to ensure the new device functions as intended and safely, similar to the predicate, despite minor design changes.

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance

  • Sample Size for Test Set: Not explicitly stated in terms of specific numbers for each test (e.g., how many dishes were tested for pyrogenicity). The document indicates "Non-clinical testing was conducted on the Eeva Dish with 12 microwells." It implies that sufficient samples were used to meet the requirements of the standards/methods for each test.
  • Data Provenance: Not explicitly stated (e.g., country of origin). Given it's a 510(k) submission to the FDA, the testing would generally be expected to follow internationally recognized standards, potentially conducted in the US or by accredited labs elsewhere. The timing (July 2014) is for the summary preparation, the tests themselves would have occurred prior. The study is prospective in nature, as the tests were specifically conducted to evaluate the new device.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts

  • This information is not applicable in this context. The Eeva™ Dish is an IVF culture dish, which is a physical labware device. Its performance criteria (e.g., pyrogenicity, embryotoxicity, dimensional accuracy) are assessed through standardized laboratory tests, not through expert interpretation of data or images. "Ground truth" here refers to the quantitative results of these scientific tests against defined criteria.

4. Adjudication method for the test set

  • This information is not applicable. As explained above, the tests are objective laboratory assessments with established pass/fail criteria, not subjective interpretations requiring adjudication.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

  • No, an MRMC comparative effectiveness study was not done. This device is a culture dish, not an AI-powered diagnostic tool requiring human reader interaction. Therefore, concepts like "human readers improve with AI" are not relevant to this submission.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

  • No, a standalone AI algorithm study was not done. This device is a physical labware product and does not involve an algorithm.

7. The type of ground truth used

The ground truth used for these tests is based on:

  • Standardized assay results: For example, Limulus Amoebocyte Lysate (LAL) testing for pyrogenicity, and 1-Cell Mouse Embryo Assay (MEA) for embryotoxicity (where "non-embryotoxic" is defined by ≥ 80% of embryos developing to the expanded blastocyst stage within 96 hours).
  • Engineering specifications and measurements: For dimensional accuracy, packaging integrity, sterilization efficacy, and shelf-life verification.
  • Verification of compatibility and usability: Against defined functional requirements.

8. The sample size for the training set

  • Not applicable. This device is a physical product, not an AI or machine learning model that requires a training set.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

  • Not applicable. As there is no training set for this device, there is no ground truth for a training set to be established.

§ 884.6160 Assisted reproduction labware.

(a)
Identification. Assisted reproduction labware consists of laboratory equipment or supplies intended to prepare, store, manipulate, or transfer human gametes or embryos for in vitro fertilization (IVF), gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT), or other assisted reproduction procedures. These include syringes, IVF tissue culture dishes, IVF tissue culture plates, pipette tips, dishes, plates, and other vessels that come into physical contact with gametes, embryos or tissue culture media.(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls) (mouse embryo assay information, endotoxin testing, sterilization validation, design specifications, labeling requirements, and clinical testing). The device, when it is a dish or plate intended for general assisted reproduction technology procedures, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 884.9.