(91 days)
The Comfortear® Lacrisolve™ Absorbable Punctum Plugs are intended to temporarily block tear drainage by the occlusion of the canaliculus in order to:
- Determine the potential effectiveness of permanent occlusion, .
- Temporarily treat dry eye syndrome, and the dry eye components of various ocular . surface diseases,
- . Temporarily enhance the efficacy of topical medications or ocular lubricants.
- . Temporarily treat contact lens intolerance secondary to dry eye, and
- Temporarily treat dry eye after ocular surgery.
Comfortear® Lacrisolve™ Absorbable Punctum Plugs are intended to temporarily block tear drainage by occlusion of the canaliculus. The plug is supplied in various sizes ranging from 0.2mm to 0.5mm in diameter and has a length of approximately 1.75mm, see table below. The plug is dyed (D&C Violet No. 2). Comfortear® Lacrisolve™ Absorbable Punctum Plugs are composed of the following absorbable suture materials: polydioxanone (PDO).
The design features of the Comfortear@ Lacrisolve™ Absorbable Punctum Plugs raise no new issues of safety or effectiveness. Comfortear® Lacrisolve™ Absorbable Punctum Plugs consist of a length of monofilament synthetic absorbable suture material. The Comfortear® Lacrisolve™ Absorbable Punctum Plugs are provided sterile. The Comfortear® Lacrisolve™ Absorbable Punctum Plugs are available in various sizes to accommodate different patient physiologies and achieve occlusion of the canaliculus (or punctum). Two plugs are included in each package and there is one package in each box. This device is sub-punctal, to limit contact and possible irritation to the eye.
This document describes a 510(k) premarket notification for the Comfortear® Lacrisolve™ Absorbable Punctum Plug. It focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices rather than providing a study proving the device meets specific acceptance criteria in the clinical performance sense (e.g., diagnostic accuracy or treatment effectiveness).
The "acceptance criteria" discussed in the document are primarily related to safety, material biocompatibility, and manufacturing controls, aligning with the requirements for justifying substantial equivalence.
Here's an analysis of the provided text in relation to your questions:
1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
The document doesn't present a table of quantitative acceptance criteria and device performance for clinical effectiveness per se. Instead, it outlines testing performed to ensure safety and manufacturing consistency. The "acceptance criteria" are implied by compliance with established international and FDA standards.
| Acceptance Criteria (Implied) | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|
| Sterility Assurance Level (SAL) of 10⁻⁶ or better (EN ISO 11135-1:2007) | Validated with a half-cycle; independent lab monitoring. |
| Ethylene Oxide (EO) Sterilization Residuals (ANSI/AAMI/ISO 10993-7:2008(R)2012) | Results "fell far below" the standard. Upper control limit set at 3 times measured value for routine testing, which is "well below" ISO standards. |
| Endotoxin Limit (Bacterial Endotoxins Test, LAL) for medical devices (not more than 20.0 EU/device, and not more than 2.15 EU/device for CSF contact devices) (ANSI/AAMI ST72:2011, USP <161>, USP <85>, EP 2.6.14, JP 4.01) | Detected Endotoxin: <0.00500 EU/mL or <0.0375 EU/device (for all 3 pooled samples). "Based on the testing above, the device has passed all LAL testing." |
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)
- Clinical Efficacy/Effectiveness Test Set: No clinical efficacy test set is described. The submission relies on substantial equivalence to predicate devices for its intended use and general performance.
- Safety/Manufacturing Test Set (for EO Residuals and LAL):
- EO Residuals: The document mentions "all lots tested" but does not specify the number of lots or individual devices. This likely refers to manufacturing validation data.
- LAL Test: 3 pooled samples were used, with each pool consisting of 2 devices (Total 6 devices).
- Data Provenance: Not explicitly stated, but given it's a 510(k) submission to the US FDA, the testing would typically be performed by laboratories compliant with US good manufacturing practice (GMP) regulations (21 CFR Parts 210, 211, and 820), implying a US or internationally accredited laboratory context. The data is retrospective in the sense that it represents completed validation and routine testing.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)
Not applicable. This is not a study involving expert-established ground truth for clinical diagnosis or assessment. The "ground truth" for the safety tests is defined by the international standards themselves (e.g., SAL of 10⁻⁶, endotoxin limits).
4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set
Not applicable, as there's no diagnostic or assessment test set requiring adjudication.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
Not applicable. This device is a physical medical implant (punctum plug), not an AI diagnostic/imaging device.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
Not applicable. This is a physical medical implant.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)
For the safety testing presented:
- The ground truth for sterility is defined by the requirements of EN ISO 11135-1:2007 (SAL of 10⁻⁶).
- The ground truth for ethylene oxide residuals is defined by ANSI/AAMI/ISO 10993-7:2008(R)2012.
- The ground truth for bacterial endotoxins is defined by ANSI/AAMI ST72:2011, USP <161>, USP <85>, EP 2.6.14, and JP 4.01 (e.g., <20.0 EU/device).
For the overall device, the "ground truth" for its safety and effectiveness for its intended use is established by its substantial equivalence to legally marketed predicate devices which have a history of safe and effective use.
8. The sample size for the training set
Not applicable. This is a physical medical implant, not an AI model.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
Not applicable. This is a physical medical implant, not an AI model.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Paragon BioTeck, Inc. The logo features a stylized abstract figure on the left, followed by the word "Paragon" in a larger font. Below "Paragon" is the text "BioTeck, Inc." in a smaller font. The logo appears to be in black and white.
Page 1 of 7 K140711 JUN 2 0 2014
510(k) Summary or 510(k) Statement
Contact Details
Applicant Name: Paragon BioTeck, Inc.
4640 SW Macadam Avenue, Suite 80
Portland, OR 97239
1-888-424-1192
Lauren M-C Bluett
Date Prepared: 13JUN2014
Device Name
Trade Name: (1) Comfortear® Lacrisolve™ Absorbable Punctum Plug
(2) Lacrisolve™ Absorbable Punctum Plug
(3) Comfortear® Lacrisolve™ Punctum Plug
(4) Lacrisolve™ Punctum Plug
Common Name: Intracanalicular Plug/Punctum Plug
Classification Name: Plug, Punctal
{1}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/1/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for Paragon BioTeck, Inc. The logo features a stylized human figure on the left, with the company name to the right. The words "BioTeck, Inc." are written in a smaller font size below the word "Paragon."
Legally Marketed Predicate Device(s)
The Comfortear® Lacrisolve™ Absorbable Punctum Plugs have similar technological characteristics as the predicate devices. Like the currently marketed Opaque Herrick Lacrimal Plug (K030300), and the Temporary Intracanalicular Collagen Implant (K890919) the modified device is a sterile, monofilament synthetic absorbable suture material at the same or similar diameters and at the same or similar lengths.
| 510(k) Number | Product Code | Trade Name | Applicant |
|---|---|---|---|
| K030300 | LZU | DISSOLVABLE OPAQUEHERRICK LACRIMALPLUG | LACRIMEDICS, INC. |
| K890919 | LZU | TEMPORARYINTRACANALICULARCOLLAGEN IMPLANT | EAGLE VISION, INC. |
Device Description
Comfortear® Lacrisolve™ Absorbable Punctum Plugs are intended to temporarily block tear drainage by occlusion of the canaliculus. The plug is supplied in various sizes ranging from 0.2mm to 0.5mm in diameter and has a length of approximately 1.75mm, see table below. The plug is dyed (D&C Violet No. 2). Comfortear® Lacrisolve™ Absorbable Punctum Plugs are composed of the following absorbable suture materials: polydioxanone (PDO).
| Size (mm) | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Length (mm) | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.75 |
The design features of the Comfortear@ Lacrisolve™ Absorbable Punctum Plugs raise no new issues of safety or effectiveness. Comfortear® Lacrisolve™ Absorbable Punctum Plugs consist of a length of monofilament synthetic absorbable suture material. The
{2}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/2/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for Paragon BioTeck, Inc. The logo features a stylized human figure on the left, followed by the word "Paragon" in a bold, outlined font. Below "Paragon" is the text "BioTeck, Inc." in a smaller font. The overall design is simple and professional.
Comfortear® Lacrisolve™ Absorbable Punctum Plugs are provided sterile. The Comfortear® Lacrisolve™ Absorbable Punctum Plugs are available in various sizes to accommodate different patient physiologies and achieve occlusion of the canaliculus (or punctum). Two plugs are included in each package and there is one package in each box. This device is sub-punctal, to limit contact and possible irritation to the eye.
Comfortear® Lacrisolve™ Absorbable Punctum Plugs are contraindicated for use in patients with known sensitivity to any one of the materials that comprise the device, infectious conjunctivitis, dacrocycstitis, inflammation of the eyelid, infected eyes, or epiphora.
Intended Use/Indications for use
The Comfortear® Lacrisolve™ Absorbable Punctum Plugs are intended to temporarily block tear drainage by the occlusion of the canaliculus in order to:
- Determine the potential effectiveness of permanent occlusion, .
- Temporarily treat dry eye syndrome, and the dry eye components of various ocular . surface diseases,
- . Temporarily enhance the efficacy of topical medications or ocular lubricants.
- . Temporarily treat contact lens intolerance secondary to dry eye, and
- Temporarily treat dry eye after ocular surgery.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Paragon BioTeck, Inc. The logo features a stylized abstract symbol on the left, followed by the word "Paragon" in a bold, outlined font. Below "Paragon" is the text "BioTeck, Inc." in a smaller font. The overall design is simple and professional.
Substantial Equivalence Comparison
1
| Elements | DISSOLVABLE OPAQUEHERRICK LACRIMALPLUG (K030300) | Comfortear® Lacrisolve™Absorbable Punctum Plug | TEMPORARYINTRACANALICULARCOLLAGEN IMPLANT(K890919) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indications | Dissolvable Opaque HerrickLacrimal Plug® may beused:• As a diagnostic aid todetermine the potentialeffectiveness of OcclusionTherapy with non-dissolvable plugs.• To temporarily enhancethe efficacy of topicalmedications or ocularlubricants.• After ocular surgery toprevent complications dueto dry eyes.• To evaluate treatment ofocular dryness secondaryto contact lens use.• In the treatment of DryEye Syndrome and the dryeye components ofvarying Ocular SurfaceDiseases. | The Comfortear® Lacrisolve™Absorbable Punctum Plugs areintended to temporarily blocktear drainage by the occlusion ofthe canaliculus in order to:• Determine the potentialeffectiveness of permanentocclusion,• Temporarily treat dry eyesyndrome, and the dry eyecomponents of various ocularsurface diseases,• Temporarily enhance theefficacy of topical medicationsor ocular lubricants,• Temporarily treat contact lensintolerance secondary to dryeye, and• Temporarily treat dry eye afterocular surgery. | Ideal for:• Treatment of post lasikinduced dry eye• Treatment of seasonaldry eye• Retention of ocularmedication |
ﺩ
・
{4}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/4/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for Paragon BioTeck, Inc. The logo consists of a stylized human figure on the left, followed by the word "Paragon" in a bold, sans-serif font. Below "Paragon" is the text "BioTeck, Inc." in a smaller font. The logo is simple and professional, and it is likely used to represent the company's brand.
| Design Elements | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| IntracanalicularPunctum Plug | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| IntendedDuration | Approximately 180 days | Approximately 180 days | 60-180 days |
| Material | A copolymer of L-lactideand ε-caprolactone (PCL) orPolydioxanone (PDO) orglycolic acid &trimethylene carbonatecopolymer | Polydioxanone (PDO) | Polycaprolactone (PCL) |
| Color Additive | D&C Violet No. 2 | D&C Violet No. 2 | N/A |
| Packaging | Tyvek/Poly pouch | Tyvek/Poly pouch | Tyvek/Poly pouch |
| Method ofInsertion | Forceps | Forceps | Forceps |
| Method ofRemoval | Dissolution, Salineirrigation, or Lacrimalprobe | Dissolution, Saline irrigation, orLacrimal probe | Dissolution, Salineirrigation, or Lacrimalprobe |
| Method ofSterilization | EtO Sterilization (EO) | EtO Sterilization (EO) | Gamma Irradiation |
| Available Sizes | 0.4mm, 0.5mm | 0.2mm, 0.3mm, 0.4mm, 0.5mm | 0.2mm, 0.3mm, 0.4mm |
Similarities: The indications for use of the Comfortear® Lacrisolve™ Absorbable Punctum Plug and the predicate devices are very similar. The wording is different, but all the same situations are covered by the indications for use. In addition, most of the design elements are identical: type of plug, intended duration, suture material, color additive, packaging, method of insertion, method of removal, method of sterilization, and available sizes.
Differences: The only differences are that one (K030300) predicate submission covers punctum plugs made of three different suture materials and the current submission covers only one of those suture materials.
Based on the comparison tables above, the Comfortear® Lacrisolve™ Absorbable Punctum Plug is substantially equivalent to the predicate products.
Testing
Comfortear® Lacrisolve™ Absorbable Punctum Plugs will be sterilized by ethylene oxide sterilization. The program used to validate the sterilization process complies with the EN ISO 11135-1:2007 Medical Devices - Validation and routine control of ethylene oxide sterilization. A . half cycle was utilized to validate the ethylene oxide sterilization process.
{5}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/5/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for Paragon BioTeck, Inc. The logo consists of a stylized human figure on the left, followed by the word "Paragon" in a bold, outlined font. Below "Paragon" is the text "BioTeck, Inc." in a smaller font. The overall design is simple and professional.
This process is validated to ensure that a sterility assurance level of 10 o or better is achieved. Each sterilization run is monitored by an independent accredited laboratory.
The levels of ethylene oxide sterilization residuals that remain on Comfortear® Lacrisolve™ Absorbable Punctum Plugs will comply with the requirements of ANSI/AAMI/ISO 10993-7:2008(R)2012 Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices - Part 7: Ethylene Oxide Sterilization Residuals.
During testing for EO and ECH residuals, the results fell far below the standard stated above.
In order to ensure consistency of product, an upper control limit was set that is more indicative of routine testing. The calculation of +3 standard deviations from the data could not be calculated based on the results being the same number for all lots tested; therefore a value of three (3) times the measured value is the upper limit. This number remains well below the ISO standards acceptable for the device. The lower limit is zero (0) for all values. All routine testing shall be trended as well to ensure consistency of sterilization.
Total Extractable Residual Upper Limits
| Extraction (hrs) | EO | ECH |
|---|---|---|
| Total mg/device | Total mg/device | |
| Prolonged orLifetime | 0.003 | 0.021 |
Limulus Amebocyte Lysate (LAL) testing was performed to assess the level of endotoxins on the product. (The Bacterial Endotoxins Test, or Limulus Amebocyte Lysate (LAL) test, is an in vitro assay to detect and quantify bacterial endotoxin, a component of the cell wall of Gram negative bacteria. Standard controls and a positive product control (PPC) demonstrate a compliant assay. A PPC recovery within the 50%-200% range indicates that the test solution is free of interfering factors given the specific conditions of the test. If applicable, dilutions are calculated into the reported endotoxin level.) The testing was conducted in accordance with the following regulatory documents: ANSI/AAMI ST72:2011, USP <161>, USP <85>, EP 2.6.14, and JP 4.01. Testing was performed in compliance with US FDA good manufacturing practice (GMP) regulations 21 CFR Parts 210, 211 and 820.
{6}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/6/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Paragon BioTeck, Inc. The logo features a stylized human figure on the left, with the company name "Paragon" in a bold, outlined font to the right. Below "Paragon" is the text "BioTeck, Inc." in a smaller font. The overall design is simple and professional.
| TestArticle | Quantity | ExtractionVolume | Detected Endotoxin | PPC Recovery |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2(pooled) | 7.5 mL/device | <0.00500 EU/mL or<0.0375 EU/device | 147% |
| 2 | 2(pooled) | 7.5 mL/device | <0.00500 EU/mL or<0.0375 EU/device | 124% |
| 3 | 2(pooled) | 7.5 mL/device | <0.00500 EU/mL or<0.0375 EU/device | 125% |
Kinetic Turbidimetric Results:
Endotoxin Limit: For medical devices, the endotoxin limit is not more than 20.0 EU/device. For medical devices in contact with cerebrospinal fluid the limit is not more than 2.15 EU/device.
Preparation: The extraction was performed by immersing the test article in endotoxin free water and placing it on an orbital shaker in an incubator for 40-60 minutes at 37-40°C.
Test Procedure: The assay was performed at a sensitivity of 0.005EU/mL using Charles River reagents. For valid results, the combination of lysate and test solution was verified to be within 6-8 pH units.
Based on the testing above, the device has passed all LAL testing.
{7}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/7/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" arranged around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized symbol that resembles a human figure embracing or supporting another, with flowing lines suggesting movement or support.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
June 20, 2014
Paragon Bio Teck, Inc. Ms. Lauren McBluett Director of Quality Assurance 4640 SW Macadam, Suite 80 Portland, OR 97239
Re: K140711
Trade/Device Name: Comfortear® Lacrisolve™ Absorbable Punctum Plug Regulation Number: (Unclassified) Regulation Name: (Unclassified) Regulatory Class: Unclassified Product Code: LZU Dated: May 29, 2014 Received: May 30, 2014
Dear Ms. McBluett:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{8}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Ms. Lauren McBluett
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportalProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours.
Kesia Y. Alexander -S
. for Malvina B. Eydelman, M.D. Director
Division of Ophthalmic and Ear,
Nose and Throat Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{9}------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration
Indications for Use
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: January 31, 2017 See PRA Statement on last page.
510(k) Number (if known) K140711
Device Name
Comfortear® Lacrisolve™ Absorbable Punctum Plug
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Comfortean® Lacrisolve™ Absorbable Punctum Plugs arc intended to temporarily block tear drainage by the occlusion of the canaliculus in order to:
· Determine the potential effectiveness of a permanent occlusion,
- · Temporarily treat dry eye syndrome, and the dry eye components of various ocular surface diseases,
- · Temporarily enhance the efficacy of topical medications or ocular lubricants,
- · Temporarily treat contact lens intolerance secondary to dry eye. and
- · Temporarily treat dry eye after ocular surgery
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
FOR FDA USE ONLY
Concurrence of Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) (Signature)
Susanna W. Jones -S 2014.06.17 14:10:07 -04'00'
FORM FDA 3881 (1/14)
Page 1 of 2
{10}------------------------------------------------
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
*DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW."
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
N/A