(44 days)
The PRO-TOE® Hammenoc Fixation Systems are indicated for the fixation of ostconstruction of the lesser toes following correction procedures for hammertoe, claw toe, and mallet toe.
Cannulated Implants in the PRO-TOE® Hammerton Fixation Systems can be used with K-wires for the delivery of implants of the temporary stabilization of outlying joints (c.g. MTP Joint).
The Implantable K-Wires are indicated for use in fixation of bone reconstructions, and as guide pins for inscrion of other implants. Additionally, Implantable K-Wires are indicated for the fixation of osteonomics and reconstruction of the lesser toc following correction procedures for hammerloe, claw toe, mallet toe, and metatarsophalangeal joint instability.
The PRO-TOE® Hammetoe Fixation System is composed of implants and instruments intended for use in the fixation or reconstruction of the lesser toes. The implants within the PRO-TOE® Hammertoe System have proximal & distal fixation features and will be offered in multiple sizes. The implants are manufactured from stainless steel or titanium.
This submission seeks to add previously cleared WMT Implantable K-Wires to the system for use with cannulated implants, for which clearance is also sought in this submission. The WMT Implantable K-wires are offered in surgical grade stainless steel. A range of diameters and lengths are offered from the manufacturer and planning should be conducted prior to implantation to determine the best fit.
The provided document is a 510(k) summary for the PRO-TOE® Hammertoe Fixation System, which is a medical device. It focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices rather than proving performance against specific acceptance criteria through a clinical study. Therefore, much of the requested information regarding acceptance criteria, study details, and AI performance metrics is not applicable or cannot be extracted from this type of regulatory submission.
Here's a breakdown of what can be inferred or explicitly stated based on the document's content:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:
- Acceptance Criteria: The primary "acceptance criteria" for a 510(k) submission like this is typically substantial equivalence to legally marketed predicate devices. This means the new device performs at least as well as the predicate and does not raise new questions of safety or effectiveness. Specific quantifiable performance criteria (e.g., success rates, complication rates) are generally not established or reported in this type of document for new predicate devices.
- Reported Device Performance: The document states that "Mathematical mechanical analysis related to static bend testing has shown that the subject implants do not present a new worst case." This is the only performance-related statement, indicating that the mechanical properties are at least equivalent to or better than the predicate in certain aspects. No clinical performance metrics are provided.
| Acceptance Criteria (Implied for 510(k)) | Reported Device Performance (from document) |
|---|---|
| Substantial Equivalence to predicate | Mathematical mechanical analysis showed no new worst-case (static bend testing). |
| No new questions of safety or effectiveness | Concluded that the "design characteristics... do not raise any new types of questions of safety or effectiveness." |
2. Sample Size for the Test Set and Data Provenance:
- Not Applicable. This submission relies on a non-clinical "mathematical mechanical analysis" rather than a clinical "test set" with human or animal subjects. Therefore, there's no sample size or data provenance in the context of clinical testing.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications:
- Not Applicable. No clinical test set or human-based ground truth establishment is described. The assessment is based on engineering analysis.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set:
- Not Applicable. As there is no clinical test set, there is no adjudication method.
5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study:
- No. This document does not mention an MRMC comparative effectiveness study. It's a submission for a mechanical implant, not a diagnostic or AI-driven imaging device.
6. Standalone (Algorithm Only) Performance Study:
- No. This is not an AI-driven device or algorithm. The submission pertains to a physical implant.
7. Type of Ground Truth Used:
- The "ground truth" here is the performance of the predicate device as established through its existing regulatory clearance and assumed safety and effectiveness. The new device demonstrates "substantial equivalence" based on similar materials, indications, dimensions, geometry, and non-clinical mechanical testing that shows it doesn't present a "new worst case."
8. Sample Size for the Training Set:
- Not Applicable. There is no "training set" as this is a physical medical device, not an AI or machine learning model.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established:
- Not Applicable. As above, no training set exists for this type of device.
Summary of the Study that Proves the Device Meets Acceptance Criteria:
The document describes a non-clinical study involving mathematical mechanical analysis related to static bend testing. This analysis was conducted to compare the new PRO-TOE® Hammertoe Fixation System implants (specifically the PRO-TOE® VO Cannulated and PRO-TOE® C2 implants) against their legally marketed predicate device (K101165 – PRO-TOE™ VO Hammertoe Implant System and K120645 - PRO-TOE™ Hammertoe Implant System).
The purpose of this study was to demonstrate that the mechanical properties of the subject implants, in terms of static bending, do not present a new worst case compared to the predicate devices. This finding, along with the similarities in indications, materials (stainless steel or titanium), dimensions, and geometry, allowed Wright Medical Technology, Inc. to conclude that the device is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices and does not raise new questions of safety or effectiveness. No human or animal subjects were involved in this specific study.
{0}------------------------------------------------
PRO-TOE® Hammertoe System
Traditional 510(k)
Image /page/0/Picture/3 description: The image shows a date, "MAR 07 2014", in bold black font. The date is likely a stamp or printed on a document. The letters and numbers are clear and legible against a white background.
Image /page/0/Picture/4 description: The image shows the word "WRIGHT." in a bold, sans-serif font. Below the word is a graphic design element that appears to be a stylized representation of wings or a similar abstract shape. The overall design is simple and clean, with a focus on the text and the graphic element.
Wright Medical Technology, Inc. 5677 Airline Road Arlington, TN 38002 www.wmt.com
510(K) SUMMARY
In accordance with the Food and Drug Administration Rule to implement provisions of the Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990 and in conformance with 21 CFR 807.92, this information serves as a Summary of Safety and Effectiveness for the use of the WMT PRO-TOE® Hammertoe Fixation System line additions.
(a)(1). Submitted By:
Date:
Contact Person:
(a)(2). Proprietary Name:
Common Name:
Classification Name and Reference:
Device Product Code, Device Panel:
(a)(3). Predicate Device:
Wright Medical Technology, Inc. 5677 Airline Road Arlington, TN 38002
January 21, 2014
Val Myles Regulatory Affairs Specialist I Office - (901) 290-5162 Fax - (901) 867-4190
PRO-TOE® Hammertoe Fixation System
Smooth or threaded metallic bone fixation fastener
21 CFR 888.3040 - Class II
HWC- Orthopedic
K101165 – PRO-TOE™ VO Hammertoe Implant System
K120645 - PRO-TOE™ Hammertoe Implant System
K122959 - Trilliant Hammer Toe Implant
K132895 - WMT Implantable K-Wires
(a)(4). Device Description
The PRO-TOE® Hammetoe Fixation System is composed of implants and instruments intended for use in the fixation or reconstruction of the lesser toes. The implants within the
{1}------------------------------------------------
PRO-TOE® Hammertoe System have proximal & distal fixation features and will be offered in multiple sizes. The implants are manufactured from stainless steel or titanium.
This submission seeks to add previously cleared WMT Implantable K-Wires to the system for use with cannulated implants, for which clearance is also sought in this submission. The WMT Implantable K-wires are offered in surgical grade stainless steel. A range of diameters and lengths are offered from the manufacturer and planning should be conducted prior to implantation to determine the best fit.
(a)(5). INTENDED USE
The PRO-TOE® Hammertoe Fixation Systems are indicated for the fixation of osteotomies and reconstruction of the lesser toes following correction procedures for hammertoe, claw toe, and mallet toe.
Cannulated Implants in the PRO-TOE® Hammertoe Fixation Systems can be used with K-wires for the delivery of implants or the temporary stabilization of outlying joints (e.g. MTP Joint).
The Implantable K-Wires are indicated for use in fixation of bone fractures, for bone reconstructions, and as guide pins for insertion of other implants. Additionally, Implantable K-Wires are indicated for the fixation of osteotomies and reconstruction of the lesser toe following correction procedures for hammertoe, claw toe, mallet toe, and metatarsophalangeal joint instability.
(a)(6). Technological Characteristics Comparison
The PRO-TOE® Hammertoe Fixation System and the legally marketed predicate devices have similar indications, dimensions and geometry, and are identical in material. The purpose of this submission is to add PRO-TOE® VO Cannulated and PRO-TOE® C2 implants to the PRO-TOE® Hammertoe System. Indications have been updated to include the additional indication for temporary stabilization of outlying joints (e.g. MTP joint), identical to that of the previously cleared WMT Implantable K-Wire.
(b)(1). Substantial Equivalence - Non-Clinical Evidence
Mathematical mechanical analysis related to static bend testing has shown that the subject implants do not present a new worst case.
(b)(2). Substantial Equivalence - Clinical Evidence
N/A
(b)(3). Substantial Equivalence - Conclusions
The design characteristics of the subject devices do not raise any new types of questions of safety or effectiveness. From the evidence submitted in this 510(k), the subject devices can be expected to perform at least as well as the predicate systems and are substantially equivalent.
{2}------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Image /page/2/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a stylized eagle with three tail feathers, representing the department's mission to protect the health of all Americans and provide essential human services. The words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" are arranged in a circular fashion around the eagle.
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
March 7, 2014
Wright Medical Technology, Inc. Ms. Val Myles Regulatory Affairs Specialist I 5677 Airline Road Arlington, Tennessee 38002
Re: K140148
Trade/Device Name: PRO-TOE® Hammertoe Fixation System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3040 Regulation Name: Smooth or threaded metallic bone fixation fastener Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: HWC Dated: January 9, 2014 Received: January 22, 2014
Dear Ms. Myles:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act that I Dr has interes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must or any I odotal the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set
{3}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Ms. Val Myles
forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its tollfree number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportalProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Vincent 脚
for
Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Orthopedic Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{4}------------------------------------------------
PRO-TOE® Hammertoe System
Traditional 510(k)
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known)
Device Name
PRO-TOE® Hammertoe Fixation System
Indications for Use (Describe)
The PRO-TOE® Hammenoc Fixation Systems are indicated for the fixation of ostconstruction of the lesser toes following correction procedures for hammertoe, claw toe, and mallet toe.
Cannulated Implants in the PRO-TOE® Hammerton Fixation Systems can be used with K-wires for the delivery of implants of the temporary stabilization of outlying joints (c.g. MTP Joint).
The Implantable K-Wires are indicated for use in fixation of bone reconstructions, and as guide pins for inscrion of other implants. Additionally, Implantable K-Wires are indicated for the fixation of osteonomics and reconstruction of the lesser toc following correction procedures for hammerloe, claw toe, mallet toe, and metatarsophalangeal joint instability.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
[X] Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
FOR FDA USE ONLY Concurrence of Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) (Signature)
Elizabeth L际rank -S
Division of Orthopedic Devices
FORM FDA 3881 (1/14)
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: January 31, 2017 See PRA Statement on last page.
§ 888.3040 Smooth or threaded metallic bone fixation fastener.
(a)
Identification. A smooth or threaded metallic bone fixation fastener is a device intended to be implanted that consists of a stiff wire segment or rod made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum and stainless steel, and that may be smooth on the outside, fully or partially threaded, straight or U-shaped; and may be either blunt pointed, sharp pointed, or have a formed, slotted head on the end. It may be used for fixation of bone fractures, for bone reconstructions, as a guide pin for insertion of other implants, or it may be implanted through the skin so that a pulling force (traction) may be applied to the skeletal system.(b)
Classification. Class II.