(247 days)
Not Found
No
The document describes standard digital x-ray system components and image processing functions (W/L, Marking, Crops) that are typical for such devices and do not inherently indicate AI/ML. There is no mention of AI, ML, or deep learning networks.
No
The device is described as a diagnostic x-ray system for examination and imaging, not for treating any condition.
Yes
The 'Intended Use / Indications for Use' section explicitly states, "The TITAN 11 is a diagnostic x-ray system for generation of x-rays for examination of various anatomical regions." Additionally, the 'Device Description' mentions it is "to be used to take and store image for diagnosis of patients."
No
The device description explicitly lists multiple hardware components (SSXI detector, X-ray Generator, X-ray Collimator, PC, Detector Stand, Tube Stand, Mobile Table, PU-30(Power Supply)) in addition to the viewing software.
Based on the provided information, the TITAN 11 is not an IVD (In Vitro Diagnostic).
Here's why:
- Intended Use: The intended use clearly states it's a "diagnostic x-ray system for generation of x-rays for examination of various anatomical regions." This describes an in vivo diagnostic process (examining the body directly), not an in vitro process (examining samples outside the body).
- Device Description: The components listed (X-ray Generator, Detector, Tube Stand, etc.) are all typical of an X-ray imaging system used for examining the patient directly.
- Input Imaging Modality: The input is "x-rays," which are used to image the patient's body.
- Anatomical Site: It examines "various anatomical regions" of the patient.
IVD devices are used to examine specimens such as blood, urine, or tissue samples to diagnose diseases or conditions. The TITAN 11 does not perform this function.
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
TITAN 11 is a diagnostic x-ray system for generation of x-rays for examination of various anatomical regions. This device is not intended for mammography.
Product codes (comma separated list FDA assigned to the subject device)
KPR
Device Description
TITAN 11, the high frequency inverter type of Radiographic system is operated by the built-in operation program. TITAN 11 digital X-ray imaging system is to be used to take and store image for diagnosis of patients. It consists of the SSXI detector, X-ray Generator, X-ray Collimator, PC, Detector Stand, Tube Stand, Mobile Table, PU-30(Power Supply) and viewing software. Optional devices include AEC, DAP, Hand or Foot Exposure Switch.
Mentions image processing
Not Found
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found
Input Imaging Modality
X-ray
Anatomical Site
various anatomical regions
Indicated Patient Age Range
Not Found
Intended User / Care Setting
Not Found
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Summary of Performance Studies (study type, sample size, AUC, MRMC, standalone performance, key results)
Clinical images from both the subject and the predicate devices were obtained in accordance with the FDA Guidance Document on Solid State Imaging Devices and the clinical images were evaluated by a radiologist with credentials equivalent to a US board certification. The evaluation of the qualified radiologist in the study shows that TITAN 11 provides images of equivalent diagnostic capability to the predicate device. It demonstrates that TITAN 11 is substantially equivalent with the predicate device.
Key Metrics (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, etc.)
Not Found
Predicate Device(s): If the device was cleared using the 510(k) pathway, identify the Predicate Device(s) K/DEN number used to claim substantial equivalence and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text. List the primary predicate first in the list.
KODAK DIRECTVIEW DR 7500 SYSTEM, MODEL 8791345; K051258
Reference Device(s): Identify the Reference Device(s) K/DEN number and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text.
Not Found
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information for the subject device only (e.g. presence / absence, what scope was granted / cleared under the PCCP, any restrictions, etc).
Not Found
§ 892.1680 Stationary x-ray system.
(a)
Identification. A stationary x-ray system is a permanently installed diagnostic system intended to generate and control x-rays for examination of various anatomical regions. This generic type of device may include signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, component parts, and accessories.(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls). A radiographic contrast tray or radiology diagnostic kit intended for use with a stationary x-ray system only is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 892.9.
0
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized image of three human profiles facing to the right, stacked on top of each other.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
August 7, 2014
Gemss Medical Systems Co., Ltd. % Mr. Dave Kim Medical Device Regulatory Affairs Mtech Group 8310 Buffalo Speedway HOUSTON TX 77025
Re: K133695
Trade/Device Name: TITAN 11 Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.1680 Regulation Name: Stationary x-ray system Regulatory Class: II Product Code: KPR Dated: July 15, 2014 Received: July 22, 2014
Dear Mr. Kim:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
1
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
for
Janine M. Morris Director Division of Radiological Health Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
2
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration
Indications for Use
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: December 31, 2013 See PRA Statement on last page.
510(k) Number (if known) K133695
Device Name Stationary X-ray System / TITAN 11
Indications for Use (Describe)
TITAN 11 is a diagnostic x-ray system for generation of x-rays for examination of various anatomical regions. This device is not intended for mammography.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
[X] Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
_ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 807 Subpart C)
PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE – CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
FOR FDA USE ONLY
Concurrence of Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) (Signature)
Image /page/2/Picture/13 description: The image shows a signature in black ink. The signature appears to be cursive and somewhat stylized. The background is plain white, which makes the signature stand out. The signature is likely from a document or piece of artwork.
3
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
4
SECTION 07
510(k) SUMMARY
5
510(k) SUMMARY For TITAN 11
Submitted bv:
GEMSS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CO., LTD. Address - 61,Dunchon-daero 541(obaeksasibil), Jungwon-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea Telephone -- +82-31-764-7321~3 Fax - +82-31-764-7324 Contact - Mr. Sangwoo Lee Internet – http://www.gemss-medical.com
This summary of 510(k) safety and effectiveness information is being submitted in accordance with requirements of SMDA 1990 and 21 CFR Part 807.92.
Date: July, 17th, 2014
- General Information:
Establishment: GEMSS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CO., LTD. 61, dunchon-daero 541 beon-gil jungwon-gu seongnam-si, KOREA, REPUBLIC OF 468-865 Registration Number: 3003384390
GMESS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CO., LTD. is the holder/owner for this 510(k).
US Agent: John W. Lee United Radiology Systems, Inc 151 s. pfingsten rd. unit t deerfield, IL 60015 Phone: 847 2910999 ext Fax: 847 2911090 Email: johnlee@united-radiology.com
- Official Correspondent Contact:
Dave Kim Mtech Group 8310 Buffalo Speedway Houston, TX 77025 TEL : 713-467-2607
FAX : 713-583-8988
E-mail : davekim@mtech-inc.net
6
3. Device name and Classification
| Trade Name | : TITAN 11 |
|---|---|
| Classification Name | Stationary X-ray System |
| Classification Panel | : Radiology |
| Classification Regulation | : 21 CFR 892. 1680 |
| Device Classification | : Class II |
| Product Code | : KPR |
4. Legally Marketed Predicated Device
| Trade Name | : KODAK DIRECTVIEW DR 7500 SYSTEM, MODEL 8791345 |
|---|---|
| 510(k) Clearance # | : K051258 |
| Clearance date | : 06/01/2005 |
| Classification Name | : Stationary X-ray System |
| Classification Panel | : Radiology |
| CFR Section | : 21CFR 892.1680 |
| Device Class | : Class II |
| Product Code | : KPR |
5. Device Description
TITAN 11, the high frequency inverter type of Radiographic system is operated by the built-in operation program. TITAN 11 digital X-ray imaging system is to be used to take and store image for diagnosis of patients. It consists of the SSXI detector, X-ray Generator, X-ray Collimator, PC, Detector Stand, Tube Stand, Mobile Table, PU-30(Power Supply) and viewing software. Optional devices include AEC, DAP, Hand or Foot Exposure Switch.
6. Indications for Use
The TITAN 11 is a diagnostic x-ray system for generation of x-rays for examination of various anatomical regions. This device is not intended for mammography.
7. Substantial Equivalence
TITAN 11 and components are conforms to the FDA recognized standards as like the predicate device. Based on the recognized standard conformity evidences related to electro-, mechanical-, software-, clinical-, and risk management, it is confirmed that TITAN 11 is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
| ITEM | Contents | GEMSS MEDICAL
(Model TITAN 11) | Predicate device
(K051258) | SE-# |
|---------------------|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------|
| Indications for use | | The TITAN 11 is a diagnostic x-ray system
for generation of x-rays
for examination of various anatomical
regions. This device is | The KODAK DirectView DR
7500 system is a
permanently installed
diagnostic X-ray system
for generation of X-ray for
examination of various | same |
7
| | | not intended for
mammography. | anatomical regions. | |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|------|
| Software | Name | X-view 4 | KODAK direct view
EVP software | SE-1 |
| DICOM
compatibility | DICOM 3.0 | DICOM 3.0 compliance | DICOM 3.0 compliance | Same |
| TFT Detector | Detector type | CsI | CsI | Same |
| | Pixels | 3008 (v) x 3072 (v) | 3000 x 3000 | |
| | Output data | 16 bit gray scales tiff | 16,384 capture; 4,096
gray levels output | SE-2 |
| | Spatial resolution
(DIGITAL
SYSTEM) | 3.4 lp/mm | 3.5 lp/mm | |
| X-ray Generator | Application | DR-Digital radiography | DR-Digital radiography | same |
| | Description | 40kW | 80kW | SE-3 |
| | AEC | Yes | Yes | same |
| X-ray Tube | Anode Heat
Content
(Heating Unit) | 140kHU | 400kHU | SE-4 |
| PC | General purpose
PC | YES | YES | same |
| Detector STAND | U-D movements
(At center) | 350~1,800mm(1450m
m, 40mm/sec) :
1400mm more than. | 47 (18.5) table; 152.4
(60) wall | |
| Mobile Table | Table top
dimensions
(L x W) | 2000X700mm | 2200X868mm | SE-5 |
| | Table lock | wheel lock | Mechanical lock | |
| | Maximum patient
weight | 300kg | 342kg | |
8. Difference Discussion
| SE-# | SE discussion |
|---|---|
| SE-1 | TITAN 11 software (X-view 4.1) receives patient information from work-list, and |
| corrects images, and transfers the information to PACS same as the predicate | |
| device. A series of process for communication is same as well. TITAN 11 software | |
| has all functions that predicate device has, including patient information editing, | |
| input value adjustment (ex. kVp, mA, mAs, Time), and image correction such as | |
| W/L, Marking, Crops and so on. Therefore the software programs used in the new | |
| and predicated device are substantially equivalent. | |
| SE-2 | Image pixels size and spatial resolution are similar with the predicate device. The |
| differences are not significant in terms of the overall quality of patient image | |
| acquisition. TITAN 11 has more number of pixels than the predicate. The | |
| performance specification, specifically spatial resolution, of Titan 11 is better than | |
| the predicate, and this does not raise any new concern for safety and effectiveness. |
8
| SE-3 | The generation capacity of proposed device is lower than the predicate device.
Even though the capacity is lower, the conclusion of the radiologist's review
demonstrates compatible image quality using short/long scale contrast control
processing method. While the X-ray generation capacity is lower than the predicate
device, the exposure time for the subject device may be set longer than predicate
device for compatible image quality compared to the predicate device. |
|------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| SE-4 | The anode heating unit of the subject device is lower than the predicate device.
This issue is related to the overheating problem. The proposed device is able to
shoot successively240 times per minute without over heating which is lower than
that of predicate device. However, it is deemed sufficient and acceptable within the
hospital / clinic operating parameter. Therefore this does not raise new safety. |
| SE-5 | The predicate device table is available for "Ceiling, Wall Stand, up/down", TITAN 11
is composed of tube stand, detector stand, mobile table. TITAN 11 has less
restriction than the predicate in terms of spacing. Both TITAN 11 and the predicate
provide various patient positions for radiographic exposure, such as standing, lying,
and sitting. |
- Summary of the technological characteristics of the device compared to the predicate device:
The indications for use, mechanical components, performances and safety characteristics of Titan 11 described in this 510(k) are similar to those of the predicate device.
The primary differences are the specifications of X-ray tube, and X-ray generator of the subject device. The pixel matrix for the subject device is higher than that of the predicate device while the X-ray generator and X-ray tube anode heat content (Heating Unit) for the new device are smaller than those of the predicate device. However, as demonstrated by the clinical image review by an expert, both devices are capable of generating quality radiographs sufficient for patient diagnosis.
The image quality of radiographs depends on various factors including the pixel size of the detector, KVp, mA and X-ray exposure time. As demonstrated in the clinical image review report, the technological characteristics of the subject device as well as its superior pixel matrix are more than adequate to obtain radiographs with compatible image quality compared to the predicate device.
These differences do not have an effect on safety and effectiveness compared to the predicate device.
10. Performance Testing/Data
Testing for verification and validation of the device was found acceptable to support the claims of substantial equivalence. Safety compliance checking (including EMC, and so on) was evaluated according to the IEC Standards. GMESS MEDICAL SYSTEMS Co., Ltd certifies conformance to Voluntary Standards covering electrical and Mechanical safety. In conclusion, the identified risk of electrical hazards was mitigated and is substantially equivalent to the predicate device in terms of safety and effectiveness.
10.1 Description of non-clinical tests.
The proposed device(TITAN11) has undergone electromagnetic compatibility testing, as well as software validation and risk analysis.
Compliance evidences were submitted for the following standards:
- A IEC 60601-1: Test Report issued by 300 party testing lab
9
- IEC 60601-1-2: Test Report issued by 3" party testing lab
IEC 60601-1-3: Test Report issued by 3" party testing lab A - A
- IEC 60601-2-54: Test Report issued by 3rd party testing lab A
- A IEC 62304: Software development DHF package by GEMSS MEDICAL SYSTEMS, Co., Ltd.
- A EPRC Standard: 21 CFR 1020.30 and 31: In-house Test Report issued by GEMSS MEDICAL SYSTEMS. Co., Ltd.
-
ISO 14971: Risk management file by GEMSS MEDICAL SYSTEMS. Co., Ltd.
10.2 Description of clinical tests.
Clinical images from both the subject and the predicate devices were obtained in accordance with the FDA Guidance Document on Solid State Imaging Devices and the clinical images were evaluated by a radiologist with credentials equivalent to a US board certification. The evaluation of the qualified radiologist in the study shows that TITAN 11 provides images of equivalent diagnostic capability to the predicate device. It demonstrates that TITAN 11 is substantially equivalent with the predicate device.
-
- Conclusion as to Substantial Equivalence
TITAN11 is substantially equivalent to the predicate device KODAK DIRECTVIEW DR 7500 SYSTEM (K051258). These 2 devices are same or very similar in the intended use, the design principle, the performance and the applicable standards. Some characteristics, for example, their appearance, the user interfaces and the capacity of X-ray generator and X-ray tube are different. However the compliance reports, performance demonstrations and description of clinical review result in this submission STED provide demonstration that these differences do not raise any new questions of safety and effectiveness. Therefore, GEMSS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CO., LTD. concludes TITAN 11 is substantially equivalent with the predicate device KODAK DIRECTVIEW DR 7500 SYSTEM (K051258).
- Conclusion as to Substantial Equivalence