(25 days)
The IMMULITE® Total T3 Calibration Verification Material (CVM) is intended for in vitro diagnostic use in the verification of calibration of the IMMULITE Total T3 assay on the IMMULITE 2000 systems.
The IMMULITE® Total T4 Calibration Verification Material (CVM) is for in vitro diagnostic use in the verification of calibration of the IMMULITE Total T4 assay on the IMMULITE 2000 systems.
The IMMULITE® TBG Calibration Verification Material (CVM) is for in vitro diagnostic use in the verification of calibration of the IMMULITE TBG assay on the IMMULITE 2000 systems.
The IMMULITE® FSH Calibration Verification Material (CVM) is for in vitro diagnostic use in the verification of calibration of the IMMULITE FSH assay on the IMMULITE 2000 systems.
The IMMULITE® Estradiol Calibration Verification Material (CVM) is for in vitro diagnostic use in the verification of calibration of the IMMULITE Estradiol assay on the IMMULITE 2000 systems.
IMMULITE® 2000 Total T3 Calibration Verification Material (CVM) contains one set of four vials, 3 mL each. LT3CVM1 contains T3-free human serum matrix with preservatives. LT3CVM2, LT3CVM3 and LT3CVM4 contain low, intermediate and high levels of T3 respectively, in human serum matrix with preservatives. CVMs are supplied frozen in lyophilized form.
IMMULITE® 2000 Total T4 Calibration Verification. Material (CVM) contains one set of four vials, 3 mL each. LT4CVM1 contains T4-free human serum matrix with preservatives. LT4CVM2, LT4CVM3 and LT4CVM4 contain low, intermediate and high levels of T4 respectively, in human serum matrix with preservatives. CVMs are supplied frozen in lyophilized form.
IMMULITE® 2000 TBG Calibration Verification Material (CVM) contains one set of four vials, 2.0 mL each. LTBCVM1 contains a bovine-based matrix with preservatives. LTBCVM2, LTBCVM3 and LTBCVM4 contain low, intermediate and high levels of TBG respectively, in human-based matrix with preservatives. CVMs are supplied frozen in lyophilized form.
IMMULITE® 2000 FSH Calibration Verification Material (CVM) contains one set of four vials, 3 mL each. LFSCVM1 contains a bovine serum with preservatives. LFSCVM2. LFSCVM3 and LFSCVM4, 2 mL each, contain low, intermediate and high levels of human source FSH respectively, in bovine serum matrix with preservatives. CVMs are supplied frozen in lyophilized form.
IMMULITE® 2000 Estradiol Calibration Verification Material (CVM) contains one set of four vials. 2 mL each. LE2CVM1 contains human serum with preservatives. LE2CVM2. LE2CVM3 and LE2CVM4 contain low, intermediate and high levels of human source Estradiol respectively, in human serum matrix with preservatives. CVMs are supplied frozen in lyophilized form.
The provided text describes the acceptance criteria and performance studies for several In Vitro Diagnostic (IVD) Calibration Verification Materials (CVMs) manufactured by Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. These CVMs are intended for use with IMMULITE 2000 systems to verify the calibration of specific assays (Total T3, Total T4, TBG, FSH, and Estradiol).
Since the information is provided for multiple CVMs within a single 510(k) summary (K133124), I will choose one representative CVM to fully describe the acceptance criteria and study that proves the device meets them. I will select the IMMULITE® 2000 Total T3 Calibration Verification Material for this detailed description.
It's important to note that this document is for a Calibration Verification Material (CVM), which is a type of quality control material used in laboratory diagnostics, not an AI-powered diagnostic device for image interpretation. Therefore, many of the requested items related to AI/human reader studies, expert ground truth, and MRMC studies are not applicable to this type of device.
Here's the description for the IMMULITE® 2000 Total T3 Calibration Verification Material:
1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
The device performance is demonstrated through stability studies and value assignment testing. The primary acceptance criteria for stability are based on the dose value of the CVM falling within a specified percentage difference of the assigned dose.
Table: Acceptance Criteria for Stability of IMMULITE® 2000 Total T3 CVM
| CVM Level | Assigned Dose (ng/dL) | Guideline Criteria % difference to assigned dose | Acceptable Dose range (ng/dL) | Review Limits (if guideline criteria not met) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LT3CVM1 | 0.00 | not applicable | ≤40.00 | Controls are within 2SD of target from stability calibrator curve |
| LT3CVM2 | 101 | ±12% | 88.88 - 113.12 | Controls are within 2SD of target from stability calibrator curve |
| LT3CVM3 | 215 | ±8% | 197.8 - 232.2 | Controls are within 2SD of target from stability calibrator curve |
| LT3CVM4 | 610 | ±15% | 518.5 - 701.5 | Controls are within 2SD of target from stability calibrator curve |
The document states that the stability study was conducted to validate shelf life claim and "ensure that it maintains optimal product performance on IMMULITE 2000 platforms throughout the established shelf life of the CVM." The CVMs are stable up to 5 years when stored frozen at -20°C prior to opening. The protocol involved running CVMs and reference CVMs in duplicate (as a minimum) and determining the dose value from the reference calibrator curve.
For actual reported performance, the summary states: "Performance testing has been carried out to demonstrate that this device meets the performance specifications for its intended use." And "The substantial equivalence of the device is supported by the non-clinical testing and was found to be comparable and supports the claims of substantial equivalence, product safety and effectiveness." While the summary outlines the acceptance criteria, it does not provide specific numerical results from the stability studies that "prove" the device met these criteria, beyond the general statement of compliance. This is typical for a 510(k) summary, which focuses on summarizing the regulatory submission rather than detailing all raw data.
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance
-
Test Set (Stability Study):
- The stability study involved testing CVM levels (LT3CVM1, LT3CVM2, LT3CVM3, LT3CVM4) at specific time-points (1, 1092, 1456, 1820 days).
- The CVMs and reference CVMs were run in "duplicate (as a minimum)".
- Data Provenance: Not explicitly stated, but assumed to be internal laboratory testing by Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. (manufacturer), likely in the US given the submission to the FDA. The study is prospective in nature, as it's designed to validate shelf life (i.e., forward-looking stability over time).
-
Test Set (Value Assignment and Expected Values):
- To establish Expected Values/Target Values/Reference Range (Table 4), each CVM level was tested for a total of 27 replicates. This was comprised of 9 runs and 3 replicates per run, across 6 different reagent kit lots and 8 IMMULITE 2000 systems.
- Data Provenance: Not explicitly stated, but assumed to be internal laboratory testing by Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. (manufacturer), likely in the US. This data collection would be prospective for the purpose of establishing these values.
- Additionally, 25 patient samples (5 normal patients samples and 20 patient panel samples) were used to validate CVM value assignments, and "Two tri-level commercially available controls" were also used. The provenance of these patient samples is not specified (e.g., country of origin, retrospective/prospective collection methods).
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts
This is not applicable. This is a Calibration Verification Material, which is a chemical reference material/quality control, not an AI or image analysis device that requires expert human interpretation for its output. The "ground truth" or reference values for the CVMs are established through a process called "Value Assignment" which relies on assigned reference calibrators, gravimetric preparation, and internal quality control procedures, rather than human expert consensus on medical images or clinical outcomes.
4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set
This is not applicable for the same reasons as #3. Adjudication methods are typically for subjective assessments (e.g., image interpretation) where multiple readers disagree. For this IVD device, performance is measured against quantitative analytical criteria.
5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
This is not applicable. This is an IVD device (Calibration Verification Material), not an AI-powered diagnostic system that assists human readers.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done
This is not applicable. This is an IVD device, not an algorithm. Its "performance" is its ability to maintain its assigned values and function within specified analytical limits.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)
The "ground truth" for these Calibration Verification Materials (CVMs) is established through a process called Value Assignment. Key elements of this include:
- Traceability to internal assigned reference calibrators: These calibrators are prepared using Total T3 antigen stock solution.
- Traceability to internal material which is gravimetrically prepared. This implies a gravimetric (mass-based) method for the primary reference, which is a highly accurate quantitative method.
- The CVM values are calculated based on recovered values from runs using these assigned reference calibrators and then averaged across all systems.
- Validation of CVM value assignments is performed by calculating the recovery of patient samples (5 normal, 20 panel) and commercially available controls, with controls required to fall within their target ranges.
In essence, the ground truth is an analytically established reference value system linked to gravimetric preparations and verified against well-characterized patient samples and commercial controls.
8. The sample size for the training set
- Training Set (for "Value Assignment" and "Expected Values"): For the establishment of expected values, each CVM level was tested on a total of 27 replicates (9 runs, 3 replicates per run) across 6 reagent kit lots and 8 IMMULITE 2000 systems.
- Additionally, two tri-level commercially available controls and 25 patient samples (5 normal patients, 20 patient panel samples) were used to validate CVM value assignments.
It's important to clarify that for a CVM, there isn't a "training set" in the machine learning sense. These samples and runs are part of the thorough characterization and validation process to assign accurate values and ranges to the CVMs.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
As explained in #7, the "ground truth" (assigned/target values for the CVM levels) is established through a rigorous internal value assignment process:
- The CVMs are a subset of 6-level Total T3 calibrators, which are not commercialized but used internally for manufacturing and release testing.
- These calibrators and CVMs are value assigned using assigned reference calibrators.
- The assigned reference calibrators are prepared using Total T3 antigen stock and are traceable to internal material that has been gravimetrically prepared.
- CVMs are manufactured using qualified materials and measurement procedures.
- CVM dose values are generated using a curve derived from the assigned reference calibrators.
- CVM values are calculated from recovered values for each run on each instrument independently, then averaged across all systems.
- Quality control for this process involves verifying the recovery of patient samples (normal, panel) and commercially available controls, ensuring they fall within their expected target ranges.
This process ensures that the assigned values for the CVMs are accurate and traceable to fundamental analytical methods and established references.
{0}------------------------------------------------
SIEMENS
510(k) Summary
Introduction: According to the requirements of 21 CFR 807.92, the following information provides sufficient details to understand the basis for determination of substantial equivalence.
The assigned 510(k) Number: K133124
| 1. Submitter | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mailing Address: | Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc.511 Benedict AvenueTarrytown, NY 10591 | ||
| Contact Person: | Garo Mimaryan, MS, RACTechnical Regulatory Affairs Specialist III | OCT 2 5 2013 | |
| Phone Number: | (914)-524-3270 | ||
| Fax Number: | (914)-524-2101 | ||
| E-mail Address: | garo.mimaryan@siemens.com | ||
| Date Prepared: | October 15, 2013 | ||
| 2. Device Name | |||
| Proprietary Name: | IMMULITE® 2000 Total T3 Calibration Verification Material | ||
| Measurand: | Quality Control materials for IMMULITE® 2000 Total T3 assay | ||
| Type of Test: | Calibration Verification Material (CVM) for IMMULITE® 2000Total T3 assay | ||
| Regulation Section: | 21 CFR 862.1660, Quality Control Material | ||
| Classification: | Class I Reserved | ||
| Products Code: | JJX - Single (Specified) Analyte Controls (Assayed andUnassayed) | ||
| Panel: | Clinical Chemistry (75) |
-
Predicate Device Name Predicate 510(k) No:
-
Device Description:
-
- Intended Use: Indication for Use:
Special Conditions for Use Statement(s): Special Instrument Requirements:
- Intended Use: Indication for Use:
Elecsys T3 CalCheck 5 K ! 1 1 552
The Total T3 Calibration Verification Material (CVM) contains one set of four vials, 3 mL each. LT3CVM1 contains T3-free human serum matrix with preservatives. LT3CVM2, LT3CVM3 and LT3CVM4 contain low, intermediate and high levels of T3 respectively, in human serum matrix with preservatives. CVMs are supplied frozen in lyophilized form.
See Indications for Use Statement below The IMMULITE® Total T3 Calibration Verification Material (CVM): For in vitro diagnostic use in the verification of calibration of the IMMULITE Total T3 assay on the IMMULITE 2000 systems
For prescription use only
IMMULITE® 2000 Systems
{1}------------------------------------------------
-
- Technological Characteristics A comparison of the device features, intended use, and other and Substantial Equivalence information demonstrates that the IMMULITE® 2000 Total T3 Comparison with Predicate: Calibration Verification Material (CVM) is substantially equivalent to the predicate device as summarized in Table 1.
| Table 1: Substantial Equivalence Comparison |
|---|
| --------------------------------------------- |
| SIMILARITIES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Candidate Device | Predicate Device | |
| IMMULITE 2000 Total T3 CVM | Elecsys T3 CalCheck 5 | |
| IntendedUse | The IMMULITE® Total T3 CalibrationVerification Material (CVM) is for in vitrodiagnostic use in the verification ofcalibration of the IMMULITE Total T3assay on the IMMULITE 2000 systems | The Elecsys T3 CalCheck 5 is an assayedcontrol for use in calibration verificationand for use in the verification of theassay range established by the ElecsysT3 reagent on the indicated Elecsys andcobas e immunoassay analyzers. |
| Analyte | T3 | Same |
| Form | Lyophilized | Same |
| Matrix | Human Serum | Same |
| Stability | Stable unopened until the expiration date | Same |
| DIFFERENCES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Candidate Device | Predicate Device | |
| IMMULITE 2000 Total T3 CVM | Elecsys T3 CalCheck 5 | |
| Levels | 4 | 5 |
| Storage | -20°C | 2-8°C |
| Use | Single Use Only | Not for Single Use |
7. Non-Clinical Performance Testing
Performance testing has been carried out to demonstrate that this device meets the performance specifications for its intend use. The following tests were performed on the candidate device.
Stability Summary:
The stability study was conducted to validate shelf life claim for the IMMULITE 2000 Total T3 Calibration Verification Material (CVM) to ensure that it maintains optimal product performance on IMMULITE 2000 platforms throughout the established shelf life of the CVM. The Calibration Verification Materials are stable up to 5 years when stored frozen at -20°C prior to opening.
{2}------------------------------------------------
Stability Protocol Summary:
The CVM study protocols are run as part of the calibrator stability testing. The stability CVMs and reference CVMs are run in duplicate (as a minimum) and the dose value determined from the reference calibrator curve and is summarized in Table 2.
:
Table 2: Stability Protocol Summary
| CVM Level | Time-Points(Days) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LT3CVM1 | 1 | 1092 | 1456 | 1820 |
| LT3CVM2 | 1 | 1092 | 1456 | 1820 |
| LT3CVM3 | 1 | 1092 | 1456 | 1820 |
| LT3CVM4 | 1 | 1092 | 1456 | 1820 |
Stability Acceptance Criteria Summary:
The Acceptance Criteria for the IMMULITE Total T3 Calibration Verification Material (CVM) are in 2 parts. Part 1 consists of the guideline acceptance criteria which require dose value of stability CVM to fall between ±12% of assigned dose for CVM level 2, ±8% of assigned dose for CVM levels 3 and ±15% for CVM level 4. Part 2 review limits criteria which require dose value of the controls to be within 2SD of the control target value when generated from the stability calibrator curve. If the result is not within acceptable dose range of ±12% for level 2 and ±8% for levels 3 and ±15% for CVM level 4 then additional data review is conducted using part 2 criteria. The acceptance criteria is summarized in Table 3.
| CVMLevel | Assigned Dose(ng/dL) | Guideline Criteria% difference toassigned dose | Acceptable Doserange (ng/dL) | Review Limits |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LT3CVM1 | 0.00 | not applicable | ≤40.00 | Controls are |
| LT3CVM2 | 101 | ±12 | 88.88 - 113.12 | within 2SD of |
| LT3CVM3 | 215 | ±8 | 197.8 - 232.2 | target from |
| LT3CVM4 | 610 | ±15 | 518.5 - 701.5 | stabilitycalibrator curve |
Table 3 Acceptance criteria for stability of IMMULITE 2000 Total T3 CVM
Traceability:
The IMMULITE Total T3 CVMs are traceable to internal assigned reference calibrators prepared using Total T3 antigen stock solution and are traceable to internal material which is gravis protecally prepared.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Value Assignment:
The IMMULITE Total T3 CVMs are 4 level materials which are a subset of 6 level Total T3 calibrators. Calibrators are not commercialized but are used internally during manufacture and release testing of Total T3 reagents and two point adjustors. The IMMULITE calibrators and therefore CVMs are value assigned using assigned reference calibrators. The assigned reference calibrators are prepared using Total T3 antigen stock and are traceable to internal material which hass been gravimetrically prepared. The CVMs are manufactured using qualified materials and measurement procedures. The CVMs dose values are generated using curve generated by assigned reference calibrators. The CVM values are calculated based on the recovered values for each run ore each instrument independently. CVM values are then averaged across all systems. Quality control is performed by calculating the recovery of patient samples, spiked patient samples and control using the assigned CVM values. The controls must fall within their target and Two tri-level commercially available controls, and 25 patient samples (5 normal patients samples and 20 patient panel samples) are used to validate CVM value assignments.
Expected Values/Target Values/Reference Range:
Each CVM level was tested for a total of 27 replicates; 9 runs and 3 replicates per run, 6 different reagent kit lots and 8 IMMULITE 2000 systems. The Guideline Range (95% confidence interval) for each CVM level was established based on the Target Mean and ± 2 Standard Deviation (SD). The target values are provided in the IMMULITE® 2000 CVM Calibration verification Material lotspecific value card. The expected assay range is 40-600 ng/dL. The target values in Table 4 and be considered as guidelines.
| Analyte target levels | CVM Level | Target Mean (ng/dL) | SD | Guideline ±2SD Range (ng/dL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LT3CVM1 | 0.00 | - | ≤40.00 | |
| LT3CVM2 | 99.0 | 5.975 | 87.1 - 111 | |
| LT3CVM3 | 201 | 14 | 173 - 229 | |
| LT3CVM4 | 603 | 45 | 513 - 693 | |
| Assay Range | 40 - 600 ng/dL |
Table 4: Analyte Target Range Values
Each laboratory should establish their limits for acceptability based on methodology, clinical significance and medical decision levels of the test analyte. The representative, than a tabulated in the respective assay instructions for use may be considered as one factor when establishing local, acceptable ranges. The values provided above may be considered as quidelines. Value assignment is lot specific.
Standard/Guidance Documents Referenced:
- CEN 13640 Stability Testing of In Vitro Diagnostic Reagents .
- Guidance for Industry Abbreviated 510(k) Submissions for In Vitro Diagnostic Calibrators .
- Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff Assayed and Unassayed Quality Control Material .
Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10
{4}------------------------------------------------
9. Conclusion:
The IMMULITE® 2000 Total T3 Calibration Material is substantially equivalent to other products in commercial distribution intended for similar use. Most notably, it is substantially equivalent to the currently Elecsys T3 CalCheck 5. The substantial equivalence of the device is supported by the non-clinical testing and was found to be comparable and supports the claims of substantial equivalence. product safety and effectiveness. Based on the testing completed and the comparisons with predicate device, the IMMULITE® 2000 Total T3 Calibration Verification Material does not raise any new questions on safety and effectiveness and the results support a determination of substantial equivalence.
{5}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Summary
Introduction: According to the requirements of 21 CFR 807.92, the following information provides sufficient details to understand the basis for determination of substantial equivalence.
The assigned 510(k) Number: K133124
-
- Submitter Mailing Address:
Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. 511 Benedict Avenue Tarrytown. NY 10591
- Submitter Mailing Address:
Contact Person:
Phone Number: Fax Number: E-mail Address: Date Prepared:
- Device Name Proprietary Name: Measurand: Type of Test:
Regulation Section: Classification: Products Code:
Panel:
-
- Predicate Device Name Predicate 510(k) No:
-
Device Descrintion:
-
Intended Use: Indication for Use:
Special Conditions for Use Statement(s): Special Instrument Requirements:
Garo Mimaryan, MS, RAC Technical Regulatory Affairs Specialist III (914)-524-3270 (914)-524-2101
garo.mimaryan@siemens.com October 15, 2013
IMMULITE® 2000 Total T4 Calibration Verification Material Quality Control materials for IMMULITE® 2000 Total T4 assay Calibration Verification Material (CVM) for IMMULITE® 2000 Total T4 assav 21 CFR 862.1660. Quality Control Material Class I Reserved JJX – Single (Specified) Analyte Controls (Assayed and Unassaved) Clinical Chemistry (75)
Elecsys T4 CalCheck 5 K112528
IMMULITE® 2000 Total T4 Calibration Verification. Material (CVM) contains one set of four vials, 3 mL each. LT4CVM1 contains T4-free human serum matrix with preservatives. LT4CVM2, LT4CVM3 and LT4CVM4 contain low, intermediate and high levels of T4 respectively, in human serum matrix with preservatives. CVMs are supplied frozen in lyophilized form.
See Indications for Use Statement below The IMMULITE® Total T4 Calibration Verification Material (CVM) is for in vitro diagnostic use in the verification of calibration of the IMMULITE Total T4 assay on the IMMULITE 2000 systems
For prescription use only
IMMULITE® 2000 Systems
{6}------------------------------------------------
-
- Technological Characteristics A comparison of the device features, intended use, and other and Substantial Equivalence information demonstrates that the IMMULITE® 2000 Total T4 Comparison with Predicate: Calibration Verification Material (CVM) is substantially equivalent to the predicate device as summarized in Table 1.
| SIMILARITIES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Candidate Device | Predicate Device | |
| IMMULITE 2000 Total T4 CVM | Elecsys T4 CalCheck 5 | |
| IntendedUse | The IMMULITE® Total T4 CalibrationVerification Material (CVM) is for in vitrodiagnostic use in the verification ofcalibration of the IMMULITE Total T4assay on the IMMULITE 2000 systems | The Elecsys T4 CalCheck 5 is an assayedcontrol for use in calibration verificationand for use in the verification of theassay range established by the ElecsysT4 reagent on the indicatedElecsys and cobas e immunoassayanalyzers |
| Analyte | T4 | Same |
| Form | Lyophilized | Same |
| Matrix | Human Serum | Same |
| Stability | Stable unopened until the expiration date | Same |
Table 1: Substantial Equivalence Comparison
| DIFFERENCES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Candidate Device | Predicate Device | |
| IMMULITE 2000 Total T4 CVM | Elecsys T4 CalCheck 5 | |
| Levels | 4 | 5 |
| Storage | -20°C | 2-8°C |
| Use | Single Use Only | Not for Single Use |
7. Non-Clinical Performance Testing
Performance testing has been carried out to demonstrate that this device meets the performance specifications for its intend use. The following tests were performed on the candidate device.
Stability Summary:
The stability study was conducted to validate shelf life claim for the IMMULITE 2000 Total T4 Calibration Verification Material (CVM) to ensure that it maintains optimal product performance on IMMULITE 2000 platforms throughout the established shelf life of the CVM. The Calibration Verification Materials are stable up to 3.5 years when stored frozen at -20°C prior to opening.
{7}------------------------------------------------
Stability Protocol Summary:
The CVMs are run as part of the calibrator stability testing. The stability CVMs and reference CVMs are run in duplicate (as a minimum) and the dose value determined from reference calibrator curve and is summarized in Table 2.
| CVM Level | Time-Points(Days) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LT4CVM1 | 1 | 910 | 1092 | 1274 |
| LT4CVM2 | 1 | 910 | 1092 | 1274 |
| LT4CVM3 | 1 | 910 | 1092 | 1274 |
| LT4CVM4 | 1 | 910 | 1092 | 1274 |
Table 2: Stability Protocol Summary
Stability Acceptance Criteria Summary:
The Acceptance Criteria for the IMMULITE Total T4 Calibration Material (CVM) are in 2 parts. Part 1 consists of the guideline acceptance criteria which require dose value of stability CVM to fall between ±10% of assigned dose. Part 2 review limits criteria which require dose value of the controls to be within 2SD of the control target value when generated from the stability callbrator curve. If the result is not within acceptable dose range of ±10% then additional data review is conducted using part 2 criteria. The acceptance criteria is summarized in Table 3.
Table 3 Acceptance criteria for stability of IMMULITE 2000 Total T4 CVM
| CVMLevel | Assigned Dose(µg/dL) | GuidelineCriteria %difference toassigned dose | Acceptable Doserange (µg/dL) | Review Limits |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LT4CVM1 | 0.00 | not applicable | ≤1.00 | Controls are |
| LT4CVM2 | 3.82 | ±10 | 3.44 - 4.20 | within 2SD of |
| LT4CVM3 | 15.80 | ±10 | 14.22 - 17.38 | target from |
| LT4CVM4 | 25.00 | ±10 | 22.50 - 27.50 | stabilitycalibrator curve |
Traceability:
The IMMULITE Total T4 CVMs are traceable to internal assigned reference calibrators prepared using Total T4 antigen stock solution and are traceable to internal material which is gravimetrically prepared.
{8}------------------------------------------------
Value Assignment:
The IMMULITE® 2000 Total T4 CVMs are 4 level materials which are a subset of 6 level Total T4 calibrators. Calibrators are not commercialized but are used internally during manufacture and release testing of Total T4 reagents and two point adjustors. The IMMULITE calibrators and therefore CVMs are value assigned using assigned reference calibrators. The assigned reference calibrators are prepared using Total T4 antigen stock and are traceable to an internal material which has been gravimetrically prepared. The CVMs are manufactured using qualified materials and measurement procedures. The CVMs dose values are generated using curve generated by assigned reference calibrators. The CVM values are calculated based on the recovered values for each run on each instrument independently. The CVM values are then averaged across all systems. Quality control is performed by calculating the recovery of patient samples and controls using the assigned CVM values. The controls must fall within their target ranges. Two tri-level commercially available controls, and 25 patient samples (5 normal patients samples and 20 patient panel samples) are used to validate CVM value assignments. Quality control is performed by calculating the recovery of patient samples, spiked patient samples and controls using the assigned CVM values. The controls must fall within their target ranges
Expected Values/Target Values/Reference Range:
The CVMs are manufactured using qualified materials and measurement procedures. The TOTAL T4 CVMs were tested on 27 replicates in total comprised of 9 runs, 7 IMMULITE 2000 systems and 6 different reagent kit lots. The CVMs dose values are generated using curve generated by assigned reference calibrators. The CVM values are calculated based on the recovered values for each run on each instrument independently. The CVM values are then averaged across all systems. Quality control is performed by calculating the recovery of patient samples and controls using the assigned CVM values. The Guideline Range (95% confidence interval) for each CVM level was established based on the Target Mean and ± 2 Standard Deviation (SD). The expected assay range is 1.0 -24 ug/dL. The target values in Table 4 can be considered as guidelines.
| Analytetarget levels | CVM Level | Target Mean(µg/dL) | SD | Guideline ±2SD Range(µg/dL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LT4CVM1 | 0.00 | - | 0.00≤1.00 | |
| LT4CVM2 | 3.87 | 0.33 | 3.214.53 | |
| LT4CVM3 | 16.0 | 0.95 | 14.117.9 | |
| LT4CVM4 | 25.0 | 1.375 | 22.327.8 |
Table 4: Analyte Target Range Levels
Each laboratory should establish their limits for acceptability based on methodology, clinical significance and medical decision levels of the test analyte. The representative, total precision tabulated in the respective assay instructions for use may be considered as one factor when establishing local. acceptable ranges. The values provided above may be considered as guidelines. Value assignment is lot specific.
Standard/Guidance Documents Referenced:
- CEN 13640 Stability Testing of In Vitro Diagnostic Reagents .
- Guidance for Industry Abbreviated 510(k) Submissions for In Vitro Diagnostic Calibrators .
- Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff Assayed and Unassayed Quality Control Material
{9}------------------------------------------------
Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10
9. Conclusion:
The Total T4 Calibration Verification Material is substantially equivalent to other products in commercial distribution intended for similar use. Most notably, it is substantially equivalent to the currently marketed Elecsys T4 CalCheck 5. The substantial equivalence of the device is supported by the non-clinical testing and was found to be comparable and supports the claims of substantial equivalence, product safety and effectiveness. Based on the testing completed and the comparisons with predicate device. The IMMULITE® 2000 Total T4 Calibration Verification Material does not raise any new questions on safety and effectiveness and the results support a determination of substantial equivalence.
{10}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Summary
Introduction: According to the requirements of 21 CFR 807.92, the following information provides sufficient details to understand the basis for determination of substantial equivalence.
The assigned 510(k) Number: K133124
-
- Submitter
Mailing Address:
- Submitter
Contact Person:
Phone Number: Fax Number: E-mail Address: Date Prepared:
-
- Device Name Proprietary Name: Measurand: Type of Test:
Regulation Section: Classification: Products Code: Panel:
- Device Name Proprietary Name: Measurand: Type of Test:
-
- Predicate Device Name Predicate 510(k) No:
- Device Description:
-
- Intended Use: Indication for Use:
Special Conditions for Use Statement(s): Special Instrument Requirements:
- Intended Use: Indication for Use:
Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. 511 Benedict Avenue Tarrytown, NY 10591
Garo Mimaryan, MS, RAC Technical Regulatory Affairs Specialist III (914)-524-3270 (914)-524-2101 garo.mimaryan@siemens.com October 15. 2013
IMMULITE® 2000 TBG Calibration Verification Material Quality Control materials for IMMULITE® 2000 TBG assay Calibration Verification Material (CVM) for IMMULITE® 2000 TBG assay 21 CFR 862.1660, Quality Control Material Class | Reserved JJX - Single (Specified) Analyte Controls (Assayed and Unassayed) Clinical Chemistry (75)
ADVIA Centaur® Intact PTH Master Curve Material K020217
IMMULITE® 2000 TBG Calibration Verification Material (CVM) contains one set of four vials, 2.0 mL each. LTBCVM1 contains a bovine-based matrix with preservatives. LTBCVM2, LTBCVM3 and LTBCVM4 contain low, intermediate and high levels of TBG respectively, in human-based matrix with preservatives. CVMs are supplied frozen in lyophilized form.
See Indications for Use Statement below
The IMMULITE® TBG Calibration Verification Material (CVM) is for in vitro diagnostic use in the verification of the IMMULITE TBG assay on the IMMULITE 2000 systems
For prescription use only
IMMULITE® 2000 Systems
{11}------------------------------------------------
SIEMENS
-
- Technological Characteristics A comparison of the device features, intended use, and other and Substantial Equivalence information demonstrates that the IMMULITE® 2000 TBG Comparison with Predicate: Calibration Verification Material (CVM) is substantially equivalent to the predicate device, as summarized in Table 1.
| Table 1: Substantial Equivalence ComparisonCARDE IN COLLECTION COLLEGION COLLEGION COLLEGION------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| SIMILARITIES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Candidate Device | Predicate Device | |
| IMMULITE 2000 TBG CVM | ADVIA Centaur Intact PTH MCM | |
| IntendedUse | The IMMULITE® TBG CalibrationVerification Material (CVM) is for in vitrodiagnostic use in the verification ofcalibration of the IMMULITE TBG assayon the IMMULITE 2000 systems | For in vitro diagnostic use for evaluatingthe ADVIA Centaur® Intact PTH assays.This material is intended to be run singlyas unknown samples after a two-pointcalibration has been performed on thesystem |
| Form | Lyophilized | Same |
| Stability | Stable unopened until the expiration date | Same |
| Storage | -20°C | Same |
| Use | Single Use Only | Same |
| DIFFERENCES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Candidate Device | Predicate Device | |
| IMMULITE 2000 TBG CVM | ADVIA Centaur Intact PTH MasterCurve Material (MCM) | |
| Analyte | TBG | Intact PTH |
| Levels | 4 | 7 |
| Matrix | Human Serum | Bovine Serum |
7. Non-Clinical Performance Testing
Performance testing has been carried out to demonstrate that this device meets the performance specifications for its intend use. The following tests were performed on the candidate device.
Stability Summary:
The stability study was conducted to validate shelf life claim for the IMMULITE 2000 TBG Calibration Verification Material (CVM) to ensure that it maintains optimal product performance on IMMULITE 2000 platforms throughout the established shelf life of the CVM. The Calibration Verification Materials are stable up to 5 years when stored frozen at -20℃ prior to opening.
{12}------------------------------------------------
Stability Protocol Summary:
The CVM study protocols are run as part of the calibrator stability testing. The stability CVMs and reference CVMs are run in duplicate (as a minimum) and the dose value determined from the reference calibrator curve and is summarized in Table 2.
Table 2: Stability Protocol Summary
| CVM Level | Time-Points(Days) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTBCVM1 | 1 | 1456 | 1638 | 1820 |
| LTBCVM2 | 1 | 1456 | 1638 | 1820 |
| LTBCVM3 | 1 | 1456 | 1638 | 1820 |
| LTBCVM4 | 1 | 1456 | 1638 | 1820 |
Stability Acceptance Criteria Summary:
The Acceptance Criteria for the IMMULITE TBG Calibration Material (CVM) are in 2 parts. Part 1 consists of the guideline acceptance criteria which require dose value of stability CVM to fall between ±20% of assigned dose for CVM level 2, ±15% of assigned dose for CVM levels 3 and ±20% for CVM level 4. Part 2 review limits criteria which require dose value of the controls to be within 2SD of the control target value when generated from the stability calibrator curve. If the result is not within acceptable dose range of ±20% for level 2 and ±15% for levels 3 and ±20% for CVM level 4 then additional data review is conducted using part 2 criteria. The acceptance criteria is summarized in Table 3.
| CVMLevel | Assigned Dose(µg/mL) | Guideline Criteria %difference to assigneddose | AcceptableDose range(µg/mL) | Review Limits |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTBCVM1 | 0.00 | not applicable | ≤3.50 | Controls are within |
| LTBCVM2 | 5.60 | ±20 | 4.48 - 6.72 | 2SD of target from |
| LTBCVM3 | 51.0 | ±15 | 43.35 - 58.65 | stability calibrator |
| LTBCVM4 | 99.5 | ±20 | 79.60-119.40 | curve |
Table 3 Acceptance criteria for stability of IMMULITE_2000 TBG CVM
Traceability:
The IMMULITE TBG CVMs are traceable to WHO 1ST International Standard 88/638. The CVMs are manufactured using qualified materials and measurement procedures.
{13}------------------------------------------------
Value Assignment:
The IMMULITE® 2000 TBG CVMs are 4 level materials which are a subset of 7 level TBG calibrators. Calibrators are not commercialized but are used internally during manufacture and release testing of TBG reagents and two point adjustors. The IMMULITE calibrators and therefore CVMs are value assigned using assigned reference calibrators. The CVMs dose values are generated using curve generated by assigned reference calibrators. The CVM values are calculated based on the recovered values for each run on each instrument independently. CVM values are then averaged across all systems. Quality control is performed by calculating the recovery of patient samples and controls using the assigned CVM values. Two levels of commercially available controls, and 30 patient samples (5 spiked normal patients samples and 25 patient panel samples) are used to validate CVM value assignments. Quality control is performed by calculating the recovery of patient samples. spiked patient samples and controls using the assigned CVM values. The controls must fall within their target ranges
Expected Values/Target Values/Reference Range:
The TBG CVMs were tested on 15 replicates in total comprised of 5 runs and 3 replicates per run, 4 IMMULITE 2000 systems and 4 different reagent kit lots. The CVMs dose values are generated using curve generated by assigned reference calibrators. The CVM values are calculated based on the recovered values for each run on each instrument independently. CVM values are then averaged across all systems. Quality control is performed by calculating the recovery of patient samples and controls using the assigned CVM values. The Guideline Range (95% confidence interval) for each CVM level was established based on the Target Mean and ± 2 Standard Deviation (SD). The expected assay range is 3.5-80 ug/mL. The target values in Table 4 can be considered as guidelines.
| Analytetarget levels | CVM Level | Target Meanµg/mL | SD | Guideline ±2SD Range(µg/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTBCMV1 | 0.00 | - | 0.00≤3.50 | |
| LTBCVM2 | 5.85 | 0.585 | 4.687.02 | |
| LTBCVM3 | 49.9 | 3.75 | 42.457.4 | |
| LTBCVM4 | 99.0 | - | - | |
| (85% of LTBCVM4 +15% of LTB1CVM1)* | 84.2 | 8.4 | 67.4101 | |
| Assay Range | 3.5 - 80 µg/mL |
Table 4: Analyte Target Range Levels
*Note: LTBCVM4 requires dilution to ensure that the target value is within the +10% of the top of the reportable range of the assay.
Each laboratory should establish their limits for acceptability based on methodology, clinical significance and medical decision levels of the test analyte. The representative, total precision · tabulated in the respective assay instructions for use may be considered as one factor when establishing local, acceptable ranges. The values provided above may be considered as guidelines. Value assignment is lot specific.
Standard/Guidance Documents Referenced:
- CEN 13640 Stability Testing of In Vitro Diagnostic Reagents .
- Guidance for Industry Abbreviated 510(k) Submissions for In Vitro Diagnostic Calibrators .
- Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff Assayed and Unassaved Quality Control Material .
{14}------------------------------------------------
Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10
9. Conclusion:
TBG Calibration Verification Material is substantially equivalent to other products in commercial distribution intended for similar use. Most notably, it is substantially equivalent to the currently marketed ADVIA Centaur Intact PTH MCM . The substantial equivalence of the device is supported by the non-clinical testing and was found to be comparable and supports the claims of substantial equivalence, product safety and effectiveness. Based on the testing completed and the comparisons with predicate device, the IMMULITE® 2000 TBG Calibration Material does not raise any new questions on safety and effectiveness and the results support a determination of substantial equivalence.
{15}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Summary
Introduction: According to the requirements of 21 CFR 807.92, the following information provides sufficient details to understand the basis for determination of substantial equivalence.
The assigned 510(k) Number: K133124
-
- Submitter Mailing Address:
Contact Person:
- Submitter Mailing Address:
Phone Number: Fax Number: E-mail Address: Date Prepared:
-
- Device Name Proprietary Name: Measurand: Type of Test:
Regulation Section: Classification: Products Code: Panel:
- Device Name Proprietary Name: Measurand: Type of Test:
-
Predicate Device Name Predicate 510(k) No:
-
Device Description:
-
- Intended Use: Indication for Use:
Special Conditions for Use Statement(s): Special Instrument Requirements:
- Intended Use: Indication for Use:
Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. 511 Benedict Avenue Tarrytown, NY 10591
Garo Mimaryan, MS, RAC Technical Regulatory Affairs Specialist III (914)-524-3270 (914)-524-2101 garo.mimaryan@siemens.com October 15, 2013
IMMULITE® 2000 FSH Calibration Verification Material Quality Control materials for IMMULITE® 2000 FSH assay Calibration Verification Material (CVM) for IMMULITE® 2000 FSH assay 21 CFR 862.1660, Quality Control Material Class I Reserved JJX - Single (Specified) Analyte Controls (Assayed and Unassayed) Clinical Chemistry (75)
Elecsvs FSH CalCheck K964829
IMMULITE® 2000 FSH Calibration Verification Material (CVM) contains one set of four vials, 3 mL each. LFSCVM1 contains a bovine serum with preservatives. LFSCVM2. LFSCVM3 and LFSCVM4, 2 mL each, contain low, intermediate and high levels of human source FSH respectively, in bovine serum matrix with preservatives. CVMs are supplied frozen in lyophilized form.
See Indications for Use Statement below
The IMMULITE® FSH Calibration Verification Material (CVM) is for in vitro diagnostic use in the verification of the IMMULITE FSH assay on the IMMULITE 2000 systems
For prescription use only IMMULITE® 2000 Systems
{16}------------------------------------------------
| 6. Technological | A comparison of the device features, intended use, and other |
|---|---|
| Characteristics | information demonstrates that the IMMULITE® 2000 FSH |
| and Substantial Equivalence | Calibration Verification Material (CVM) is substantially |
| Comparison with Predicate: | equivalent to the predicate device, as summarized in Table 1. |
Table 1: Substantial Equivalence Comparison
| SIMILARITIES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Candidate Device | Predicate Device | |
| IMMULITE 2000 FSH CVM | Elecsys FSH CalCheck | |
| IntendedUse | The IMMULITE® FSH CalibrationVerification Material (CVM) is for invitro diagnostic use in the verification ofcalibration of the IMMULITE FSH assayon the IMMULITE 2000 systems | For use in the verification of thecalibration established by the ElecsysFSH reagent on the indicated Elecsysand cobas e immunoassay analyzers. |
| Analyte | FSH | Same |
| Form | Lyophilized | Same |
| Stability | Stable unopened until the expiration date | Same |
DIFFERENCES
| Candidate Device | Predicate Device | |
|---|---|---|
| IMMULITE 2000 FSH CVM | Elecsys FSH CalCheck | |
| Levels | 4 | 3 |
| Matrix | Bovine Serum | Human Serum |
| Storage | -20°C | 2-8°C |
| Use | Single Use Only | Not for Single Use |
7. Non-Clinical Performance Testing
Performance testing has been carried out to demonstrate that this device meets the performance specifications for its intend use. The following tests were performed on the candidate device.
Stability Summary:
The stability study was conducted to validate shelf life claim for the IMMULITE 2000 TBG Calibration Verification Material (CVM) to ensure that it maintains optimal product performance on IMMULITE 2000 platforms throughout the established shelf life of the CVM. The Calibration Verification Materials are stable up to 5 years when stored frozen at -20°C prior to opening.
{17}------------------------------------------------
Stability Protocol Summary:
The CVM study protocols are run as part of the calibrator stability testing. The stability CVMs and reference CVMs are run in duplicate (as a minimum) and the dose value determined from the reference calibrator curve and is summarized in Table 2.
Table 2: Stability Protocol Summary
| CVM Level | Time-Points(Days) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LFSCVM1 | 1 | 1460 | 1642 | 1825 |
| LFSCVM2 | 1 | 1460 | 1642 | 1825 |
| LFSCVM3 | 1 | 1460 | 1642 | 1825 |
| LFSCVM4 | 1 | 1460 | 1642 | 1825 |
Stability Acceptance Criteria Summary:
The Acceptance Criteria for the IMMULITE FSH Calibration Material (CVM) are in 2 parts. Part 1 consists of the Guideline acceptance criteria which require dose value of stability CVM to fall between ±10% of assigned dose. Part 2 review limits criteria which require dose value of the controls to be within 2SD of the control target value when generated from the stability calibrator curve. If the result is not within acceptable dose range of ±10% then additional data review is conducted using part 2 criteria. The acceptance criteria is summarized in Table 3.
Table 3 Acceptance criteria for stability of IMMULITE 2000 FSH CVM
| CVM Level | Assigned Dose (mIU/mL) | Guideline Criteria % difference to assigned dose | Acceptable dose range (mIU/mL) | Review Limits |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LFSCVM1 | 0 | not applicable | $ \le $ 0.10 | |
| LFSCVM2 | 4.64 | $ \pm $ 10 | 4.18 - 5.10 | Controls are within 2SD of |
| LFSCVM3 | 96 | $ \pm $ 10 | 86.40 - 105.60 | target on each |
| LFSCVM4 | 174 | $ \pm $ 10 | 156.60 - 191.40 | curve |
Traceability:
The IMMULITE FSH CVMs are traceable to WHO 2nd IRP (78/549, interim replacement code 94/632).
{18}------------------------------------------------
Value Assignment:
The IMMULITE® 2000 FSH CVMs are 4 level materials which are a subset of 9 level FSH calibrators. Calibrators are not commercialized but are used internally during manufacture and release testing of FSH reagents and two point adjustors. The CVMs dose values are generated using curve generated by assigned reference calibrators. The CVM values are calculated based on the recovered values for each run on each instrument independently. CVM values are then averaged across all systems. Quality control is performed by calculating the recovery of patient samples and controls using the assigned CVM values. Six levels of commercially available controls, and 30 patient samples were used to validate CVM value assignments. Quality control is performed by calculating the recovery of patient samples spiked patient samples and controls using the assigned CVM values. The controls must fall within their target ranges
Expected Values/Target Values/Reference Range:
The FSH CVMs were tested on 15 replicates in total comprised of 5 runs and 3 replicates per run. 5 IMMULITE 2000 systems and 3 different reagent kit lots. The CVMs dose values are generated using curve generated by assigned reference calibrators. The CVM values are calculated based on the recovered values for each run on each instrument independently. CVM values are then averaged across all systems. Quality control is performed by calculating the recovery of patient samples and controls using the assigned CVM values. The Guideline Range (95% confidence interval) for each CVM level was established based on the Target Mean and ± 2 Standard Deviation (SD). The expected assay range is 0.1 -170 mlU/mL. The target values in Table 4 can be considered as guidelines.
| Analytetargetlevels | CVM Level | Target Mean(mIU/mL) | SD | Guideline ±2SD Range(mIU/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LFSCVM1 | 0.00 | - | 0.00≤0.10 | |
| LFSCVM2 | 4.59 | 0.23 | 4.135.05 | |
| LFSCVM3 | 98 | 7.925 | 82.3114 | |
| LFSCVM4 | 174 | 14 | 146202 | |
| AssayRange | 0.1 - 170 mIU/mL |
Table 4: Analyte Target Range Levels
Each laboratory should establish their limits for acceptability based on methodology, clinical significance and medical decision levels of the test analyte. The representative, total precision tabulated in the respective assay instructions for use may be considered as one factor when establishing local, acceptable ranges. The values provided above may be considered as guidelines. Value assigninent is lot specific.
Standard/Guidance Documents Referenced:
- CEN 13640 Stability Testing of In Vitro Diagnostic Reagents �
- Guidance for Industry Abbreviated 510(k) Submissions for In Vitro Diagnostic Calibrators .
- Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff Assayed and Unassayed Quality Control Material .
Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10
্ৰ
{19}------------------------------------------------
ﻢ. Conclusion:
The FSH Calibration Verification Material is substantially equivalent to other products in commercial distribution intended for similar use. Most notably, it is substantially equivalent to the currently marketed Elecsys FSH CalCheck. The substantial equivalence of the device is supported by the non-clinical testing and was found to be comparable and supports the claims of substantial equivalence, product safety and effectiveness. Based on the testing completed and the comparisons with predicate device, the IMMULITE® 2000 FSH Calibration Material does not raise any new questions on safety and effectiveness and the results support a determination of substantial equivalence.
{20}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Summary
Introduction: According to the requirements of 21 CFR 807.92, the following information provides sufficient details to understand the basis for determination of substantial equivalence.
The assigned 510(k) Number: K133124
-
- Submitter Mailing Address:
Contact Person:
- Submitter Mailing Address:
Phone Number: Fax Number: E-mail Address: Date Prepared:
-
- Device Name Proprietary Name: Measurand: Type of Test:
Regulation Section: Classification: Products Code: Panel:
- Device Name Proprietary Name: Measurand: Type of Test:
- Predicate Device Name Predicate 510(k) No:
-
- Device Description:
-
- Intended Use: Indication for Use:
Special Conditions for Use Statement(s): Special Instrument Requirements:
- Intended Use: Indication for Use:
Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. 511 Benedict Avenue Tarrytown, NY 10591
Garo Mimaryan, MS, RAC Technical Regulatory Affairs Specialist III (914)-524-3270 (914)-524-2101 garo.mimaryan@siemens.com October 15. 2013
IMMULITE® 2000 Estradio1 Calibration Verification Material Quality Control materials for IMMULITE® 2000 Estradiol assay Calibration Verification Material (CVM) for IMMULITE® 2000 Estradiol assay 21 CFR 862.1660. Quality Control Material Class I Reserved JJX - Single (Specified) Analyte Controls (Assayed and Unassayed) Clinical Chemistry (75)
ADVIA Centaur® Enhanced Estradiol (eE2) MCM K102904
IMMULITE® 2000 Estradiol Calibration Verification Material (CVM) contains one set of four vials. 2 mL each. LE2CVM1 contains human serum with preservatives. LE2CVM2. LE2CVM3 and LE2CVM4 contain low, intermediate and high levels of human source Estradiol respectively, in human serum matrix with preservatives. CVMs are supplied frozen in lyophilized form.
See Indications for Use Statement below
The IMMULITE® Estradiol Calibration Verification Material (CVM) is for in vitro diagnostic use in the verification of the IMMULITE Estradiol assay on the IMMULITE 2000 systems
For prescription use only IMMULITE® 2000 Systems
{21}------------------------------------------------
6. Technological Characteristics and Substantial Equivalence Comparison with Predicate:
A comparison of the device features, intended use, and other information demonstrates that the IMMULITE® 2000 Estradiol Calibration Verification Material (CVM) is substantially equivalent to the predicate device, as summarized in Table 1.
Table 1: Substantial Equivalence Comparison
| SIMILARITIES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Candidate Device | Predicate Device | |
| IMMULITE 2000 Estradiol CVM | The ADVIA Centaur® EnhancedEstradiol (eE2) MCM | |
| IntendedUse | The IMMULITE® Estradiol CalibrationVerification Material (CVM) is for in vitrodiagnostic use in the verification ofcalibration of the IMMULITE Estradiolassay on the IMMULITE 2000 systems | The ADVIA Centaur® EnhancedEstradiol (eE2) Master Curve Material isfor in vitro diagnosticuse in the verification of calibration andreportable range of the ADVIA CentaurEnhanced Estradiol assay. |
| Analyte | Estradiol. | Same |
| Form | Lyophilized | Same |
| Matrix | Human Serum | Same |
| Stability | Stable unopened until the expiration date | Same |
| Use | Single Use Only | Same |
DIFFERENCES
| Candidate Device | Predicate Device | |
|---|---|---|
| IMMULITE 2000 Estradiol CVM | The ADVIA Centaur® EnhancedEstradiol (eE2) MCM | |
| Levels | 4 | 6 |
| Storage | -20°C | 2-8°C |
7. Non-Clinical Performance Testing
Performance testing has been carried out to demonstrate that this device meets the performance specifications for its intend use. The following tests were performed on the candidate device.
Stability Summary:
The stability study was conducted to validate shelf life claim for the IMMULITE 2000 Estradiol Calibration Verification Material (CVM) to ensure that it maintains optimal product performance on IMMULITE 2000 platforms throughout the established shelf life of the CVM. The CVM. The Clibration Verification Materials are stable up to 5 years when stored frozen at -20℃ prior to opening.
{22}------------------------------------------------
Stability Protocol Summary:
The CVM study protocols are run as part of the calibrator stability testing. The stability CVMs and reference CVMs are run in duplicate (as a minimum) and the dose value determined from the reference calibrator curve and is summarized in Table 2.
Table 2: Stability Protocol Summarv
| CVM Level | Time-Points(Days) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LE2CVM1 | 1 | 1460 | 1642 | 1825 |
| LE2CVM2 | 1 | 1460 | 1642 | 1825 |
| LE2CVM3 | 1 | 1460 | 1642 | 1825 |
| LE2CVM4 | 1 | 1460 | 1642 | 1825 |
Stability Acceptance Criteria Summary:
The Acceptance Criteria for the IMMULITE Estradiol Calibration Verification Material (CVM) are in 2 parts. Part I consists of the guideline acceptance criteria which require dose value of stability CVM to fall between ±14% of assigned dose for CVM level 2, ±10% of assigned dose for CVM levels 3 and ±8% for CVM level 4. Part 2 review limits criteria which require dose value of the controls to be within 2SD of the control target value when generated from the stability calibrator curve. If the result is not within acceptable dose range of ±14% for level 2 and ±10% for levels 3 and ±8% for Cr VM level 4 then additional data review is conducted using part 2 criteria. The acceptance criteria is summarized in Table 3.
| CVM level | AssignedDose(pg/mL) | Guideline Criteria% difference to assigneddose | Acceptable Doserange (pg/mL) | Review Limits |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LE2CVM1 | 0.00 | not applicable | ≤20.00 | Controls are |
| LE2CVM2 | 52 | ±14% | 44.72 - 59.28 | within 2SD of |
| LE2CVM3 | 502 | ±10% | 451.80 - 552.20 | target on each |
| LE2CVM4 | 2323 | ±8% | 2137.16 - 2508.84 | curve |
Table 3 Acceptance criteria for stability of IMMULITE 2000 Estradiol CVM
Traceability:
The IMMULITE Estradiol CVMs are traceable to internal assigned reference calibrators prepared using an Estradiol antigen stock solution and are traceable to internal material which is gravimetrically prepared.
{23}------------------------------------------------
Value Assignment:
The IMMULITE Estradiol CVMs are 4 level materials which are a subset of 7 level Estradiol calibrators. Calibrators are not commercialized but are used internally during manufacture and release testing of Estradiol reagents and two point adjustors. The CVMs dose values are generated using curve generated by assigned reference calibrators. The CVM values are calculated based on the recovered values for each run on each instrument independently. CVM values are then averaged across all systems. Quality control is performed by calculating the recovery of patient samples and controls using the assigned CVM values. Four levels of commercially available controls, and 30 patient samples (5 normal patients samples and 25 spiked samples) are used to validate CVM value assignments. Quality control is performed by calculating the recovery of patient samples, spiked patient samples and controls using the assigned CVM values. The controls must fall within their target ranges
Expected Values/Target Values/Reference Range:
The FSH CVMs were tested on 15 replicates in total comprised of 5 runs and 3 replicates per run, 5 IMMULITE 2000 systems and 3 different reagent kit lots. The CVMs dose values are generated using curve generated by assigned reference calibrators. The CVM values are calculated based on the recovered values for each run on each instrument independently. CVM values are then averaged across all systems. Quality control is performed by calculating the recovery of patient samples and controls using the assigned CVM values. The Guideline Range (95% confidence interval) for each CVM level was established based on the Target Mean and ± 2 Standard Deviation (SD). The expected assay range is 20 -2000 pg/mL. The target values in Table 4 can be considered as guidelines.
| Analytetargetlevels | CVM Level | Target Mean(pg/mL) | SD | Guideline ±2SD Range(pg/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LE2CVM1 | 0.00 | - | ≤20.00 | |
| LE2CVM2 | 61.5 | 9.85 | 81.20 | |
| LE2CVM3 | 478 | 33.5 | 545 | |
| LE2CVM4 | 2034 | 142.5 | 2319 | |
| AssayRange | 20 - 2000 pg/mL |
Table 4: Analyte Target Range Levels
Each laboratory should establish their limits for acceptability based on methodology, clinical significance and medical decision levels of the test analyte. The representative, total recision tabulated in the respective assay instructions for use may be considered as one factor when establishing local. acceptable ranges. The values provided above may be considered as guidelines, Value assignment is lot specific.
Standard/Guidance Documents Referenced:
- CEN 13640 Stability Testing of In Vitro Diagnostic Reagents .
- Guidance for Industry Abbreviated 510(k) Submissions for In Vitro Diagnostic Calibrators .
- Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff Assayed and Unassayed Quality Control Material .
Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10
{24}------------------------------------------------
9. Conclusion:
The Estradiol Calibration Verification Material is substantially equivalent to other products in commercial distribution intended for similar use. Most notably, it is substantially equivalent the currently marketed The ADVIA Centaur® Enhanced Estradiol (eE2) MCM. The substantial equivalence of the device is supported by the non-clinical testing and was found to be comparable and supports the claims of substantial equivalence, product safety and effectiveness. Based on the testing completed and the comparisons with predicate device, the IMMULITE® 2000 Estradiol Calibration Verification Material does not raise any new questions on safety and effectiveness and the results support a determination of substantial equivalence.
{25}------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Image /page/25/Picture/1 description: The image shows a circular logo with the words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES USA" around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized symbol that resembles three overlapping waves or curves. The logo is black and white and appears to be a scanned image.
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
October 25, 2013
SIEMENS HEALTHCARE DIAGNOSTICS INC. c/o Garo Mimaryan 511 Benedict Ave. TARRYTOWN NY 10591
Re: K133124
Trade/Device Name: IMMULITE® 2000 Total T3 Calibration Verification Material IMMULITE® 2000 Total T4 Calibration Verification Material IMMULITE® 2000 TBG Calibration Verification Material IMMULITE® 2000 FSH Calibration Verification Material IMMULITE® 2000 Estradiol Calibration Verification Material Regulation Number: 21 CFR 862.1660 Regulation Name: Quality control material (assayed and unassayed) Regulatory Class: I, reserved Product Code: JJX Dated: September 27, 2013 Received: September 30, 2013
Dear Garo Mimaryan:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug. and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration. Iisting of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Parts 801 and 809); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the
{26}------------------------------------------------
Page 2-Garo Mimaryan
electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulations (21 CFR Parts 801 and 809), please contact the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638 2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFF) Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Carol C. Benson -S for
Courtney H. Lias, Ph.D. Director Division of Chemistry and Toxicology Devices Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{27}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known): K133124
Device Name:
IMMULITE® 2000 Total T3 Calibration Verification Material IMMULITE® 2000 Total T4 Calibration Verification Material IMMULITE® 2000 TBG Calibration Verification Material IMMULITE® 2000 FSH Calibration Verification Material IMMULITE® 2000 Estradiol Calibration Verification Material
Indications for Use:
The IMMULITE® Total T3 Calibration Verification Material (CVM) is intended for in vitro diagnostic use in the verification of calibration of the IMMULITE Total T3 assay on the IMMULITE 2000 systems.
The IMMULITE® Total T4 Calibration Verification Material (CVM) is for in vitro diagnostic use in the verification of calibration of the IMMULITE Total T4 assay on the IMMULITE 2000 systems.
The IMMULITE® TBG Calibration Verification Material (CVM) is for in vitro diagnostic use in the verification of calibration of the IMMULITE TBG assay on the IMMULITE 2000 systems.
The IMMULITE® FSH Calibration Verification Material (CVM) is for in vitro diagnostic use in the verification of calibration of the IMMULITE FSH assay on the IMMULITE 2000 systems.
The IMMULITE® Estradiol Calibration Verification Material (CVM) is for in vitro diagnostic use in the verification of calibration of the IMMULITE Estradiol assay on the IMMULITE 2000 systems.
Prescription Use X (21 CFR Part 801 Subpart D)
And/Or
Over the Counter Use (21 CFR Part 801 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE; CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health (OIR)
YunglRDCban-S
Division Sign-Off Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health 510(k) K133124
§ 862.1660 Quality control material (assayed and unassayed).
(a)
Identification. A quality control material (assayed and unassayed) for clinical chemistry is a device intended for medical purposes for use in a test system to estimate test precision and to detect systematic analytical deviations that may arise from reagent or analytical instrument variation. A quality control material (assayed and unassayed) may be used for proficiency testing in interlaboratory surveys. This generic type of device includes controls (assayed and unassayed) for blood gases, electrolytes, enzymes, multianalytes (all kinds), single (specified) analytes, or urinalysis controls.(b)
Classification. Class I (general controls). Except when intended for use in donor screening tests, quality control materials (assayed and unassayed) are exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9.