(212 days)
This TENS Device is to be used for temporary relief of pain associated with sore or aching muscles of lower back, arms, or legs due to strain from exercise or normal household and work activities.
The Counter Pain Therapy Device, Model P.T.S.-IV features two channels and seven (7) preset programs. The output of both channels can be adjusted individually for intensity in sixteen (16) steps and the treatment time is selectable from 20, 30 or 40 minutes. All features are well indicated by large icons on a backlit LCD screen for easy reading. The device is powered by three (3) rechargeable Lithium Batteries which are permanently built into the main unit and can be recharged with the charging unit supplied for the device. The Pain Therapy Device consists of the handheld main unit (controller), two pairs of self-adhesive electrodes, a plug-in charging unit (adaptor 120VAC to 5VDC) and two pairs of electrode cables.
The Counter Pain Therapy Device, Model P.T.S.-IV is a Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulator (TENS) device intended for the temporary relief of pain associated with sore or aching muscles of the lower back, arms, or legs due to strain from exercise or normal household and work activities.
The device's acceptance criteria and performance were established through non-clinical testing for substantial equivalence to a predicate device, the OMRON Electro Therapy Pain Relief, Model PM3030 (K110068).
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
| Acceptance Criteria Category | Acceptance Criteria Standard | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Electrical Safety | IEC 60601-1:1988 + A1:1991 + A2:1995 "Medical electrical Equipment - Part 1: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance". | The device has been tested to and meets the requirements of IEC 60601-1. Performance testing established that, with respect to electrical safety in its intended operational environment, the device conforms to all applicable requirements of IEC 60601-1. |
| Particular Safety for Nerve & Muscle | IEC 60601-2-10: 1987 (first Edition + amendment 1 (2001) for use in conjunction with IEC 60601-1 (1988), Amendments 1 (1991) and 2 (1995) "Medical electrical equipment - Part 2: "Particular Requirements for safety of nerve and muscle stimulators". | The device has been tested to and meets the requirements of IEC 60601-2-10. |
| Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) | IEC 60601-1-2: 2001 + A1: 2004 & IEC60601-2-10: 1987 + A1: 2001 Clause 36 Medical Electrical Equipment, Part1-2: "General requirements for Basic Safety and Essential Performance" Collateral Standard: Electromagnetic Compatibility. (Also cited as IEC 60601-1-2 in other sections) | The device has been tested to and meets the requirements of IEC 60601-1-2. Performance testing established that, with respect to EMC in its intended operational environment, the device conforms to all applicable requirements of IEC 60601-1-2. |
| Biocompatibility | Not explicitly stated as a separate standard, but addressed. | The electrodes (the only body contacting parts) have been tested for biocompatibility as part of their separate FDA 510(k) clearance. |
| Software Performance | Not explicitly stated as a separate standard, but addressed internally. | Based upon test results, it was concluded that the software performs within specifications and is safe for the stated intended use. A permanent hazard analysis is implemented in the software development process, and the test protocol sufficiently verifies the software's main functional operation due to its clear architecture. |
| Cleaning Effectiveness | Not explicitly stated as a separate standard, but addressed internally. | The cleaning instructions in the Instruction Manual have been tested and validated to be sufficient. All testing concluded that the device can be cleaned by the methods described in the Instruction Manual. |
| Substantial Equivalence (Overall) | Performance and safety compared to predicate device (OMRON Electro Therapy Pain Relief, Model PM3030 - K110068). | Bench testing and safety report documentation demonstrated that the submitted device could maintain the same safety and effectiveness as the predicate device. Differences (7 program modes vs 3, 2 channels vs 1) do not affect intended use, raise new questions of safety or effectiveness, or alter the fundamental scientific technology. Therefore, the device is substantially equivalent to the predicate. |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
No specific "test set" in the context of clinical data (e.g., patient data) was used. The substantial equivalence determination was based on non-clinical testing, primarily engineering and performance verification against recognized consensus standards.
- Sample size: Not applicable in terms of patient data. Testing involved engineering samples of the device.
- Data Provenance: The testing was conducted by or for Counter Scientific Development (GZ) Ltd. in China, to demonstrate compliance with international standards for medical electrical equipment.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Their Qualifications
Not applicable. Ground truth, in this context, pertains to clinical outcomes or expert consensus on medical conditions, which were not part of this non-clinical submission. The "truth" in this submission was adherence to engineering and safety standards, evaluated through standard test methodologies, not expert medical assessment of patient data.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
Not applicable, as no clinical test set requiring adjudication was used.
5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study
No MRMC comparative effectiveness study was conducted. The submission explicitly states: "Counter did not conduct, nor rely upon, clinical tests to determine substantial equivalence of the Pain Therapy Device Model P.T.S.-IV. vs. the predicate."
6. Standalone (Algorithm Only Without Human-in-the-Loop Performance) Study
Not applicable, as this is a physical medical device (TENS unit), not an algorithm or AI system for diagnostic or treatment decisions. The "software" mentioned refers to embedded firmware controlling the device's functions, not a standalone diagnostic algorithm.
7. Type of Ground Truth Used
The "ground truth" for this submission was compliance with recognized consensus standards for electrical safety, electromagnetic compatibility, and specific requirements for nerve and muscle stimulators (IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-2-10, IEC 60601-1-2). Additionally, design requirements and specifications from the manufacturer formed the basis for verifying software performance and cleaning efficacy.
8. Sample Size for the Training Set
Not applicable, as there was no artificial intelligence or machine learning component requiring a training set. This was a non-clinical device submission based on engineering and safety testing.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
Not applicable, as there was no training set in the context of machine learning.
{0}------------------------------------------------
APR 2 4 2014
510(k) SUMMARY
Date of Summary Prepared: 01/24/2014
- Submitter's Name: Counter Scientific Development (GZ) Ltd.
2nd & 3rd Floor, Blg. 6, DaPian Industrial Zone Address: Tangxia Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou 510665, China
Contact person: Wendi Poon, Manager
Tel: +86-20 -8328 9980
Fax: +86-20-38339500
E-mail Counter_csd@yahoo.com.cn
2. Proposed New Device:
Trade Name: Pain Therapy Device, Model P.T.S .- IV Classification Name: TENS Device Regulation Number: 882.5890 Product Code: NUH Device Class: II
3. Predicate (cleared) Device:
OMRON Electro Therapy Pain Relief, Model PM3030
510(k) Number: K110068
Manufacturer: OMRON Healthcare Co., Ltd., China.
{1}------------------------------------------------
4. Description of Proposed Device:
The Counter Pain Therapy Device, Model P.T.S.-IV features two channels and seven (7) preset programs. The output of both channels can be adjusted individually for intensity in sixteen (16) steps and the treatment time is selectable from 20, 30 or 40 minutes. All features are well indicated by large icons on a backlit LCD screen for easy reading.
The device is powered by three (3) rechargeable Lithium Batteries which are permanently built into the main unit and can be recharged with the charging unit supplied for the device.
The Pain Therapy Device consists of the handheld main unit (controller), two pairs of self-adhesive electrodes, a plug-in charging unit (adaptor 120VAC to 5VDC) and two pairs of electrode cables.
The device has been tested to and meets the requirements of the following recognized consensus standards:
IEC 60601-1:1988 + A1:1991 + A2:1995 "Medical electrical Equipment - Part 1: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance".
IEC 60601-2-10: 1987 (first Edition + amendment 1 (2001) for use in conjunction with IEC 60601-1 (1988). Amendments 1 (1991) and 2 (1995) "Medical electrical equipment -Part 2: "Particular Requirements for safety of nerve and muscle stimulators".
IEC 60601-1-2: 2001 + A1: 2004 & IEC60601-2-10: 1987 + A1: 2001 Clause 36 Medical Electrical Equipment, Part1-2: "General requirements for Basic Safety and Essential Performance" Collateral Standard: Electromagnetic Compatibility.
5. Indication for Use:
The Counter Pain Therapy Device Model P.T.S.-IV is intended for the relief of pain associated with sore or aching muscles of the lower back, arms, or legs due to strain from exercise or normal household work activities.
2
{2}------------------------------------------------
6. Environment of Use:
Clinics, Hospitals and home environments
7. Contraindications:
Do not use this device if you have a cardiac pacemaker, implanted defibrillator, or other implanted metallic or electronic device. Such use could cause electrical shock, burns, electrical interference, or death.
Do not use this device together with a life-supporting medical electronic device such as an artificial heart or lung.
Do not use this device together with a body-worn medical electronic device such as an ECG.
8. Technological Characteristics Compared to the Predicate Device
Both, the Counter Pain Therapy Device Model P.T.S.-IV and the predicate device the OMRON TENS Model PM3030 have the same intended use and fundamental technology. Both the Counter unit and the predicate provide electrically generated pulses applied to the skin via electrodes. The main differences between the two devices are that the Counter Pain Therapy Device has 7 program modes versus 3 on the OMRON unit and 2 channels versus 1 channel. However, the Counter device can be viewed as substantially equivalent to the predicate device because: The electrical stimulation provided by the Counter device is substantially equivalent to that commonly employed by TENS devices that have been cleared for marketing without prescription labeling; i.e. for OTC sale. Technological characteristics, features, specifications, materials and intended uses of the Counter device are substantially equivalent to the quoted predicate device. The differences that exist between the devices are insignificant in terms of safety or effectiveness.
9. Discussion of Non-Clinical Tests Performed for Determination of Substantial Equivalence is as follows:
Counter did not conduct, nor rely upon, clinical tests to determine substantial equivalence of the Pain Therapy Device Model P.T.S.-IV. vs. the predicate. Non-clinical testing was performed in order to validate the design according to the company's specified design requirements, and to assure conformance with the following voluntary design standards:
IEC 60601-1:1988 + A1:1991 + A2:1995 "Medical electrical Equipment - Part 1: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance".
3
{3}------------------------------------------------
IEC 60601-2-10: 1987 (first Edition + amendment 1 (2001) for use in conjunction with IEC 60601-1 (1988), Amendments 1 (1991) and 2 (1995) "Medical electrical equipment -Part 2: "Particular Requirements for safety of nerve and muscle stimulators".
IEC 60601-1-2: 2001 + A1: 2004 & IEC60601-2-10: 1987 + A1: 2001 Clause 36 Medical Electrical Equipment. Part1-2: "General requirements for Basic Safety and Essential Performance" Collateral Standard: Electromagnetic Compatibility.
a. EMC and electrical safety
IEC 60601-1 "Medical Electrical Equipment-Part 1: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance ".
IEC 60601-1-2 "Medical Electrical Equipment - Part 1-2: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance-collateral standard: Electromagnetic compatibility-requirements and tests".
b. Biocompatibility
The electrodes are the only body contacting parts. They have been tested for biocompatibility as part of their separate FDA 510(k) clearance.
c. Software
Based upon the test results it was concluded that the software performs within specifications and is safe to the stated intended use. Since a permanent hazard analysis is implemented in the software development process, and due to the clear software architecture, it is believed that the test protocol sufficiently verifies the software's main functional operation.
d. Cleaning
The cleaning instructions as described the Instruction Manual have been tested to be sufficient. Testing involved validation of the manual cleaning method as per the instructions. All testing concluded that that the Pain Therapy Device can be cleaned by the use of the methods described in the Instruction Manual.
e. EMC and Electrical Safety
Performance testing has established that, with respect to EMC and electrical safety in its intended operational environment, the device conforms to all applicable
4
{4}------------------------------------------------
requirements of IEC 60601-1 and IEC 60601-1-2.
8. Conclusions:
The Counter Pain Therapy Device, Model P.T.S.-IV has the same intended use and technological characteristics as the predicate device. Moreover, bench testing and safety report documentation demonstrate that the submitted device could maintain the same safety and effectiveness as that of predicate device. In the other words, the differences do not affect the intended use and do not raise any new questions of safety or effectiveness or alter the fundamental scientific technology of the device. Thus, the Counter Pain Therapy Device, Model P.T.S.-IV is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
5
{5}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/5/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The logo consists of a stylized human figure with outstretched arms, enclosed within a circle. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES - USA" is arranged around the perimeter of the circle.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
April 24, 2014
Counter Scientific Development (GZ) Ltd c/o Guenter Ginsberg, President Media Trade Corporation 11820 Red Hibiscus Drive Bonita Springs, FL 34135
Re: K132993
Trade/Device Name: Counter OTC TENS Device, Model PTS-IV Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.5890 -Regulation Name: Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulator for Pain Relief Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: NUH Dated: March 15, 2014 Received: March 18, 2014
Dear Mr. Ginsberg:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28. 1976. the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA), You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations. Title 21. Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21
{6}------------------------------------------------
CFR Part 807): labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
:"
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportalProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm.
Image /page/6/Picture/7 description: The image shows a white background with several small, irregularly shaped black spots scattered across it. The spots are concentrated in the upper right and lower right quadrants of the image, with a few isolated spots elsewhere. The spots vary in size and shape, with some appearing as single dots and others as clusters of dots.
Sincerely yours,
Felipe Aquel -S
Carlos L. Peña, Ph.D., M.S. Director Division of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{7}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K132993
Device Name Counter OTC TENS Device, Model PTS-IV
Indications for Use (Describe)
This TENS Device is to be used for temporary relief of pain associated with sore or aching muscles of lower back, arms, or legs due to strain from exercise or normal household and work activities.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
] Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
FOR FDA USE ONLY
Concurrence of Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) (Signature)
Date: 2014.04.24 11:58:31 -04'00'
FORM FDA 3881 (9/13)
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: December 31, 2013 See PRA Statement on last page.
{8}------------------------------------------------
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
"
§ 882.5890 Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator for pain relief.
(a)
Identification. A transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator for pain relief is a device used to apply an electrical current to electrodes on a patient's skin to treat pain.(b)
Classification. Class II (performance standards).