(105 days)
Tiger® Occipital-Cervical-Thoracic Spinal Fixation System is intended to promote fusion of the cervical spine and the occipito-cervico-thoracic junction (occiput-T3). The system is intended to be used in skeletally mature patients as an adjunct to fusion using autograft and allograft for the following conditions: degenerative disc disease (DDD): defined as neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies; spondylolisthesis; spinal stenosis; fracture/dislocation; atlanto/axial fracture with instability; occipitocervical dislocation; revision of previous cervical spine surgery; and tumor.
The occipital bone screws are limited to occipital fixation only. Hook components are indicated for use from C1-C7. The use of polyaxial screws is limited to placement in the upper thoracic spine (T1-T3). They are not intended to be placed in the cervical spine.
The Tiger® Occipital-Cervical-Thoracic Spinal Fixation System can be connected to the Tiger® Spine System using the side by side and end to end rod to rod connectors.
The CoreLink Tiger® OCT System consists of occipital plates, occipital bone screws, cervical hooks, upper thoracic pedicle screws, rods in both titanium and cobalt chrome, transverse connectors, and other various connectors. These components are manufactured from Ti-6Al-4V ELI in accordance with ASTM F136.
The provided text describes a 510(k) summary for the Tiger® OCT System, a spinal fixation system. It details the device's indications for use, description, predicate devices, and performance standards. However, it does not contain information regarding an AI/ML device or a study comparing device performance against acceptance criteria in the way typically expected for an AI/ML diagnostic or assistive tool.
The "Performance Standards" section refers to mechanical testing of the implantable device against ASTM F2706 standards, not a clinical performance study with human subjects, ground truth, or expert readers.
Therefore, many of the requested categories for AI/ML device evaluation are not applicable or cannot be extracted from this document.
Here's a breakdown of the information that can be extracted and what cannot:
1. Table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance:
| Acceptance Criteria (Study Type) | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|
| Mechanical Performance: - Static Compression Bending - Static Torsion - Dynamic Torsion - Dynamic Compression Bending | "ASTM F2706 performance standards were adhered to and all applicable requirements were met." (Specific numerical values or pass/fail thresholds are not provided in this summary.) |
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance:
- Not Applicable. This document describes mechanical testing of an implantable device, not a performance study on a test set of data (e.g., medical images) to evaluate an AI/ML algorithm.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:
- Not Applicable. No human experts were involved in establishing ground truth for mechanical device testing.
4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set:
- Not Applicable. No adjudication method is relevant for mechanical device testing.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:
- No. This is not an AI/ML device. No MRMC study was performed.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:
- Not Applicable. This is not an AI/ML device. No standalone algorithm performance was assessed.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.):
- For the mechanical performance testing, the "ground truth" would be the engineering specifications and requirements outlined in ASTM F2706.
8. The sample size for the training set:
- Not Applicable. This is not an AI/ML device. No training set was used.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established:
- Not Applicable. This is not an AI/ML device. No training set ground truth was established.
{0}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Summary
| Contact: | Justin EggletonMusculoskeletal Clinical & Regulatory Advisers, LLC1331 H Street NW. 12th FloorWashington. DC 20005202.552.5800 |
|---|---|
| Date Prepared: | November 18. 2013 |
| Device Trade Name: | Tiger® OCT System |
| Manufacturer: | CoreLink, LLC10805 Sunset Office Drive, Suite 300St. Louis. MO 63127 |
| Common Name: | OCT System |
| Classification: | 21 CFR §888.3050; Spinal interlaminal fixation orthosis |
| Class: | 11 |
| Product Code: | KWP, MNH, MNL. |
Indications For Use:
Tiger® Occipital-Cervical-Thoracic Spinal Fixation System is intended to promote fusion of the cervical spine and the occipito-cervico-thoracic junction (occiput-T3). The system is intended to be used in skeletally mature patients as an adjunct to fusion using autograft and allografi for the following conditions: degenerative disc disease (DDD): defined as neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies; spondylolisthesis; spinal stenosis; fracture/dislocation; atlanto/axial fracture with instability; occipitocervical dislocation; revision of previous cervical spine surgery; and tumor.
The occipital bone screws are limited to occipital fixation only. Hook components are indicated for use from C1-C7. The use of polyaxial screws is limited to placement in the upper thoracic spine (TI-T3). They are not intended to be placed in the cervical spine.
The Tiger® Occipital-Cervical-Thoracic Spinal Fixation System can be connected to the Tiger® Spine System using the side by side and end to end rod to rod connectors.
Device Description:
The CoreLink Tiger® OCT System consists of occipital plates, occipital bone screws, cervical hooks, upper thoracic pedicle screws, rods in both titanium and cobalt chrome.
{1}------------------------------------------------
transverse connectors, and other various connectors. These components are manufactured from Ti-6Al-4V ELI in accordance with ASTM F136.
Predicate Device(s):
The Tiger® OCT System was shown to be substantially equivalent to previously cleared devices and has the same indications for use, design, function, and materials used. These devices include the Pioneer Surgical Streamline OCT System (K121725). DePuy Spine Mountaineer OCT Spinal System (K110353), and Synthes Synapse OCT System (K091689).
Performance Standards:
Testing performed on this device indicates that the Tiger® OCT System is substantially equivalent to predicate devices. ASTM F2706 performance standards were adhered to and all applicable requirements were met. This testing included static compression bending, static torsion, dynamic torsion, and dynamic compression bending.
Conclusion:
The Tiger® OCT System is substantially equivalent to predicate devices with respect to safety and effectiveness.
{2}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/2/Picture/0 description: The image shows a logo for the Department of Health & Human Services - USA. The logo consists of a circular arrangement of text around a symbol. The text reads "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA". The symbol is a stylized representation of a human figure.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Public Health Service
November 25, 2013
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
Corelink, LLC % Musculoskeletal Clinical Regulatory Advisers, LLC Mr. Justin Eggleton 1331 H Street NW, 12th Floor Washington, District of Columbia 20005
Re: K132504
Trade/Device Name: TIGER® OCT System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3050 Regulation Name: Spinal interlaminal fixation orthosis Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: KWP, MNH, MNI Dated: November 18. 2013 Received: November 20, 2013
Dear Mr. Eggleton:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug. and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set
{3}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Mr. Justin Eggleton
forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its tollfree number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Mark Nijelkerson -S
Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Orthopedic Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{4}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known): _____________________
Device Name: CoreLink Tiger® OCT System
Tiger® Occipital-Cervical-Thoracic Spinal Fixation System is intended to promote fusion of the cervical spine and the occipito-cervico-thoracic junction (occiput-T3). The system is intended to be used in skeletally mature patients as an adjunct to fusion using autograft and allograft for the following conditions: degenerative disc disease (DDD): defined as neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies; spondylolisthesis; spinal stenosis; fracture/dislocation; atlanto/axial fracture with instability; occipitocervical dislocation: revision of previous cervical spine surgery; and tumor.
The occipital bone screws are limited to occipital fixation only. Hook components are indicated for use from C1-C7. The use of polyaxial screws is limited to placement in the upper thoracic spine (T1-T3). They are not intended to be placed in the cervical spine.
The Tiger® Occipital-Cervical-Thoracic Spinal Fixation System can be connected to the Tiger® Spine System using the side by side and end to end rod to rod connectors.
Prescription Use V Over-The-Counter Use AND/OR (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE OF NEEDED) -
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Ronald聘싱Jean -S
(Division Sign-Off) Division of Orthopedic Devices 510(k) Number: K132504
§ 888.3050 Spinal interlaminal fixation orthosis.
(a)
Identification. A spinal interlaminal fixation orthosis is a device intended to be implanted made of an alloy, such as stainless steel, that consists of various hooks and a posteriorly placed compression or distraction rod. The device is implanted, usually across three adjacent vertebrae, to straighten and immobilize the spine to allow bone grafts to unite and fuse the vertebrae together. The device is used primarily in the treatment of scoliosis (a lateral curvature of the spine), but it also may be used in the treatment of fracture or dislocation of the spine, grades 3 and 4 of spondylolisthesis (a dislocation of the spinal column), and lower back syndrome.(b)
Classification. Class II.