(85 days)
Not Found
No
The description mentions "algorithms" for analysis but does not use terms like AI, ML, deep learning, or neural networks, nor does it describe characteristics typically associated with AI/ML development like training sets or specific performance metrics like AUC.
No
The device analyzes ECG signals and provides interpretations for review, but it explicitly states the interpretations are "advisory" and must be validated by a physician. It does not directly provide or control treatment; its function is diagnostic and analytical support.
Yes
The device analyzes ECG signals and provides interpretations to assist clinicians in evaluating potential diagnoses, treatment effectiveness, or ruling out causes for symptoms. This function directly supports diagnostic processes.
Unknown
The summary describes an ECG analysis algorithm, which is software. However, it doesn't explicitly state that the device only consists of this software and doesn't include any associated hardware components (like an ECG acquisition device). The description focuses on the algorithm's function, not the complete device configuration.
Based on the provided information, this device is not an IVD (In Vitro Diagnostic).
Here's why:
- IVD Definition: In Vitro Diagnostics are tests performed on samples taken from the human body, such as blood, urine, or tissue, to detect diseases, conditions, or infections.
- Device Function: This device analyzes multi-channel ECG signals. ECG signals are electrical signals measured directly from the body's surface, not from a sample taken from the body.
- Intended Use: The intended use is to analyze ECG signals and provide interpretations for review by a clinician. This is a direct measurement of physiological activity, not an analysis of a biological sample.
Therefore, this device falls under the category of a medical device that performs physiological measurements and analysis, but it is not an In Vitro Diagnostic device.
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
To analyze multi-channel ECG signals from adult and pediatric patients with algorithms that provide measurements, data presentations, graphical presentations and interpretations for review by the user.
The interpreted ECG with measurements and interpretive statements is offered to the clinician on an advisory basis only. It is to be used in conjunction with the clinician's knowledge of the patient, the results of the physical examination, the ECG tracings, and other clinical findings. A qualified physician is asked to over read and validate (or change) the computer generated ECG interpretation.
Where the clinician decides to evaluate the electrocardiogram of adult and pediatric patients as part of decisions regarding possible diagnosis, potential treatment, effectiveness of treatment or to rule-out causes for symptoms.
Product codes
LOS, DPS
Device Description
The Philips DXL 12/16-lead ECG Algorithm provides an analysis of the amplitudes, durations, electrical axis, and morphologies of the ECG waveforms and associated rhvthms.
Mentions image processing
Not Found
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found
Input Imaging Modality
ECG signals
Anatomical Site
Not Found
Indicated Patient Age Range
adult and pediatric patients
Intended User / Care Setting
clinician
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Testing involved use of standard ECG databases, system level tests, integration tests, and verification of risk mitigation identified in the hazard analysis.
Summary of Performance Studies (study type, sample size, AUC, MRMC, standalone performance, key results)
Verification, validation, and testing activities establish the performance, functionality, and reliability characteristics of the new algorithm with respect to the predicate. Results from interpretive ECG analysis programs are used as in an advisory nature. Physicians are required to over read each ECG report and also consider the ECG waveforms: the patient's clinical history before agreeing with the ECG analysis program statement. The Philips ECG Algorithm software meets all defined reliability requirements and performance claims.
Key Metrics (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, etc.)
Not Found
Predicate Device(s)
Reference Device(s)
Not Found
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information for the subject device only (e.g. presence / absence, what scope was granted / cleared under the PCCP, any restrictions, etc).
Not Found
§ 870.2340 Electrocardiograph.
(a)
Identification. An electrocardiograph is a device used to process the electrical signal transmitted through two or more electrocardiograph electrodes and to produce a visual display of the electrical signal produced by the heart.(b)
Classification. Class II (performance standards).
0
K132068 P 1/2
This summary of 510(k) safety and effectiveness information is submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990 and 21 C.F.R. $807.92.
The submitter of this pre-market notification is Philips Medical Systems Theresa Poole Regulatory Affairs Specialist Patient Monitoring Philips Medical Systems 3000 Minuteman Road, MS0480 Andover, MA 01810-1099
Tel: 978 659 7621 Fax: 978 685 5624 Email: theresa.poole@philips.com SEP 2 6 2013
1
This summary was prepared on 1 July 2013
The name of this device is the Philips ECG algorithm Software Release PH100C. Classification names are as follows:
Classification Pro Code Description Unclassified, Class II 74 LOS ECG Analysis System 870.2340.11 74 DPS Electrocardiograph
The new device is substantially equivalent to the previously cleared Philips ECG Algorithm software cleared under K020708 and K052049.
The Philips DXL 12/16-lead ECG Algorithm provides an analysis of the amplitudes, durations, electrical axis, and morphologies of the ECG waveforms and associated rhvthms.
The new device has the same Indications for Use as the legally marketed predicate device.
Intended Use:
To analyze multi-channel ECG signals from adult and pediatric patients with algorithms that provide measurements, data presentations, graphical presentations and interpretations for review by the user.
The interpreted ECG with measurements and interpretive statements is offered to the clinician on an advisory basis only. It is to be used in conjunction with the clinician's knowledge of the patient, the results of the physical examination, the ECG tracings, and other clinical findings. A qualified physician is asked to over read and validate (or change) the computer generated ECG interpretation.
1
K132068 P 2/2
Indications for Use:
Where the clinician decides to evaluate the electrocardiogram of adult and pediatric patients as part of decisions regarding possible diagnosis, potential treatment, effectiveness of treatment or to rule-out causes for symptoms.
The new device has the same technological characteristics as the legally marketed predicate device.
The modification also incorporates a subset of the diagnostic statement changes recommended in Wagner GS, Macfarlane P, Wellens H, Josephson M, Gorgels A, Mirvis DM, Pahlm O, Surawicz B, Kligfield P, Childers R, Gettes LS. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part VI: acute ischemia/infarction: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2009; 119:e262- e270.
Verification, validation, and testing activities establish the performance, functionality, and reliability characteristics of the new algorithm with respect to the predicate. Testing involved use of standard ECG databases, system level tests, integration tests, and verification of risk mitigation identified in the hazard analysis. Results from interpretive ECG analysis programs are used as in an advisory nature. Physicians are required to over read each ECG report and also consider the ECG waveforms: the patient's clinical history before agreeing with the ECG analysis program statement. The Philips ECG Algorithm software meets all defined reliability requirements and performance claims.
2
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Image /page/2/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo is a circular seal with the words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized image of a human figure embracing a globe.
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-002
September 26, 2013
Philips Medical Systems c/o Ms. Theresa Poole Regulatory Specialist 3000 Minuteman Rd Andover, MA 01810 US
Re: K132068
Trade/Device Name: Philips DXL 12/16-Lead ECG Algorithm Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.2340 Regulation Name: Electrocardiograph Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: DPS, LOS Dated: August 28, 2013 Received: August 29, 2013
Dear Ms. Theresa Poole:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
3
Page 2 - Ms. Theresa Poole
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050,
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its tollfree number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638 2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Owen P. Faris -S
for
Bram D. Zuckerman, Ph.D. Director Division of Cardiovascular Devices · Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
4
2.0 Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known):
Philips DXL 12/16-lead ECG Algorithm Device Name:
To analyze multi-channel ECG signals from adult and pediatric patients with algorithms that provide measurements, data presentations, graphical presentations and interpretations for review by the user.
The interpreted ECG with measurements and interpretive statements is offered to the clinician on an advisory basis only. It is to be used in conjunction with the clinician's knowledge of the patient, the results of the physical examination, the ECG tracings, and other clinical findings. A qualified physician is asked to over read and validate (or change) the computer generated ECG interpretation.
Where the clinician decides to evaluate the electrocardiogram of adult and pediatric patients as part of decisions regarding possible diagnosis, potential treatment, effectiveness of treatment or to rule-out causes for symptoms.
AND/OR Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-
Over-The-Counter Use N/A (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Page
Digitally signed by
Owen P. Faris -S
Date: 2013.09.26
16:09:27-04'00'
CONFIDENTIAL