(292 days)
The VISICLEAR Smoke Evacuation System is designed to remove and filter smoke, aerosols produced during electrosurgical and laser procedures.
Indications for use for the VISICLEAR smoke evacuation system include:
a. To remove and filter smoke and aerosols from a surgical site produced during electrosurgical and laser procedures
The VISICLEAR smoke evacuation system is a self-contained system that is used to remove and filter surgical smoke. The device is intended for general electrosurgical and laser applications for removing smoke generated by electrosurgery and laser procedures.
The device is constructed using the same materials and design specifications commonly found in the predicate devices in the smoke evacuation marketplace. The smoke evacuator is comprised of a vacuum motor, aluminum, and plastic components combined with sound reducing insulation. The vacuum motor is used to draw the smoke from the surgical site, through the vacuum tubing and into the VISICLEAR filter where the surgical smoke is processed by a series of filtration stages.
The vacuum flow rate for the VISICLEAR smoke evacuation device ranges from a minimum of 5 liters per minute (LPM) in Laparoscopic Mode to 30 cubic feet per minute in Open Mode. These flow rates are substantially equivalent to the flow range for the predicate devices.
The filter for the VISICLEAR smoke evacuation system, like the filters for the predicate devices, is a replaceable self-contained filter that is completely enclosed to protect health care personnel from potential contamination during filter changes. The VIROSAFE 135 filter ("VS135") is an Ultra Low Penetration Air (ULPA) grade with carbon fitter that has filter efficiency of 99.999% for particle sizes of 0.1 to 0.2 microns or greater. These characteristics are consistent with the predicate devices.
The provided document is a 510(k) summary for the VISICLEAR Smoke Evacuation System. It outlines the device's characteristics and compares it to predicate devices to establish substantial equivalence.
Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and study information:
Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
Acceptance Criteria / Parameter | Predicate Device (Conmed Aer Defense K091139) Reported Performance | Predicate Device (Buffalo Filter Porta PlumeSafe 601 K924732) Reported Performance | VISICLEAR Smoke Evacuation System Reported Performance |
---|---|---|---|
Intended Use | Smoke Evacuation and Filtration | Smoke Evacuation and Filtration | Smoke Evacuation and Filtration |
Indications for Use | To remove smoke, aerosols and mitigate odors produced by surgical smoke during electrosurgical procedures | Evacuation of smoke plume and odor generated during laser or electrosurgery procedures | To remove smoke and aerosols from a surgical site; to mitigate odors produced by surgical smoke during electrosurgical and laser procedures. |
Target Population | Physicians and trained hospital staff during the use of lasers or electrosurgery | For physicians and trained hospital staff during the use of lasers or electrosurgery | For physicians and trained hospital staff during the use of lasers or electrosurgery |
User Interface | Touch Keypad with LED Indicator Lights | Touch Keypad with LED Indicator Lights | Touch Keypad with LED Indicator Lights |
Energy Used | Electrical Current | Electrical Current | Electrical Current |
Operational Settings | On/Off Switch, Suction level buttons for Motor Control | On/Off Switch, Suction level buttons for Motor Control | On/Off Switch, Suction level buttons for Motor Control |
Compatibility with Environment & Other Devices | Compatible, neutral to other devices | Compatible, neutral to other devices | Compatible, neutral to other devices |
Materials of Construction | Coated Aluminum Housing and ABS Plastic Fascia, Insulation, Glass micro fiber filter media, coconut shell carbon | Stainless Steel Housing, Insulation, Glass micro fiber filter media, granular activated carbon | Powder-Coated Aluminum Housing, ABS -PC Plastic Fascia, Insulation, Glass micro fiber filter media, granular activated carbon |
Maximum Flow Rate | Up to 25 CFM | Up to 60 CFM | Up to 30 CFM |
Filter Efficiency | ULPA Filter Efficiency of 99.9995% at 0.12 microns or greater | 99.99995% at 0.12 microns | 99.999% at 0.1 to 0.2 microns |
Device Mechanism of Action | Vacuum source with a mechanical means of filtration | Vacuum source with a mechanical means of filtration | Vacuum source with a mechanical means of filtration |
Air Flow Path | Through Vacuum hose or tubing, into a filter, then vacuum motor, and vented into the room | Through Vacuum hose or tubing, into a filter, then vacuum motor, and vented into the room | Through Vacuum hose or tubing, into a filter, then vacuum motor, and vented into the room |
Filter Life | Up to 35 hours | 25 Hours filter life | Up to 35 hours (Laparoscopic Mode), 18 hours (Open Mode) |
Human Factors | Used by surgeons and trained health care professionals | Used by surgeons and trained health care professionals | Used by surgeons and trained health care professionals |
Electrical Safety | IEC 60601-1 tested and compliant | Tested and Compliant to IEC 60601-1:1990 | Tested and Compliant to IEC 60601-1 and IEC 60601-1-2 |
Mechanical Safety | Tested and compliant per IEC60601-1 for mechanical safety | Tested and compliant per IEC60601-1 for mechanical safety | Tested and compliant per IEC60601-1 for mechanical safety |
Chemical Safety | Neutral pH, non-patient contact | Neutral pH, non-patient contact | Neutral pH, non-patient contact |
Thermal Safety | Operation of the device does not result in harmful temperatures, tested and compliant per IEC60601-1 | Operation of the device does not result in harmful temperatures, tested and compliant per IEC60601-1 | Operation of the device does not result in harmful temperatures, tested and compliant per IEC60601-1 |
Radiation Safety | Non-radioactive | Non-radioactive | Non-radioactive |
Laparoscopic Smoke Evacuation Verification | Not explicitly detailed, but implied by intended use | Not explicitly detailed, but implied by intended use | Confirmed effectiveness at clearing smoke while not reducing the pneumoperitoneum |
Software Verification (for filter life decrementing) | Not explicitly detailed, but implied by predicate filter life | Not explicitly detailed, but implied by predicate filter life | Confirmed the effectiveness of this feature to limit the filter use to only the intended life. |
Study Details
The document describes bench testing for verification and validation to demonstrate substantial equivalence to predicate devices, rather than a clinical study involving patients or human readers.
-
Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance:
- The document primarily refers to "bench testing" and does not specify a "test set" in terms of patient data or clinical images. It implies testing of the device itself and its components.
- Data provenance is not explicitly stated in terms of country of origin, but the company, Buffalo Filter LLC, is based in Lancaster, NY, USA. The testing appears to be "retrospective" in the sense that it's based on engineering tests rather than prospective patient recruitment.
-
Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:
- This is not applicable as the "ground truth" for this device's performance is established through objective engineering measurements (e.g., flow rate, filter efficiency, safety standards compliance) rather than expert interpretation of data.
-
Adjudication method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set:
- Not applicable, as this was not a study involving human interpretation or adjudication of results.
-
If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:
- Not applicable. This device is a smoke evacuation system and does not involve AI or human readers for diagnostic interpretation.
-
If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:
- Not applicable. The device is a physical system, not an algorithm. Its performance is inherent to its physical design and operation.
-
The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.):
- The "ground truth" is defined by established engineering and regulatory standards for air handling devices and smoke evacuator performance. This includes:
- ULPA efficiency standards: 99.999% for particle sizes of 0.1 to 0.2 microns or greater.
- Flow rate measurements: Minimum 5 LPM (Laparoscopic Mode) to 30 CFM (Open Mode).
- Filter life: 35 hours (Laparoscopic Mode), 18 hours (Open Mode).
- Electrical safety standards: IEC/ANSI/AAMI 60601-1 and IEC/ANSI/AAMI 60601-1-2.
- Mechanical safety standards: IEC/ANSI/AAMI 60601-1.
- Software functionality: Verification that the filter life decrementing feature works as intended.
- Smoke removal effectiveness: Quantified ability to remove smoke aerosols.
- The "ground truth" is defined by established engineering and regulatory standards for air handling devices and smoke evacuator performance. This includes:
-
The sample size for the training set:
- Not applicable. This refers to a physical device, not a machine learning algorithm that requires a training set.
-
How the ground truth for the training set was established:
- Not applicable. See point 7.
§ 878.5070 Air-handling apparatus for a surgical operating room.
(a)
Identification. Air-handling apparatus for a surgical operating room is a device intended to produce a directed, nonturbulent flow of air that has been filtered to remove particulate matter and microorganisms to provide an area free of contaminants to reduce the possibility of infection in the patient.(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls). The device, when it is an air handling bench apparatus, an air handling room apparatus, or an air handling enclosure apparatus, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 878.9.