K Number
K131402
Date Cleared
2014-03-03

(292 days)

Product Code
Regulation Number
878.5070
Panel
HO
Reference & Predicate Devices
AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
Intended Use

The VISICLEAR Smoke Evacuation System is designed to remove and filter smoke, aerosols produced during electrosurgical and laser procedures.

Indications for use for the VISICLEAR smoke evacuation system include:

a. To remove and filter smoke and aerosols from a surgical site produced during electrosurgical and laser procedures

Device Description

The VISICLEAR smoke evacuation system is a self-contained system that is used to remove and filter surgical smoke. The device is intended for general electrosurgical and laser applications for removing smoke generated by electrosurgery and laser procedures.

The device is constructed using the same materials and design specifications commonly found in the predicate devices in the smoke evacuation marketplace. The smoke evacuator is comprised of a vacuum motor, aluminum, and plastic components combined with sound reducing insulation. The vacuum motor is used to draw the smoke from the surgical site, through the vacuum tubing and into the VISICLEAR filter where the surgical smoke is processed by a series of filtration stages.

The vacuum flow rate for the VISICLEAR smoke evacuation device ranges from a minimum of 5 liters per minute (LPM) in Laparoscopic Mode to 30 cubic feet per minute in Open Mode. These flow rates are substantially equivalent to the flow range for the predicate devices.

The filter for the VISICLEAR smoke evacuation system, like the filters for the predicate devices, is a replaceable self-contained filter that is completely enclosed to protect health care personnel from potential contamination during filter changes. The VIROSAFE 135 filter ("VS135") is an Ultra Low Penetration Air (ULPA) grade with carbon fitter that has filter efficiency of 99.999% for particle sizes of 0.1 to 0.2 microns or greater. These characteristics are consistent with the predicate devices.

AI/ML Overview

The provided document is a 510(k) summary for the VISICLEAR Smoke Evacuation System. It outlines the device's characteristics and compares it to predicate devices to establish substantial equivalence.

Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and study information:

Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

Acceptance Criteria / ParameterPredicate Device (Conmed Aer Defense K091139) Reported PerformancePredicate Device (Buffalo Filter Porta PlumeSafe 601 K924732) Reported PerformanceVISICLEAR Smoke Evacuation System Reported Performance
Intended UseSmoke Evacuation and FiltrationSmoke Evacuation and FiltrationSmoke Evacuation and Filtration
Indications for UseTo remove smoke, aerosols and mitigate odors produced by surgical smoke during electrosurgical proceduresEvacuation of smoke plume and odor generated during laser or electrosurgery proceduresTo remove smoke and aerosols from a surgical site; to mitigate odors produced by surgical smoke during electrosurgical and laser procedures.
Target PopulationPhysicians and trained hospital staff during the use of lasers or electrosurgeryFor physicians and trained hospital staff during the use of lasers or electrosurgeryFor physicians and trained hospital staff during the use of lasers or electrosurgery
User InterfaceTouch Keypad with LED Indicator LightsTouch Keypad with LED Indicator LightsTouch Keypad with LED Indicator Lights
Energy UsedElectrical CurrentElectrical CurrentElectrical Current
Operational SettingsOn/Off Switch, Suction level buttons for Motor ControlOn/Off Switch, Suction level buttons for Motor ControlOn/Off Switch, Suction level buttons for Motor Control
Compatibility with Environment & Other DevicesCompatible, neutral to other devicesCompatible, neutral to other devicesCompatible, neutral to other devices
Materials of ConstructionCoated Aluminum Housing and ABS Plastic Fascia, Insulation, Glass micro fiber filter media, coconut shell carbonStainless Steel Housing, Insulation, Glass micro fiber filter media, granular activated carbonPowder-Coated Aluminum Housing, ABS -PC Plastic Fascia, Insulation, Glass micro fiber filter media, granular activated carbon
Maximum Flow RateUp to 25 CFMUp to 60 CFMUp to 30 CFM
Filter EfficiencyULPA Filter Efficiency of 99.9995% at 0.12 microns or greater99.99995% at 0.12 microns99.999% at 0.1 to 0.2 microns
Device Mechanism of ActionVacuum source with a mechanical means of filtrationVacuum source with a mechanical means of filtrationVacuum source with a mechanical means of filtration
Air Flow PathThrough Vacuum hose or tubing, into a filter, then vacuum motor, and vented into the roomThrough Vacuum hose or tubing, into a filter, then vacuum motor, and vented into the roomThrough Vacuum hose or tubing, into a filter, then vacuum motor, and vented into the room
Filter LifeUp to 35 hours25 Hours filter lifeUp to 35 hours (Laparoscopic Mode), 18 hours (Open Mode)
Human FactorsUsed by surgeons and trained health care professionalsUsed by surgeons and trained health care professionalsUsed by surgeons and trained health care professionals
Electrical SafetyIEC 60601-1 tested and compliantTested and Compliant to IEC 60601-1:1990Tested and Compliant to IEC 60601-1 and IEC 60601-1-2
Mechanical SafetyTested and compliant per IEC60601-1 for mechanical safetyTested and compliant per IEC60601-1 for mechanical safetyTested and compliant per IEC60601-1 for mechanical safety
Chemical SafetyNeutral pH, non-patient contactNeutral pH, non-patient contactNeutral pH, non-patient contact
Thermal SafetyOperation of the device does not result in harmful temperatures, tested and compliant per IEC60601-1Operation of the device does not result in harmful temperatures, tested and compliant per IEC60601-1Operation of the device does not result in harmful temperatures, tested and compliant per IEC60601-1
Radiation SafetyNon-radioactiveNon-radioactiveNon-radioactive
Laparoscopic Smoke Evacuation VerificationNot explicitly detailed, but implied by intended useNot explicitly detailed, but implied by intended useConfirmed effectiveness at clearing smoke while not reducing the pneumoperitoneum
Software Verification (for filter life decrementing)Not explicitly detailed, but implied by predicate filter lifeNot explicitly detailed, but implied by predicate filter lifeConfirmed the effectiveness of this feature to limit the filter use to only the intended life.

Study Details

The document describes bench testing for verification and validation to demonstrate substantial equivalence to predicate devices, rather than a clinical study involving patients or human readers.

  1. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance:

    • The document primarily refers to "bench testing" and does not specify a "test set" in terms of patient data or clinical images. It implies testing of the device itself and its components.
    • Data provenance is not explicitly stated in terms of country of origin, but the company, Buffalo Filter LLC, is based in Lancaster, NY, USA. The testing appears to be "retrospective" in the sense that it's based on engineering tests rather than prospective patient recruitment.
  2. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:

    • This is not applicable as the "ground truth" for this device's performance is established through objective engineering measurements (e.g., flow rate, filter efficiency, safety standards compliance) rather than expert interpretation of data.
  3. Adjudication method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set:

    • Not applicable, as this was not a study involving human interpretation or adjudication of results.
  4. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:

    • Not applicable. This device is a smoke evacuation system and does not involve AI or human readers for diagnostic interpretation.
  5. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:

    • Not applicable. The device is a physical system, not an algorithm. Its performance is inherent to its physical design and operation.
  6. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.):

    • The "ground truth" is defined by established engineering and regulatory standards for air handling devices and smoke evacuator performance. This includes:
      • ULPA efficiency standards: 99.999% for particle sizes of 0.1 to 0.2 microns or greater.
      • Flow rate measurements: Minimum 5 LPM (Laparoscopic Mode) to 30 CFM (Open Mode).
      • Filter life: 35 hours (Laparoscopic Mode), 18 hours (Open Mode).
      • Electrical safety standards: IEC/ANSI/AAMI 60601-1 and IEC/ANSI/AAMI 60601-1-2.
      • Mechanical safety standards: IEC/ANSI/AAMI 60601-1.
      • Software functionality: Verification that the filter life decrementing feature works as intended.
      • Smoke removal effectiveness: Quantified ability to remove smoke aerosols.
  7. The sample size for the training set:

    • Not applicable. This refers to a physical device, not a machine learning algorithm that requires a training set.
  8. How the ground truth for the training set was established:

    • Not applicable. See point 7.

§ 878.5070 Air-handling apparatus for a surgical operating room.

(a)
Identification. Air-handling apparatus for a surgical operating room is a device intended to produce a directed, nonturbulent flow of air that has been filtered to remove particulate matter and microorganisms to provide an area free of contaminants to reduce the possibility of infection in the patient.(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls). The device, when it is an air handling bench apparatus, an air handling room apparatus, or an air handling enclosure apparatus, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 878.9.