(167 days)
The Philips Respironics SimplyClear device promotes airway clearance by gradually applying air pulse generated high frequency oscillatory vibrations on the positive and negative pressures applied to the chest wall via the airways. The high frequency oscillatory vibrations release mucus from the bronchial walls, increasing mobilization. The shift in pressure produces a high expiratory flow from the lungs, promoting the clearance of the mobilized secretions via coughing.
The Philips Respironics SimplyClear device may be used either with a facemask or mouthpiece, or with an adapter to a patient's endotracheal or tracheostomy tube. It is for use on adult or pediatric patients having difficulty with secretion clearance and/or inability to cough.
The SimplyClear device is for use in a hospital, institutional environment or in the home.
The Philips Respironics SimplyClear device promotes airway clearance by loosening, mobilizing and clearing secretions. The loosening and mobilization occurs by gradually applying air pulse generated high frequency oscillatory vibrations on the positive and negative pressures applied to the chest wall via the airways. The high frequency oscillatory vibrations release mucus from the bronchial walls, increasing mobilization. The positive to negative shift in pressure produces a high expiratory flow from the lungs, promoting the clearance of the mobilized secretions via coughing.
The SimplyClear device combines the loosening and mobilization functionality of the Vest Airway Clearance System (K024309) with the secretion clearance functionality of the CoughAssist device (K002598), Dima Italia Negavent DA-3 Plus Pegaso (K072292) and the CoughAssist T70 device (K121955).
Here's a breakdown of the acceptance criteria and the study information for the Philips Respironics SimplyClear device, based on the provided text:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The document does not explicitly present a table of quantitative acceptance criteria with corresponding performance results in the format requested. Instead, it describes various "performance testing" and "verification activities" against "design input specifications" and "product requirements." The acceptance criteria are broadly implied by the successful completion of these tests.
However, based on the Testing Summary table and the Performance Data section, we can infer the tested features and their successful verification:
| Device Feature | Acceptance Criteria (Implied) | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|---|
| User Interface | Meet product requirements; proper display functions, user controls, and informational messages; display correct data and therapy information. | Verified to meet product requirements. All display functions, user controls, and informational messages performed as intended. Displayed proper data and expected therapy information. |
| Delivered Pressure & Flow Stability | Deliver accurate pressure for intended duration (insufflation, exsufflation, pause); demonstrate pressure and flow stability across all patient test cases, including extreme flow rates and sensor malfunctions. | Verified to deliver accurate pressure for the intended duration. Demonstrated pressure and flow stability across all patient test cases, including extreme flow rates and sensor malfunctions (inaccuracies and/or complete drop out). |
| CoughTrak | Meet product specifications with defined patient case simulations; availability, operation, and triggering performance across patient cases. | Verified to meet product specifications with each defined patient case simulation. Availability, operation, and triggering performance verified across the range of patient cases. |
| Oscillations | Meet product specifications; bench testing at extreme therapy settings (waveform testing on maximum duration, extreme settings). | Verified to meet product specifications. Bench testing at extreme therapy settings conducted, including waveform testing on maximum duration of therapy at extreme therapy settings. Oscillations waveforms compared against predicate device waveforms with no oscillations. |
| Data Management | Meet product specifications for SD card data integrity. | Verified to meet product specifications for SD card data integrity through software verification, code reviews, and software verification testing. |
| Oximetry Accessory | Proper display of SpO2 and heart rate data received. | Tested to verify the behavior of pulse oximetry data and proper display of data received. |
| Wired Remote Control | Availability and operation of the device. | Verification testing conducted to verify availability and operation. |
| External Suctioning Accessory Interface | Provide power to a suctioning accessory as specified. | Verified to demonstrate that the device provides power to a suctioning accessory as specified. |
| Power Management | Properly interface with detachable battery; display battery information; charge battery; indicate low battery; compatible with external DC power supply; display power supply information; indicate low external battery. | Verified to properly interface with the detachable battery, properly display battery information, properly charge the battery, and indicate a low battery charge. Verified to be compatible with an external DC power supply, to properly display the power supply information, and to properly indicate a low external battery. |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
- Sample Size: Not explicitly stated as a number of devices or patient cases. The testing involved "defined patient test cases" but the quantity isn't specified.
- Data Provenance: The study was a non-clinical bench testing study. It used simulated patient test cases and "worst-case scenario inputs" rather than actual patient data. Therefore, there's no country of origin for patient data (as none was used) and it is not retrospective or prospective in the human-subjects sense.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts
Not applicable. This was a non-clinical bench testing study where "ground truth" was established by the device's design input specifications and expected performance, rather than expert interpretation of patient data.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
Not applicable. As a non-clinical bench testing study, there was no need for adjudication by experts to establish a ground truth. Performance was assessed against predefined engineering specifications.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was Done, If So, What Was the Effect Size of How Much Human Readers Improve with AI vs Without AI Assistance
Not applicable. This device is a powered percussor for airway clearance, not an AI-assisted diagnostic or interpretation tool that would involve human readers.
6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done
Yes, in a way. The "performance data" describes standalone validation of the device's algorithms and hardware performance against specifications using "black-box" and "white-box" bench testing. This confirms the algorithm and system's functional integrity independent of a human operator's assessment of patient outcomes during therapy, although a human is operating the device.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
The "ground truth" for this non-clinical testing was based on the device's design input specifications and product requirements. This would include engineering specifications for pressure, flow, timing, oscillation parameters, user interface functionality, data integrity, and power management.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
Not applicable. This document describes a traditional medical device (hardware and embedded software) verification and validation process, not a machine learning or artificial intelligence (AI) device that would involve a "training set" for an algorithm. The software algorithms were designed and tested, not "trained" on data.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
Not applicable, as no training set was used.
{0}------------------------------------------------
K 122111
Philips Respironics SimplyClear
Premarket Notification -- Abbreviated 510(k)
Section 5.0 510(k) Summary
DEC 3 1 2012
Administrative Information and Device Identification
| Name and address of the | Manufacturer: |
|---|---|
| manufacturer and sponsor of the | |
| 510(k) submission: | Respironics, Inc. |
| 175 Chastain Meadows Court | |
| Kennesaw, GA 30144-3714 | |
| Office: (770) 423-2322 | |
| Fax: (770) 423-2300 | |
| Sponsor: | |
| Respironics | |
| 1740 Golden Mile Highway | |
| Monroeville, PA 15146 | |
| Office: 724-387-7562 | |
| Fax: 724-387-7490 | |
| FDA registration number of the | Manufacturer: 1040777 (Establishment |
| manufacturer of the new device: | registration number) |
| Sponsor: 2518422 (Establishment registration | |
| number) | |
| Official contact person for all | Colleen Witt, RAC |
| correspondence: | Senior Regulatory Affairs Engineer |
| Philips Respironics | |
| 1740 Golden Mile Highway | |
| Monroeville, PA 15146 | |
| Office: 724-387-4870 | |
| Fax: 724-387-7490 | |
| Email: colleen.witt(@)philips.com | |
| Date Prepared: | July 16, 2012 |
| Device Name: | Philips Respironics SimplyClear Device |
| Proprietary name of new device: | Philips Respironics SimplyClear Device |
| Common or usual name of the | Percussor, Powered-Electric |
| device: | |
| Philips/Respironics model number: | Philips Respironics SimplyClear Device |
| Classification of new device: | Class II |
| Classification of the predicate | Class II |
| device: | |
| Classification Panel: | Anesthesiology |
| Panel Code: | BYI - powered percussor |
| NHJ - noncontinuous ventilator (IPPB) |
{1}------------------------------------------------
| CFR Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 868.5665 |
|---|---|
| a) Identification. A powered percussor is a | |
| device that is intended to transmit vibration | |
| through a patient's chest wall to aid in freeing | |
| mucus deposits in the lung in order to improve | |
| bronchial drainage and that may be powered by | |
| electricity or compressed gas | |
| (b) Classification. Class II (performancestandards). | |
| Predicate Device Name(s) and510(k) numbers: | Modified Vest Airway™ Clearance System -K024309 |
| Emerson CoughAssist, Model CA-3000 -K002598 | |
| Dima Italia Negavent DA-3 Plus Pegaso -K072292 | |
| Philips Respironics CoughAssist T70 - K121955 | |
| Reason for submission: | New Device |
Description of Device:
The Philips Respironics SimplyClear device promotes airway clearance by loosening, mobilizing and clearing secretions. The loosening and mobilization occurs by gradually applying air pulse generated high frequency oscillatory vibrations on the positive and negative pressures applied to the chest wall via the airways. The high frequency oscillatory vibrations release mucus from the bronchial walls, increasing mobilization. The positive to negative shift in pressure produces a high expiratory flow from the lungs, promoting the clearance of the mobilized secretions via coughing.
The SimplyClear device combines the loosening and mobilization functionality of the Vest Airway Clearance System (K024309) with the secretion clearance functionality of the CoughAssist device (K002598), Dima Italia Negavent DA-3 Plus Pegaso (K072292) and the CoughAssist T70 device (K121955).
The key benefits of this device are:
- Oscillations .
- Simplicity of Use .
-
Common User Interface across product platforms
-
{2}------------------------------------------------
Philips Respironics SimplyClear
- Triggering adjustments (Cough-Trak)
-
Data storage, transfer and reporting (DirectView and Encore)
- Portability ●
-
Maintains patient lifestyle
-
Smaller size and decreased weight
-
- Accessory Options ●
-
Oximetry Accessory ·
-
Remote Control Accessory (foot pedal)
-
External Suctioning Accessory Interface
-
- Power Management Options
-
Detachable battery
-
External DC battery
-
Universal Battery pack
-
Statement of Intended Use:
The Philips Respironics SimplyClear device assists patients in loosening, mobilizing and clearing secretions by providing high frequency oscillatory vibrations while gradually applying a positive pressure to the airway, then rapidly shifting to a negative pressure. The oscillatory vibrations assist in loosening and mobilizing the secretions while the rapid shift in pressure produces a high expiratory flow rate from the lungs, which promotes the clearance of secretions.
Indications for Use:
The SimplyClear device may be used either with a facemask or mouthpiece, or with an adapter to a patient's endotracheal or tracheostomy tube. It is for use on adult or pediatric patients having difficulty with secretion clearance and/or inability to cough. The SimplyClear device is for use in a hospital. institutional environment or in the home.
Comparison of Device Technological Characteristics to Predicate Device
Substantial Equivalence
The submitted SimplyClear device has the following similarities to the predicate devices listed in this submission which previously received 510(k) concurrence; the SimplyClear device:
- Has the same intended use, .
- . Uses the same operating principle,
- Incorporates the same basic system requirements including, but not limited to: physical . interfaces; modes of operation; therapy controls; and
- Incorporates similar materials ●
- Is manufactured utilizing the same manufacturing processes .
{3}------------------------------------------------
The table below summarizes the key technical characteristics between the SimplyClear device to those of the predicate devices listed in the submission:
| Technological | SimplyClear | The Vest | Emerson | Negavent DA-3 | CoughAssist T70 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristic | Airway | CoughAssist | Plus Pegaso | ||
| Clearance | |||||
| System | |||||
| Patient | Adult or | Adult and | Adult or | Adult or | Adult or pediatric |
| Population | pediatric | pediatric | pediatric patient | pediatric patient | patient unable to |
| patients having | patients with | with an | unable to cough | cough or clear | |
| difficulty with | evidence or | ineffective | or clear | secretions | |
| secretion | suggestion of | cough due to | secretions effectively | effectively | |
| clearance | retained | muscular | effectively | ||
| and/or inability | secretions, | dystrophy, | |||
| to cough. | evidence that | myasthenia | |||
| the patient is | gravis, | ||||
| having | poliomyelitis, or | ||||
| difficulty withsecretion | other neurologicdisorder with | ||||
| clearance or | some paralysis | ||||
| presence of | of the | ||||
| atelectasis | respiratory | ||||
| caused by | muscles, such as | ||||
| mucus | spinal cord | ||||
| plugging. | injury. | ||||
| Delivery Type | Non Invasive | Non-Invasive,Inflatable Vest | Non Invasive orInvasive | Non Invasive orInvasive | Non Invasive orInvasive |
| Modes of | Manual and | Auto | Manual and | Manual and Auto | Manual and Auto |
| Operation | Auto | Auto | |||
| Inhalation | 0 to 70 cmH2O | Pressuresetting 1-10 | 0 to 60 cmH2O | +5 to 70 cmH2O | 0 to 70 cmH2O |
| Pressure | |||||
| Exhalation | 0 to -70 | Pressuresetting 1-10 | 0 to -60 cmH2O | -5 to -70 cmH2O | 0 to -70 cmH2O |
| Pressure | cmH2O | ||||
| Inhale Flow | Low, Medium,High | N/A | Low and High | Low, Medium,High | Low, Medium,High |
| Pause Time | 0 to 5 seconds | N/A | 0 to 5 seconds | 0.1 - 9.9 seconds | 0 to 5 seconds |
| Phases of | Insufflation,Exsufflation,Pause | N/A | Insufflation,Exsufflation,Pause | Insufflation,Exsufflation,Pause | Insufflation,Exsufflation,Pause |
| Therapy Features | CoughTrak,Oscillations | Oscillations | N/A | N/A | CoughTrak |
| Software | DynamicStabilityAnalysisFlow andPressure BasedOscillationDetectionExtreme FlowRate Controland ResponseSensorMalfunctionStability | N/A | N/A | N/A | DynamicStability AnalysisFlow andPressure BasedOscillationDetectionExtreme FlowRate Control andResponseSensorMalfunctionStability |
| Oscillations | 1 to 20 cmH2O | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Amplitude | |||||
| OscillationFrequency | 0 to 20 Hz | 5 to 20 cyclesper second(Hz) | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Remote DataAccess | A securedigital (SD)card providesmeans for dataaccess | N/A | N/A | A secure digital(SD) cardprovides meansfor data access |
Tab 5 Page 4 of 8
·
{4}------------------------------------------------
The table below provides a description of the features of the SimplyClear device that are the subject of this 510(k) submission:
| Device Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| User Interface | A new graphical user interface with hierarchal menu system |
| Delivered Pressure | The device Inhale pressure is 0 to 70 cmH2O and Exhale pressure is 0 to -70 cmH2O |
| CoughTrak | A feature for patients who can provide a spontaneous breathing effort to triggerthe cough sequence, instead of using manual or auto modes of therapy. Thissoftware feature monitors the device outlet pressure and initiates the Insufflationphase of therapy delivery when the pressure decreases below a set thresholdindicative of patient effort. |
| Oscillations | A feature that delivers an oscillation on the pressure signal based on frequencyand amplitude set points |
| Displayed TherapyParameters · | The device displays outlet pressure, measured peak cough flow and measuredinhaled tidal volume |
| Data Management | Therapy data will be stored on an SD card, which will be compatible with bothDirectView and Encore |
| Oximetry Accessory | Device shall interface with the Oximetry accessory to display current SpO2 andheart rate data received from the oximeter |
| Wired Remote Control | A remote control accessory (foot pedal) is provided to initiate manual therapy bymeans of a wired remote control interface |
| External SuctioningAccessory Interface | Device shall provide a DC output intended to power an external suctioningaccessory |
| Power Management | Options include a Detachable battery, External DC battery and Universal Batterypack |
The software design and algorithm descriptions for each of these features of the SimplyClear device have been provided as part of this 510(k) submission.
Performance Data
Non-Clinical Testing
Black-box performance testing was conducted for the SimplyClear device using side by side bench testing methodologies to demonstrate that the SimplyClear device performs to design input specifications and is equivalent to the predicate devices. This bench testing included both open and closed loop conditions from the defined patient test cases to verify that the SimplyClear software algorithms performed to specification. Bench testing conducted for the SimplyClear device characterized the types of worst case scenario inputs that would be experienced in the intended use environment such as extreme flow rates. Additional white-box
{5}------------------------------------------------
testing verified proper operation under conditions of sensor malfunctions and inaccurate or complete sensor dropout. This combination of testing demonstrated that the SimplyClear devices' closed loop control algorithms function safely and effectively under worst case scenarios.
Device Testing Summary
Verification activities have been performed to verify that the device features stated above did not affect the safety and effectiveness of the subject device. This included bench testing, software unit testing and code reviews. A control system analysis was completed and submitted as part of this 510(k) submission.
The table below provides a summary of the testing that was conducted on the features of the Philips Respironics SimplyClear device that are the subject of this 510(k) submission:
| Device Feature | Testing Summary |
|---|---|
| User Interface includingdisplayed therapyparameters | Has been verified to meet product requirements defined for the SimplyClear UI. Bench testing, code reviews and software unit testing was performed to ensure that all display functions, user controls and informational messages performed as intended. The User Interface was verified to ensure that it displayed the proper data and expected therapy information. |
| Delivered Pressure andFlow Stability | Verification testing has verified that the SimplyClear device delivers accurate pressure for the intended duration of the insufflation, exsufflation and pause phases of therapy. The SimplyClear device has been verified to demonstrate pressure and flow stability across all patient test cases, including extreme flow rates and sensor malfunctions (i.e. sensor inaccuracies and / or complete sensor drop out). |
| CoughTrak | The CoughTrak feature of the SimplyClear device has been verified to meet product specifications with each defined patient case simulation. The availability, operation and triggering performance has been verified to operate across the range of patient cases. |
| Oscillations | The Oscillation feature of the SimplyClear device has been verified to meet product specifications. Bench testing at extreme therapy settings has been provided, which includes waveform testing conducted on maximum duration of therapy at extreme therapy settings. Oscillation waveforms were also compared against the predicate device waveforms with no oscillations. |
| Data Management | Data management of the SimplyClear device has been verified to meet product specifications for SD card data integrity. Software verification, including code reviews and software verification testing was conducted to verify the expected results with the SD card. |
| Oximetry Accessory | The Oximetry Accessory has been tested to verify the behavior of the pulse oximetry data and the proper display of data received by the oximetry accessory. |
| Wired Remote Control | Verification testing has been conducted to verify the availability and operation of the SimplyClear wired remote control device. |
| External SuctioningAccessory Interface | The SimplyClear device has been verified to demonstrate that the device provides power to a suctioning accessory as specified. |
| Power Management | The SimplyClear device has been verified to properly interface with the |
{6}------------------------------------------------
| detachable battery, properly display the battery information, properly |
|---|
| charge the battery and indicate a low battery charge. The SimplyClear |
| device has also been verified to be compatible with an external DC power |
| supply, to properly display the power supply information and to properly |
| indicate a low external battery. |
Standards Evaluation
This device has been tested to appropriate ISO, ASTM, and IEC standards and other applicable requirements passing all test protocols. The Philips Respironics SimplyClear device was designed and tested according to:
-
ISO 14971 Medical devices - Application of risk management to medical devices
-
ISO 10993-1 Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process
-
IEC 60601-1 Medical Electrical Equipment - Part 1: General Requirements of Safety
-
IEC 60601-1-2 Medical Electrical Equipment -- Part 1-2: Electromagnetic Compatibility
-
- IEC 60601-1-6 Medical Electrical Equipment Part 1-6: Usability
-
IEC 60068 Environmental Testing (Part 2-6, 2-27, 2-64): Mechanical Vibration and Shock Resistance testing
-
IEC 62304 Medical device software - Software life cycle processes
The SimplyClear device complies with the applicable requirements referenced in the FDA guidance documents:
- FDA's Draft Reviewer Guidance for Premarket Notification Submissions -. Anesthesiology and Respiratory Devices Branch: Division of Cardiovascular. Respiratory, and Neurological Devices (November 1993); and
- FDA "Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices" (May 11, 2005).
As suggested by FDA's November 1993 publication entitled "Reviewer Guidance for Premarket Notification Submissions - Anesthesiology and Respiratory Devices Branch: Division of Cardiovascular, Respiratory, and Neurological Devices" the Philips Respironics SimplyClear device was tested in accordance with the applicable voluntary standards. The Philips Respironics SimplyClear met the required performance criteria and functioned as intended.
Conclusion
The SimplyClear device that is the subject of this 510(k) submission has been validated using non-clinical tests and has been determined to be substantially equivalent to the predicate devices. In summary, bench testing (black-box and white-box) and software code reviews have
{7}------------------------------------------------
Philips Respironics SimplyClear
confirmed that the SimplyClear device performs equivalently to the cited predicate devices. The indications for use, technological characteristics, and principles of operation are similar to the predicate devices. The Philips Respironics SimplyClear device is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices listed in this summary and the new device does not raise any new issues of safety and effectiveness.
{8}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/8/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized symbol that resembles an abstract caduceus or a series of waving lines, representing health and human services.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
December 31, 2012
Ms. Colleen Witt, RAC Senior Regulatory Affairs Engineer Respironics 1740 Golden Mile Highway MONROEVILLE PA 15146
Re: K122111
Trade/Device Name: Phillips Respironics SimplyClear Regulation Number: 21 CFR 868.5665 Regulation Name: Powered Percussor Regulatory Class: II Product Code: BYI, NHJ Dated: December 28, 2012 Received: December 31, 2012
Dear Ms. Witt:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration. Iisting of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{9}------------------------------------------------
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH/CDRHOffices/ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Kwame O. Ulmer
Anthony D. Watson, B.S., M.S., M.B.A. Director
Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Respiratory, Infection Control and
. Dental Devices
Office of Device Evaluation
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{10}------------------------------------------------
Philips Respironics SimplyClear
Section 4.0 Indications for Use
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Device Name: Philips Respironics SimplyClear
The Philips Respironics SimplyClear device promotes airway clearance by gradually applying air pulse generated high frequency oscillatory vibrations on the positive and negative pressures applied to the chest wall via the airways. The high frequency oscillatory vibrations release mucus from the bronchial walls, increasing mobilization. The shift in pressure produces a high expiratory flow from the lungs, promoting the clearance of the mobilized secretions via coughing.
The Philips Respironics SimplyClear device may be used either with a facemask or mouthpiece, or with an adapter to a patient's endotracheal or tracheostomy tube. It is for use on adult or pediatric patients having difficulty with secretion clearance and/or inability to cough.
The SimplyClear device is for use in a hospital, institutional environment or in the home.
Prescription Use X (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
:
. . . . . .
AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 807 Subpart C)
| (PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF | |
|---|---|
| NEEDED) |
| Paul H. Shin -S | For L.S. |
|---|---|
| 2012.12.31 11:39:21 | |
| -05'00' | Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE) |
| (Division Sign-Off)Division of Anesthesiology, General HospitalInfection Control, Dental Devices | Page 1 of 1 |
K122111 510(k) Number:
§ 868.5665 Powered percussor.
(a)
Identification. A powered percussor is a device that is intended to transmit vibration through a patient's chest wall to aid in freeing mucus deposits in the lung in order to improve bronchial drainage and that may be powered by electricity or compressed gas.(b)
Classification. Class II (performance standards).