(211 days)
The Equinoxe Shoulder System is indicated for use in skeletally mature individuals with degenerative diseases or fractures of the glenohumeral joint where total or hemi- arthroplasty is determined by the surgeon to be the preferred method of treatment.
The cemented primary humeral stem, long/revision stem, fracture stems and all Equinoxe glenoids are intended for cemented fixation.
The press-fit humeral stems are intended for press-fit applications but may be used with bone cement at the discretion the surgeon.
The reverse humeral components are intended to be used in cemented applications or in revision cases when the humeral component is well-fixed/stable, as deemed by the orthopaedic surgeon.
Humeral Heads are intended for use in cemented and press-fit applications.
Clinical indications for the PRIMARY (P), LONG/REVISION (L), and FRACTURE (F) humeral components are as follows:
Rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, osteonecrosis or post-traumatic degenerative problems
Congenital abnormalities in the skeletally mature
Primary and secondary necrosis of the humeral head.
Humeral head fracture with displacement of the tuberosities
Pathologies where arthrodesis or resectional arthroplasty of the humeral head are not acceptable
Revisions of humeral prostheses when other treatments or devices have failed (where adequate fixation can be achieved)
Displaced three-part and four-part upper humeral fractures
Spiral and other fractures of the mid-humerus (in combination with glenohumeral degenerative diseases)
Revision of failed previous reconstructions when distal anchorage is required
To restore mobility from previous procedures (e.g. previous fusion)
The Equinoxe Reverse Shoulder System is indicated for use in skeletally mature individuals with degenerative diseases of the glenohumeral joint and a grossly deficient, irreparable rotator cuff. The Equinoxe Reverse Shoulder is also indicated for a failed glenohumeral joint replacement with loss of rotator cuff function resulting in superior migration of the humeral head.
The Equinoxe Platform Fracture Stem is indicated for use in skeletally mature individuals with acute fracture of the proximal humerus and displacement of the tuberosities, displaced 3- and 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus (hemi-arthroplasty), or acute fracture of the proximal humerus with failure of the glenohumeral joint (primary total shoulder arthroplasty). The Equinoxe Platform Fracture Stem is also indicated for acute fracture of the proximal humerus in combination with degenerative diseases of the glenohumeral joint and a grossly deficient, irreparable rotator cuff resulting in superior migration of the humeral head (reverse total shoulder arthroplasty). The Equinoxe Platform Fracture Stem is indicated for cemented use only.
This submission proposes an increase in the angled surface from 12° to 16°, relative to the 12° posterior augment pegged glenoid devices previously cleared via 510(k) K111379. The proposed Exactech Equinoxe Posterior Augment Glenoids are intended to be used with Equinoxe shoulder system components described in #K042021, #K061454, #K093430, #K103419, and #K111379.
The provided text describes a Special 510(k) for the Exactech® Equinoxe® UHMWPE 16° Posterior Augment Pegged Glenoids™, which is a modification of a previously cleared device (Exactech Equinoxe UHMWPE 12 Degree Posterior Augment Pegged Glenoid, K111379). The primary change is an increase in the angled surface from 12° to 16°.
Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and study information based on the provided text:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
Acceptance Criteria (What was measured) | Reported Device Performance (Result) |
---|---|
Mechanical Stability (Dynamic Evaluation of Glenoid Loosening or Disassociation) (via ASTM F2028) | Demonstrated safety and effectiveness, supporting substantial equivalence to the predicate device. (Specific quantitative values not provided) |
Cyclic Shear Strength | Demonstrated safety and effectiveness, supporting substantial equivalence to the predicate device. (Specific quantitative values not provided) |
Shear Load to Failure | Demonstrated safety and effectiveness, supporting substantial equivalence to the predicate device. (Specific quantitative values not provided) |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
The document does not specify the sample size (number of devices or tests) used for the mechanical testing.
The data provenance is from non-clinical performance data (laboratory testing) conducted by the manufacturer, Exactech Inc. It is not patient data (retrospective or prospective) and thus has no country of origin in the clinical sense.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts
This information is not applicable as the study described is a non-clinical, mechanical testing study, not a clinical study involving expert interpretation of patient data.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
This information is not applicable as there was no expert review or adjudication of clinical data. The study was mechanical testing.
5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study
A multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was not performed. This was a non-clinical mechanical testing study to demonstrate substantial equivalence of a modified medical device.
6. Standalone (Algorithm Only Without Human-in-the-Loop Performance) Study
This information is not applicable as the device is a physical implant, not an AI algorithm. Therefore, "standalone" performance in the context of an algorithm is irrelevant.
7. Type of Ground Truth Used
The "ground truth" for this study was established through recognized industry standard test methods (ASTM F2028) for evaluating the mechanical properties of glenoid components. This standard defines the criteria for what constitutes acceptable mechanical behavior.
8. Sample Size for the Training Set
This information is not applicable as the device is not an AI algorithm and therefore does not have a "training set."
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
This information is not applicable as the device is not an AI algorithm and therefore does not have a "training set" or ground truth established for one.
§ 888.3660 Shoulder joint metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis.
(a)
Identification. A shoulder joint metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a shoulder joint. The device limits translation and rotation in one or more planes via the geometry of its articulating surfaces. It has no linkage across-the-joint. This generic type of device includes prostheses that have a humeral resurfacing component made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, and a glenoid resurfacing component made of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene, and is limited to those prostheses intended for use with bone cement (§ 888.3027).(b)
Classification. Class II. The special controls for this device are:(1) FDA's:
(i) “Use of International Standard ISO 10993 ‘Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices—Part I: Evaluation and Testing,’ ”
(ii) “510(k) Sterility Review Guidance of 2/12/90 (K90-1),”
(iii) “Guidance Document for Testing Orthopedic Implants with Modified Metallic Surfaces Apposing Bone or Bone Cement,”
(iv) “Guidance Document for the Preparation of Premarket Notification (510(k)) Application for Orthopedic Devices,” and
(v) “Guidance Document for Testing Non-articulating, ‘Mechanically Locked’ Modular Implant Components,”
(2) International Organization for Standardization's (ISO):
(i) ISO 5832-3:1996 “Implants for Surgery—Metallic Materials—Part 3: Wrought Titanium 6-aluminum 4-vandium Alloy,”
(ii) ISO 5832-4:1996 “Implants for Surgery—Metallic Materials—Part 4: Cobalt-chromium-molybdenum casting alloy,”
(iii) ISO 5832-12:1996 “Implants for Surgery—Metallic Materials—Part 12: Wrought Cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloy,”
(iv) ISO 5833:1992 “Implants for Surgery—Acrylic Resin Cements,”
(v) ISO 5834-2:1998 “Implants for Surgery—Ultra-high Molecular Weight Polyethylene—Part 2: Moulded Forms,”
(vi) ISO 6018:1987 “Orthopaedic Implants—General Requirements for Marking, Packaging, and Labeling,” and
(vii) ISO 9001:1994 “Quality Systems—Model for Quality Assurance in Design/Development, Production, Installation, and Servicing,” and
(3) American Society for Testing and Materials':
(i) F 75-92 “Specification for Cast Cobalt-28 Chromium-6 Molybdenum Alloy for Surgical Implant Material,”
(ii) F 648-98 “Specification for Ultra-High-Molecular-Weight Polyethylene Powder and Fabricated Form for Surgical Implants,”
(iii) F 799-96 “Specification for Cobalt-28 Chromium-6 Molybdenum Alloy Forgings for Surgical Implants,”
(iv) F 1044-95 “Test Method for Shear Testing of Porous Metal Coatings,”
(v) F 1108-97 “Specification for Titanium-6 Aluminum-4 Vanadium Alloy Castings for Surgical Implants,”
(vi) F 1147-95 “Test Method for Tension Testing of Porous Metal,”
(vii) F 1378-97 “Standard Specification for Shoulder Prosthesis,” and
(viii) F 1537-94 “Specification for Wrought Cobalt-28 Chromium-6 Molybdenum Alloy for Surgical Implants.”