(59 days)
The device absorbs and diffuses the light transmitted through the cable in order to prevent patient burns and igniting flammable items in the surgical suite.
The CableCap device attaches to the distal end of high intensity light cables. The device absorbs and diffuses the light transmitted through the cable in order to prevent patient burns and igniting flammable items in the surgical suite.
There are three separate models made for the three types of light cables:
Here's an analysis of the provided text regarding the SensorMed CableCap™ 510(k) submission, outlining acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets those criteria:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
| Acceptance Criteria (Inferred from Test Objective) | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|
| Prevent patient burns | Maximum device temperature of 95 °F after 60 minutes of contact. |
| Prevent igniting flammable items | Maximum device temperature of 95 °F after 60 minutes of contact. |
| Maintain temperature well below standard for patient contact | 95 °F is "well below the standard" (specific standard not provided but implied to be higher than 95°F for patient contact safety). |
| Safe for extended use (at least 30 minutes) | Tested for 60 minutes, remaining at 95 °F. |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
- Sample Size: Not explicitly stated as a numerical 'sample size' in terms of units tested. The text mentions "test runs" and a "report included in the testing section." It doesn't specify if one device was tested multiple times, or if multiple devices were tested.
- Data Provenance: The testing was conducted by "Materials, Engineering, and Testing Corp. located in Oak Ridge, TN." This indicates the data is from a U.S.-based, independent testing lab. The study appears to be prospective bench-top testing specifically designed to evaluate the safety of the CableCap.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth for the Test Set and Their Qualifications
- Not Applicable. The ground truth for this device's performance is objective physical measurements (temperature). No human experts were used to establish a subjective "ground truth" for the test set. The acceptance criteria themselves (e.g., maximum safe temperature) would be derived from established medical device safety standards, which are developed by experts and regulatory bodies, but no specific number or qualification of experts is mentioned for this particular test.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
- Not Applicable. As the ground truth was objective physical measurement (temperature), there was no need for expert adjudication.
5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study
- No. This device (CableCap) is a physical accessory designed to reduce heat from a surgical light cable. Its performance is evaluated through objective physical measurements related to temperature, not through human interpretation of medical images or data. Therefore, an MRMC study comparing human readers with and without AI assistance is irrelevant and was not conducted.
6. Standalone (Algorithm Only Without Human-in-the-Loop Performance) Study
- Yes, in essence. The performance testing described is of the device itself (the "algorithm" in this context being the device's physical heat-dissipating properties) without any human interaction influencing its core function or measurement during the test. The device's ability to absorb and diffuse light to prevent heat buildup was tested in a standalone, bench-top environment.
7. Type of Ground Truth Used
- Objective Physical Measurements: The ground truth was established by direct measurement of the device's temperature under simulated "extreme scenarios" (contact with skin for 60 minutes). This is a physical, measurable outcome, not expert consensus, pathology, or patient outcomes data directly from a clinical trial.
8. Sample Size for the Training Set
- Not Applicable. This device is a passive physical accessory, not an AI/ML algorithm that requires a training set. The performance is determined by its design and material properties, not learned from data. Therefore, there is no training set.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
- Not Applicable. As there is no training set for this type of device, this question is not relevant.
{0}------------------------------------------------
K 113330
JAN 1 2 2012
510(k) Summary SensorMed CableCap™ 510(k) Number K401496 K | | 333 O Manufacturer Identification
SensorMed, Inc. Submitted by: 2450 EJ Chapman Dr., Suite 104 Knoxville, TN 37996 865-216-6307 Contact Information: William Milam VP of Engineering SensorMed, Inc. 2450 EJ Chapman Dr., Suite 104 Knoxville, TN 37996 865-216-6307 wmilam@sensormed.com October 10, 2011 Date Prepared: Device Identification Proprietary Name CableCap™
Common Name Light Cable Burn and Fire Prevention Device Classification Name Accessory to Fiberoptic Surgical Light Device Classification 21 CFR 878.4580 Proposed Regulatory Class Class II Device Product Code FST
Device Description
The CableCap device attaches to the distal end of high intensity light cables. The device absorbs and diffuses the light transmitted through the cable in order to prevent patient burns and igniting flammable items in the surgical suite.
There are three separate models made for the three types of light cables:
| LAND, IL MIN CHANNE RESERVED MENSIONALIN IN IN MININE & CONNUMER AN I. I. I CHINANCE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(-VInne. I T U BO B | And Acres of Cattle------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------100 000 0000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 |
|---|---|
| 1KY YY111 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1ﺮ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Accessful and successful and |
| amo | 087and the first of the first of theA STATE AND A BREAK A BALL A BALL A BALL A BALL A BALL A BALL A BALL A BALL A BALL A BALL A BALL A BALL A BALL A BALL A BALL A BALL A BALL A BALL A BALL A BALL A BALL A BALL |
| Acres Antiques Antiques A de AllerAll - American a------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
Intended Use of the Device
The device absorbs and diffuses the light transmitted through the cable in order to prevent patient burns and igniting flammable items in the surgical suite.
Predicate Device
SensorMed Reusable CableCap device (K101496)
Technology Comparison
{1}------------------------------------------------
Both devices are constructed from biocompatible plastics. Both are accessories to hight cables. Both devices attach to the distal end of light cables and modify the outgoing light stream to benefit minimally invasive surgical procedures. Please see the table below for a device comparison table.
| ReusableCableCap | DisposableCableCap | |
|---|---|---|
| Attenuates light from a medical light box | X | X |
| Diffuses light in multiple directions | X | X |
| Is manufactured from a combination of biocompatible plastic | X | X |
| Is autoclave-able | X | no |
| Improves surgical procedure for patient | X | X |
| Does not directly treat or diagnose patient | X | X |
| Works with multiple light sources and different intensities | X | X |
Performance Testing
Bench-top physical testing was performed by Materials, Engineering, and Testing Corp. located in Oak Ridge, TN. Their Accreditation number is 59214 and they are ISO/IEC 17025:2005 compliant. As an extreme scenario, we assumed that the device might remain in contact with a patient's skin for 30 minutes. As an extra precaution, we doubled this time to 60 minutes for test runs. As indicated in the report included in the testing section, the maximum temperature for the device was only 95 °F, which is still well below the standard.
Therefore, SensorMed is confident that the device temperature will not be a concern even if used for extended periods of time.
Conclusion
Verification and validation activities were conducted to establish the performance and safety characteristics of the CableCap. The results of these activities demonstrate that the CableCap is safe and effective when used in accordance with its intended use and labeling.
Therefore, CableCap is considered substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
{2}------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Image /page/2/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS). The logo consists of a circular seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES • USA" arranged around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized symbol resembling an abstract caduceus or a representation of human figures, with three curved lines forming a shape that suggests movement or flow.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Room-WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
SensorMed. Incorporated % Mr. William Milam Vice President of Engineering 2450 EJ Chapman Drive, Suite 104 Knoxville, Tennessee 37996
JAN 1 2 2012
Re: K113330
Trade/Device Name: CableCap Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.4580 Regulation Name: Surgical lamp Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: FST Dated: November 9, 2011 Received: November 14, 2011
Dear Mr. Milam:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you; however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set
{3}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Mr. William Milam
forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled. "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,//
for Dosh Cr
Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Surgical, Orthopedic and Restorative Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{4}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known):____ Kxxxxxx=1 | 33330 Device Name:_CableCap Indications For Use:
The device absorbs and diffuses the light transmitted through the cable in order to prevent patient burns and igniting flammable items in the surgical suite.
AND/OR Over-The-Counter Use __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Prescription Use × (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) (21 CFR 807 Subpart C) (PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Devices (OIVD)
Nyl RROh for mkin
(Division Sign-Off) Division of Surgical, Orthopedic, and Restorative Devices
. 510(k) Number K113330
§ 878.4580 Surgical lamp.
(a)
Identification. A surgical lamp (including a fixture) is a device intended to be used to provide visible illumination of the surgical field or the patient.(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls). The device, when it is an operating room lamp, a surgical instrument light, a surgical floor standing light, an endoscopic surgical light, a surgical light connector, a ceiling mounted surgical light, a surgical light carrier, surgical light accessories, a surgical lamp, a remote illuminator, or an incandescent surgical lamp, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 878.9.