(233 days)
Not Found
No
The description focuses on ultrasonic vibration for bone cutting and polishing, with no mention of AI/ML, image processing, or data-driven performance metrics.
Yes
The device is used for surgical procedures like osteotomy and osteoplasty, which are therapeutic interventions aimed at treating conditions or modifying anatomical structures.
No
The device is described as being used for surgical procedures like bone cutting and polishing using ultrasonic vibration, not for identifying a condition or disease.
No
The device description explicitly states it uses ultrasonic vibration supplied by electricity and water, indicating it is a hardware device, not software-only.
Based on the provided information, this device is not an IVD (In Vitro Diagnostic).
Here's why:
- Intended Use: The intended use is for surgical procedures (osteotomy, osteoplasty, periodontal surgery, and implantation) involving bone cutting and polishing. This is a direct surgical intervention on the patient's body.
- Device Description: The device description clearly states it's used for bone cutting and polishing during implant procedures using ultrasonic vibration. This is a physical action performed on the patient's tissue.
- Lack of IVD Characteristics: An IVD device is used to examine specimens derived from the human body (like blood, urine, tissue) to provide information for diagnosis, monitoring, or screening. This device does not interact with or analyze such specimens.
The device is a surgical tool used directly on the patient during a procedure, not for in vitro analysis of biological samples.
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
A device intended for use surgical procedure Including osteotomy, osteoplasty, Periodontal surgery and implantation
Product codes (comma separated list FDA assigned to the subject device)
DZI
Device Description
This product is a device using by purpose of bone cutting, polishing when operate implant for dentist's office using ultrasonic vibration because it is supplied electric and water in outside
Mentions image processing
Not Found
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found
Input Imaging Modality
Not Found
Anatomical Site
Not Found
Indicated Patient Age Range
Not Found
Intended User / Care Setting
dentist's office
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Summary of Performance Studies (study type, sample size, AUC, MRMC, standalone performance, key results)
Nonclinical Tests:
- Biocompatibility tests: in vitro cytotoxicity test, skin sensitization test and oral mucosa irritation test were conducted. No evidence of causing cell lysis or toxicity was found (Grade 0 on ISO 10993-5). Skin sensitization scores were zero with 0% sensitization rates at 24 hours. No mortality, body weight changes, or differences between saline and test groups in oral mucosa irritation test.
- Electrical safety and electromagnetic compatibility: tested according to EN 60601-1 and IEC 60601-1-2 and met the requirements.
- Software validation: report indicates substantial equivalence and proper performance.
Clinical Tests:
- Comparison with predicate: similar in functions and efficiency.
- Post market experience: proves substantial equivalence.
Conclusion:
Biocompatibility, electric safety, and electromagnetic compatibility tests meet standards. Literatures and post market experience, along with comparison to the predicate device, show similar specification and performance, concluding substantial equivalence.
Key Metrics (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, etc.)
Not Found
Predicate Device(s): If the device was cleared using the 510(k) pathway, identify the Predicate Device(s) K/DEN number used to claim substantial equivalence and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text. List the primary predicate first in the list.
Reference Device(s): Identify the Reference Device(s) K/DEN number and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text.
Not Found
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information for the subject device only (e.g. presence / absence, what scope was granted / cleared under the PCCP, any restrictions, etc).
Not Found
§ 872.4120 Bone cutting instrument and accessories.
(a)
Identification. A bone cutting instrument and accessories is a metal device intended for use in reconstructive oral surgery to drill or cut into the upper or lower jaw and may be used to prepare bone to insert a wire, pin, or screw. The device includes the manual bone drill and wire driver, powered bone drill, rotary bone cutting handpiece, and AC-powered bone saw.(b)
Classification. Class II.
0
KI13152 JUN 1 4 2012
510(k) Summary
Owner Information
-
Name: DMETEC CO., LTD.
-
Address: 402-603 Techno-Park, 193 Yakdae-Dong, Wonmi-Ku, Bucheon City, KOREA
-
- Phone Number: 82-32-234-0011
-
- FAX Number: 82-32-234-1444
- Name of Contact Person: Hong-Geun, Lee
-
- Date the Summary was Prepared: 05/11/2012
Device Information
-
- Common Name: Bone cutting instrument and accessories
-
- Trade Name: Ultrasonic Surgery Machine
-
- Model Number(s): Surgy Star, AIC SURGERY
-
- Classification Name: Drill, Bone, Powered
-
- Requlation Number: 872.4120
Predicate Device Information
-
- 510(k) Number: K072146
-
- Trade Name: EMS Piezon Master Surgery
-
- Product Code: DZI
Description of the Device
This product is a device using by purpose of bone cutting, polishing when operate implant for dentist's office using ultrasonic vibration because it is supplied electric and water in outside
1
KII 3159
Specifications of unit:
Model:
Supply voltage:
Supply frequency:
Power input:
Device life
Output characteristics(Ultrasonic output):
Type of protection against electric shock: Degree of protection aqainst electric shock: Specification of transformer Output characteristics of transformer: Specification of Tip Tip material :
Tin coating method : Coating thickness : Coating Temperature : Surgy Star DC 24V 50 / 60 Hz 24 VA 5years Maximum output power with load:50W Frequency range available: 24-32kHz. Class 1, with transformer Applied part type B AC100-250V, 50-60Hz DC 24V SUS420J2
PVD 8.084pm 500°C
Intended Use
A device intended for use surgical procedure Including osteotomy, osteoplasty, Periodontal surgery and implantation
-
Product Name : Ultrasonic Surgery Machine
-
Model : Surgy Star, AIC Surgery
2
| | DMETEC
(Surgy Star, AIC Surgery) | EMS
(Piezon Master Surgery) |
|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 510(k) reference | - | K072146 |
| Indication for use | A device intended for use surgical procedure Including osteotomy, osteoplasty, periodontal surgery and implantation | The EMS Piezon Master Surgery is an ultrasonic bone-cutting instrument for use in surgical dentistry |
| UNIT | | |
| Supply voltage | 24V DC | 100-240 V AC |
| Power consumption(max) | 50W max | 105VA |
| OUTPUT CHARACTERISTICS | | |
| Maximum output power with load | 50W | 25W |
| Frequency range available | 24-32 kHz | 24-32 kHz |
| TRANSFORMER | | |
| Input | 100-240 VAC, 50-60Hz | 100/220 VAC/50-60Hz |
| Output | 24V DC/ 3.75A | 24V AC/ 1.25A |
| MAIN COMPONENT | | |
| | 1 Unit Body
1 Hand-piece
10 Tips | 1 Unit Body
1 Hand-piece
5 Tips |
| MATERIAL | | |
| Tip(contact with patient) | Stainless steel | Stainless steel |
Summary of Technical Characteristics Compared to the Predicate Device
.
.
.
3
Brief Discussion of Nonclinical Tests (if applicable)
For biocompatibility, in vitro cytotoxicity test, skin sensitization test and oral mucosa irritation test were conducted. During the in vitro cytotoxicity test, no evidence of causing cell lysis or toxicity was found and it was evaluated as Grade 0 on the criteria of ISO 10993-5. As for skin sensitization scores were zero and the sensitization rates were observed 0% at 24 hours. As for oral mucosa irritation test, no mortality was observed, no changes in body weight were observed, and there were no differences in saline and test group.
For electric safety and electromaqnetic compatibility, the device was tested according to EN 60601-1 and IEC 60601-1-2 and the device was found to meet the requirements of the standards.
Software validation report shows that the device is substantially equivalent and performs as it should.
Brief Discussion of Clinical Tests (if applicable)
Comparison with the predicate indicates they are similar in functions and efficiency, and the post market experience proves that it is substantially equivalent.
Conclusion from Nonclinical and Clinical Tests (if applicable)
Biocompatibility tests, electric safety test and electromagnetic compatibility test show that the device meets the requirements of those standards.
Literatures and post market experience show that the device is substantially equivalent.
Comparison with the predicate device shows that the device has similar specification and performance.
Thus, we conclude that Surgy Star and AIC Surgery are substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
4
Image /page/4/Picture/1 description: The image is a circular seal for the Department of Health & Human Services - USA. The seal features the department's emblem, which is a stylized caduceus, a symbol often associated with medicine and healthcare. The words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" are arranged around the emblem in a circular fashion.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Room -WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
JUN 1 4 2012
DMETEC CO. LTD, C/O Mr. Daniel Nam Pats Corporation 4568 West 1st Street, Suite 104 Los Angeles, California 90004
Re: K113152
Trade/Device Name: Ultrasonic Surgery Machine (Surgy Star, AIC SURGERY) Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.4120 Regulation Name: Bone Cutting Instrument And Accessories Regulatory Class: II Product Code: DZI Dated: May 22, 2012 Received: May 29, 2012
Dear Mr. Nam:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
5
Page 2 – Mr. Nam
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act): 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If vou desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH/CDRHOffices /ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours.
FN
Anthony D. Watson, B.S., M.S., M.B.A. Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Infection Control and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
6
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known): KIBIS2
Device Name: Ultrasonic Surgery Machine (Surgy Star, AIC SURGERY)
Indications For Use: A device intended for use surgical procedure Including osteotomy, osteoplasty,
Periodontal surgery and implantation
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Susan Kunnes
(Division Sign-Off)
(1999-1991) Sign=Oil)
Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital Infection Control, Dental Devices
510(k) Number:
Page 1 of