(142 days)
EPIgray is a software to be used by radiation oncologist and medical physicist to detect errors in the delivery of high energy X-rays during the course of patient treatment. This product verifies if the reconstructed dose, computed by the system, is in agreement with the planned dose given by the treatment planning system. This product uses the measurements performed by an Electronic Portal Imaging Device (EPID). This product uses the prescription computed by the treatment planning system. This product in not used to give a prescription of the radiation therapy.
EPIgray is comprehensive software that allows the user to perform an in-vivo dosimetry by means of imaging device such as an Electronic Portal Imaging Device (EPID). The product is composed of: EPIgray workstation and In-Vivo Manager tool. Epigray workstation is an extension of an already cleared product: ISOgray planning system (K103146). It uses only two modules of the previously approved system: Information module and Exacor module. In Vivo manager software is a year application intended for in-vivo measurements management. In particular, it allows to retrieve, on a web browser, the result of dose reconstruction by EPIgray workstation based on EPID.
The provided text is a 510(k) premarket notification for DOSIsoft's EPIgray software. It outlines the device's description, intended use, and substantial equivalence to a predicate device. However, it explicitly states that clinical trials were not performed, and therefore, an acceptance criteria table and a comprehensive study demonstrating direct device performance against such criteria are not provided in the document.
The document focuses on non-clinical verification and validation testing to ensure the system works according to requirements, rather than a clinical study with detailed performance metrics.
Here's an analysis of the requested information based on the provided text:
1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance:
This information is not available in the provided text. The document states: "Clinical trials were not performed as part of the development of this product." and "However, algorithm evaluation was performed by Medical Physicists team using measured data in a clinical facility. Evaluation summary is available in tab 13 of this submission." Without access to "tab 13," specific acceptance criteria and reported device performance metrics cannot be tabulated.
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance:
- Sample Size for Test Set: Not explicitly stated. The document mentions "measured data in a clinical facility" was used for algorithm evaluation, but the size of this dataset is not specified.
- Data Provenance: "measured data in a clinical facility" suggests clinical data, likely retrospective, given no clinical trials were performed. The country of origin is not specified, but since the manufacturer is based in France and the evaluation was done by a "Medical Physicists team," it could be from a French clinical facility or an unspecified international setting.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:
- Number of Experts: Not explicitly stated. The evaluation was performed by a "Medical Physicists team," which implies more than one expert, but an exact number is not given.
- Qualifications of Experts: "Medical Physicists team." Their specific experience (e.g., years of experience) is not mentioned.
4. Adjudication method for the test set:
Not applicable/Not mentioned. Since the evaluation involved a "Medical Physicists team" working with "measured data," it's more likely they were assessing algorithmic accuracy against physical measurements/expected dose rather than adjudicating discrepancies in expert interpretations. No specific adjudication method (like 2+1 or 3+1) is described.
5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:
No. The document explicitly states: "Clinical trials were not performed." Therefore, no MRMC comparative effectiveness study was conducted to assess human reader improvement with AI assistance. The intended use of EPIgray is described as a software for error detection and dose reconstruction, which implies a standalone function that outputs warnings, not directly a tool for human readers to improve their diagnostic accuracy in a MRMC setting.
6. If a standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:
Yes, implicitly. The algorithm evaluation by the Medical Physicists team using measured data in a clinical facility suggests a standalone performance assessment. The device's function is described as using EPID images to reconstruct dose and compare it to the planned dose, activating warnings. This is an algorithm-only function without explicit human-in-the-loop performance being evaluated in this submission.
7. The type of ground truth used:
The ground truth appears to be based on physical measurements and planned dose data. The device reconstructs the dose (based on EPID images) and compares it to the "planned dose given by the treatment planning system." The "algorithm evaluation was performed by Medical Physicists team using measured data," suggesting that these measurements (likely independent dosimetry measurements or precise EPID measurements used as a reference) served as a form of ground truth for assessing the accuracy of the reconstructed dose.
8. The sample size for the training set:
Not mentioned. The document focuses on the evaluation (test) phase and does not provide details regarding the training set's sample size.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established:
Not mentioned. As the document doesn't discuss the training set, there's no information on how its ground truth was established.
{0}------------------------------------------------
DOSIsoft
2002
LAUREAT
CREATION D'ENTREPRISES DE TECHNOLOGIES INNOVANTES
Ministère
jeunesse
éducation
recherche
ministère délégué
recherche et nouvelles
technologies
FEB - 8 2012
Premarket Notification [510(k)] Summary Tab 4
Tuesday, September 6th, 2011
Trade Name: EPIgray
Classification Name: Accelerator, Linear, Medical, IYE (per 21 CFR section 892.5050)
Manufacturer's Name: DOSIsoft SA Address: 45-47 avenue Carnot 94230 CACHAN - France
| Corresponding Official: | Hanna Kafrouni, Ph.D. |
|---|---|
| Title: | CEO |
| Telephone: | 33 1 41 24 26 26 |
| Fax: | 33 1 41 24 26 28 |
Predicate: Dosimetry Check with Exit Dose from Math Resolutions, LLC (K 101503)
Device Description: EPIgray is comprehensive software that allows the user to perform an in-vivo dosimetry by means of imaging device such as an Electronic Portal Imaging Device (EPID). The product is composed of: EPIgray workstation and In-Vivo Manager tool. Epigray workstation is an extension of an already cleared product: ISOgray planning system (K103146). It uses only two modules of the previously approved system: Information module and Exacor module. In Vivo manager software is a year application intended for in-vivo measurements management. In particular, it allows to retrieve, on a web browser, the result of dose reconstruction by EPIgray workstation based on EPID.
Intended Use: EPIgray is a software dedicated for error detection in dose delivery and patient positioning during X-ray high energy radiation therapy. EPIgray uses images acquired from a portal imaging system (EPID) to reconstruct the dose in the patient. The comparison between the reconstructed and the planned dose, activates warnings and allows a follow-up of the dose actually given to the patient.
DOSISOFT SA 45/47, avenue Carnot 94230 CACHAN S.A. capital 500.000 €
.. .
Tél. : 01 41 24 26 26 Fax : 01 41 24 26 28
info@dosisoft.com www.dosisoft.com
{1}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/1/Picture/0 description: The image shows the word "DOSI" in bold, followed by a butterfly-like shape with arrows pointing towards it. The word "soft" is written after the butterfly shape. The text and butterfly shape appear to be part of a logo or design.
Image /page/1/Picture/1 description: The image shows a logo with the word "LAUREAT" at the top. Below that is the text "CREATION D'ENTREPRISES ET TECHNOLOGIES INNOVANTES". There is also text that says "Ministere" and "Jeunesse Education recherche". The logo also includes the text "ministre delegue recherche et nouvelles technologies" and the number "2002".
Clinical tests: Clinical trials were not performed as part of the development of this product. Clinical testing is not advantageous in demonstrating substantial equivalence or safety and effectiveness of the device since testing can be performed such that no human subjects are exposed to risk. However, algorithm evaluation was performed by Medical Physicists team using measured data in a clinical facility. Evaluation summary is available in tab 13 of this submission.
Non-Clinical tests: Verification tests were written and executed internally to validate that the system works according to the requirement. The documentation includes system level test pass/fail criteria and a summary of the test results. It is available in the Verification and Validation section from Tab 12, Sub Tab 6.
DOSISOFT SA 45/47, avenue Carnot 94230 CACHAN SA canital 500 000 €
Tél. : 01 41 24 26 26 Fax : 01 41 24 26 28 info@dosisoft.com www.dosisoft.com
{2}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/2/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a stylized eagle with its wings spread, enclosed within a circle. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" is arranged around the upper portion of the circle.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Room - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
DOSIsoft SA % Mr. Robert J. Morton President Quality and Regulatory Services, Inc. 1244 Fairway Valley Court LINCOLN CA 95648-8489
FEB - 8 2012
Re: K112723
Trade/Device Name: EPIgray Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.5050 Regulation Name: Medical charged-particle radiation therapy system Regulatory Class: II Product Code: MUJ Dated: January 18, 2012 Received: January 27, 2012
Dear Mr. Morton:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into class II (Special Controls), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Parts 800 to 895. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Parts 801 and 809); medical device reporting (reporting of
{3}------------------------------------------------
medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); and good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820). This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Parts 801 and 809), please contact the Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation and Safety at (301) 796-5450. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/industry/support/index.html.
Sincerely Yours,
Mary S Patel
Mary S. Pastel, Sc.D. Director Division of Radiological Devices Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation and Safety Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{4}------------------------------------------------
Indication for Use Statement
510(k) Number (if known): Ki l 2723
Device Name: EPIgray
Indications for Use:
EPIgray is a software to be used by radiation oncologist and medical physicist to detect errors in the delivery of high energy X-rays during the course of patient treatment. This product verifies if the reconstructed dose, computed by the system, is in agreement with the planned dose given by the treatment planning system. This product uses the measurements performed by an Electronic Portal Imaging Device (EPID). This product uses the prescription computed by the treatment planning svstem. This product in not used to give a prescription of the radiation therapy.
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE OF NEEDED)
§ 892.5050 Medical charged-particle radiation therapy system.
(a)
Identification. A medical charged-particle radiation therapy system is a device that produces by acceleration high energy charged particles (e.g., electrons and protons) intended for use in radiation therapy. This generic type of device may include signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, treatment planning computer programs, component parts, and accessories.(b)
Classification. Class II. When intended for use as a quality control system, the film dosimetry system (film scanning system) included as an accessory to the device described in paragraph (a) of this section, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 892.9.