K Number
K110493
Device Name
TANDEMHEART PUMP
Manufacturer
Date Cleared
2011-09-20

(210 days)

Product Code
Regulation Number
870.4360
Panel
CV
Reference & Predicate Devices
AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
Intended Use

The TandemHeart pump is intended to pump the blood through an extracorporeal circuit for periods lasting less than 6 hours for the purpose of providing either: (i) Full or partial cardiopulmonary bypass (i.e., circuit includes an oxygenator) during open surgical procedures on the heart or great vessels; or (ii) Temporary circulatory bypass for diversion of flow around a planned disruption of the circulatory pathway necessary for open surgical procedures on the aorta or vena cava.

Device Description

The TandemHeart System consists of two major components, the Escort Controller (K061369), and the TandemHeart Blood Pump (K991783), along with a number of accessory components required to setup and utilize the Pump. The system is intended for extracorporeal circulatory support using an extracorporeal bypass circuit.

AI/ML Overview

The provided document is a 510(k) summary for the TandemHeart System, a non-roller type cardiopulmonary bypass blood pump. This type of document is a premarket notification to the FDA to demonstrate that the device is substantially equivalent to a legally marketed predicate device. As such, it focuses on comparing the new device to existing ones rather than presenting a standalone study with detailed acceptance criteria and performance metrics in the way one might expect for a novel AI/software medical device.

Based on the available text, here's what can be extracted and what cannot:

  1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

    • Acceptance Criteria (Implicit): The primary acceptance criterion for a 510(k) submission is "substantial equivalence" to a predicate device. For the specific performance test mentioned, the implicit acceptance criterion was that the TandemHeart System demonstrate "adequate flow performance with the inclusion of an Oxygenator in the extracorporeal circuit, and that the flows were substantially equivalent to those provided by the predicate AB-180 XC System."
    • Reported Device Performance:
      • "The HQ testing results demonstrated adequate flow performance with the inclusion of an Oxygenator in the extracorporeal circuit, and that the flows were substantially equivalent to those provided by the predicate AB-180 XC System."

    Table:

Acceptance Criteria (Implicit)Reported Device Performance
Adequate flow performance with an Oxygenator in the extracorporeal circuit.Demonstrated (implied by "adequate flow performance").
Flow performance substantially equivalent to the predicate AB-180 XC System when an Oxygenator is included.Flows were "substantially equivalent to those provided by the predicate AB-180 XC System" with an Oxygenator.
Device design, construction, performance, materials, and method of construction are substantially equivalent to the predicate.The TandemHeart System is "substantially equivalent to the predicate CardiacAssist AB-180 XC System in design characteristics, performance, materials, method of construction, and intended use." (This is a general statement of equivalence as required for 510(k)).
  1. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)

    • Sample Size: Not specified. The document mentions "subsequent testing of the TandemHeart System" for "flow vs. pressure drop (HQ)," but does not provide details on the number of units tested, the duration of tests, or any patient data sample sizes.
    • Data Provenance: Not specified. As the testing was to verify performance, it's likely internal lab testing, but specific country or retrospective/prospective nature regarding patient data is not applicable/provided.
  2. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)

    • Not applicable. This device is a mechanical blood pump, not an AI/diagnostic imaging device. "Ground truth" in the context of expert review or clinical outcomes is not pertinent to the "flow vs. pressure drop" testing described.
  3. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

    • Not applicable. This is not a study involving expert adjudication for diagnostic accuracy. The performance testing described (flow vs. pressure drop) would likely involve objective measurements against engineering specifications or comparative measurements with a predicate, not expert adjudication.
  4. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

    • Not applicable. This is not an AI-assisted diagnostic device.
  5. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

    • Not applicable. This is a mechanical device.
  6. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)

    • For the "flow vs. pressure drop (HQ)" testing, the ground truth would be based on physical measurements and engineering principles, likely comparing the device's performance against established specifications or the performance of the predicate device. It's not based on expert consensus, pathology, or outcomes data.
  7. The sample size for the training set

    • Not applicable. This is not an AI/machine learning device that requires a training set.
  8. How the ground truth for the training set was established

    • Not applicable. As above, this is a mechanical device, not an AI system.

§ 870.4360 Nonroller-type blood pump.

(a)
Nonroller-type cardiopulmonary and circulatory bypass blood pump —(1)Identification. A nonroller-type cardiopulmonary and circulatory bypass blood pump is a prescription device that uses a method other than revolving rollers to pump the blood through an extracorporeal circuit for periods lasting less than 6 hours for the purpose of providing either:(i) Full or partial cardiopulmonary bypass (
i.e., circuit includes an oxygenator) during open surgical procedures on the heart or great vessels; or(ii) Temporary circulatory bypass for diversion of flow around a planned disruption of the circulatory pathway necessary for open surgical procedures on the aorta or vena cava.
(2)
Classification —Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are:(i) Non-clinical performance testing must perform as intended over the intended duration of use and demonstrate the following: Operating parameters, dynamic blood damage, heat generation, air entrapment, mechanical integrity, and durability/reliability;
(ii) The patient-contacting components of the device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible;
(iii) Sterility and shelf life testing must demonstrate the sterility of patient-contacting components and the shelf life of these components; and
(iv) Labeling must include information regarding the duration of use, and a detailed summary of the device- and procedure-related complications pertinent to use of the device.
(b)
Nonroller-type temporary ventricular support blood pump —(1)Identification. A nonroller-type temporary ventricular support blood pump is a prescription device that uses any method resulting in blood propulsion to provide the temporary ventricular assistance required for support of the systemic and/or pulmonary circulations during periods when there is ongoing or anticipated hemodynamic instability due to immediately reversible alterations in ventricular myocardial function resulting from mechanical or physiologic causes. Duration of use would be less than 6 hours.(2)
Classification. Class III (premarket approval).(c)
Date premarket approval application (PMA) or notice of completion of product development protocol (PDP) is required. A PMA or notice of completion of a PDP is required to be filed with FDA on or before September 8, 2015, for any nonroller-type temporary ventricular support blood pump that was in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976, or that has, on or before September 8, 2015, been found to be substantially equivalent to any nonroller-type temporary ventricular support blood pump that was in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976. Any other nonroller-type temporary ventricular support blood pump shall have an approved PMA or declared completed PDP in effect before being placed in commercial distribution.