K Number
K102549
Date Cleared
2010-12-21

(105 days)

Product Code
Regulation Number
N/A
Reference & Predicate Devices
Predicate For
AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
Intended Use

The Ascension® MOVEMENT™ Great Toe System, Total Arthroplasty is a twopiece implant that is intended to be used as prosthesis for the metatarsophalangeal joint (MTP). The device is intended for cemented use only. Indications for use include:

  • Painful degenerative metatarso-phalangeal joint change .
  • Hallux rigidus stage 3 and 4 ◆
  • Hallux valgus and hallux rigidus .
  • Hallux limitus with painful arthrofibrosis .
  • Revisions after moderate proximal phalanx resection .
Device Description

The Ascension® MOVEMENT Great Toe System, Total Arthroplasty device is an anatomically designed, semi-constrained, two-piece device designed for resurfacing of the base of the 1st metatarso-phalangeal (MTP) joint. The device couples with the Ascension metatarsal hemi-arthroplasty device to allow total arthroplasty of the 1st MTP joint. The device is designed for cemented fixation. The device is boxed individually and delivered sterile for single use. The device incorporates four anatomically designed base geometries with appropriately sized stems. The stem is cylindrical with tapered ribs to provide rotational as well as axial stability of the seated implant. System instrumentation is designed to offer precise implant preparation.

AI/ML Overview

The provided text describes the Ascension® MOVEMENT™ Great Toe System, a total arthroplasty device. The submission focuses on establishing substantial equivalence to predicate devices based on testing and geometrical comparison, rather than clinical performance or AI/software system evaluation. Therefore, many of the requested categories are not applicable to this submission.

Here's a breakdown of the requested information based on the provided text:

1. Table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

Acceptance CriteriaReported Device Performance
Interconnection strength testing (axial, shear, bending strength)Performed to substantiate equivalence. (Specific results not detailed in provided text)
Geometrical comparisons between subject and predicate devicesCompleted. (Specific measurements not detailed in provided text)

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance

Not applicable. The submission is for a medical device (great toe implant) and relies on mechanical testing and geometrical comparison, not a test set of data typically used for AI or diagnostic devices.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts

Not applicable. Ground truth for a test set is not relevant for this type of device submission.

4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

Not applicable. Adjudication methods are not relevant for this type of device submission.

5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

Not applicable. This is not an AI-assisted diagnostic device.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done

Not applicable. This is not an algorithm or AI system.

7. The type of ground truth used

Not applicable in the context of clinical "ground truth" as typically defined for diagnostic or AI devices. The "ground truth" for this device's acceptance would be established by validated engineering and biomechanical testing standards for orthopedic implants.

8. The sample size for the training set

Not applicable. This is not an AI/machine learning device.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

Not applicable. This is not an AI/machine learning device.

{0}------------------------------------------------

K102549 1/2

501(k) Summary

DEC 2 1 2010

.

SUBMITTER NAME:Ascension Orthopedics, Inc.8700 Cameron Road, #100Austin, TX 78754-3832
510(k) CONTACT:Susan WaltonPhone: (512) 836-5001 x1591
TRADE NAME:Ascension® MOVEMENT Great Toe System
COMMON NAME:prosthesis, toe (metatarso-phalangeal), joint,metal/polymer, semi-constrained
CLASSIFICATION:unclassified
PRODUCT CODE:LZJ
PANEL:Orthopedic
PREDICATE DEVICES:KGTI™ Kinetik Great Toe Implant System,Integra Lifesciences, K924724
Merete ToeMobile™ Anatomical Great ToeResurfacing System, Merete Medical,K072251
DEVICE DESCRIPTION:The Ascension® MOVEMENT Great ToeSystem, Total Arthroplasty device is ananatomically designed, semi-constrained,two-piece device designed for resurfacing ofthe base of the 1st metatarso-phalangeal(MTP) joint. The device couples with theAscension metatarsal hemi-arthroplastydevice to allow total arthroplasty of the 1stMTP joint. The device is designed forcemented fixation. The device is boxedindividually and delivered sterile for singleuse. The device incorporates fouranatomically designed base geometries withappropriately sized stems. The stem iscylindrical with tapered ribs to providerotational as well as axial stability of theseated implant. System instrumentation isdesigned to offer precise implant preparation.

.

{1}------------------------------------------------

77

INTENDED USE:

The Ascension® MOVEMENT™ Great Toe System, Total Arthroplasty is a two-piece implant that is intended to be used as prosthesis for the metatarso-phalangeal ioint (MTP). The device is intended for cemented use only. Indications for use include:

  • . Painful degenerative metatarsophalangeal joint change
  • . Hallux rigidus stage 3 and 4
  • . Hallux valqus and hallux rigidus
  • . Hallux limitus with painful arthrofibrosis
  • . Revisions after moderate proximal phalanx resection

Substantial equivalence was based upon testing and a geometrical comparison of the subject and predicate devices. Interconnection strength testing, axial, shear and bending strength, was performed to substantiate equivalence. Geometrical comparisons between the subject device, Ascension® MOVEMENT™ Great Toe System and Integra KGTI™ Kinetik Great Toe Implant System (K904724) were completed. The Merete ToeMobile Anatomical Great Toe Resurfacing System (K072251) was used as a template for labeled indications.

There are no significant differences between the Ascension MOVEMENT Great Toe System and other systems currently being marketed which would adversely affect the use of the product. It is substantially equivalent to these other devices in design. function, material and intended use.

BASIS OF SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE:

{2}------------------------------------------------

Image /page/2/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the Department of Health & Human Services USA. The logo consists of a stylized eagle or bird symbol, with three curved lines representing its wings or feathers. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES USA" is arranged in a circular fashion around the bird symbol.

Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Mail Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002

DEC 2 1 , 2010

Ascension Orthopedics, Inc. % Ms. Susan Walton 8700 Cameron Road, #100 Austin, TX 78754-3832

Re: K102549

Trade/Device Name: Ascension MOVEMENT Great Toe System Regulation Number: Unclassified Regulation Name: Prosthesis, Toe (metatarso-phalangeal), Joint, Metal/polymer, Semiconstrained Regulatory Class: Unclassified Product Code: LZJ Dated: December 9, 2010 Received: December 10, 2010

Dear Ms. Walton:

We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.

If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.

Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set

{3}------------------------------------------------

Page 2 – Ms. Susan Walton

forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act): 21 CFR 1000-1050. If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRHOffices/ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to

http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/Reportal?roblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.

You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm.

Sincerely yours.

AC. B. 2. h

Din

Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Surgical, Orthopedic and Restorative Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health

Enclosure

{4}------------------------------------------------

Indications for Use

510(K) Number.

Kj02549

Device Name:

Ascension® MOVEMENT™ Great Toe System

Indications for Use:

The Ascension® MOVEMENT™ Great Toe System, Total Arthroplasty is a twopiece implant that is intended to be used as prosthesis for the metatarsophalangeal joint (MTP). The device is intended for cemented use only. Indications for use include:

  • Painful degenerative metatarso-phalangeal joint change .
  • Hallux rigidus stage 3 and 4 ◆
  • Hallux valgus and hallux rigidus .
  • Hallux limitus with painful arthrofibrosis .
  • Revisions after moderate proximal phalanx resection .

Prescription Use x (Part 21 CFR 801Subpart B)

OR

Over-The-Counter Use (Part 21 CFR 801Subpart C)

(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NECESSARY)

Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)

M. Melkerson
Division Sign Off

(Division Sign-Oft) Division of Surgical, Orthopedic, and Restorative Devices

Page 1 of

510(k) Number K102549

N/A