(156 days)
The Fresenius 2008T is indicated for acute and chronic dialysis therapy.
The optional CDX modification incorporates a standard Windows/Linux capable computer (PC board) into the 2008T giving clinics the option to load data management software into the machine. With data management software on the machine the user may then interface with the program, using the machines preexisting alphanumeric keyboard, then transfer treatment data directly from the 2008T machine to their In-center medical information system. Additionally, the selection of Citrasate® (K000792) and DRYalvsate® (K980659) acid concentrates have been added to the selection of acid concentrates available to our customers on the 2008T hemodialysis machine. The user interface has been changed to allow the user to select Citrasate/DRYalysate from the dialysis screen of the 2008T hemodialysis machine and to display the proper constituents of the concentrate.
The provided text describes modifications to the Fresenius 2008T Hemodialysis Machine, not a diagnostic AI device. Therefore, the requested information categories (acceptance criteria, sample sizes, expert ground truth, MRMC study, standalone performance, training set details) are largely not applicable in the context of this medical device (a hemodialysis machine) and the information available in this 510(k) summary.
However, I can extract information related to acceptance criteria and "studies" as presented in the document, interpreting them in the context of a non-AI medical device submission.
Here's an attempt to answer based on the provided text, noting where the requested AI-specific information is not available:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
| Acceptance Criteria Category | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|
| Software Functionality | Acceptance Criteria: Modifications to the 2008T hemodialysis functions as intended and modifications did not negatively impact the overall 2008T hemodialysis machine system. |
| Reported Performance: Full system validation and software regression testing were performed. "The results from the testing demonstrated that all modifications functioned as intended and met pre-determined acceptance criteria." (Specific details of acceptance criteria for software were not provided beyond successful functioning and no negative impact). | |
| Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) | Acceptance Criteria: Compliance with IEC 60601-1-2 (2007) Class A. |
| Reported Performance: EMC testing was conducted according to IEC 60601-1-2 (2007) Class A. "The modified 2008T hemodialysis machine... met the requirements for IEC 60601-1-2 devices." | |
| Electrical Safety | Acceptance Criteria: Compliance with UL 60601-1, 1st Edition, 2006-04-26, and CAN/CSA-C22.2 No. 601.1-M90, 2005. |
| Reported Performance: Electrical safety testing was conducted according to the specified standards. "The modified 2008T hemodialysis machine was found to comply with the above standards." | |
| System Performance (with Citrasate®) | Acceptance Criteria: Function as intended when using Citrasate® acid concentrate and meet pre-determined acceptance criteria (specific criteria not detailed). |
| Reported Performance: "System performance testing using Citrasate® acid concentrate" was performed. "The results from the testing demonstrated that all modifications functioned as intended and met pre-determined acceptance criteria." (Specific details of acceptance criteria for system performance were not provided beyond successful functioning). |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
The document does not specify a "test set" in the context of data for an AI algorithm. The testing described (software validation, EMC, electrical safety, system performance) would typically involve physical units of the device and simulation/testing environments rather than a "data set." Therefore, information on sample size for an AI test set or data provenance (country, retrospective/prospective) is not applicable/not provided.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts
This information is not applicable/not provided as the submission is for a physical medical device (hemodialysis machine) with minor modifications, not an AI algorithm requiring expert-established ground truth on data.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
This information is not applicable/not provided as the submission is for a physical medical device.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done, If So, What Was the Effect Size of How Much Human Readers Improve With AI vs Without AI Assistance
This information is not applicable/not provided. This is not an AI-assisted diagnostic or decision support device.
6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done
This information is not applicable/not provided. This is not an AI algorithm.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
The concept of "ground truth" as it relates to expert consensus, pathology, or outcomes data for an AI algorithm is not applicable here. The "truth" in this context is the successful and compliant operation of the physical device according to engineering standards and regulatory requirements.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
This information is not applicable/not provided. This is not an AI algorithm, so there is no "training set."
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
This information is not applicable/not provided. There is no "training set" or corresponding ground truth establishment for an AI algorithm in this submission.
{0}------------------------------------------------
This 510(k) Summary is in accordance with the requirements of 21CFR Part 807.92
A. Submitter's Information:
MAY 2 7 2010
| Name: | Fresenius Medical Care North America |
|---|---|
| Address: | 920 Winter StreetWaltham, MA 02451 |
| Phone: | 1-781-699-4475 |
| Fax: | (781) 699-9635 |
| Contact Person: | Janet Kay, Director of Regulatory Affairs-Devices |
| Date of Preparation: | December 21, 2009 |
- B. Device Name: Fresenius 2008T Hemodialysis Machine
Common Name: Hemodialysis Machine
Product Code/Classification Panel: 78 KDI / Gastroenterology/Urology
Classification: Class II per § 876.5860
- C. Legally Marketed Predicate Device (unmodified devices); Fresenius 2008T Hemodialysis Machine
D. Device Description:
-
- The optional CDX modification incorporates a standard Windows/Linux capable computer (PC board) into the 2008T giving clinics the option to load data management software into the machine. With data management software on the machine the user may then interface with the program, using the machines preexisting alphanumeric keyboard, then transfer treatment data directly from the 2008T machine to their In-center medical information system.
{1}------------------------------------------------
select Citrasate/DRYalysate from the dialysis screen of the 2008T hemodialysis machine and to display the proper constituents of the concentrate.
E. Indications for Use:
The Fresenius 2008T is indicated for acute and chronic dialysis therapy.
Substantial Equivalence Decision Making Process
1. Is the product a device?
YES - The modified Fresenius 2008T Hemodialysis Machine is a device pursuant to 21 CFR §201 [321] (h).
2. Does the new device have the same intended use?
YES - The intended use for the modified 2008T Hemodialysis Machine is identical to that for the unmodified 2008T (K080964) as follows:
Intended Use
The Fresenius 2008T is indicated for acute and chronic hemodialysis
3. Does the device have technological characteristics that raise new types of safety or effectiveness questions?
NO - The Fresenius 2008T with CDX option is a modified version of the Fresenius 2008T Dialysate Delivery System. The performance and technological characteristics of the modified Fresenius 2008T are equivalent to those of the Fresenius 2008T (K080964) Dialysate Delivery System and raise no new types of safety or effectiveness questions.
4. Does descriptive or performance information demonstrate equivalence?
YES - Fresenius Medical Care North America believes the information provided in this submission clearly describes the modified Fresenius 2008T and demonstrates that it is substantially equivalent to the original Fresenius 2008T Dialysate Delivery system.
F. Safety Summary
The Fresenius 2008T hemodialysis machine with CDX option incorporates a standard Windows/Linux capable computer (PC board) into the machine. Additionally, Citrasate/DRYalysate was added to the 2008T's selectable acid concentrates. All water requirements, module options, functional options, performance limits, control parameters, compatible bloodlines.
{2}------------------------------------------------
and language options remain unchanged from the predicate device, the 2008T (K080964). A Risk Analysis has been completed and potential hazards associated with the modifications have been identified, mitigated and where applicable mitigations have been verified. All potential risks were deemed acceptable after mitigation.
G. Summary of non-clinical tests submitted with the premarket notification of the device
-
- Full system validation and software regression testing was performed to ensure that the modifications to the 2008T hemodialysis functions as intended and that the modifications did not negatively impact the overall 2008T hemodialysis machine system. Testing included:
- . Software validation and regression testing
- · Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) testing
- · Electrical safety testing
- · System performance testing using Citrasate® acid concentrate
The results from the testing demonstrated that all modifications functioned as intended and met pre-determined acceptance criteria.
-
- Electromagnetic compatibility testing (EMC) was conducted according to the IEC 60601-1-2 (2007) Class A Testing at CKC Laboratories, Inc. The modified 2008T hemodialysis machine, outlined in this submission, met the requirements for IEC 60601-1-2 devices.
-
- Electrical safety testing was conducted according to the following standards:
- UL 60601-1, 1st Edition, 2006-04-26, (Medical Electrical Equipment, . Part 1:General Requirements for Safety)
CAN/CSA-C22.2 No. 601.1-M90, 2005, (Medical Equipment Electrical . Equipment, Part 1: General Requirements for Safety) The modified 2008T hemodialysis machine with was found to comply with the above standards.
H. General Safety and Effectiveness Concerns
Operators of the 2008T Hemodialysis machine with CDX option must be trained to administer hemodialysis at the direction of a physician. In addition, the operator should be:
- . Knowledgeable of hemodialysis methodology and relevant physiology.
- . Proficient in healthcare procedures regarding aseptic techniques.
{3}------------------------------------------------
- Thoroughly familiar with the contents of the Operator's manual.
Fully trained and qualified to operate this machine, and able to distinguish between normal and abnormal operation.
.
{4}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/4/Picture/1 description: The image shows the seal for the Department of Health & Human Services USA. The seal is circular and contains the words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES USA" around the perimeter. In the center of the seal is an abstract image of an eagle.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Mail Center . WO66-G6( Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
Ms. Janet C. Kay Director of Regulatory Affairs Renal Therapies Group Fresenius Medical Care North America 920 Winter Street WALTHAM MA 02451
MAY 2 7 2010
Re: K093902
Trade/Device Name: Fresenius 2008T Hemodialysis Machine Regulation Number: 21 CFR §876.5860 Regulation Name: High permeability hemodialysis system Regulatory Class: II Product Code: KDI Dated: April 27, 2010 Received: April 28, 2010
Dear Ms. Kay:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related
{5}------------------------------------------------
adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH0ffices/ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Janine M. Morris
Acting Director, Division of Reproductive, Abdominal, and Radiological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{6}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known): K093902
Device Name: Fresenius 2008T Hemodialysis Machine
Indications for Use:
Fresenius 2008T is indicated for acute and chronic dialysis therapy
Prescription Use _ √ (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE OF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Huld Reum
(Division Sign-Off)
Division of Reproductive, Abdominal and Radiological Devices 510(k) Number
Page_1_of_1
127
§ 876.5860 High permeability hemodialysis system.
(a)
Identification. A high permeability hemodialysis system is a device intended for use as an artificial kidney system for the treatment of patients with renal failure, fluid overload, or toxemic conditions by performing such therapies as hemodialysis, hemofiltration, hemoconcentration, and hemodiafiltration. Using a hemodialyzer with a semipermeable membrane that is more permeable to water than the semipermeable membrane of the conventional hemodialysis system (§ 876.5820), the high permeability hemodialysis system removes toxins or excess fluid from the patient's blood using the principles of convection (via a high ultrafiltration rate) and/or diffusion (via a concentration gradient in dialysate). During treatment, blood is circulated from the patient through the hemodialyzer's blood compartment, while the dialysate solution flows countercurrent through the dialysate compartment. In this process, toxins and/or fluid are transferred across the membrane from the blood to the dialysate compartment. The hemodialysis delivery machine controls and monitors the parameters related to this processing, including the rate at which blood and dialysate are pumped through the system, and the rate at which fluid is removed from the patient. The high permeability hemodialysis system consists of the following devices:(1) The hemodialyzer consists of a semipermeable membrane with an in vitro ultrafiltration coefficient (K
uf ) greater than 8 milliliters per hour per conventional millimeter of mercury, as measured with bovine or expired human blood, and is used with either an automated ultrafiltration controller or anther method of ultrafiltration control to prevent fluid imbalance.(2) The hemodialysis delivery machine is similar to the extracorporeal blood system and dialysate delivery system of the hemodialysis system and accessories (§ 876.5820), with the addition of an ultrafiltration controller and mechanisms that monitor and/or control such parameters as fluid balance, dialysate composition, and patient treatment parameters (e.g., blood pressure, hematocrit, urea, etc.).
(3) The high permeability hemodialysis system accessories include, but are not limited to, tubing lines and various treatment related monitors (e.g., dialysate pH, blood pressure, hematocrit, and blood recirculation monitors).
(b)
Classification. Class II. The special controls for this device are FDA's:(1) “Use of International Standard ISO 10993 ‘Biological Evaluation of Medical Device—Part I: Evaluation and Testing,’ ”
(2) “Guidance for the Content of 510(k)s for Conventional and High Permeability Hemodialyzers,”
(3) “Guidance for Industry and CDRH Reviewers on the Content of Premarket Notifications for Hemodialysis Delivery Systems,”
(4) “Guidance for the Content of Premarket Notifications for Water Purification Components and Systems for Hemodialysis,” and
(5) “Guidance for Hemodialyzer Reuse Labeling.”