(112 days)
The ESPRIT ventilator is a microprocessor controlled, electrically powered, mechanical ventilator. It is intended for use by qualified medical personnel in providing continuous or intermittent ventilatory support for adult, pediatric and neonatal patients as prescribed by a physician. The ESPRIT Ventilator is intended for use in either invasive or noninvasive applications. The Auto-Trak option is intended for adult and pediatric patients, and automatically adjusts I-Triggers and E-Cycles breathing without the need for user adjustment of I-trigger (sensitivity) and E-cycle thresholds under changing leak conditions. The Auto-Trak option provides leak-compensated ventilation for leaks up to 60L/min.
The Respironics Esprit Ventilator is unchanged from K072450. The only change is to include the Respironics Performax Youth SE mask as an option for use by its pediatric users. This mask is the same mask design as is used by the small size of the cleared Respironics Performax SE Total Face Mask (K072588). The mask consists of a silicon cushion, polycarbonate faceplate with an elbow that contains the exhalation feature. The anthropometric profile of the Respironics Performax Youth SE mask was designed to meet the 90" percentile for pediatrics age 7 and older and > 40 lbs.
The provided text describes a Special 510(k) submission for the Esprit Ventilator, primarily focusing on adding the Respironics Performax Youth SE mask as an option. As such, the study described is a compatibility test rather than a typical clinical performance study for an AI-powered device.
Here's an analysis based on the provided information, addressing your points where applicable:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The document states that "mask compatibility testing was performed. This testing included pressure performance, waveform performance, triggering, cycling and alarm functionality testing. All tests were verified to meet the required acceptance criteria." However, the specific quantitative acceptance criteria or detailed numerical performance results are not provided in this document excerpt.
| Acceptance Criteria Category | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|
| Pressure performance | Verified to meet required acceptance criteria (details not provided) |
| Waveform performance | Verified to meet required acceptance criteria (details not provided) |
| Triggering functionality | Verified to meet required acceptance criteria (details not provided) |
| Cycling functionality | Verified to meet required acceptance criteria (details not provided) |
| Alarm functionality | Verified to meet required acceptance criteria (details not provided) |
2. Sample Size for the Test Set and Data Provenance
- Sample Size: The document indicates "mask compatibility testing was performed" but does not specify the sample size (e.g., number of test sessions, number of masks tested, duration of tests).
- Data Provenance: The testing was "performed" by Respironics, Inc. ("This testing is provided in Tab 8 of this submission"). This implies the data is prospective and generated specifically for this submission, likely within a controlled lab or testing environment. The country of origin of the data is not explicitly stated beyond Respironics being based in the US (Monroeville, Pennsylvania).
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth and Qualifications
This information is not applicable in this context. The study is a compatibility test for a medical device (ventilator and mask), not an AI diagnostic tool requiring expert interpretation to establish ground truth for a test set. The "ground truth" here would be the established functional specifications and performance characteristics of the ventilator and mask system, evaluated against engineering and physiological standards.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
This information is not applicable. Since it's a compatibility test, not an expert-based diagnostic study, there's no need for adjudication of expert opinions.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done
No, a MRMC study was not done. This submission is for a ventilator and mask, not an AI system where human readers would interpret results.
6. If a Standalone (algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
No, this is not an AI algorithm. The device, the Esprit Ventilator, is a "microprocessor controlled, electrically powered, mechanical ventilator." The "Auto-Trak option" automatically adjusts parameters, which involves an algorithm, but the study described is about the physical compatibility of a new mask with the existing ventilator, not a performance study of the Auto-Trak algorithm itself.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
The ground truth used for this compatibility testing would be the engineering specifications, recognized standards, and physiological performance requirements for a ventilator and its compatible components (like a mask). The verification would be against these predefined technical and performance standards, not against "expert consensus, pathology, or outcomes data" in the typical sense of diagnostic AI studies. The statement "All tests were verified to meet the required acceptance criteria" implies testing against these pre-established standards.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
This information is not applicable. This is not an AI model requiring a training set.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set was Established
This information is not applicable. This is not an AI model requiring a training set with established ground truth.
{0}------------------------------------------------
K09264/8
Premarket Notification – Special 510(k)
ર મુ
ಿ ಒ
్రా . U ਸ ਨੂੰ ਲ ਜ਼ੁਰੂ ਕ੍ਰਿ . 1 ត 司 分
| Original Date of Submission | 19 August 2009 | DEC 18 2009 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Device Trade Name | Esprit Ventilator | ||
| Common/Usual Name | Ventilator, continuous, life supporting | ||
| Establishment Registration # | 2518422 | ||
| Address of Mfr. Facility | Respironics, Inc.2271 Cosmos CourtCarlsbad, CA 92011(724) 387-4120 FAX (724)-387-4216 CELL (724) 882-4120 | ||
| Classification | Class II device | ||
| Classification Panel | Anesthesiology Devices | ||
| Classification Reference | 21 CFR 868.5895 | ||
| Product Code | CBK - Continuous ventilator | ||
| Predicate Device(s) | Respironics Esprit Ventilator (K072450)Respironics Performax SE Total Face Mask (K072588) | ||
| Labeling | Draft Labeling can be found in Tab 5. | ||
| Intended Use | The ESPRIT ventilator is a microprocessor controlled, electricallypowered, mechanical ventilator. It is intended for use by qualifiedmedical personnel in providing continuous or intermittent ventilatorysupport for adult and pediatric patients as prescribed by a physician.The ESPRIT Ventilator is intended for use in either invasive or non-invasive applications. The Auto-Trak option is intended for adult andpediatric patients, and automatically triggers and cycles breathingwithout the need for user-adjustment of I-trigger (sensitivity) and E-cycle thresholds. | ||
| Reason for Submission | Include a Respironics pediatric total face mask to use with this device. |
Device is unchanged as a result of the addition of this mask
{1}------------------------------------------------
Substantial Equivalence
The Esprit Ventilator has the following similarities to the previously cleared predicate device:
- O Same intended use.
- O Same operating principle.
- O Same technology.
- o Same manufacturing process.
There is no change to the intended use, operating principle, technology or manufacturing process for the Esprit Ventilator. Further, there is no modification required to the electromechanical platform of the Esprit Ventilator as a result of adding this pediatric mask to the existing cleared device (K072450). To demonstrate compatibility of the Respironics Performax Youth SE mask with the Esprit Ventilator. mask compatibility testing was performed. This testing is provided in Tab 8 of this submission. This testing included pressure performance, waveform performance, triggering, cycling and alarm functionality testing. All tests were verified to meet the required acceptance criteria. Results of this testing concluded that the verification testing raises no new issues of safety or effectiveness.
Respironics has followed the FDA's Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff document "pre-market assessment of pediatric medical devices" and applied the principle of FDA's Least Burdensome Approach to demonstrate the Substantial Equivalence of the Esprit Ventilator. As a result we conclude that the existing indications for use can be safely and effectively applied to this device with the new Respironics mask.
Intended Use
The ESPRIT ventilator is a microprocessor controlled; electrically powered, mechanical ventilator. It is intended for use by qualified medical personnel in providing continuous or intermittent ventilatory support for adult and pediatric patients as prescribed by a physician. The ESPRIT Ventilator is intended for use in either invasive or non-invasive applications. The Auto-Trak option is intended for adult and pediatric patients, and automatically triggers and cycles breathing without the need for user-adjustment of I-trigger (sensitivity) and E-cycle thresholds.
{2}------------------------------------------------
Device Description
The Respironics Esprit Ventilator is unchanged from K072450. The only change is to include the Respironics Performax Youth SE mask as an option for use by its pediatric users. This mask is the same mask design as is used by the small size of the cleared Respironics Performax SE Total Face Mask (K072588). The mask consists of a silicon cushion, polycarbonate faceplate with an elbow that contains the exhalation feature. The anthropometric profile of the Respironics Performax Youth SE mask was designed to meet the 90" percentile for pediatrics age 7 and older and > 40 lbs.
{3}------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Room W-O66-0609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
Ms. Zita A. Yurko Director of Regulatory Affairs · Respironics, Incorporated Sleep & Home Respiratory Group 1740 Golden Mile Highway Monroeville, Pennsylvania 15146
DEC 1 8 2009
Re: K092648
Trade/Device Name: Esprit Ventilator Regulation Number: 21 CFR 868.5895 Regulation Name: Continuous Ventilator Regulatory Class: II Product Code: CBK Dated: November 20, 2009 Received: November 23, 2009
Dear Ms. Yurko:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{4}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Ms. Yurko
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH/CDRHOffices/ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/mdr/for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (240) 276-3150 or at its Internet address ~ http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/industry/support/index.html.
Sincerely yours.
A for
Anthony D. Watson, BS, MS, MBA Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Infection Control, and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{5}------------------------------------------------
Page 1 of 1
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known):
Device Name: ____Esprit Ventilator
The ESPRIT ventilator is a microprocessor controlled, electrically powered, mechanical ventilator. It is intended for use by qualified medical personnel in providing continuous or intermittent ventilatory support for adult, pediatric and neonatal patients as prescribed by a physician. The ESPRIT Ventilator is intended for use in either invasive or noninvasive applications. The Auto-Trak option is intended for adult and pediatric patients, and automatically adjusts I-Triggers and E-Cycles breathing without the need for user adjustment of I-trigger (sensitivity) and E-cycle thresholds under changing leak conditions. The Auto-Trak option provides leak-compensated ventilation for leaks up to 60L/min.
| Prescription Use | X | AND/OR |
|---|---|---|
| (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) |
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 807 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
L. Schutten
(Division Sign-Off) Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital Infection Control, Dental Devices
510(k) Number: K092648
§ 868.5895 Continuous ventilator.
(a)
Identification. A continuous ventilator (respirator) is a device intended to mechanically control or assist patient breathing by delivering a predetermined percentage of oxygen in the breathing gas. Adult, pediatric, and neonatal ventilators are included in this generic type of device.(b)
Classification. Class II (performance standards).