(294 days)
Not Found
No
The summary describes calculations based on physiological parameters and a visual display, but does not mention any AI/ML techniques.
No
The device is indicated for the acquisition, processing, and display of hemodynamic parameters to assist clinicians, rather than directly treating a condition.
Yes
The device is indicated for the "acquisition, processing, and display of hemodynamic parameters" to "assist the clinician in achieving and maintaining a prescribed target hemodynamic stability." It also calculates specific parameters and provides "a visual indication of the patient's circulatory status," all of which point to its role in providing objective information about the patient's condition for clinical assessment and decision-making, which is characteristic of a diagnostic device.
Yes
The device description focuses on the processing and display of data obtained from other monitoring equipment and manual entry, indicating a software-based function. There is no mention of proprietary hardware components being part of the Navigator system itself, only that it obtains data from existing patient monitoring equipment.
Based on the provided information, the Navigator™ is not an IVD (In Vitro Diagnostic) device.
Here's why:
- Intended Use: The intended use clearly states that the Navigator™ is for the "acquisition, processing, and display of hemodynamic parameters" to assist clinicians in managing a patient's circulatory status. This involves analyzing physiological data obtained directly from the patient (Cardiac Output, MAP, RAP) and manually entered data.
- Device Description: The description reinforces that it's a "physiologically integrated system designed to assist clinicians in the management of the systemic circulatory state in the critically ill patient."
- Lack of IVD Characteristics: IVD devices are typically used to examine specimens (like blood, urine, tissue) in vitro (outside the body) to provide information for diagnosis, monitoring, or screening. The Navigator™ does not perform any analysis on patient specimens. It processes and displays physiological data obtained in vivo (within the body) or manually entered.
The Navigator™ is a patient monitoring and data processing system used to provide clinical decision support based on real-time physiological data.
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
The Navigator™ is indicated for the acquisition, processing, and display of hemodynamic parameters, in order to assist the clinician in achieving and maintaining a prescribed target hemodynamic stability.
Mean Systemic Filling Pressure (Pms) and Heart Efficiency (En) parameters are calculated by the Navigator from Cardiac Output (CO), Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) and Right Atrial Pressure (RAP) data, obtained directly from patient monitoring equipment, and other data obtained by manual clinician entry. The Navigator system provides a visual indication of the patient's circulatory status in relation to predetermined goals.
Product codes (comma separated list FDA assigned to the subject device)
DXG
Device Description
The Navigator is a physiologically integrated system designed to assist clinicians in the management of the systemic circulatory state in the critically ill patient.
Mentions image processing
Not Found
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found
Input Imaging Modality
Not Found
Anatomical Site
Not Found
Indicated Patient Age Range
patients (between the ages of 15-90 and weights of 40-150 with unstable circulations
Intended User / Care Setting
valuable in any environment where resuscitation, stabilization and optimize . . . I hemodynamic and oxygen metabolism is required. It provides clinicians with monitori… and support information that assists with management of the circulatory state of ' critically in patients. The device provides clinicians with a graphical display of monitoring and support in inning as a visual aid in determining a patient's circulatory state. Navigator ™ is used in cc rjunction with standard monitoring in the following environments including:
- Intensive care .
- OR/cu: · thesia .
- High .. vendency and step-down units .
- rey departments Emer .
- . Coro .
- Achie care.
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Summary of Performance Studies (study type, sample size, AUC, MRMC, standalone performance, key results)
Clinical Testing
Methodology: Following Ingerv, cligible patients were to be randomized on admission to ICU to receive care guideu. invigator™ or conventional care while CO was being monitored. All patients were to be coni I to the Navigator™. The screen of the patients in the control group was to have the graphic ction blank, the right hand side was to display actual values of MAP. CO and Right Atrial I ur. (RAP) as slaved from the bedside monitor, along with the patient's screening and randon ion number and initials. The arm of the study to which the patient was randomized (contro vigator™), was also to be shown.
Number of subjects (planned and analyzed): Suffici mients were to be consented to allow 100 patients to complete the study (50 in each :n). A total of 112 patients were enrolled into the study and formed the intent to treat treatme O. these, 107 patients completed the study as planned. A total of 105 patients formed popula יוו the mo i intent to treat (MITT) population (57 patients in the Navigator™ arm and 48 patient he control arm) these being the patients connected to Navigator™ with three hours or more o !.
Results: Effic :. The pr chopoint was the average distance (mean standardized) to the central point of the targeı ı >> >scular zone over the period the patient was connected to the Navigator™.
instrated non-inferiority to Navigator over conventional care. There was no The st: statist i significant difference between the two treatment arms with regards to the mean standa • · I distance to the central point of the cardiovascular zone.
- Safet . : :ts:
on'ts cnrolled in the study were included in the safety evaluation. Adverse events All 11. e. Irom the time that the patient was connected to Navigator™ until the follow up were c
visit. follow us adverse events were collected from the time the patient was randomized until the visit.
Four h
Navig
study. ed and thirteen (413) adverse events involving 99 patients (52 (88.1%) patients in the Navigator™ arm and 47 (88.7%) patients on the conventional care arm) were reported during the study.
The mo
haemo
by pati
have a equently reported adverse events were anaemia, hyperglycaemia, decreased in, hypotension and abnormal blood glucose. None of the adverse events experienced on the Navigator™ arm or the conventional care arm of the study were considered to ionship to the device.
One pa
consid
events was withdrawn from the study due to an adverse event (cardiac tamponade one serious but not related to the device). Two patients died during the study due to idered to be not related to the device.
Ten (1
comp'
correct
categor vi re incidents occurred during the study, but none were associated with any clinical ns. All occurrences were recognizable by the operator or physician, and necessary were made in the production device. These incidents fell into the following
•
F
occ urrences of Navigator screen buttons or settings that did not function as intended. These were recognizable by the operator.
•
Fou
dat urrences of data communication problems with peripheral equipment or failure to display peripheral equipment.
•
One
sta urrence where a Swan-Ganz catheter appeared to be incorrectly positioned on x-ray and confident of MAP, CO and CI readings.
•
One
wa errence where a discrepancy was reported with MAP display when an aortic balloon pump te.
Thirty
on the c
consid ) serious adverse events involving 24 patients (12 on the Navigator™ arm and 12 ional care arm) were reported during the study. No serious adverse events were e device related.
Review
frequer rse events per treatment group, suggested no trends in the presentation (type, severity) of adverse events per study arm.
Conc
The s't
statist
stand: instrated non-inferiority to Navigator over conventional care. There was no aificant difference between the two treatments arms with regards to the mean stance to the central point of the cardiovascular zone.
The in
arms, w
events of adverse events and serious adverse events was comparable across the two study ends in the type, frequency or severity of event. No adverse or serious adverse asidered to be related to Navigator™.
Devic
comp ts which occurred during the study were not associated with any clinical and did not impact on patient safety.
Data at the use of Navigator™ is safe when compared to conventional ICU care.
Key Metrics (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, etc.)
Not Found
Predicate Device(s): If the device was cleared using the 510(k) pathway, identify the Predicate Device(s) K/DEN number used to claim substantial equivalence and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text. List the primary predicate first in the list.
Reference Device(s): Identify the Reference Device(s) K/DEN number and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text.
Not Found
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information for the subject device only (e.g. presence / absence, what scope was granted / cleared under the PCCP, any restrictions, etc).
Not Found
§ 870.1435 Single-function, preprogrammed diagnostic computer.
(a)
Identification. A single-function, preprogrammed diagnostic computer is a hard-wired computer that calculates a specific physiological or blood-flow parameter based on information obtained from one or more electrodes, transducers, or measuring devices.(b)
Classification. Class II (performance standards).
0
510(k) Number:
Date: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 4
510(k) Summary
Introduction
MAY 1 2 2010
This summary is intended to comply with requirements of the SMDA and 21CFR 807.92. FDA may make this summary available to the public within 30 days following a finding of substantial equivalence.
510(k) Applicant
Applied Physiology Pty Ltd 119 Willoughby Rd., Crows Nest 2065 Sydney, NSW, Australia Tel: +61 (2) 9956 3838 / Fax: +61 (2) 9439 2157
510(k) Correspondent
Robert N. Clark, President and Senior Consultant Medical Device Regulatory Advisors, Inc. 13605 West 7th Ave., Golden, CO 80401 USA Tel: 303-463-0900 / Fax: 303-558-3833
Date Prepared
April 30, 2010
Trade Name of Device
Navigator™M
Common Name of Device
Computer, diagnostic, pre-programmed, single-function
Classification Name
Single function pre-programmed diagnostic computer
510(k) Classification
· Class II 21 CFR 870.1435
Predicate Devices
The Navigator is substantially equivalent to the following predicate device(s):
Device Description
The Navigator is a physiologically integrated system designed to assist clinicians in the management of the systemic circulatory state in the critically ill patient.
1
Indications for Use:
The Navigator™ is indicated for the acquisition, processing, and display of hemodynamic parameters, in order to assist the clinician in achieving and maintaining a prescribed target hemodynamic stability.
Mean Systemic Filling Pressure (Pms) and Heart Efficiency (En) parameters are calculated by the Navigator from Cardiac Output (CO), Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) and Right Atrial Pressure (RAP) da'n, obtained directly from patient monitoring equipment, and other data obtained by manual clinician entry. The Navigator system provides a visual indication of the patient's circulatory status in relation to predetermined goals.
Intendod Use
The Navivator TM is valuable in any environment where resuscitation, stabilization and optimize . . . I hemodynamic and oxygen metabolism is required. It provides clinicians with monitori… and support information that assists with management of the circulatory state of ' critically in patients. The device provides clinicians with a graphical display of monitoring and support in inning as a visual aid in determining a patient's circulatory state. Navigator ™ is used in cc rjunction with standard monitoring in the following environments including:
- Intensive care .
- OR/cu: · thesia .
- High .. vendency and step-down units .
- rey departments Emer .
- . Coro .
- Achie care. �
This inc : es a broad range of patients (between the ages of 15-90 and weights of 40-150 with unstable circulations presenting to the intensive care unit (ICU) or critical care kilogram» units and ose undergoing or suffering from:
- Pre vost open heart surgery. .
- . Pre : iost major surgery.
- . Secte . stients.
- Drug rdose .
- Septi · . rock
- . Renn lure
- Maje. . . 1718.
- Muje. unnu.
- Hyp. ni_shock
- � Car. ic shock
is applicable to critically ill patients requiring circulatory support in whom MAP, The dev RAP ar. O are being monitored regularly.
Risk । nagement
has been designed to either completely eliminate or mitigate known health hazards This de ith the use of the device. Health hazard risk reduction has been accomplished by associ:: rigoroı. > >ication of a risk management program according to standard ISO 14971:2007.
2
Non-{ ical Testing
Non-cl al testing was performed in order to validate the design against the company's esign requirements, and to assure conformance with the following voluntary specific standar،
IEC 60(0) .- 1: Medical Electrical Equipment -- Part 1: General Requirements for Safety (1988), .mendment 1 (1991) & Amendment 2 (1995). includir
BS EN 01-1-2:2002, incorporating amendment A1:2006. This standard is identical with EMC s ard IEC 60601-1-2:2001, incorporating amendment 1:2004: Medical electrical - Part 1-2: General requirements for safety - Collateral Standard: Electromagnetic equipm· Compa .ity - Requirements and Tests (Edition 2:2001 with Amendment 1:2004).
Rigorors ofiware verification and validation testing was successfully performed by an indeper ' t software testing service. Testing included verification and validation to approved iystem Requirements, Operational Requirements, and Data Processing Requirements. Naviga
iation of Electrical Safety testing, EMC testing, and Software Verification and The co Valida provide a high level of confidence that both the Navigator hardware and software are ale and effective as the predicate devices. at least
Clinica Testing
Applier viology Pty Ltd conducted multi-center, open, randomized, controlled human clinica' Is in order to collect safety and efficacy data supporting substantial equivalence.
Meth c ogy:
Follow Ingerv, cligible patients were to be randomized on admission to ICU to receive care guideu. invigator™ or conventional care while CO was being monitored. All patients were to be coni I to the Navigator™. The screen of the patients in the control group was to have the graphic ction blank, the right hand side was to display actual values of MAP. CO and Right Atrial I ur. (RAP) as slaved from the bedside monitor, along with the patient's screening and randon ion number and initials. The arm of the study to which the patient was randomized (contro vigator™), was also to be shown.
Numl. َ subjects (planned and analyzed):
Suffici mients were to be consented to allow 100 patients to complete the study (50 in each :n). A total of 112 patients were enrolled into the study and formed the intent to treat treatme O. these, 107 patients completed the study as planned. A total of 105 patients formed popula יוו the mo i intent to treat (MITT) population (57 patients in the Navigator™ arm and 48 patient he control arm) these being the patients connected to Navigator™ with three hours or more o !.
c :ults:
Effic :.
The pr chopoint was the average distance (mean standardized) to the central point of the targeı ı >> >scular zone over the period the patient was connected to the Navigator™.
instrated non-inferiority to Navigator over conventional care. There was no The st: statist i significant difference between the two treatment arms with regards to the mean standa • · I distance to the central point of the cardiovascular zone.
- Safet . : :ts:
on'ts cnrolled in the study were included in the safety evaluation. Adverse events All 11. e. Irom the time that the patient was connected to Navigator™ until the follow up were c
3
| visit. follow | us adverse events were collected from the time the patient was randomized until the visit. |
|---|---|
| Four h | |
| Navig | |
| study. | ed and thirteen (413) adverse events involving 99 patients (52 (88.1%) patients in the Navigator™ arm and 47 (88.7%) patients on the conventional care arm) were reported during the study. |
| The mo | |
| haemo | |
| by pati | |
| have a | equently reported adverse events were anaemia, hyperglycaemia, decreased in, hypotension and abnormal blood glucose. None of the adverse events experienced on the Navigator™ arm or the conventional care arm of the study were considered to ionship to the device. |
| One pa | |
| consid | |
| events | was withdrawn from the study due to an adverse event (cardiac tamponade one serious but not related to the device). Two patients died during the study due to idered to be not related to the device. |
| Ten (1 | |
| comp' | |
| correct | |
| categor | vi re incidents occurred during the study, but none were associated with any clinical ns. All occurrences were recognizable by the operator or physician, and necessary were made in the production device. These incidents fell into the following |
| • | |
| F | |
| occ | urrences of Navigator screen buttons or settings that did not function as intended. These were recognizable by the operator. |
| • | |
| Fou | |
| dat | urrences of data communication problems with peripheral equipment or failure to display peripheral equipment. |
| • | |
| One | |
| sta | urrence where a Swan-Ganz catheter appeared to be incorrectly positioned on x-ray and confident of MAP, CO and CI readings. |
| • | |
| One | |
| wa | errence where a discrepancy was reported with MAP display when an aortic balloon pump te. |
| Thirty | |
| on the c | |
| consid | ) serious adverse events involving 24 patients (12 on the Navigator™ arm and 12 ional care arm) were reported during the study. No serious adverse events were e device related. |
| Review | |
| frequer | rse events per treatment group, suggested no trends in the presentation (type, severity) of adverse events per study arm. |
| Conc | |
| The s't | |
| statist | |
| stand: | instrated non-inferiority to Navigator over conventional care. There was no aificant difference between the two treatments arms with regards to the mean stance to the central point of the cardiovascular zone. |
| The in | |
| arms, w | |
| events | of adverse events and serious adverse events was comparable across the two study ends in the type, frequency or severity of event. No adverse or serious adverse asidered to be related to Navigator™. |
| Devic | |
| comp | ts which occurred during the study were not associated with any clinical and did not impact on patient safety. |
| Data | at the use of Navigator™ is safe when compared to conventional ICU care. |
| Subs | Equivalence |
| Applier | |
| instruc | logy Pty Ltd believes that the Navigator is safe and effective when used as nowledgeable and trained personnel. Navigator performs at least as safely and |
·
effec! onventional care using predicate devices, and is therefore substantially equivalent to the n rketed predicate device(s).
4
Image /page/4/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features a stylized eagle with three stripes forming its wing and body. The eagle is oriented diagonally, facing upwards and to the right. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES USA" is arranged in a circular pattern around the eagle.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Room -WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
MAY 12 2010
Applied Physiology Pty., Ltd. c/o-Mr .- Robert-N .- Clark ---President and Senior Consultant Medical Device Regulatory Advisors, Inc. 4251 Kipling Street, Suite 565 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-2899
Re: K092219
Device Name: Navigator™ Clinical Guidance System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.1435 Regulation Name: Single function pre-programmed diagnostic computer Regulatory Class: Class II (Two) Product Code: DXG Dated: April 30, 2010 Received: May 7, 2010
Dear Mr. Clark
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
5
Page 2 - Mr. Robert N. Clark
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRHOffices/ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely vours.
am D. Zuckerman, M.D. Director Division of Cardiovascular Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
6
Indications for Use
K092219 - - -510(k) Number (if known): __
Device Name: Navigator™
Indications for Use:
The Navigator™ is indicated for the acquisition, processing, and display of hemodynamic parameters, in order to assist the clinician in achieving and maintaining a prescribed target hemodynamic stability.
Mean Systemic Filling Pressure (Pms) and Heart Efficiency (En) parameters are calculated by the Navigator from Cardiac Output (CO), Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) and Right Atrial Pressure (RAP) data, obtained directly from patient monitoring equipment, and other data obtained by manual clinician entry. The Navigator system provides a visual indication of the patient's circulatory status in relation to predetermined goals.
Prescription Use X (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
(Division Sign-Off)
Division di Cardiovascular Devices 510(k) Number 120922