K Number
K082451
Manufacturer
Date Cleared
2008-12-16

(113 days)

Product Code
Regulation Number
884.1720
Reference & Predicate Devices
Predicate For
N/A
AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
Intended Use

The Stryker Videoscope is a video endoscope indicated for use in endoscopy and endoscopic surgery within the thoracic and abdominal cavities, including female reproductive organs.

Device Description

The Stryker Videoscope is a video endoscope intended to illuminate and allow observation of body cavities relating to general endoscopic, laparoscopic and gynecological surgeries. Traditionally, surgeons would need multiple scopes with varying direction of view angles (such as 0°, 30°, and 45°) to have a wide range of view. The Stryker Videoscope can provide varying angles all in one scope through a distal articulating section that changes the direction of view between 0° and 110° (±10°) from the axis of the scope. The Videoscope will have a working length of 330mm, with an outer diameter of 10mm.

AI/ML Overview

The provided document is a 510(k) pre-market notification for the Stryker Videoscope. It focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device rather than providing a detailed study proving the device meets specific acceptance criteria based on clinical performance metrics. Therefore, many of the requested elements for a detailed study report are not present in this document.

Here's an analysis based on the information available:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

The document does not explicitly present a table of acceptance criteria with corresponding performance results in the format typically seen for a new device's clinical performance study (e.g., sensitivity, specificity, accuracy). Instead, it focuses on demonstrating equivalence to a predicate device by comparing characteristics and performance specifications.

The closest to "acceptance criteria" are the standards the device conforms to and the comparison to the predicate device.

Characteristic / StandardAcceptance Criteria (Implied by Predicate Equivalence & Standards)Reported Device Performance (Stryker Videoscope)
Intended UseSame as predicate (endoscopy and endoscopic surgery within the thoracic and abdominal cavities, including female reproductive organs).The Stryker Videoscope is a video endoscope indicated for use in endoscopy and endoscopic surgery within the thoracic and abdominal cavities, including female reproductive organs. (Same)
Field of View (FOV)Not explicitly stated as "acceptance criteria," but compared to predicate's 90°.75° +/- 5° (Different, but deemed equivalent)
Direction of ViewSame as predicate (0° Forward Viewing).0° Forward Viewing (Same)
Outer DiameterNot explicitly stated as "acceptance criteria," but compared to predicate's 10.5mm.10mm (Different, but deemed equivalent)
Bending Section Angulations (UP/DOWN/LEFT/RIGHT)Not explicitly stated as "acceptance criteria," but compared to predicate's 100°/100°/60°/60°.110°/110°/110°/110°, ± 10 (Different, but deemed equivalent, allowing more flexibility)
Working LengthSame as predicate (330mm).330mm (Same)
Inner Working ChannelNot explicitly stated as "acceptance criteria," but compared to predicate's "Provided."None (Different, but deemed equivalent as its function (insufflation/irrigation) is not indicated for the Stryker Videoscope)
BiocompatibilityConformance to ISO 10993-1:2003 and FDA Blue Book Memorandum #G95-1.All patient contacting materials are validated for biocompatibility in accordance with the requirements.
SterilizationAble to be sterilized to a SAL = 10⁻⁶ via Sterrad and ETO.Sterility Assurance Validation testing will be conducted to ensure it is able to be sterilized to a SAL = 10⁻⁶. ETO Residuals will be tested according to ISO10993-7.
Mechanical ReliabilityOptimal performance and reliability (implied).A mechanical reliability test will be conducted to ensure optimal performance and reliability.

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance

The document does not describe a clinical "test set" in the context of diagnostic performance (e.g., images for readers to interpret). The "testing" mentioned pertains to engineering verification and validation of physical device characteristics (e.g., mechanical reliability, biocompatibility, sterilization). Therefore, sample sizes for a clinical test set and data provenance (country, retrospective/prospective) are not applicable or provided in this document.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts

As there is no clinical "test set" for performance evaluation against a ground truth in this document, this information is not available.

4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

Not applicable as there is no clinical "test set" for performance evaluation.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

Not applicable. This document describes a videoscope, which is a viewing instrument, not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

Not applicable. This document describes a videoscope, not an algorithm.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)

Not applicable. Ground truth for clinical performance comparison is not relevant to this 510(k) submission for a videoscope. The "ground truth" for the device's characteristics is based on established engineering and manufacturing specifications and testing standards.

8. The sample size for the training set

Not applicable. This document describes a videoscope, not a machine learning model that requires a training set.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

Not applicable. This document describes a videoscope, not a machine learning model that requires a training set.

Summary of the Study and Device Approval:

The document describes a 510(k) pre-market notification for the Stryker Videoscope. The "study" presented here is a demonstration of substantial equivalence to a predicate device (Olympus Laparo-Thoraco Videoscope XLTF-VAW, K053382), rather than a clinical performance study with defined acceptance criteria and statistical analysis.

The document claims that the Stryker Videoscope meets acceptance criteria implicitly by:

  • Having the same intended use as the predicate device.
  • Conforming to various voluntary safety and performance standards (e.g., ISO 10993 for biocompatibility, IEC 60601-1 for electrical safety, ISO 8600 for endoscope requirements, EN 550 for sterilization).
  • Undergoing (or committing to undergo) verification and validation testing for mechanical reliability, biocompatibility, and sterilization, ensuring it meets these relevant safety and performance standards.
  • Minor technological differences (such as outer diameter, FOV, bending angulations, and absence of an inner working channel) are argued not to raise new questions regarding safety or effectiveness and are explained with rationale (e.g., smaller FOV allows better image quality, increased articulation offers more flexibility).

The FDA's decision to clear the device K082451 confirms that based on the presented information, the device is considered substantially equivalent to the predicate device and therefore "as safe and effective."

{0}------------------------------------------------

5900 Optical Court San Jose, CA 95138 t: 408 754 2000 f: 408 754 2521

K082451

Image /page/0/Picture/2 description: The image shows the word "Stryker" in a bold, sans-serif font. The letters are black, and the background is white. There is a registered trademark symbol in the upper right corner of the word. The word is the logo for Stryker Corporation, a medical technology company.

Endoscopy

510(k) SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS

Device Name

DEC 1 6 2008

Table 1

Proprietary Name:Stryker Videoscope
Common and Usual Names:Endoscopic Laparoscope, Gynecological Laparoscope,Videoscope
Classification Name:Laparoscope, General & Plastic Surgery - CFR 21 §876.1500, Laparoscope, Gynecological - CFR 21 §884.1720

Product Description:

Device Description and Intended Use: The Stryker Videoscope is a video endoscope indicated for use in endoscopy and endoscopic surgery within the thoracic and abdominal cavities, including female reproductive organs.

Voluntary Safety and Performance Standards: The Stryker Videoscope will conform to the standards deemed applicable for this device. Please refer to section 5.1 for a list of standards that will be used.

Predicate Device

Table 2

NameLAPARO THORACO VIDEOSCOPE XLTF-VAW
ManufacturerOlympus
510(k)K053382

Substantial Equivalence: The indications for use and most technological characteristics are the same for both devices. The few differences in technological characteristics are slight and do not raise new questions of safety and effectiveness, thus demonstrating that the Stryker Videoscope is at least as safe and effective as the Laparo Thoraco Videoscope XLTF - VAW that is currently legally marketed. Please see substantial equivalence table 4 for a detailed comparison.

INTRODUCTION 1.0

This 510(k) pre-market notification letter is submitted to notify the FDA of Stryker Endoscopy's intent to market the Stryker Videoscope. The Stryker Videoscope is a video endoscope indicated for use in endoscopy and endoscopic surgery within the thoracic and abdominal cavities, including female reproductive organs.

{1}------------------------------------------------

5900 Optical Court San Jose, CA 95138 t: 408 754 2000 f: 408 754 2521

stryker®

Endoscopy

DEVICE SPONSOR: 2.0

Stryker Endoscopy is the sponsor of this pre-market notification. Stryker Endoscopy has an established history of manufacturing and marketing medical products for endoscopic surgery.

Sponsor of 510(k):Stryker Endoscopy5900 Optical CourtSan Jose, CA 95138FDA Registration # 2936485
Owner:Stryker Corporation2725 Fairfield RoadKalamazoo, MI 49002FDA Registration # 1811755
Manufacturer of VideoscopeHenke-Sass, Wolf, GMBHKeltenstrasse 1Tuttlingen, Germany D-78532FDA Registration # 8010418
Manufacturer of CameraControl Unit (CCU)Stryker Endoscopy5900 Optical CourtSan Jose, CA 95138FDA Registration # 2936485
Correspondence Regardingthis 510(k):Desiree CrisoloSr. Regulatory RepresentativeStryker Endoscopy5900 Optical Ct.San Jose, CA 95138Phone: 408-754-2784Fax: 408-754-2521Email: Desiree.Crisolo@Stryker.com

Table 3

STRYKER VIDEOSCOPE 510(K) SUBMISSION

{2}------------------------------------------------

DEVICE IDENTIFICATION 3.0

3.1 Proposed Device Name

Table 4

Proprietary Name:Stryker Videoscope
Common and Usual Name:Endoscopic Laparoscope, GynecologicalLaparoscope, Videoscope

3.2 Predicate Device Name

Table 5

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------NameManufacturer------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------10/17
ADARO THORACOAnd Advertising on the discussion of the contributionBook AndrewlympusA Print of Children And ChildrenKAS3287
VIDEOSCODE VI TE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

4.0 CLASSIFICATION AND PRODUCT CODE

Table 6

Classification NameProductCodeProductClassRegulationNumber
Laparoscope, General and Plastic SurgeryGCJII876.1500
Laparoscope, GynecologicHETII884.1720

4.1. Advisory Committee General & Plastic Surgery Obstetrics/Gynecology

5.0 SECTION 514 SPECIAL CONTROLS

No performance standards or special controls have been established under section 514 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.

However, Stryker Endoscopy has chosen to comply with the following voluntary standards:

5.1. Voluntary Standards

Table 7StandardTitle of Standard
EN 550: 1994Sterilization of Medical Devices: Validation and routine Control ofEthylene Oxide Sterilization
ISO 14971:2007Medical Devices- Application of risk management to medical devices.
ISO 10993-1:2003Biological evaluation of medical devices- Part 1: Evaluation and testing.
ISO 10993-5:1999Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 5: Tests for in vitrocytotoxicity

'T'shle 7

{3}------------------------------------------------

ISO 10993-7:1995Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 7: Ethylene oxidesterilization residuals
ISO 10993-10:2002Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 10: Tests for irritationand delayed-type hypersensitivity
ISO 10993-11:2006Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 11: Tests for systemictoxicity
RequiredBiocompatibilityTraining andToxicology Profilesfor Evaluation ofMedical Devices (G95-1)Use of International Standard ISO-10993, "Biological Evaluation ofMedical Devices Part 1: Evaluation and Testing"
IEC 60601-1:2005Medical Electrical Equipment - Part 1: General Requirements for BasicSafety and Essential Performance
IEC60601-1-1:2000Medical electrical equipment - Part 1-1: General requirements for safety- Collateral standard: Safety requirements for medical electrical systems
IEC 60601-1-2:2001 + A1:2004Medical electrical equipment - Part 1-1: General requirements for safety- Collateral standard: Safety Requirements for Medical ElectricalSystems
IEC 60601-1-4:2000 +A1:1999Medical Electrical Equipment - Part 1-4: General Requirements forSafety Collateral Standard: Programmable Medical Devices
IEC60601-2-18:1996Medical Electrical Equipment - Part 2: Particular Requirements for thesafety of endoscopic equipment
ISO 8600-1:2005Optics and Photonics - Medical Endoscopes and Endotherapy DevicesPart 1: General Requirements
ISO 8600-3:1997Optics and optical instruments - Medical Endoscopes and endoscopicaccessories Part 3: Determination of field of view and direction of viewof endoscopes with optics
ISO 8600-4Optics and optical instruments - Medical endoscopes and endoscopicaccessories - Part 4: Determination of maximum width of insertionportion

.

.

:

:

{4}------------------------------------------------

DEVICE DESCRIPTION 6.0

  • Intended Use: The Stryker Videoscope is a video endoscope indicated for use in 6.1. endoscopic surgery within the thoracic and abdominal cavities, including female reproductive organs.

System Description and Diagrams 6.2.

Figure 1: Stryker Videoscope System Block Diagram

Image /page/4/Figure/4 description: The image shows a diagram of a videoscopic system. The system includes a sterile field, a videoscope, a videoscope camera control unit (CCU), a light source, and a display monitor. The videoscope is connected to the videoscope camera control unit (CCU) and the light source. The videoscope camera control unit (CCU) is connected to the display monitor.

6.2.1. Stryker Videoscope

The Stryker Videoscope is intended to illuminate and allow observation of body cavities relating to general endoscopic, laparoscopic and gynecological surgeries. Traditionally, surgeons would need multiple scopes with varying direction of view angles (such as 0°, 30°, and 45°) to have a wide range of view. The Stryker Videoscope can provide varying angles all in one scope through a distal articulating section that changes the direction of view between 0° and 110° (±10°) from the axis The Videoscope will have a working length of 330mm, of the scope. with an outer diameter of 10mm.

{5}------------------------------------------------

Image /page/5/Figure/0 description: The image is labeled as "Figure 2: Stryker Videoscope" and shows a Stryker videoscope with several labeled parts. The distal tip housing/cover, articulating section/rigid shaft, keypad, articulation levers, handle/housing, cable to CCU and LS, and video connector are all labeled with arrows pointing to the corresponding parts of the videoscope. The videoscope has a long, thin rigid shaft with an articulating section near the distal tip.

6.2.2.2.

Table 8: Patient Contacting Materials

ComponentDevice ComponentMaterial
VideoscopeDistal Tip Housing/Rigid Shaft/Articulation Levers304 Stainless Steel
Distal Tip CoverGlass
Articulating SectionViton
Housing6061 - T6 AluminumAnodized
KeypadSilicone Rubber
CableSilicone Rubber

{6}------------------------------------------------

Safety and Performance Testing 6.3.

Mechanics/Articulating mechanism and controls: The Stryker 6.3.1.

Videoscope has an articulating distal tip to allow the user to view the surgical area. The articulating section is made up of several links that are attached to four guide wires. These guide wires run from the distal tip up into the handle where the control levers are located. The external control handles, when moved, drive the internal articulating mechanism to push and pull the bending section in four directions and operates similarly to a pulley system. A mechanical reliability test will be conducted to ensure optimal performance and reliability.

Biocompatibility 6.3.2.

All patient contacting materials are validated for biocompatibility in accordance with the requirements of ISO 10993-1:2003 and FDA Blue Book Memorandum #G95-1. Additionally, patient-contacting and usercontacting materials do not contain natural rubber or latex. Refer to Section 6.2.2 or Table 3 for patient contacting materials.

  • Sterilization: The Stryker Videoscope will be a reusable device. As 6.3.3. such, it will undergo Sterility Assurance Validation testing to ensure it is able to be sterilized to a SAL =10 - . The two methods of sterilization that will be available to the users are Sterrad and ETO. ETO Residuals will be tested according to ISO10993-7.

SUBSTANTIAL ROUTHAL BROOM COMPARISON 7.0

The Stryker Videoscope described in this 510(k) notification is substantially equivalent to the currently marketed predicate device; the Olympus Laparo-Thoraco Videoscope XLTF-VAW. The fundamental technology and intended use is similar for both the Stryker Videoscope and Olympus Laparo Thoraco Videscope XLTF-VAW. In the following sections, the proposed device's characteristics are compared with the predicate device and the differences with respect to their impact on safety and effectiveness are discussed.

{7}------------------------------------------------

Table 9: Substantial Equivalence Table

:

.

:

Proposed DeviceStryker VideoscopePredicate DeviceOlympus Laparo ThoracoVideoscope XLTF-VAW(K053382)Same orDifferentEquivalence
Characteristics
Intended UseThe StrykerVideoscope is a videoendoscope intendedfor use in endoscopyand endoscopicsurgery within thethoracic andabdominal cavities,including femalereproductive organs.LAPARO-THORACOVIDEOSCOPE XLTF-VAWis designed for endoscopy andendoscopic surgery within thethoracic and abdominalcavities including femalereproductive organs.SameEquivalent
Field of View(FOV),(Degree)75° +/- 5°90°DifferentEquivalent
Direction of View(degree)0° Forward Viewing0° Forward ViewingSameEquivalent
Outer Diameter ofDistal End10mm10.5mmDifferentEquivalent
Bending SectionAngulations(UP/DOWN/LEFT/RIGHT),(degree)110°/110°/110°/110°,± 10100°/100°/60°/60°DifferentEquivalent
Working Length(mm)330mm330mmSameEquivalent
Inner WorkingChannelNoneProvidedDifferentEquivalent

.

:

. . . .

.

:

{8}------------------------------------------------

DISCUSSION OF DIFFERENCES 7.1.

  • Outer Diameter: The diameter of the Stryker Videoscope is .5mm 7.1.1. smaller than the Olympus Laparo Thoraco Videoscope XLTF-VAW. Laparoscopes generally come in 5mm and 10 - 11mm. Both the Stryker and Olympus Videoscopes fall within the 10-11mm range. The slight difference in diameter will not significantly affect the optical image or the incision created when used in surgery.
  • Bending Section Angulations/FOV: The Stryker Videoscope will have 7.1.2. a bending articulation of 110° (±10°) up, down, left and right with a field of view (FOV) of 75 degrees. The Olympus Laparo Thoraco Videoscope XLTF-VAW has a bending articulation of 100° up and down, 60° left and right with a FOV of 90 degrees. The bending section angulations allow the user to vary the direction of view; while the FOV dictates how much the user sees within the image. In general, as the FOV gets bigger, the image quality tends to get reduced. By keeping a smaller FOV, the Stryker Videoscope may maintain a greater degree of image quality. The device will have the ability to articulate at 110° all around, so that although the FOV is smaller than the Olympus Videoscope, the direction of view can be varied 50° more to the left and right. The surgeon will have the convenience of articulating 110° (±10°) all around, allowing more flexibility through articulation while minimizing the movement of the scope handle.
  • Inner Working Channel: An inner working channel will not be 7.1.3. provided with the Stryker Videoscope. The predicate device uses the inner working channel to perform insufflation and irrigation, both of which are not indicated in the Stryker Videoscope.

8.0 CONCLUSION

As demonstrated through comparisons between the predicate device Olympus Laparo Thoraco Videoscope XLTF-VAW and the proposed, the Stryker Videoscope, no significant differences exist in the indications for use, surgical procedures, constructions, performance specifications and labeling of these devices. As there are no significant differences, there are no new questions raised regarding safety and effectiveness. Therefore, the Stryker Videoscope is considered, in terms of safety and effectiveness, substantially equivalent to the currently marketed device.

{9}------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES

Image /page/9/Picture/1 description: The image contains the text "Public Health Service". The text is in a bold, serif font. The text is black and the background is white.

Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850

Ms. Desiree Mae Crisolo Sr. Regulatory Representative Stryker® Endoscopy 5900 Optical Court SAN JOSE CA 95138

K082451 Re:

Trade/Device Name: Stryker Videoscope Regulation Number: 21 CFR §884.1720 Regulation Name: Gynecologic laparoscope and accessories Regulatory Class: II Product Codes: HET and GCJ Dated: November 25, 2008 Received: November 28, 2008

Dear Ms. Crisolo:

We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.

If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA, may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.

{10}------------------------------------------------

Page 2

Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable; the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.

This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.

If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Office of Compliance at one of the following numbers, based on the regulation number at the top of this letter:

21 CFR 876.xxx(Gastroenterology/Renal/Urology)240-276-0115
21 CFR 884.xxx(Obstetrics/Gynecology)240-276-0115
21 CFR 894.xxx(Radiology)240-276-0120
Other240-276-0100

Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding postmarket surveillance, please contact CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics' (OSB's) Division of Postmarket Surveillance at 240-276-3474. For questions regarding the reporting of device adverse events (Medical Device Reporting (MDR)), please contact the Division of Surveillance Systems at 240-276-3464. You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (240) 276-3150 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/industry/support/index.html.

Sincerely vours.

Jorgu M. Whang

Joyce M. Whang, Ph.D. Acting Director, Division of Reproductive. Abdominal, and Radiological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health

Enclosure

{11}------------------------------------------------

INDICATIONS FOR USE

Device Name: Stryker Videoscope

510(k) Number:_KO82451

The Stryker Videoscope is a video endoscope indicated for use in endoscopy and endoscopic surgery within the thoracic and abdominal cavities, including female reproductive organs.

Prescription Use X (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)

AND/OR

Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)

(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE OF NEEDED)

Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)

Hulut Reimer

(Division Sign-Off) Division of Reproductive, Abdominal, and Radiological Devic 510(k) Number.

§ 884.1720 Gynecologic laparoscope and accessories.

(a)
Identification. A gynecologic laparoscope is a device used to permit direct viewing of the organs within the peritoneum by a telescopic system introduced through the abdominal wall. It is used to perform diagnostic and surgical procedures on the female genital organs. This generic type of device may include: Trocar and cannula, instruments used through an operating channel, scope preheater, light source and cables, and component parts.(b)
Classification. (1) Class II (performance standards).(2) Class I for gynecologic laparoscope accessories that are not part of a specialized instrument or device delivery system, do not have adapters, connector channels, or do not have portals for electrosurgical, lasers, or other power sources. Such gynecologic laparosope accessory instruments include: the lens cleaning brush, biopsy brush, clip applier (without clips), applicator, cannula (without trocar or valves), ligature carrier/needle holder, clamp/hemostat/grasper, curette, instrument guide, ligature passing and knotting instrument, suture needle (without suture), retractor, mechanical (noninflatable), snare, stylet, forceps, dissector, mechanical (noninflatable), scissors, and suction/irrigation probe. The devices subject to this paragraph (b)(2) are exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 884.9.