(61 days)
No
The device description and performance studies focus on automated real-time PCR and DNA detection, with no mention of AI or ML algorithms for analysis or interpretation.
No
The device is an in vitro diagnostic test used to detect the DNA of specific bacteria from blood cultures, which aids in diagnosis. It does not provide any form of therapy or treatment.
Yes
Explanation: The "Intended Use/Indications for Use" section explicitly states that the device is "a qualitative in vitro diagnostic test intended for the detection of Staphylococcus aureus (SA) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) DNA directly from patient positive blood cultures." The term "diagnostic test" clearly indicates its diagnostic function.
No
The device description clearly outlines hardware components including the GeneXpert® Dx System instrument platform, fluidic cartridges, syringe drive, ultrasonic horn, and thermocycler, in addition to reagents. While software is involved in the system's operation, it is not a software-only medical device.
Yes, this device is an IVD (In Vitro Diagnostic).
The "Intended Use / Indications for Use" section explicitly states: "The Cepheid Xpert™ MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay performed on the GeneXpert® Dx System™ is a qualitative in vitro diagnostic test intended for the detection of Staphylococcus aureus (SA) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) DNA directly from patient positive blood cultures."
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
The Cepheid Xpert™ MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay performed on the GeneXpert® Dx System™ is a qualitative in vitro diagnostic test intended for the detection of Staphylococcus aureus (SA) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) DNA directly from patient positive blood cultures. The assay utilizes automated realtime polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the amplification of MRSA/SA specific DNA targets and fluorogenic target-specific hybridization probes for the real-time detection of the amplified DNA. The assay is performed directly on positive blood culture specimens that are determined as Gram Positive Cocci in Clusters (GPCC) or as Gram Positive Cocci in singles (GPC) by Gram stain. The Cepheid Xpert™ MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay is not intended to monitor treatment for MRSA/SA infections. Subculturing of positive blood cultures is necessary to recover organisms for susceptibility testing or for epidemiological typing.
Product codes
NQX
Device Description
The Cepheid Xpert™ MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay (Xpert MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay) is a rapid, automated DNA test for simultaneously detecting MRSA and SA Alber) I a rapids, and culture specimens. The specimens. The specimen consists of an aliquot taken from a positive blood culture bottle for testing with the Xpert MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay. Using one of the small disposable transfer pipettes provided with the test kit, a single drop of the positive blood culture aliquot (approximately 50 µL) is transferred into the Elution Reagent. The Elution Reagent is vortexed for 10 seconds and the entire contents are transferred to "S" chamber of the disposable fluidic cartridge (the Xpert MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay cartridge). The two single-use reagents (Reagent 1 and Reagent 2) that are provided with the assay are transferred to different, uniquelylabeled chambers of the Xpert MRSA/SA cartridge. The user initiates a test from the system user interface and places the cartridge into the GeneXpert® Dx System instrument platform, which performs hands-off real-time, multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detection of DNA. In this platform, additional sample preparation, amplification, and real-time detection are all fully-automated and completely integrated.
The GeneXpert Dx System consists of a GeneXpert instrument, personal computer, and the multi-chambered fluidic cartridges that are designed to complete sample preparation and real-time PCR for detection of MRSA and SA in approximately 50 minutes. Each system has 2 to 16 randomly accessible modules that are each capable of performing separate sample preparation and real-time PCR tests. Each module contains a syringe drive for dispensing fluids, an ultrasonic horn for lysing cells or spores, and a proprietary I-CORE® thermocycler for performing real-time PCR and detection.
The Xpert MRSA/SA Assay includes reagents for the simultaneous detection of the target organisms, SA and MRSA. The primers and probes in the Xpert MRSA/SA Assay detect nucleic acid sequences of the staphylococcal protein A (spa), the gene for methicillin/oxacillin resistance (mecA), and staphylococcal cassette chromosome (SCCmec) inserted in the SA chromosomal attB site.
The test includes a Sample Processing Control (SPC) to control for adequate processing of the target bacteria and to monitor the presence of inhibitor(s) in the PCR assay. The Probe Check Control (PCC) verifies reagent rehydration, PCR tube filling in the cartridge, probe integrity, and dye stability.
Mentions image processing
Not Found
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found
Input Imaging Modality
Not Found
Anatomical Site
Not Found
Indicated Patient Age Range
Not Found
Intended User / Care Setting
Operators with no clinical lab experience to experienced clinical laboratory technologists.
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
A multi-center study was conducted on 279 patients to determine the performance characteristics of the device relative to the reference culture results and susceptibility testing, the current standard of care. The test results showed the Xpert MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay to be substantially equivalent to the current standard of care.
Clinical Comparison Study:
Subjects included individuals whose routine care called for blood culture testing. If the blood culture sample was positive for microbial growth and the Gram stain showed Gram positive cocci (singles or in clusters), the sample was eligible for inclusion in the clinical study, and aliquots of leftover culture material were obtained for testing by the Xpert MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay. Culture and Gram stain procedures, and patient management continued at the site per the standard practice. Susceptibility testing was performed in accordance with the CLSI documents M2-A9 and M100-S17.89 Cefoxitin was used as a surrogate for detecting methicillin/oxacillin resistance.
Performance of the Xpert MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay was calculated relative to the reference culture results.
Overall Results:
A total of 249 specimens were tested for MRSA and SA by Xpert MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay and culture.
Summary of Performance Studies (study type, sample size, AUC, MRMC, standalone performance, key results)
Non-Clinical Studies:
Analytical Inclusivity Study on CDC Staphylococcus aureus Specimens:
- Sample Size: 25 Staphylococcus aureus strains from CDC.
- Data Source: CDC.
- Annotation Protocol: All strains tested in triplicate using 100 ul of stationary phase cell suspension diluted 10 million-fold. CFU/test determined by plate counts in triplicate. Bacterial strain identification, PFGE type, and SCCmec type determined by CDC.
- Key Results: All results reported correctly by the Xpert™ MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay, except one specimen which was found to be mislabeled by CDC.
Analytical Inclusivity Study on Expanded Panel of Staphylococcus aureus Specimens:
- Sample Size: 121 additional Staphylococcus aureus strains.
- Data Source: Not explicitly stated, implied to be laboratory cultures.
- Annotation Protocol: Overnight cultures grown in BHI broth and adjusted to 0.5 McFarland units. All strains tested in triplicate using 100 uL of cultures further diluted 100 thousand to one million-fold. MRSA (78) and SA (43) strains selected to broadly represent genetic diversity. Discordant results characterized by catalase, tube coagulase, and Gram stain. Methicillin susceptibility assessed by disk diffusion.
- Key Results: The Xpert MRSA/SA Assay correctly identified 116 of 121 strains.
- 3 of 78 MRSA strains reported MRSA negative; SA positive, and further characterization indicated they were not resistant and correctly reported.
- 2 of 43 SA strains reported MRSA positive, and further characterization indicated they were resistant and correctly reported.
- All 12 known USA300 isolates were correctly reported MRSA positive and SA positive.
- 22 "empty cassette variants" isolates were correctly identified as MRSA negative and SA positive.
Analytical Limit of Detection (LoD):
- Study Type: Analytical LoD determination studies.
- Sample Size: Replicates of 20 for each MRSA concentration tested (6 individual isolates) and for each MSSA concentration (3 individual MSSA isolates).
- Key Results:
- Positive SA result 95% of the time with 95% confidence for 100 CFU.
- Positive MRSA result 95% of the time with 95% confidence for 250 CFU.
- No significant competitive inhibitory effects observed on analytical LoD of MRSA SCCmec types I, II, III, IVa, V, or VI in presence of competing MSSA cells as high as 1:1x10^3.
Linearity:
- Study Type: Linearity study.
- Annotation Protocol: Ten-fold serial dilutions (1e8 CFU/sample - 10 CFU/sample) of SA and MRSA isolates.
- Key Results:
- Responds linearly (r^2 = 0.998) for spa detection as function of SA cell input over 6 logs. PCR efficiency for spa reaction is 100%.
- Responds linearly (r^2 = 0.999) for spa detection as function of MRSA cell input over 6 logs. PCR efficiency for spa reaction is 95.4%.
- Responds linearly (r^2 = 0.999) for mecA detection as function of MRSA cell input over 6 logs. PCR efficiency for mecA reaction is 93.3%.
- Responds linearly (r^2 = 0.999) for SCCmec detection as function of MRSA cell input over 5 logs. PCR efficiency for mec reaction is 94.6%.
Analytical Specificity (Cross-reactivity Study):
- Sample Size: 105 strains (98 ATCC, 7 NARSA).
- Annotation Protocol: Two or more replicates of each isolate tested at 1.7 - 3.2 McFarland units.
- Key Results: All isolates were reported MRSA negative and SA negative; none of the isolates were detected. Analytical specificity was 100%.
Interfering Substances Study:
- Study Type: Interfering Substances study.
- Key Results: Under the conditions of this study, presence of potentially interfering substances (anticoagulants, blood culture media components) did not affect assay performance.
Clinical Studies:
Clinical Comparison Study:
- Study Type: Multi-site prospective investigation study.
- Sample Size: 249 specimens.
- Settings: Three US institutions.
- Key Results: The Xpert MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay identified 100 % of the specimens positive for MRSA and 100 % of the specimens negative for MRSA relative to culture. The Xpert MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay identified 100 % of the specimens positive for SA and 99.4 % of the specimens negative for SA relative to the reference culture method.
- MRSA Performance: Positive Percent Agreement: 100% (53/53), 95% CI: 93.3% - 100%. Negative Percent Agreement: 100% (196/196), 95% CI: 98.1% - 100%.
- SA Performance: Positive Percent Agreement: 100% (77/77), 95% CI: 95.3% - 100%. Negative Percent Agreement: 99.4% (171/172), 95% CI: 96.8% - 100%.
- Success Rate: 92.8% (233/251) successful on first attempt. 94.1% (16/17) of retested indeterminate samples gave a result on second attempt.
Antibiotic Usage:
- Sample Size: 249 cases.
- Key Results: Antibiotic use within 3 weeks prior to sample collection did not cause a statistically significant difference in assay positive percent agreement or negative percent agreement.
Reproducibility Study:
- Study Type: Reproducibility study.
- Sample Size: 10 specimens (varying concentrations of SA, MRSA, S. epidermidis).
- Settings: Three sites.
- Annotation Protocol: Tested in duplicate on 10 different days at each site.
- Key Results: 100% total agreement across all sites and specimens (600/600). Mean Cycle Threshold (Ct) values and variance components (SD and %CV) were provided for each concentration level tested, showing low variability.
Key Metrics (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, etc.)
Clinical Comparison Study (vs. Reference Culture):
- MRSA:
- Positive Percent Agreement: 100% (53/53)
- Negative Percent Agreement: 100% (196/196)
- SA:
- Positive Percent Agreement: 100% (77/77)
- Negative Percent Agreement: 99.4% (171/172)
Reproducibility Study:
- Total Agreement by Site: 100% (200/200) for each site.
- Total Agreement Overall: 100% (600/600).
Data from BD GeneOhm™ StaphSR Assay (from predicate device's 510(k) Summary):
- MRSA:
- Positive % Agreement: 100.0
- Negative % Agreement: 98.2 - 100.0
- SA:
- Positive % Agreement: 98.8 - 100.0
- Negative % Agreement: 96.5 - 100.0
Predicate Device(s)
BD GeneOhm™ StaphSR Assay (510(k) #K071026), Remel Staphaurex Latex Agglutination Test (510(k) #K851949), BBL (BD) Oxacillin Screen Agar (550(k) #K863821), BD BBL CHROMagar MRSA (510(k) #K042812), BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology ID/AST System (510(k) #K020322 and #K023301).
Reference Device(s)
Not Found
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information
Not Found
§ 866.1640 Antimicrobial susceptibility test powder.
(a)
Identification. An antimicrobial susceptibility test powder is a device that consists of an antimicrobial drug powder packaged in vials in specified amounts and intended for use in clinical laboratories for determining in vitro susceptibility of bacterial pathogens to these therapeutic agents. Test results are used to determine the antimicrobial agent of choice in the treatment of bacterial diseases.(b)
Classification. Class II (performance standards).
0
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the word "CONFIDENTIAL" in all caps. The word is written in a simple, sans-serif font. The text is black against a white background, creating a high contrast.
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows a handwritten string of characters. The string appears to be "K082140". The characters are written in black ink on a white background. The handwriting is somewhat messy, but the characters are still legible.
Image /page/0/Picture/11 description: The image contains the word "Cepheid." in a stylized font. To the left of the word is a graphic of three curved lines that are stacked on top of each other. The lines are thick and black, and they appear to be moving in a upward direction.
SEP 2 9 2008
5.0 510(k) Summary
As required by 21 CFR Section 807.92(c).
| Submitted by: | Cepheid
904 Caribbean Drive
Sunnyvale, CA 90489
Phone number: (408) 400-8230
Fax number: (408) 541-6439 |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Contact: | Russel K. Enns, Ph.D. |
| Date of Preparation: | September 17, 2008 |
| Device: | |
| Trade name: | Xpert™ MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay |
| Common name: | Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and
Staphylococcus aureus (SA) from positive blood culture
bottles assay. |
| Type of Test: | Nucleic Acid Amplification Test, DNA, Methicillin-
resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and
Staphylococcus aureus (SA), qualitative |
| Classification name: | Antimicrobial susceptibility test powder |
| Regulation number: | 866.1640 |
| Procode: | NQX |
| Classification
Advisory Committee: | Microbiology |
| Panel: | 83 |
| Predicate Devices: | BD GeneOhm™ StaphSR Assay (510(k) #K071026),
Remel Staphaurex Latex Agglutination Test (510(k)
#K851949),
BBL (BD) Oxacillin Screen Agar (510(k) #K863821),
BD BBL CHROMagar MRSA (510(k) #K042812
BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology ID/AST System
(510(k) #K020322 and #K023301). |
Device Description:
The Cepheid Xpert™ MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay (Xpert MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay) is a rapid, automated DNA test for simultaneously detecting MRSA and SA Alber) I a rapids, and culture specimens. The specimens. The specimen consists of an aliquot
1
taken from a positive blood culture bottle for testing with the Xpert MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay. Using one of the small disposable transfer pipettes provided with the test kit, a single drop of the positive blood culture aliquot (approximately 50 µL) is transferred into the Elution Reagent. The Elution Reagent is vortexed for 10 seconds and the entire contents are transferred to "S" chamber of the disposable fluidic cartridge (the Xpert MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay cartridge). The two single-use reagents (Reagent 1 and Reagent 2) that are provided with the assay are transferred to different, uniquelylabeled chambers of the Xpert MRSA/SA cartridge. The user initiates a test from the system user interface and places the cartridge into the GeneXpert® Dx System instrument platform, which performs hands-off real-time, multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detection of DNA. In this platform, additional sample preparation, amplification, and real-time detection are all fully-automated and completely integrated.
The GeneXpert Dx System consists of a GeneXpert instrument, personal computer, and the multi-chambered fluidic cartridges that are designed to complete sample preparation and real-time PCR for detection of MRSA and SA in approximately 50 minutes. Each system has 2 to 16 randomly accessible modules that are each capable of performing separate sample preparation and real-time PCR tests. Each module contains a syringe drive for dispensing fluids, an ultrasonic horn for lysing cells or spores, and a proprietary I-CORE® thermocycler for performing real-time PCR and detection.
The Xpert MRSA/SA Assay includes reagents for the simultaneous detection of the target organisms, SA and MRSA. The primers and probes in the Xpert MRSA/SA Assay detect nucleic acid sequences of the staphylococcal protein A (spa), the gene for methicillin/oxacillin resistance (mecA), and staphylococcal cassette chromosome (SCCmec) inserted in the SA chromosomal attB site.
The test includes a Sample Processing Control (SPC) to control for adequate processing of the target bacteria and to monitor the presence of inhibitor(s) in the PCR assay. The Probe Check Control (PCC) verifies reagent rehydration, PCR tube filling in the cartridge, probe integrity, and dye stability.
Device Intended Use:
The Cepheid Xpert™ MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay performed on the GeneXpert® Dx System™ is a qualitative in vitro diagnostic test intended for the detection of Staphylococcus aureus (SA) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) DNA directly from patient positive blood cultures. The assay utilizes automated realtime polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the amplification of MRSA/SA specific DNA targets and fluorogenic target-specific hybridization probes for the real-time detection of the amplified DNA. The assay is performed directly on positive blood culture specimens that are determined as Gram Positive Cocci in Clusters (GPCC) or as Gram Positive Cocci in singles (GPC) by Gram stain. The Cepheid Xpert™ MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay is not intended to monitor treatment for MRSA/SA infections. Subculturing of positive blood cultures is necessary to recover organisms for susceptibility testing or for epidemiological typing.
2
In a mixed culture containing MRSA/SA and other organisms (e.g. Gram negative bacilli, yeast), results can be false negative or variable depending on the concentration of MRSA/SA present, particularly if the concentration of MRSA/SA is close to the LoD of the assay.
The performance of the Xpert MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay was validated in Cepheid's clinical study using BD BACTEC™ Plus Aerobic/F blood culture bottles. Use of any other culture bottles and/or media would require independent validation.
Substantial Equivalence:
The Xpert MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay is substantially equivalent to the BD GeneOhm™ StaphSR Assay (510(k) #K071026). Both assays detect SA and MRSA from positive blood cultures and determine the presence of the target organisms through real-time PCR amplification and fluorogenic target-specific hybridization detection.
Table 5.1 shows the similarities and differences between the Xpert MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay and the BD GeneOhmTM StaphSR Assay.
The Xpert MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay is also substantially equivalent to conventional microbiology-based predicate devices that identify (ID) and/or test for antimicrobial susceptibility (AST) of gram positive organisms, including Staphylococcus species of human origin from pure culture isolates. These conventional microbiologybased predicates accommodate multiple specimen types, including positive blood cultures. These conventional microbiology-based predicates are:
- Remel Staphaurex Latex Agglutination Test (510(k) #K851949), .
- BBL (BD) Oxacillin Screen Agar (510(k) #K863821), .
- BD BBL CHROMagar MRSA (510(k) #K042812), and .
- BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology ID/AST System (510(k) #K020322 and . #K023301).
Table 5.2 compares the new device with the conventional microbiology-based assays for SA. Table 5.3 compares the new device with the conventional microbiology-based assays for MRSA.
A multi-center study was conducted on 279 patients to determine the performance characteristics of the device relative to the reference culture results and susceptibility testing, the current standard of care. The test results showed the Xpert MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay to be substantially equivalent to the current standard of care.
3
Table 5.1
Similarities and Differences Between the Xpert MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay and the Molecular-based Predicate Device
Similarities | ||
---|---|---|
Device | Predicate | |
Item | Xpert MRSA/SA Blood Culture | |
Assay | BD GeneOhm™ StaphSR | |
Assay (510(k) #K071026) | ||
Intended Use | Rapid detection of MRSA and SA | Same |
Indication for Use | Identification of MRSA and SA | |
colonization | Same | |
Specimen Type | Positive Blood Culture | Same |
Technological | ||
Principles | Fully-automated nucleic acid | |
amplification (DNA); real-time PCR | Same | |
DNA Target | ||
Sequence | Sequence incorporating the insertion | |
site ( attBssc ) of Staphylococcal | ||
Cassette Chromosome mec | ||
(SCC mec ) for detection of MRSA. | Same | |
Clinical | ||
Comparison | ||
Results: | Xpert™ MRSA/SA Blood Culture | |
Assay Performance vs. Reference | ||
Culture : | ||
MRSA: | ||
Sensitivity: 100.0 % | ||
Specificity: 100.0 % | ||
Accuracy: 100.0% | ||
PPVa: 100.0 % | ||
NPVb: 100.0 % | ||
Prevalence: 19.0 % | ||
SA: | ||
Sensitivity: 100.0% | ||
Specificity: 99.5 % | ||
Accuracy: 99.6 % | ||
PPV: 98.7 % | ||
NPV: 100.0 % | ||
Prevalence: 27.6 % | ||
aPositive predictive value | ||
bNegative predictive value | BD GeneOhm™ StaphSR | |
Assay Performance vs. | ||
Reference Culture methods : | ||
MRSA: | ||
Positive % Agreement: 100.0 | ||
Negative % Agreement: 98.2 - | ||
100.0 | ||
SA: | ||
Positive % Agreement: 98.8 - | ||
100.0 | ||
Negative % Agreement: 96.5 - | ||
100.0 | ||
[Data obtained from the BD | ||
GeneOhm StaphSR Assay | ||
510(k) Summary] | ||
Differences | ||
Device | Predicate | |
Item | Xpert™ MRSA/SA Blood Culture | |
Assay | BD GeneOhm™ StaphSR | |
Assay (K071026) | ||
Test Cartridge | Disposable single-use, multi-chambered fluidic cartridge. | Disposable single-use PCR tube |
Instrument System | Cepheid GeneXpert Dx System | Cepheid SmartCycler |
Sample | ||
Preparation | Self-contained and automated after mixed specimen and two single-dose reagents are added to cartridge. | Manual |
Probes | TaqMan® Probes | Molecular Beacons |
Internal Controls | Sample processing control (SPC) and probe check control (PCC). | One internal reagent control and external positive and negative controls required per run |
DNA Target | ||
Sequence | Sequence specific to methicillin/oxacillin resistance ( mecA gene) | N/A |
Users | Operators with no clinical lab experience to experienced clinical laboratory technologists. | CLIA High Complexity |
Laboratory Users | ||
DNA Target | ||
Sequence | Sequence specific to Staphylococcus aureus species ( spa gene) | Sequence specific to Staphylococcus aureus species ( nuc gene) |
Ability to identify | ||
correctly "Empty | ||
Cassette Variants" | Yes, sequence specific to Staphylococcus aureus species ( mecA gene) | No |
Rapid test results | Approximately 50 minutes to result. | Approximately 60-75 minutes to result. |
4
:
.
5
Table 5.2
Similarities and Differences Between the Xpert MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay and the Conventional Microbiology-based Predicate Devices for Staphylococcus aureus (SA) only
Similarities | |||
---|---|---|---|
Item | Device | Predicates (SA only) | |
Xpert MRSA/SA Blood | |||
Culture Assay | Staphaurex Latex | ||
Agglutination | |||
Test for SA | |||
K851949 | BD Phoenix | ||
Automated | |||
Microbiology | |||
System for SA | |||
510(k) #K020322 | |||
Intended Use | Detection of SA | Same | Same |
Single use | Yes | Same | Same |
Assay Controls | Positive Control: SA | ||
Negative Control: S. | |||
epidermidis | Same | Same |
Differences | |||
---|---|---|---|
Item | Device | Predicates (SA only) | |
Xpert MRSA/SA Blood | |||
Culture Assay | Staphaurex Latex | ||
Agglutination | |||
Test for SA | |||
K851949 | BD Phoenix | ||
Automated | |||
Microbiology | |||
System for SA | |||
K020322 | |||
Mode of | |||
Detection | Sequence specific to | ||
Staphylococcus aureus | |||
species (spa gene) | Clumping factor | ||
and protein A | Microbial | ||
utilization and | |||
degradation of | |||
specific | |||
substrates | |||
Specimen Type | Positive Blood Cultures | Staphylococcus | |
species | Gram Positive | ||
organisms | |||
Assay format | Amplification: PCR | ||
Detection: Fluorogenic target- | |||
specific hybridization | Agglutination | ||
with latex | |||
particles | |||
sensitized with | |||
fibrinogen and | |||
IgG | Conventional, | ||
chromogenic and | |||
fluorogenic | |||
biochemical tests | |||
for identification | |||
(ID) and | |||
antimicrobial | |||
resistance test | |||
(AST) |
6
Differences | |||
---|---|---|---|
Item | Device | Predicates (SA only) | |
Xpert MRSA/SA Blood | |||
Culture Assay | Staphaurex Latex | ||
Agglutination | |||
Test for SA | |||
K851949 | BD Phoenix | ||
Automated | |||
Microbiology | |||
System for SA | |||
K020322 | |||
Interpretation of test results | Diagnostic software of the GeneXpert Dx System | Visual interpretation | Automated |
Table 5.3
Similarities and Differences Between the Xpert MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay and the Conventional Microbiology-based Predicate Devices for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
Similarities | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Item | Device | Predicates (MRSA only) | ||
Xpert | ||||
MRSA/SA | ||||
Blood Culture | ||||
Assay | Mueller Hinton | |||
Agar w/ 4% NaCl | ||||
and Oxacillin | ||||
(Oxacillin Screen | ||||
Agar Test) | ||||
K863821 | BBL | |||
CHROMagar | ||||
MRSA | ||||
(510(k) | ||||
#K042812) | BD Phoenix | |||
Automated | ||||
Microbiology | ||||
System | ||||
510(k) | ||||
#K023301 | ||||
Intended | ||||
Use | Detection of | |||
MRSA | Same | Same | Same | |
Single use | Yes | Same | Same | Same |
Assay | ||||
Controls | Positive Control: | |||
MRSA | ||||
Negative Control: | ||||
SA | Same | Same | Same |
Differences | |||
---|---|---|---|
Item | Device | Predicates (MRSA only) | |
Xpert | |||
MRSA/SA | |||
Blood Culture | |||
Assay | Mueller Hinton | ||
Agar w/ 4% NaCl | |||
and Oxacillin | |||
(Oxacillin Screen | |||
Agar Test) | |||
K863821 | BBL | ||
CHROMagar | |||
MRSA | |||
(510(k) | |||
#K042812) |
BD Phoenix
Automated
Microbiology
System
510(k)
#K023301 |
7
Differences | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Item | Device | Predicates (MRSA only) | ||
Xpert | ||||
MRSA/SA | ||||
Blood Culture | ||||
Assay | Mueller Hinton | |||
Agar w/ 4% NaCl | ||||
and Oxacillin | ||||
(Oxacillin Screen | ||||
Agar Test) | ||||
K863821 | BBL | |||
CHROMagar | ||||
MRSA | ||||
(510(k) | ||||
#K042812) | BD Phoenix | |||
Automated | ||||
Microbiology | ||||
System | ||||
510(k) | ||||
#K023301 | ||||
Mode of | ||||
Detection | ||||
for | ||||
methicillin | ||||
resistance | SCCmec gene | |||
specific for | ||||
MRSA | ||||
mecA gene | ||||
specific for | ||||
methicillin/ | ||||
oxacillin | ||||
resistance | Growth on | |||
Mueller Hinton | ||||
Agar with 4% | ||||
NaCl and 6 ug/ml | ||||
oxacillin | Use of specific | |||
Chromogenic | ||||
substrates and | ||||
cefoxitin to | ||||
differentiate | ||||
MRSA from | ||||
other organisms | Utilizes a | |||
redox indicator | ||||
for detection of | ||||
organism | ||||
growth in the | ||||
presence of an | ||||
antimicrobial | ||||
agent | ||||
Specimen | ||||
Type | Positive Blood | |||
Cultures | Pure culture | |||
isolate of | ||||
Staphylococcus | ||||
aureus | Anterior nares | Pure culture | ||
isolate of | ||||
Staphylococcus | ||||
aureus | ||||
Assay | ||||
format | Amplification: | |||
PCR | ||||
Detection: | ||||
Fluorogenic | ||||
target-specific | ||||
hybridization | Phenotypic | |||
detection based | ||||
on a 24 hour | ||||
growth of SA | ||||
inoculated on | ||||
media | Phenotypic | |||
detection base | ||||
on a 24-48 hour | ||||
growth of SA | ||||
(mauve | ||||
colonies) | ||||
inoculated on | ||||
media | AST panels | |||
containing | ||||
MIC tests for | ||||
several | ||||
antimicrobial | ||||
agents | ||||
Interpretatio | ||||
n of test | ||||
results | Diagnostic | |||
software of the | ||||
GeneXpert Dx | ||||
System | Manual: Visual | |||
interpretation | Manual: Visual | |||
interpretation | Automated |
Non-Clinical Studies:
Analytical Inclusivity Study on CDC Staphylococcus aureus Specimens
Twenty-five (25) Staphylococcus aureus strains from multiple sources provided by the CDC were tested using the Xpert™ MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay. All strains were tested in triplicate using 100 ul of stationary phase cell suspension diluted 10 millionfold. Colony forming units per assay (CFU/test) were determined by plate counts in
8
triplicate. Bacterial strain identification, PFGE type and SCCmec type were determined by the CDC.
All results were reported correctly by the Xpert™ MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay, except one specimen. Further investigation reveled that the particular specimen was actually mislabeled by the CDC.
Analytical Inclusivity Study on Expanded Panel of Staphylococcus aureus Specimens
One hundred twenty-one (121) additional Staphylococcus aureus strains were tested using the Xpert MRSA/SA Assay. Overnight cultures were grown in Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) broth and adjusted to 0.5 McFarland units. All strains were tested in triplicate using 100 uL of cultures further diluted 100 thousand to one million-fold.
MRSA (78) and SA (43) strains were selected to broadly represent the range of genetic diversity found in the species Staphylococcus aureus based on phylogenetic structure. Selections represent primary lineages with emphasis on specific clonal complexes within which MRSA is predominantly observed. Lineages that contain MRSA and SA, as well as those that contain SA exclusively were included.
The Xpert MRSA/SA Assay correctly identified 116 of 121 strains. The 5 discordants were characterized by catalase, tube coagulase, and Gram stain. Methicillin susceptibility was assessed by disk diffusion using a 30 µg cefoxitin disk and a diameter cut-off of 21/22 mm.
Three of 78 MRSA strains were reported MRSA negative; SA positive using the Xpert assay. Further characterization indicates these strains are not resistant and were correctly reported MRSA negative; SA positive.
Two of 43 SA strains were reported MRSA positive using the Xpert assay. Further characterization indicates these strains are resistant and were correctly reported MRSA positive; SA positive.
Each of the 12 known USA300 isolates were correctly reported MRSA positive and SA positive as expected.
In another study, 22 Staphylococcus aureus isolates identified as "empty cassette variants" were tested using the Xpert MRSA/SA Assay. Overnight cultures were adjusted to 0.5 McFarland units. All strains were tested from cultures further diluted 100-fold (high) and 100 thousand-fold (low), providing a range of 300 - 3000 CFU/mL. The Xpert MRSA/SA Assay correctly identified all 22 isolates as MRSA negative and SA positive. At both cell concentrations tested, only Cts for the spa and SCCmec targets were reported. No mecA Cts were reported.
Analytical Limit of Detection
9
Studies were performed to determine the 95% confidence intervals for the analytical limit of detection (LoD) of Staphylococcus aureus (SA) cells and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) cells diluted into a blood and blood culture medium that can be detected using the Xpert MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay. The limit of detection is defined as the lowest number of colony forming units (CFU) per test that can be reproducibly distinguished from negative samples with 95% confidence or the lowest concentration at which 19 of 20 replicates are positive.
For MRSA, replicates of 20 were evaluated at each MRSA concentration tested (CFU/test) for 6 individual isolates representing SCCmec types I, II, III, IVa, V, and VI. When characterized by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), USA100, the most common healthcare-acquired strain and USA400, one of the most common communityacquired strains were represented.
For SA, replicates of 20 were evaluated at each MSSA concentration (CFU/test) for 3 individual MSSA isolates. USA types USA900 and USA1200 were represented.
The estimate and confidence intervals were determined using logistic regression with data (number of positive results per number of replicates at each level) over the range of CFU/test loadings. The confidence intervals were determined using maximum likelihood estimates on the logistic model parameters using the large sample variance-covariance matrix.
The results of this study indicate that the Xpert MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay will produce a positive SA result 95% of the time with 95% confidence for a positive blood culture aliquot (1 drop or 50uL) containing 100 CFU and a positive MRSA result 95% of the time with 95% confidence for a blood culture aliquot (1 drop or 50μL) containing 250 CFU.
An auxiliary study evaluated MRSA LOD in the presence of up to 1 x 106 MSSA cells. Under the conditions of this study, no significant competitive inhibitory effects were observed on the analytical LoD of MRSA SCCmec types I, II, III, IVa, V, or VI in the presence of competing MSSA cells as high as 1:1x103.
Linearity
A study was conducted to define the reportable range of the Xpert MRSA/SA Assay and demonstrate a linear relationship between SA and MRSA input and assay output (Ct). Linearity was evaluated using ten-fold serial dilutions (1e8 CFU/sample - 10 CFU/sample) of SA and MRSA isolates.
The Xpert MRSA/SA Assay responds linearly (r2 = 0.998) with respect to spa detection as a function of SA cell input over 6 logs. PCR efficiency for the spa reaction is 100%.
The Xpert MRSA/SA Assay responds linearly (r2 = 0.999) with respect to spa detection as a function of MRSA cell input over 6 logs. PCR efficiency for the spa reaction is 95.4%.
10
The Xpert MRSA/SA Assay responds linearly (r2 = 0.999) with respect to mecA detection as a function of MRSA cell input over 6 logs. PCR efficiency for the mecA reaction is 93.3%.
The Xpert MRSA/SA Assay responds linearly (r2 = 0.999) with respect to SCCmec detection as a function of MRSA cell input over 5 logs. PCR efficiency for the mec reaction is 94.6%
Analytical Specificity
Cross-reactivity Study
One hundred five 105 strains were collected, quantitated and tested using the Xpert MRSA/SA Assay. The 98 cultures from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and 7 strains from the Network on Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus (NARSA) represent species phylogenetically related to Staphylococcus aureus or those potentially encountered in a hospital environment.
Of these, methicillin-sensitive coagulase negative staphylococci (29) and methicillinresistant coagulase negative staphylococci (9) were included. The organisms tested were identified as either Gram positive (74), Gram negative (28), or yeast (3). The organisms were further classified as either aerobic (95) or anaerobic (10).
Two or more replicates of each isolate were tested at 1.7 - 3.2 McFarland units. Under the conditions of the study, all isolates were reported MRSA negative and SA negative; none of the isolates were detected by the Xpert MRSA/SA Assay. Positive and Negative controls were included in the study. The analytical specificity was 100%.
Interfering Substances Study
Substances that may be present in blood cultures with potential to interfere with the Xpert MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay were evaluated directly relative to the performance of the Xpert MRSA/SA Assay. Potentially interfering substances (IS) tested are shown in Table 5.6. They included anticoagulated whole blood and blood culture media components containing the anticoagulant sodium polyanetholesulfonate (SPS) or ion exchange and nonionic adsorbent resins to remove antimicrobials as listed in Table 5.4 with the active ingredients and concentrations shown. Negative samples were tested in each substance to determine the effect on the performance of the sample processing control (SPC). Positive samples were tested with MRSA cells spiked near the analytical LoD. All results were compared to positive and negative buffer controls.
Statistical analysis was conducted on the data generated.
Table 5.4: Potentially Interfering Blood Culture Substances Tested | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-- | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Substance | Active Ingredient | Conc. | Level* |
---|---|---|---|
TET Buffer (control) | Control | 100% (v/v) | 1 |
Whole Blood (ACD) | N/A | 50% (v/v) | 2 |
11
Whole Blood (EDTA) | N/A | 50% (v/v) | 3 |
---|---|---|---|
Whole Blood (Heparin) | N/A | 50% (v/v) | 4 |
Whole Blood (Sodium | |||
Citrate) | N/A | 50% (v/v) | 5 |
Human Plasma | N/A | 100% (v/v) | 6 |
BacT/Alert SA Aerobic | Supplemented | ||
Tryptic Soy, | |||
0.035% SPS | 100% (v/v) | 7 | |
BacT/Alert SN Anaerobic | Supplemented | ||
Tryptic Soy, | |||
0.035% SPS | 100% (v/v) | 8 | |
BACTEC STD | |||
Anaerobic/F | 3% Soybean- | ||
Casein Digest | |||
Broth, 0.025% SPS | 100% (v/v) | 9 | |
BACTEC STD Aerobic/F | 3% Soybean- | ||
Casein Digest | |||
Broth, 0.025% SPS | 100% (v/v) | 10 | |
BACTEC Plus | |||
Anaerobic/F | 2.75% Soybean- | ||
Casein Digest | |||
Broth, 0.05% SPS, | |||
17% resins | 100% (v/v) | 11 | |
BACTEC Plus Aerobic/F | 2.75% Soybean- | ||
Casein Digest | |||
Broth, 0.05% SPS, | |||
17% resins | 100% (v/v) | 12 |
(*) Level identifies each substance in the statistical analysis (ANOVA and Dunnett's multiple comparison method).
Statistical analysis of the data generated with and without these potentially interfering substances demonstrates that under the conditions of this study their presence did not affect assay performance. The inability to induce either MRSA or SPC failures in the presence of these substances is attributed to adequate removal of potential inhibitors during sample processing.
Clinical Studies
Clinical Comparison Study
Performance characteristics of the Xpert MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay were determined in a multi-site prospective investigation study at three US institutions by comparing the Xpert MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay with culture.
Subjects included individuals whose routine care called for blood culture testing. If the blood culture sample was positive for microbial growth and the Gram stain showed Gram positive cocci (singles or in clusters), the sample was eligible for inclusion in the clinical study, and aliquots of leftover culture material were obtained for testing by the Xpert MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay. Culture and Gram stain procedures, and patient management continued at the site per the standard practice. Susceptibility testing was
12
performed in accordance with the CLSI documents M2-A9 and M100-S17.89 Cefoxitin was used as a surrogate for detecting methicillin/oxacillin resistance.
Performance of the Xpert MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay was calculated relative to the reference culture results.
Overall Results
A total of 249 specimens were tested for MRSA and SA by Xpert MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay and culture.
The Xpert MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay identified 100 % of the specimens positive for MRSA and 100 % of the specimens negative for MRSA relative to culture.
The Xpert MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay identified 100 % of the specimens positive for SA and 99.4 % of the specimens negative for SA relative to the reference culture method.
The performance of the Xpert MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay is summarized in Table 2.
Culture | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRSA+ | SA+/MRSA- | Neg/No | ||||
Growth | Total | |||||
Xpert | MRSA+ | 53 | 0 | 0 | 53 | |
SA+/MRSA- | 0 | 24 | 1 | 25 | ||
SA- | 0 | 0 | 171 | 171 | ||
Total | 53 | 24 | 172 | 249 | ||
Xpert Performance | MRSA: | |||||
Positive Percent Agreement: 53/53 | 100% | 95% CI: 93.3% - 100% | ||||
Negative Percent Agreement: 196/196 | 100% | 95% CI: 98.1% - 100% | ||||
SA: | ||||||
Positive Percent Agreement: 77/77 | 100% | 95% CI: 95.3% - 100% | ||||
Negative Percent Agreement: 171/172 | 99.4% | 95% CI: 96.8% - 100% |
Table 2: MRSA/SA Performance vs. Reference Culture
Of the Xpert MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assays run on eligible specimens, 92.8% (233/251) of these specimens were successful on the first attempt. The remaining 18 gave indeterminate results on the first attempt (10 "INVALID", 7 "ERROR" and 1 "NO RESULT"). One of the indeterminate specimens could not be retested due to insufficient reagents available at the site to perform the retest. Of the 17 indeterminate on the first attempt with sufficient sample for retest, 94.1% (16/17) gave a result on the second attempt; one was indeterminate on the second attempt.
13
Antibiotic Usage
Among the 249 cases in the eligible dataset, antibiotic use within the 3 weeks prior to sample collection was reported for 65 and no antibiotic use was confirmed for 159; for 25 cases, antibiotic status was unknown. Antibiotic use did not cause a statistically significant difference in assay positive percent agreement or negative percent agreement.
Reproducibility Study
A panel of 10 specimens with varying concentrations of SA, MRSA and Staphylococcus epidermidis (negative) were tested in duplicate on 10 different days at each of the three sites (10 specimens x 2 times/ day x 10 days x 3 sites). One lot of Xpert MRSA/SA Blood Culture was used at each of the 3 testing sites. Xpert MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assays were performed according to the Xpert MRSA/SA procedure. Results are summarized in Table 5.6. Table 6 provides mean cycle threshold (Ct) values with variance components (SD and %CV) for each concentration level tested.
Specimen ID | Site 1 | Site 2 | Site 3 | % Total Agreement |
---|---|---|---|---|
Neg (MSSE) | 100% | |||
(20/20) | 100% | |||
(20/20) | 100% | |||
(20/20) | 100% (60/60) | |||
SA High Neg | 100% | |||
(20/20) | 100% | |||
(20/20) | 100% | |||
(20/20) | 100% (60/60) | |||
SA Low Pos | 100% | |||
(20/20) | 100% | |||
(20/20) | 100% | |||
(20/20) | 100% (60/60) | |||
SA Moderate Pos | 100% | |||
(20/20) | 100% | |||
(20/20) | 100% | |||
(20/20) | 100% (60/60) | |||
MRSA1 High Neg | 100% | |||
(20/20) | 100% | |||
(20/20) | 100% | |||
(20/20) | 100% (60/60) | |||
MRSA1 Low Pos | 100% | |||
(20/20) | 100% | |||
(20/20) | 100% | |||
(20/20) | 100% (60/60) | |||
MRSA1 Moderate Pos | 100% | |||
(20/20) | 100% | |||
(20/20) | 100% | |||
(20/20) | 100% (60/60) | |||
MRSA2 High Neg | 100% | |||
(20/20) | 100% | |||
(20/20) | 100% | |||
(20/20) | 100% (60/60) | |||
MRSA2 Low Pos | 100% | |||
(20/20) | 100% | |||
(20/20) | 100% | |||
(20/20) | 100% (60/60) | |||
MRSA2 Moderate Pos | 100% | |||
(20/20) | 100% | |||
(20/20) | 100% | |||
(20/20) | 100% (60/60) | |||
% Total Agreement | ||||
by Site | 100% | |||
(200/200) | 100% | |||
(200/200) | 100% | |||
(200/200) | 100% (600/600) |
Table 5.6 - Summary of Reproducibility Results
14
BG | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Level | Site | Mean | StdDev | CV | ||
MRSA1 neg | 1 | 34.58 | 1.65 | 4.8% | ||
MRSA1 neg | 2 | 34.27 | 0.87 | 2.5% | ||
MRSA1 neg | 3 | 34.57 | 1.14 | 3.3% | ||
MRSA1 neg | All | 34.47 | 1.25 | 3.6% | ||
MRSA2 neg | 1 | 34.44 | 0.78 | 2.3% | ||
MRSA2 neg | 2 | 34.38 | 0.67 | 1.9% | ||
MRSA2 neg | 3 | 34.60 | 1.02 | 2.9% | ||
MRSA2 neg | All | 34.47 | 0.82 | 2.4% | ||
SA neg | 1 | 34.09 | 0.80 | 2.3% | ||
SA neg | 2 | 34.39 | 0.52 | 1.5% | ||
SA neg | 3 | 34.23 | 0.88 | 2.6% | ||
SA neg | All | 34.23 | 0.75 | 2.2% | ||
NEG | 1 | 34.37 | 1.04 | 3.0% | ||
NEG | 2 | 34.35 | 0.56 | 1.6% | ||
NEG | 3 | 34.27 | 0.83 | 2.4% | ||
NEG | All | 34.33 | 0.82 | 2.4% |
Table 6 – Mean Cycle Threshold (Ct) Value With Variance Components (SD And %CV) For Each Concentration Level Tested In The Reproducibility Study
spa | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Level | Site | Mean | StdDev | CV |
MRSAI low | 1 | 31.14 | 0.58 | 1.9% |
2 | 30.62 | 0.38 | 1.2% | |
3 | 30.53 | 0.31 | 1.0% | |
All | 30.76 | 0.51 | 1.7% | |
MRSA1 mod | 1 | 29.23 | 0.34 | 1.2% |
2 | 29.03 | 0.53 | 1.8% | |
3 | 28.88 | 0.33 | 1.2% | |
All | 29.05 | 0.43 | 1.5% | |
MRSA2 low | 1 | 30.94 | 0.47 | 1.5% |
2 | 30.54 | 0.45 | 1.5% | |
3 | 30.77 | 0.39 | 1.3% | |
All | 30.75 | 0.46 | 1.5% | |
MRSA2 mod | 1 | 29.56 | 0.52 | 1.8% |
2 | 29.28 | 0.41 | 1.4% | |
3 | 29.49 | 0.46 | 1.5% | |
All | 29.44 | 0.47 | 1.6% | |
SA low | 1 | 32.93 | 0.77 | 2.3% |
.
15
2 | 32.85 | 0.71 | 2.2% | |
---|---|---|---|---|
3 | 32.57 | 0.40 | 1.2% | |
All | 32.78 | 0.65 | 2.0% | |
SA mod | 1 | 32.25 | 0.72 | 2.2% |
2 | 31.95 | 0.57 | 1.8% | |
3 | 31.81 | 0.44 | 1.4% | |
All | 32.00 | 0.61 | 1.9% |
mecA | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Level | Site | Mean | StdDev | CV |
MRSA1 low | 1 | 31.37 | 0.50 | 1.6% |
MRSA1 low | 2 | 30.92 | 0.46 | 1.5% |
MRSA1 low | 3 | 30.78 | 0.27 | 0.9% |
MRSA1 low | All | 31.02 | 0.48 | 1.6% |
MRSA1 mod | 1 | 29.48 | 0.34 | 1.2% |
MRSA1 mod | 2 | 29.27 | 0.41 | 1.4% |
MRSA1 mod | 3 | 29.23 | 0.35 | 1.2% |
MRSA1 mod | All | 29.33 | 0.38 | 1.3% |
MRSA2 low | 1 | 31.22 | 0.50 | 1.6% |
MRSA2 low | 2 | 31.02 | 0.65 | 2.1% |
MRSA2 low | 3 | 31.26 | 0.60 | 1.9% |
MRSA2 low | All | 31.17 | 0.59 | 1.9% |
MRSA2 mod | 1 | 30.01 | 0.57 | 1.9% |
MRSA2 mod | 2 | 29.62 | 0.36 | 1.2% |
MRSA2 mod | 3 | 29.79 | 0.44 | 1.5% |
MRSA2 mod | All | 29.80 | 0.48 | 1.6% |
SCCmec | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Level | Site | Mean | StdDev | CV |
MRSA1 low | 1 | 33.13 | 0.67 | 2.0% |
2 | 32.65 | 0.57 | 1.7% | |
3 | 32.47 | 0.30 | 0.9% | |
All | 32.75 | 0.60 | 1.8% | |
MRSA1 mod | 1 | 31.15 | 0.42 | 1.3% |
2 | 30.99 | 0.43 | 1.4% | |
3 | 31.04 | 0.52 | 1.7% | |
All | 31.06 | 0.46 | 1.5% | |
MRSA2 low | 1 | 33.01 | 0.45 | 1.4% |
2 | 32.65 | 0.71 | 2.2% |
·
16
3 | 33.03 | 0.57 | 1.7% | |
---|---|---|---|---|
All | 32.90 | 0.60 | 1.8% | |
MRSA2 mod | 1 | 31.74 | 0.55 | 1.7% |
2 | 31.37 | 0.43 | 1.4% | |
3 | 31.62 | 0.42 | 1.3% | |
All | 31.57 | 0.49 | 1.5% |
Conclusions
The results of the nonclinical analytical and clinical performance studies summarized above demonstrate that the MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay is as safe, as effective, and performs as well as or better than the predicate device.
:
:
17
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Image /page/17/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features a stylized eagle with three stripes forming its body and wing. The eagle is encircled by the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA". The logo is black and white.
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration 2098 Gaither Road Rockville MD 20850
SEP 2 9 2008
Russel K. Enns, Ph.D. Senior Vice President Regulatory & Clinical Affairs, Quality System and Reimbursement Cepheid, Inc. 904 Caribbcan Drive Sunnyvale, CA 94089
K082140 Trade/Device Name: Cepheid Xpert™ MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay Regulation Number: 21 CFR 866.1640 Regulation Name: Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test Powder Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: NQX Dated: September 17, 2008 Received: September 19, 2008
Dear Dr. Enns:
Re:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act (Act do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labelies roquilibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Parts 800 to 895. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Parts 801 and 809); and good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS), and good manufacturing practi
18
Page 2 -
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation and Safety at 240-276-0450. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding postmarket surveillance, please contact CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometric's (OSB's) Division of Postmarket Surveillance at 240-276-3474. For questions regarding the reporting of device adverse events (Medical Device Reporting (MDR)), please contact the Division of Surveillance Systems at 240-276-3464. You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (240) 276-3150 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/industry/support/index.html.
Sincerely vours.
Sally attaym
Sally A. Hojvat, M.Sc., Ph.D. Director Division of Microbiology Devices Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation and Safety Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
19
4.0 Indications for Use Statement
510(k) Number (if known): K082140
Device Name: Xpert™ MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay
Indications for Use:
The Cepheid Xpert™ MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay performed on the GeneXpert® Dx System™ is a qualitative in vitro diagnostic test intended for the detection of Staphylococcus aureus (SA) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) DNA directly from patient positive blood cultures. The assay utilizes automated realtime polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the amplification of MRSA/SA specific DNA targets and fluorogenic target-specific hybridization probes for the real-time detection of the amplified DNA. The assay is performed directly on positive blood culture specimens using BD BACTEC™ Plus Aerobic/F blood culture bottles that are determined as Gram Positive Cocci in Clusters (GPCC) or as Gram Positive Cocci in singles (GPC) by Gram stain. The Cepheid Xpert™ MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay is not intended to monitor treatment for MRSA/SA infections. Subculturing of positive blood cultures is necessary to recover organisms for susceptibility testing or for epidemiological typing.
Prescription Use X (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use AND/OR (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE OF NEEDED)
Freddie Lee Cooke
Division Sign Off
sion Sign-C
Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation and Safety
510(k) K082140