(211 days)
The Evolution™ Blood Glucose Testing System is for the quantitative measurement of the concentration of glucose in whole blood taken from the fingertip, ventral palm, dosal hand, upper arm, forearm, calf and/or thigh by diabetic patients or health care professionals as an aid in the management of diabetes. Evolution™ Blood Glucose Testing System is for in vitro diagnostic use and is not to be used for the diagnosis of diabetes or for neonatal use. Alternate site testing should be done during steady- state times when alucose is not changing rapidly.
The Evolution™ Monitor is an in vitro diagnostic device designed for measuring the concentration of glucose in whole blood, which is used with the Evolution™ Test strip. The principle of the test replies upon a specific type of glucose in blood sample, the oxidase glucose that reacts to electrodes in the test strip. The test strip employs an electrochemical signal generation an electrical current that will stimulate a chemical reaction. This reaction is measured by the Meter and displayed as your blood qlucose result.
Here's the information about the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets them, based on the provided text:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:
The document does not explicitly state quantitative acceptance criteria in a dedicated table format. Instead, it relies on a qualitative assessment of "substantial equivalence" to a predicate device.
| Acceptance Criteria | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|
| Substantial equivalence to predicate device (LifeScan One Touch® Ultra ® Blood Glucose Monitoring System (K021819)) for consumer use | "Test results showed substantial equivalence." |
| Substantial equivalence to predicate device for professional accuracy | "Test results showed substantial equivalence." |
| Verification of software requirement specifications based on predicate device specifications | "results showed substantial equivalence." |
| Verification of product requirement specifications based on predicate device specifications | "results showed substantial equivalence." |
| Verification of user interface requirement specifications from risk analysis based on predicate device specifications | "results showed substantial equivalence." |
| Safe, effective, and performs as well as the legally marketed predicate device | "The conclusion drawn from the clinical and non clinical tests is that the EVOLUTION™ Blood Glucose Monitoring System is as safe, as effective, and performs as well as the legally marketed predicate device, the ONE TOUCH(®) Ultra®." |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance:
The document mentions "clinical performance evaluation" but does not specify the sample size for the test set.
- Data Provenance: The document does not explicitly state the country of origin or whether the data was retrospective or prospective. It refers to "clinical performance evaluation using the EVOLUTION™ Blood Glucose Monitoring System components were conducted for the purpose of validating the consumer use for the user and the professional accuracy." This phrasing generally implies a prospective study conducted for the purpose of the submission.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts:
The document does not provide information on the number of experts used or their qualifications for establishing ground truth. Blood glucose monitoring systems typically use a laboratory reference method as ground truth rather than expert consensus on individual readings.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set:
The document does not describe an adjudication method for the test set. Given the nature of blood glucose measurement, a process like 2+1 or 3+1 expert adjudication would not be applicable.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done:
No, a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was not done. This type of study is more relevant for diagnostic imaging interpretation where human readers analyze independent cases. The study here focuses on the accuracy and performance of a blood glucose meter.
6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done:
Yes, the "Performance Data" section discusses "Non-clinical: Verification, validation and testing activities were conducted to establish the performance, functionality and reliability characteristics of the EVOLUTION™ Blood Glucose Monitoring System with respect to the predicate device. Testing involved the verification of software requirement specifications, product requirement specifications and user interface requirement specifications from risk analysis." This describes standalone testing of the device itself (its software, product, and user interface) to ensure it meets specifications, which is essentially an algorithm-only performance assessment in the context of a medical device.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used:
While not explicitly stated as "ground truth," for blood glucose monitoring systems, the implicit ground truth would be a laboratory reference method for glucose measurement. The clinical performance evaluation would compare the device's readings against these highly accurate laboratory results.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set:
The document does not specify the sample size for any training set. For blood glucose meters, the "training" (calibration) is usually inherent to the manufacturing process and chemistry of the test strips and meter, not a separate data-driven machine learning training set in the typical sense.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established:
As there is no explicit mention of a separate training set or machine learning model training, the document does not describe how ground truth for a training set was established.
{0}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Summary
This summary of 510(k)-safety and effectiveness information is being submitted in accordance with requirements of 21 CFR Part 807.92. MAR 2 I 2008 The assigned 510(K) Number is K072369.
Date: March 19, 2008
1. Submitter:
| Submitted by: | HMD Biomedical LLC8855 Grissom PkwyTitusville, FL. 32780 |
|---|---|
| Contact: | Merrell ShyePhone: 321-267-9911Fax: 321-267-5582 |
2. Device:
| Propriety Name | Evolution™ Blood Glucose Test System |
|---|---|
| Common Name | Blood Glucose Test System |
| Classification Name: | System, test, blood glucose, over the counterGlucose OxidaseSingle (specified) analyte controls |
| Classification: | Class II, 21 CFR 862.1345, |
| Product Code: | NBW, CGA, JJX |
3. Predicate Device:
We claim substantial equivalence to the LifeScan One Touch® Ultra ® Blood Glucose Monitoring System (K021819) By LifeScan Inc.
4. Description:
The Evolution™ Monitor is an in vitro diagnostic device designed for measuring the concentration of glucose in whole blood, which is used with the Evolution™ Test strip.
The test principle is:
This device is an in vitro diagnostic product intended for the measurement of glucose concentration in human blood. The principle of the test replies upon a specific type of glucose in blood sample, the oxidase glucose that reacts to electrodes in the test strip. The test strip employs an electrochemical signal
HMD Biomedical LLC.
{1}------------------------------------------------
generation an electrical current that will stimulate a chemical reaction. This reaction is measured by the Meter and displayed as your blood qlucose result.
5. Indications for use:
Indications For Use: The Evolution™ Blood Glucose Testing System is for the quantitative measurement of the concentration of glucose in whole blood taken from the fingertip, ventral palm, dosal hand, upper arm, forearm, calf and/or thigh by diabetic patients or health care professionals as an aid in the management of diabetes. Evolution™ Blood Glucose Testing System is for in vitro diagnostic use and is not to be used for the diagnosis of diabetes or for neonatal use. Alternate site testing should be done during steady- state times when alucose is not changing rapidly.
6. Comparison of Technological Characteristics with Predicate:
The technological characteristics of the new device (EVOLUTION™) in comparison to the predicate device (OneTouch(BUItra®):
The modified EVOLUTION™ device has the same technological characteristics as the current legally marketed predicate device, OneTouch(@Ultra®Blood Glucose Monitoring System (K021819) By LifeScan Inc.
7. Performance Data:
Clinical: The clinical performance evaluation using the EVOLUTION™ Blood Glucose Monitoring System components were conducted for the purpose of validating the consumer use for the user and the professional accuracy. Test results showed substantial equivalence.
Non-clinical: Verification, validation and testing activities were conducted to establish the performance, functionality and reliability characteristics of the EVOLUTION™ Blood Glucose Monitoring System with respect to the predicate device. Testing involved the verification of software requirement specifications, product requirement specifications and user interface requirement specifications from risk analysis. Pass or fail criteria were based on the specification cleared for the predicate device and results showed substantial equivalence.
8. Conclusion
The conclusion drawn from the clinical and non clinical tests is that the EVOLUTION™ Blood Glucose Monitoring System is as safe, as effective, and performs as well as the legally marketed predicate device, the ONE TOUCH(®) Ultra®.
HMD Biomedical LLC.
{2}------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Image /page/2/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features a stylized eagle with its wings spread, and the words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES · USA" are arranged in a circular pattern around the eagle. The eagle is black, and the text is also black. The background is white.
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration 2098 Gaither Road Rockville MD 20850
HMD Biomedical LLC c/o Ms. Merrell Shye 8855 Grissom Parkway Titusville, FL 32780
MAR 2 1 2008
Re: K072369
Trade/Device Name: HMD Evolution Blood Glucose Testing System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 862.1345 Regulation Name: Glucose Test System Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: NBW Dated: March 10, 2008 Received: March 11, 2008
Dear Merrell Shye:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug. and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Parts 800 to 895. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Parts 801 and 809); and good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820).
{3}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 -
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific information about the application of labeling requirements to your device, or questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation and Safety at (240) 276-0490. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (240) 276-3150 or at its Internet address at http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/industry/support/index.html.
Sincerely yours,
Jean M. Cooper, M.S., D.V.M.
Yean M. Cooper, M.S., D.V.M. Director Division of Chemistry and Toxicology Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation and Safety Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{4}------------------------------------------------
Indications of Use Statement
510(K) Number(if known): K072369 Device Number: Evolution™ Blood Glucose Test
Indications For Use: The Evolution™ Blood Glucose Testing System is for the quantitative measurement of the concentration of glucose in whole blood from the fingertip, ventral palm, dosal hand, upper arm, forearm, calf and/or thigh by diabetic patients or health care professionals as an aid in the management of diabetes. Evolution™ Blood Glucose Testing System is for in vitro diagnostic use and is not to be used for the diagnosis of diabetes or for neonatal use. Alternate site testing should be done during steady- state times when glucose is not changing rapidly.
Prescription Use X (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) Over-the-Counter Use X (21 CFR 807 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
AND / OR
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Devices (OIVD)
Division Sign-Off
Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation and Safety
072369
§ 862.1345 Glucose test system.
(a)
Identification. A glucose test system is a device intended to measure glucose quantitatively in blood and other body fluids. Glucose measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders including diabetes mellitus, neonatal hypoglycemia, and idiopathic hypoglycemia, and of pancreatic islet cell carcinoma.(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls). The device, when it is solely intended for use as a drink to test glucose tolerance, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9.