(11 days)
OsteoGraf/D-700 is indicated for treatment of intrabony periodontal defects, augmentation of bony defects in the alveolar ridge, and filling of extraction sites.
The OsteoGraf/D-700 material is a high purity, high density, nonresorbable, radiopaque, polycrystalline particulate form of hydroxylapatite, the major mineral phase of bone and dental enamel.
This 510(k) summary for the OsteoGraf/D-700 focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices, primarily through the established safety and effectiveness of its component materials. It does not contain information about acceptance criteria or a study designed to prove the device meets specific performance criteria through empirical testing.
Therefore, I cannot provide a table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance, nor details about a study designed to meet specific acceptance criteria. The document explicitly states: "We believe that the prior use of the components of OsteoGraf/D-700 in legally marketed devices, the performance data provided, and biocompatibility support the safety and effectiveness of OsteoGraf/D-700 for the indicated uses." This indicates reliance on previous approvals and material characteristics rather than new, quantitative performance studies for this specific submission.
Here's what can be inferred from the provided text, and what information is not available:
1. Table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance:
- Not Available. The document does not specify quantitative acceptance criteria or performance metrics for the device itself (e.g., bone growth percentage, defect fill rate). The acceptance criteria are implicitly tied to the safety and effectiveness demonstrated by predicate devices and the material's known properties.
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance:
- Not Applicable/Not Provided. No specific "test set" in the context of a new performance study is mentioned. The submission relies on "prior use of the components" and general "performance data provided," which likely refers to literature or historical data on the materials, not a de novo clinical or lab study for this submission.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:
- Not Applicable/Not Provided. No panel of experts established ground truth for a new test set in this submission.
4. Adjudication method for the test set:
- Not Applicable/Not Provided.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:
- Not Applicable. This is not an AI-enabled device.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done:
- Not Applicable. This is not an AI-enabled device.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.):
- Implied Ground Truth: The ground truth for the device's safety and effectiveness is based on the established regulatory history and scientific understanding of its core material (hydroxylapatite) and its components as used in predicate devices. This implicitly relies on historical clinical outcomes and expert understanding of bone grafting materials.
8. The sample size for the training set:
- Not Applicable/Not Provided. No training set for a new algorithm or performance study is mentioned.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established:
- Not Applicable/Not Provided.
Summary of available information:
- The 510(k) relies on substantial equivalence to predicate devices (K863176, K863234, K861084, K861083, K852742).
- The argument for safety and effectiveness is based on the prior use of the material's components in legally marketed devices and their known biocompatibility.
- The device is a nonresorbable, radiopaque, polycrystalline particulate form of hydroxylapatite, a known bone substitute material.
- The intended uses are treatment of intrabony periodontal defects, augmentation of bony defects in the alveolar ridge, and filling of extraction sites, which are the same as those cleared for predicate devices.
This type of 510(k) submission, particularly for a material-based device with a well-established predicate, often focuses on demonstrating that the new device does not introduce new questions of safety or effectiveness compared to the approved predicates, rather than presenting new, extensive performance study data.
{0}------------------------------------------------
510(k) SUMMARY
AUG -6 2007
DENTSPLY International Susquehanna Commerce Center West 221 West Philadelphia Street, Suite 60 York, PA 17405-0872
CONTACT: Helen Lewis
DATE PREPARED: July 18, 2007
TRADE OR PROPRIETARY NAME: OsteoGraf/D-700 CLASSIFICATION NAME: Bone Grafting Material 21 CFR 872.3930
PREDICATE DEVICES: OsteoGraf/D-700, K863176, K863234, K861084, K861083, K852742
DEVICE DESCRIPTION: The OsteoGraf/D-700 material is a high purity, high density, nonresorbable, radiopaque, polycrystalline particulate form of hydroxylapatite, the major mineral phase of bone and dental enamel.
INTENDED USE: Treatment of intrabony periodontal defects, augmentation of bony defects in the alveolar ridge, and filling of extraction sites.
TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS: All of the components found in OsteoGraf/D-700 have been used in legally marketed devices and/or were found safe for dental use. The modifications made to the legally marketed device do not affect biocompatibility. Therefore, it was determined that biocompatibility testing was not necessary. OsteoGraf/D-700 conforms to applicable industry standards.
We believe that the prior use of the components of OsteoGraf/D-700 in legally marketed devices, the performance data provided, and biocompatibility support the safety and effectiveness of OsteoGraf/D-700 for the indicated uses.
000009
{1}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/1/Picture/1 description: The image shows the seal of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The seal features a stylized eagle with its wings spread, clutching a caduceus in its talons. The words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" are arranged in a circular pattern around the eagle.
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
AUG -6 2007
Ms. Helen Lewis Director of Corporate Compliance and Regulatory Affairs DENTSPLY International, Incorporated Susquehanna Commerce Center 221 West Philadelphia Street, Suite 60 York, Pennsylvania 17405-0872
Re: K072056
Trade/Device Name: OsteoGraf/D-700 Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.3930 Regulation Name: Bone Grafting Material Regulatory Class: II Product Code: LYC Dated: July 18, 2007 Received: July 26, 2007
Dear Ms. Lewis:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{2}------------------------------------------------
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Office of Compliance at (240) 276-0115. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/industry/support/index.html.
Sincerely yours,
Chiu Lin, Ph.D.
Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Infection Control and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}------------------------------------------------
1 of 1
INDICATIONS FOR USE STATEMENT
510(k) Number (if known):
Device Name: OsteoGraf/D-700
Indications for Use:
OsteoGraf/D-700 is indicated for treatment of intrabony periodontal defects, augmentation of bony defects in the alveolar ridge, and filing of extraction sites.
These are the same indications for use previously cleared for K852742, K863176, and K862324.
Prescription Use X (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Susan Runo
(Division Sign-Off) Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital Infection Control, Dental Devices
510(k) Number: K072054
0000008
Osteo() raf/D-700
§ 872.3930 Bone grafting material.
(a)
Identification. Bone grafting material is a material such as hydroxyapatite, tricalcium phosphate, polylactic and polyglycolic acids, or collagen, that is intended to fill, augment, or reconstruct periodontal or bony defects of the oral and maxillofacial region.(b)
Classification. (1) Class II (special controls) for bone grafting materials that do not contain a drug that is a therapeutic biologic. The special control is FDA's “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Dental Bone Grafting Material Devices.” (See § 872.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.)(2) Class III (premarket approval) for bone grafting materials that contain a drug that is a therapeutic biologic. Bone grafting materials that contain a drug that is a therapeutic biologic, such as biological response modifiers, require premarket approval.
(c)
Date premarket approval application (PMA) or notice of product development protocol (PDP) is required. Devices described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section shall have an approved PMA or a declared completed PDP in effect before being placed in commercial distribution.