(86 days)
Tender fiber is a semi-manufactured product made of fibers used to reinforce composite and acrylic prosthodontic appliances and to repair or reinforce denture and rethodontic appliances. It can be use as well to immobilize teeth for periodontic or orthodontic treatments.
Tender Fiber are silanized glass fibers, impregnated with light curing resin used to reinforce prosthodontic appliances and to repair or reinforce denture and orthodontic appliances.
This 510(k) summary provides information for a dental device, "Tender Fiber," and relies on substantial equivalence to predicate devices rather than a direct study demonstrating its performance against specific acceptance criteria. Therefore, much of the requested information regarding specific study details and statistical analysis is not available in this document.
However, I can extract the relevant information and explicitly state what is not provided.
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
| Acceptance Criteria | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|
| Biocompatibility: | |
| Cytotoxicity (ISO 10993-5:1999) | "Cytotoxicity tests appears in appendix II.1" (Exact results not provided in this summary, but the report implies compliance.) |
| Physical/Chemical Performance: | |
| ISO 4049:2000 Dentistry - Polymer-Based Filling, Restorative and Luting materials | Device complies with this standard. (Specific performance metrics like flexural strength, depth of cure, etc., are not presented in this summary.) |
| Quality Management Systems: | |
| ISO 13485:2003 Medical devices -- Quality management systems -- Requirements for regulatory purposes | Device complies with this standard. |
| Risk Management: | |
| ISO 14971:2000/Amd 1:2003 - MEDICAL DEVICES - Application of risk management to medical devices | Device complies with this standard. |
| Overall Safety and Effectiveness: | "Test results indicate that there are no hazards presented with the use of Tender Fiber as compared with the predicate devices." (No specific acceptance criteria or quantitative performance given, relies on substantial equivalence.) |
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance
- Not explicitly stated for performance testing. The document refers to "Cytotoxicity tests" and "Test results," but no details on sample size for these tests are provided.
- Data Provenance: Not specified for any specific test. However, the manufacturer is Micerium SpA, located in Italy, suggesting the tests would have been performed there or commissioned by them.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts
- Not applicable. This document describes a medical device undergoing premarket notification based on substantial equivalence, not a study evaluating human reader performance against ground truth established by experts.
4. Adjudication method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set
- Not applicable. See point 3.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
- No. This is not a study involving AI or human reader comparison. It's a submission for a physical dental device.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
- Not applicable. This is not an algorithmic device.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.)
- Not applicable/Not explicitly defined in the context of this submission. The "ground truth" here would relate to the performance standards and biocompatibility tests. For biocompatibility, the chemical and biological reactions serve as the "ground truth" against the ISO standards. For physical properties, the measured values compared against the ISO 4049 standard represent the ground truth.
8. The sample size for the training set
- Not applicable. This is not a machine learning or AI device that requires a training set.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
- Not applicable. See point 8.
{0}------------------------------------------------
JAN 1 2 2007
CONFIDENTIAL
510(k) Summary
Submitter: Mr. Eugenio Miceli, QA Manager, Micerium SpA, Via Marconi, 83, 16030 Avegno (GE), Italy. Phone: 39 0185 7885 880.
- I. Classification Name and Number: Resin, denture, relining, rebasing - 872.3760 (Product Code 76EBI) . Class: II
- II. Common/Usual Name: Fiber reinforcement material
- III. Proprietary Name: Tender Fiber Ortho, Tender Fiber Due, Tender Fiber Quattro.
- IV. Registration No .: Foreign, in process
XI.
- V. Compliance with Performance Standards: "ISO 4049:2000 Dentistry - Polymer - Based Filling, Restorative and Luting materials".
"ISO 13485:2003 Medical devices -- Quality management systems -- Requirements for regulatory purposes"
For the Citotoxicity tests: "ISO 10993 -1:2003 -- Evaluation and testing" "ISO 10993 -5:1999--Tests for in vitro citotoxicity" "ISO 10993-12:2002-- Sample preparation and reference materials"
For risk analysis "ISO 14971:2000/Amd 1:2003 - MEDICAL DEVICES - Application of risk management to medical devices."
VI. Premarket Notification truthful and accurate statement
VII. Description of the Device:
Tender Fiber are silanized glass fibers, impregnated with light curing resin used to reinforce prosthodontic appliances and to repair or reinforce denture and orthodontic appliances.
- Labels and Labeling: Draft labels of the Tender Fiber and instructions for use are VIII. provided.
{1}------------------------------------------------
CONFIDENTIAL
IX. Substantial Equivalence:
The Tender fiber are substantially equivalent to:
- Everstick by Stick Tech Ltd., 510 (k) no .: K011788 ।
- Everstick Perio by Stick Tech Ltd., 510 (k) no .: K030072 -
- Everstick Ortho by Stick Tech Lid., 510 (k) no .: K021126 ı
- Stick by Stick Tech Ltd., 510(k) no .: K003333 ・
- Ribbond (TM) by Ribbond Inc, 510(k) no .: K913040 ı
-
These products have the same intended use as predicate devices.
-
Technological characteristics: Ribbond an ultra high modulus polyethylene fiber ribbon with no impregnation, while Stick is a polymer pre-impregnated unidirectional continuous glass fiber.
Everstick, Everstick Perio, Everstick Ortho and Tender fiber have the same technological characteristics of Stick but they are also impregnated with light curing resin. Curing is made with help of dental halogen, plasma or LED light systems. The curing process is triggered by initiators, which initiate the polymerization. These initiators are activated by certain wavelengths of the different light systems and are similar or exactly the same in all listed materials.
Test results indicate that there are no hazards presented with the use of Tender Fiber as compared with the predicate devices. The different technological characteristics of Tender Fiber (practically the same of Everstick, Everstick Perio, Everstick Ortho) compared with Stick and Ribbond does not raise new questions of safety and effectiveness and demonstrates that the device is safe and effective as the predicate devices.
IX.1 Risk to Health.
Potential adverse affects and complications common to glass fibers impregnated with a light curing resin include:
- Allergies or hypersensivities
- No adhesion or incomplete adhesion to teeth
- incorrect or incomplete curing
Cytotoxicity tests appears in appendix II.1
- X. Indications for Use.
Tender fiber is a semi-manufactured product made of fibers used to reinforce composite and acrylic prosthodontic appliances and to repair or reinforce denture and orthodontic appliances. It can be use as well to immobilize teeth for periodontal or orthodontic treatments.
(End of Summary)
{2}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/2/Picture/1 description: The image is a circular seal for the Department of Health & Human Services, USA. The seal features the department's emblem, which is a stylized caduceus with a human figure in the center. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES. USA" is arranged around the emblem in a circular fashion. The emblem is black and the background is white.
ood and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
Mr. Eugenio Miceli Quality Assurance Manager Micerium S.P.A. Via Marconi 83 Avegno, Italy 16030
JAN 1 2 2007
Re: K063170
Trade/Device Name: Tender Fiber Regulation Number: 872.3760 Regulation Name: Denture Relining, Repairing or Rebasing Resin Regulatory Class: II Product Code: EBI Dated: October 12, 2006 Received: October 18, 2006
Dear Mr. Miceli:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Mr. Miceli
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies, You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Office of Compliance at (240) 276-0115. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/industry/support/index.html.
Sincerely vours.
Smitte y. Michou m.D.
Chiu Lin. Ph.D. Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Infection Control and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{4}------------------------------------------------
CONFIDENTIAL
X. Indications for Use [Separate Page]
510(k) Number: (not assigned) 106 3170
Device Name: Tender Fiber
Indications for Use: Tender fiber is a semi-manufactured product made of fibers used to reinforce composite and acrylic prosthodontic appliances and to repair or reinforce denture and rethodontic appliances. It can be use as well to immobilize teeth for periodontic or orthodontic treatments.
These products are for use only by trained and experienced dentists and dental technicians and have become well-known in this area of dentistry, therefore they do not require prescription (Per 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Susan Quarre
100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
File: tender fiber_510K.doc
pag. 11/ 15
§ 872.3760 Denture relining, repairing, or rebasing resin.
(a)
Identification. A denture relining, repairing, or rebasing resin is a device composed of materials such as methylmethacrylate, intended to reline a denture surface that contacts tissue, to repair a fractured denture, or to form a new denture base. This device is not available for over-the-counter (OTC) use.(b)
Classification. Class II.