K Number
K062468
Date Cleared
2006-09-13

(20 days)

Product Code
Regulation Number
870.4330
Reference & Predicate Devices
Predicate For
AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
Intended Use

The M2 Monitor is intended as a device for the non-invasive continuous monitoring of oxygen saturation of the blood in an extracorporeal circuit. The device provides monitoring information to trained clinicians and can be configured by them to alarn for set saturation levels.

Device Description

The Spectrum M2 Monitor consists of a 10.4 inch high definition touch screen and two active measuring channels mounted into a flat panel unit. Sensor cables are used to connect one or both measuring channels to the external surface of extracorporeal blood line tubing. The sensor cable head contains a light emitting diode that sends light through the extracorporeal tube, which illuminates the flowing blood. The reflected spectra is collected by a fibre optic cable and quantified by a photo-detector contained within a spectrometer. These spectra are compared to reference spectra by the monitor's software to determine the oxygen saturation of the blood in the extracorporeal line. The oxygen saturation levels for venous blood flow alone or both venous and arterial can be displayed by using one or both sensor channels. A trace of these oxygen levels are also displayed on the monitor. The M2 Monitor has been designed to selfdetect the selected sensor and to automatically configure the required parameter display screens. The device can be configured by the trained clinician to alarm for set saturation levels on either channel and to record session data onto a memory card supplied with the system. The M2 Monitor is powered from the AC Mains supply and also incorporates a battery back-up that automatically switches on in the event of an interruption to the mains power supply. The system weighs 4.5 kg and is supplied with a pole mount clamp.

AI/ML Overview

Here's a breakdown of the acceptance criteria and study information based on the provided text:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

Performance MetricAcceptance Criteria (Implied)Reported Device Performance
Accuracy of Oxygen Saturation MeasurementEquivalent to predicate deviceAchieves equivalent accuracy to the predicate device K931968 (3M CDI 100 Extracorporeal Hematocrit / Oxygen Monitoring Device)
Non-invasivenessNon-invasiveCompletely non-invasive measurement

Note: The document explicitly states that "Performance data has been provided that shows that the proposed device achieves equivalent accuracy for the measurement of oxygen saturation of the blood to the predicate device." While no specific numerical acceptance range is provided, the criterion is to match the predecessor's accuracy.

2. Sample Size and Data Provenance

The provided 510(k) summary does not contain details regarding the sample size used for the test set or the data provenance (e.g., country of origin, retrospective/prospective). It only generally states "Performance data has been provided."

3. Number of Experts and Qualifications for Ground Truth

The provided 510(k) summary does not contain details regarding the number of experts used to establish ground truth or their specific qualifications.

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

The provided 510(k) summary does not contain details regarding the adjudication method used for the test set.

5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study

A multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was not mentioned in the provided document. The focus is on the device's standalone performance compared to a predicate device.

6. Standalone (Algorithm Only) Performance Study

Yes, a standalone study was performed. The document explicitly states: "Performance data has been provided that shows that the proposed device achieves equivalent accuracy for the measurement of oxygen saturation of the blood to the predicate device." This refers to the M2 Monitor's performance itself.

7. Type of Ground Truth Used

The type of ground truth used is implicitly the measurement provided by the predicate device (K931968 3M Health Care, Ltd CDI 100 Extracorporeal Hematocrit / Oxygen Monitoring Device). The M2 Monitor's performance is compared for "equivalent accuracy" to this predicate. The predicate device, being an "Extracorporeal Hematocrit / Oxygen Monitoring Device," would have its own established method of determining oxygen saturation, which serves as the reference for the M2.

8. Sample Size for the Training Set

The provided 510(k) summary does not contain details regarding the sample size used for any training set.

9. How Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

The provided 510(k) summary does not contain details regarding how ground truth was established for any training set, as a training set is not explicitly mentioned. Given the nature of a 510(k) summary primarily focusing on substantial equivalence, detailed algorithm training specifics are often omitted unless directly relevant to a novel aspect of the device.

{0}------------------------------------------------

K062468
Page 1 of 2

As required by 21 CFR 807.92 (c) this 510(k) summary is prepared

Application Date:

May 30, 2006

SEP 1 3 2006

Applicant:

Spectrum Medical LLP Delta Place, 27 Bath Road, Cheltenham GL53 7TH United Kingdom

Official Correspondent:

Mr. Steve Turner Managing Partner Telephone: Fax: +44 (0) 1242 229259 Email: Steve. Turner@spectrum-medical.co.uk

Proposed Device:

Blood Gas Monitor Trade Name: Spectrum M2 Monitor Classification Name: Monitor, Blood-Gas, On-Line, Cardiopulmonnary Bypass 21 CFR 870.4330, Product code: DRY

Predicate Device:

K931968 3M Health Care, Ltd CDI 100 Extracorporeal Hematocrit / Oxygen Monitoring Device

Description of Proposed Device:

The Spectrum M2 Monitor consists of a 10.4 inch high definition touch screen and two active measuring channels mounted into a flat panel unit. Sensor cables are used to connect one or both measuring channels to the external surface of extracorporeal blood line tubing. The sensor cable head contains a light emitting diode that sends light through the extracorporeal tube, which illuminates the flowing blood. The reflected spectra is collected by a fibre optic cable and quantified by a photo-detector contained within a spectrometer. These spectra are compared to reference spectra by the monitor's software to determine the oxygen saturation of the blood in the extracorporeal line.

{1}------------------------------------------------

K062468
Page 2 of 2

The oxygen saturation levels for venous blood flow alone or both venous and arterial can be displayed by using one or both sensor channels. A trace of these oxygen levels are also displayed on the monitor. The M2 Monitor has been designed to selfdetect the selected sensor and to automatically configure the required parameter display screens. The device can be configured by the trained clinician to alarm for set saturation levels on either channel and to record session data onto a memory card supplied with the system.

The M2 Monitor is powered from the AC Mains supply and also incorporates a battery back-up that automatically switches on in the event of an interruption to the mains power supply. The system weighs 4.5 kg and is supplied with a pole mount clamp.

Intended Use of Proposed Device

The intended use of the M2 Monitor is for the non-invasive continuous monitoring of oxygen saturation of the blood in an extracorporeal circuit. The device provides monitoring information to trained clinicians and can be configured by them to alarm for set saturation levels.

The difference in intended use between the proposed device and the predicate device is that the predicate device also measures the Hemaglobin and Hematocrit levels of the blood in the extracorporeal circuit. As this is an additional measurement offered by the predicate which is independent of the blood saturation measurement and is not claimed or implied by the proposed device this difference in intended use is not considered to raise any additional efficacy or safety concerns.

Summary of Technological Characteristics

The major difference in the technological characteristics of the proposed and predicate device is that the proposed device provides a completely non-invasive measurement of the blood in the extracorporeal bloodline while the predicate involves the use of a cuvette inserted into the blood line tubing. Performance data has been provided that shows that the proposed device achieves equivalent accuracy for the measurement of oxygen saturation of the blood to the predicate device.

Substantial Equivalence Determination

The M2 Monitor has an intended use that is also featured in the predicate device. Performance data has been provided to show that the M2 Monitor can measure the oxygen saturation of blood in extracorporeal blood ines to an equivalent accuracy to its predicate device. The M2 Monitor is therefore considered substantially equivalent to its predicate device for the monitoring of oxygen saturation in extracorporeal blood line tubing.

{2}------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES

Public Health Service

Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850

SEP 1 3 2006

Spectrum Medical LLP c/o Mr. Jeff D. Rongero Senior Project Engineer Underwriters Laboratories Inc. 12 Laboratory Drive P.O. Box 13995 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-3995

Re: K062468 Trade Name: Spectrum M2 Monitor Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.4330 Regulation Name: Cardiopulmonary Bypass On-line Blood Gas Monitor Regulatory Class: Class II (two) Product Code: DRY Dated:August 2, 2006 Received: August 24, 2006

Dear Mr. Rongero:

We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.

If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.

{3}------------------------------------------------

Page 2 - Mr. Jeff D. Rongero

Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.

This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.

If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Office of Compliance at (240) 276-0120. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/industry/support/index.html.

Sincerely yours,

Bram D. Zuckerman, M.D.

Director Division of Cardiovascular Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health

Enclosure

{4}------------------------------------------------

Indications for Use

510(k) Number (if known): ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Spectrum M2 Monitor Device Name:

Indications for Use:

The M2 Monitor is intended as a device for the non-invasive continuous monitoring of oxygen saturation of the blood in an extracorporeal circuit. The device provides monitoring information to trained clinicians and can be configured by them to alarn for set saturation levels.

Prescription Use X AND/OR (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)

Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)

(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE OF NEEDED)

Concurrence of CDRH. Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)

(Division Sign-Off)
Division of Cardiovascular Devices
510(k) NumberK0624168
-------------------------

§ 870.4330 Cardiopulmonary bypass on-line blood gas monitor.

(a)
Identification. A cardiopulmonary bypass on-line blood gas monitor is a device used in conjunction with a blood gas sensor to measure the level of gases in the blood.(b)
Classification. Class II (performance standards).