(19 days)
This device is intended for use in surgical procedures to repair Pectus Excavatum and other chest wall deformities.
Pectus Pre-bent Support Bar: A stainless steel or titanium bar, variable length from 7 to 17 inches, and 0.50 inches wide, with two holes and notches on both ends for sutures to secure the bar to the lateral chest wall. The bar is pre-shaped based on a CT Scan provided by the Surgeon specifically for a certain patient. The titanium bar is only used when the patient has a nickel allergy.
Pectus Titanium Support Bar Stabilizer: A titanium elongated plate with a dovetail slot in the center of the plate for the Pectus Bar to slide into. Two lips come up over the bar to secure the Pectus Bar within the slot of the stabilizer. The stabilizers have two holes on either side of the slot to suture the stabilizer to the lateral chest wall together with the support bar preventing lateral movement and flipping of the bar.
The provided text is a 510(k) Summary for a medical device (Lorenz Pectus Support Bar System) and associated FDA correspondence. This type of document is a premarket notification to the FDA to demonstrate substantial equivalence to a predicate device, not necessarily to prove that the device meets specific acceptance criteria through a clinical study with performance metrics in the way a clinical trial for a new drug or diagnostic algorithm would.
Therefore, the requested information about acceptance criteria, study design, sample sizes, ground truth establishment, expert qualifications, and MRMC studies is not present in this document. This 510(k) relies on comparison to previously cleared devices.
Here's why the information you're asking for isn't in this document:
- Acceptance Criteria & Reported Performance: The 510(k) process for this type of device (metallic bone fixation appliances) typically focuses on material safety, mechanical properties, and design similarity to a predicate device. Performance is largely inferred from the predicate device's established safety and effectiveness. There isn't a table of specific clinical "acceptance criteria" (e.g., sensitivity, specificity for a diagnostic device) and reported device performance in this context.
- Sample Size, Data Provenance, Experts, Adjudication, MRMC, Standalone: These are all elements typically found in clinical studies, especially for diagnostic or AI-driven devices. This 510(k) submission is for a surgical implant, where clinical outcomes are often assessed through post-market surveillance or through specific clinical trials if the device is novel enough to warrant a PMA (Premarket Approval) rather than a 510(k). The focus here is on engineering and material equivalence to existing devices.
- Ground Truth: For a surgical implant, "ground truth" wouldn't be established in the same way as for a diagnostic device (e.g., pathology slide for cancer detection). Clinical success (e.g., correction of deformity, absence of complications) would be the outcome measure, but this document specifies the device's intended use and substantial equivalence, not a trial demonstrating these outcomes.
- Training Set: This device is a physical implant, not an AI algorithm. Therefore, there is no "training set" in the computational sense.
Summary based on the provided document:
- No acceptance criteria for device performance (e.g., sensitivity/specificity) is defined or studied in this document. The acceptance is based on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices (K981789 and K972420).
- No clinical study demonstrating device performance against specific acceptance criteria is described.
- The document does not contain information about:
- Sample sizes for test or training sets.
- Data provenance.
- Number or qualifications of experts.
- Adjudication methods.
- Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness studies.
- Standalone algorithm performance.
- Type or method of establishing ground truth in a clinical study context.
The "study" that proves the device meets "acceptance criteria" in the context of this 510(k) submission is the comparison of its technological features and materials to predicate devices, and the conclusion that it is substantially similar in application and function. The acceptance criteria here are regulatory: demonstrating that the new device is as safe and effective as a legally marketed predicate device.
{0}------------------------------------------------
JUN -6 2006
Image /page/0/Picture/2 description: The image shows the logo for W. Lorenz Surgical. The logo is in black and white, with the words "W. Lorenz" in large, bold letters. Below the name is the word "Surgical" in smaller letters. The logo is simple and professional, and it is likely used on the company's products and marketing materials.
510(k) Summary
1520 Tradeport Drive Jacksonville, FL 32218 904-741-4400 fax 904-741-4500
Device Name: Lorenz Pectus Support Bar System
Classification Name and Reference:
Plate, Fixation, Bone
87 HRS (CFR 888.3030)
Device Classification: Class II
Device Description: Pectus Pre-bent Support Bar: A stainless steel or titanium bar, variable length from 7 to 17 inches, and 0.50 inches wide, with two holes and notches on both ends for sutures to secure the bar to the lateral chest wall. The bar is pre-shaped based on a CT Scan provided by the Surgeon specifically for a certain patient. The titanium bar is only used when the patient has a nickel allergy.
Pectus Titanium Support Bar Stabilizer: A titanium elongated plate with a dovetail slot in the center of the plate for the Pectus Bar to slide into. Two lips come up over the bar to secure the Pectus Bar within the slot of the stabilizer. The stabilizers have two holes on either side of the slot to suture the stabilizer to the lateral chest wall together with the support bar preventing lateral movement and flipping of the bar.
Intended Use: This device is intended for use in surgical procedures to repair Pectus Excavatum and other chest wall deformities.
Materials: Stainless Steel or Titanium
Possible Adverse Effects:
-
- Metal sensitivity reactions or allergic reaction to the implant material.
-
- Pain, discomfort, or abnormal sensation due to the presence of the device.
-
- Surgical trauma; permanent or temporary nerve damage, permanent or temporary damage to heart, lungs, and other organs, body structures or tissues.
-
- Skin irritation, infection, and pneumothorax.
-
- Fracture, breakage, migration, or loosening of the implant.
-
- Inadequate or incomplete remodeling of the deformity or return of deformity, prior to or after removal of implant.
-
- Permanent injury or death.
Substantial Equivalence
The Pectus Pre-bent Support Bar made of either Stainless Steel or Titanium and the Pectus Titanium Support Bar Stabilizer is believed to be substantially equivalent in application and function to:
Lorenz Pectus Support Bar Stabilizer (K981789) Lorenz Pectus Support Bar (K972420)
Statement of Comparison of Technological Features
Both the predicate and the new (contained within this submission) devices consist of non absorbable material (stainless steel, titanium) listed in FDA's Biomaterials Compendium and list of FDA recognized standards. The metallic materials and the intended use are technically equivalent. The modified devices are being added to:
- address the nickel sensitivity of some patients 一 and
-
- to address surgeon preference of receiving the Pectus Support Bar pre-bent.
Conclusions: The use of the modified devices and the predicate Pectus Support Bar and Stabilizer are substantially similar.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/1/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The logo consists of a stylized eagle or bird-like figure with three wing-like shapes extending upwards. The bird is positioned within a circular border that contains the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES - USA". The text is arranged around the circumference of the circle.
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
JUN - 6 2006
W. Lorenz Surgical % Ms. Kim Reed Senior Regulatory Specialist 1520 Tradeport Drive Jacksonville, Florida 32218
Re: K061384
Trade/Device Name: Lorenz Pectus Support Bra System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3030 Regulation Name: Single/multiple component metallic bone fixation appliances and accessories Regulation Class: II Product Code: HRS Dated: May 17, 2006 Received: May 18, 2006
Dear Ms. Reed:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set
{2}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Ms. Kim Reed
forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050. This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Office of Compliance at (240) 276-0120. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/dsmamain.html
Sincerely yours,
Hubert Lenoir us
Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of General, Restorative and Neurological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known):
Device Name: Lorenz Pectus Support Bar System
Indications For Use: This device is intended for use in surgical procedures to repair Pectus Excavatum and other chest wall deformities.
Prescription Use xx xx
. İ
Over-The-Counter Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Helent Lemer
(Division Division of Ge and Neurologica
510(k) Number K061384
§ 888.3030 Single/multiple component metallic bone fixation appliances and accessories.
(a)
Identification. Single/multiple component metallic bone fixation appliances and accessories are devices intended to be implanted consisting of one or more metallic components and their metallic fasteners. The devices contain a plate, a nail/plate combination, or a blade/plate combination that are made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, stainless steel, and titanium, that are intended to be held in position with fasteners, such as screws and nails, or bolts, nuts, and washers. These devices are used for fixation of fractures of the proximal or distal end of long bones, such as intracapsular, intertrochanteric, intercervical, supracondylar, or condylar fractures of the femur; for fusion of a joint; or for surgical procedures that involve cutting a bone. The devices may be implanted or attached through the skin so that a pulling force (traction) may be applied to the skeletal system.(b)
Classification. Class II.