K Number
K060128
Manufacturer
Date Cleared
2006-05-25

(127 days)

Product Code
Regulation Number
862.1155
Reference & Predicate Devices
N/A
Predicate For
AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
Intended Use

Clearblue Easy Digital Pregnancy Test is an over-the-counter urine hCG test which is intended for the detection of pregnancy. The test is indicated for use from four days before the expected period.

Device Description

Not Found

AI/ML Overview

The provided document is an FDA 510(k) clearance letter for the Clearblue Easy Digital Pregnancy Test. It does not contain the detailed study information required to answer your questions about acceptance criteria, device performance, sample sizes, ground truth establishment, or expert involvement. The letter simply states that the device has been found substantially equivalent to a predicate device.

To answer your questions thoroughly, I would need access to the actual 510(k) submission (K060128) which would detail the studies conducted.

However, based on the limited information available in the clearance letter, I can infer some general characteristics of this type of device and the likely studies.

Here's how I can address your request, acknowledging the limitations of the provided text:

Clearblue Easy Digital Pregnancy Test (K060128)

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

  • Acceptance Criteria: The specific acceptance criteria are not detailed in the provided FDA letter. For an hCG pregnancy test, common acceptance criteria typically involve:

    • Sensitivity: The lowest concentration of hCG the device can reliably detect (often expressed as mIU/mL).
    • Specificity: The ability to accurately detect hCG without false positives from interfering substances or other hormones.
    • Accuracy (Agreement): The percentage of agreement with a reference method or clinical outcome.
    • Readability/Interpretation: For a digital test, clearly displaying "Pregnant" or "Not Pregnant."
    • Early Detection Claim: If the device claims early detection, its performance at low hCG levels (corresponding to days before the expected period) is critical. The letter mentions "use from four days before the expected period," indicating this was a key performance claim.
  • Reported Device Performance: The letter only states that the device was found "substantially equivalent" to predicate devices. It does not provide specific performance metrics (e.g., sensitivity, specificity percentages) from Unipath Limited's studies.

Performance Metric (Likely)Acceptance Criteria (Typical/Inferred)Reported Device Performance (Not in document)
Clinical SensitivityHigh (e.g., >95% at 4 days before period)Not reported in provided document
Clinical SpecificityHigh (e.g., >99%)Not reported in provided document
Limit of Detection (LoD)Low hCG concentration (e.g., 25 mIU/mL or less for early detection)Not reported in provided document
Agreement with PredicateSubstantial EquivalenceMet Substantial Equivalence

2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

  • Sample Size: Not specified in the provided document. For an in vitro diagnostic (IVD) device like a pregnancy test, clinical studies typically involve a few hundred urine samples (both positive and negative for pregnancy, often spiked with known hCG concentrations or collected from pregnant/non-pregnant women).
  • Data Provenance: The manufacturing company, Unipath Limited, is located in the United Kingdom. It is highly probable that at least some, if not all, of the clinical data was collected from studies conducted in the UK or other European countries, given the company's location. The letter does not specify whether the data was retrospective or prospective. Most clinical validation studies for IVDs involve prospectively collected samples or a combination of prospective and banked retrospective samples.

3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications

  • This is not applicable in the traditional sense for a pregnancy test. The "ground truth" for hCG levels is established through quantitative laboratory assays (e.g., enzyme immunoassays, chemiluminescent immunoassays) performed by qualified laboratory personnel, not typically by a panel of clinical "experts" reviewing images or patient cases. The interpretation of the quantitative results would be the "expert" step.

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

  • Not applicable as the ground truth for hCG levels is quantitative. There wouldn't be an adjudication process among experts for a positive/negative result, as the quantitative gold standard determines the truth.

5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study

  • No. This type of study (MRMC) is generally conducted for diagnostic imaging devices where human readers interpret medical images (e.g., radiologists interpreting X-rays, mammograms). A pregnancy test is an in-vitro diagnostic device that directly detects a biomarker (hCG) in urine. There is no "human reader" component in the sense of interpreting complex visual data that is then compared to an AI algorithm.

6. Standalone (Algorithm Only) Performance Study

  • Yes, implicitly. The Clearblue Easy Digital Pregnancy Test is a standalone device. Its performance is evaluated on its ability to detect hCG in urine samples and display a result ("Pregnant" or "Not Pregnant") directly to the user. There isn't an "AI algorithm" in the same way one would refer to it in medical imaging. The "algorithm" here refers to the biochemical reactions and the digital reader's interpretation of the signal produced by the test strip. The clinical studies conducted by Unipath would have assessed this standalone performance.

7. Type of Ground Truth Used

  • For an hCG test, the primary ground truth would be:
    • Quantitative laboratory hCG values: Urine or serum samples with known, precisely measured concentrations of hCG (determined by a highly sensitive and specific laboratory reference method).
    • Clinical outcome: Confirmation of pregnancy via ultrasound or subsequent clinical follow-up for samples from pregnant and non-pregnant individuals.

8. Sample Size for the Training Set

  • The document does not provide this information. For a diagnostic device, the "training set" would refer to samples used during the development and optimization phase of the test (e.g., optimizing antibody concentrations, reaction times, digital reader thresholds). This is typically an internal development process, and the sample size is not usually reported in the 510(k) summary, which focuses on validation studies.

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

  • Similar to the validation set, the ground truth for training/development samples would be established using:
    • Quantitative hCG reference methods: Accurate laboratory assays to determine the precise hCG concentration in samples.
    • Known pregnancy status: Samples from women with confirmed pregnancies (of varying gestational ages) and confirmed non-pregnancies.
      This allows developers to fine-tune the test's sensitivity and specificity.

{0}------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES

Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" arranged around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized symbol that resembles an abstract human figure embracing or protecting another smaller figure, representing the department's mission of promoting health and well-being.

Public Health Service

Food and Drug Administration 2098 Gaither Road Rockville MD 20850

MAY 2 5 2006

Ms. Louise Roberts Regulatory Affairs Manager Unipath Limited Priory Business Park Bedford MK44 3UP United Kingdom

Re: K060128

Trade/Device Name: Clearblue Easy Digital Pregnancy Test Regulation Number: 21 CFR§862.1155 Regulation Name: Human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) test system Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: LCX Dated: May 10, 2006 Received: May 15, 2006

Dear Ms. Roberts:

We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.

If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Parts 800 to 895. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.

Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Parts 801 and 809); and good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820).

{1}------------------------------------------------

Page 2 --

This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.

If you desire specific information about the application of labeling requirements to your device, or questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation and Safety at (240) 276-0484. Also, please note the regulation entitled. "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/industry/support/index.html.

Sincerely yours,

Alberto G. A.

Alberto Gutierrez, Ph.D. Director Division of Chemistry and Toxicology Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation and Safety Center for Devices and Radiological Health

Enclosure

{2}------------------------------------------------

Indications for Use

510(k) Number (if known): K060128

Device Name: Clearblue Easy Digital Pregnancy Test

Indications For Use:

Clearblue Easy Digital Pregnancy Test is an over-the-counter urine hCG test which is intended for the detection of pregnancy. The test is indicated for use from four days before the expected period.

Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) AND/OR

Over-The-Counter Use X (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)

(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)

Concurrence of CDRH, Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Devices (OIVD)

CAC
Division Sign-Off

Office of In Vit~o Diagnostic Device Evaluation and Safety

X60128

Page I of 1

§ 862.1155 Human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) test system.

(a)
Human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) test system intended for the early detection of pregnancy —(1)Identification. A human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) test system is a device intended for the early detection of pregnancy is intended to measure HCG, a placental hormone, in plasma or urine.(2)
Classification. Class II.(b)
Human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) test system intended for any uses other than early detection of pregnancy —(1)Identification. A human chorionic goadotropin (HCG) test system is a device intended for any uses other than early detection of pregnancy (such as an aid in the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of treatment of persons with certain tumors or carcinomas) is intended to measure HCG, a placental hormone, in plasma or urine.(2)
Classification. Class III.(3)
Date PMA or notice of completion of a PDP is required. As of the enactment date of the amendments, May 28, 1976, an approval under section 515 of the act is required before the device described in paragraph (b)(1) may be commercially distributed. See § 862.3.