(17 days)
Not Found
No
The document does not mention AI, DNN, or ML, and the description of the analysis and testing methods does not suggest the use of these technologies.
No
The device is for the analysis and display of ECG data to aid in the diagnosis of cardiac rhythm disturbances and myocardial ischaemia, it does not provide therapy.
Yes
This device is used for the replay and analysis of ECG data to assess cardiac rhythm disturbance and myocardial ischaemia, aiding in the diagnosis of a patient's condition.
Yes
The device description explicitly states that the device is purchased as a "software kit for installation on their own compatible PC," indicating it is solely software.
Based on the provided text, this device is not an IVD (In Vitro Diagnostic).
Here's why:
- IVD definition: In vitro diagnostics are tests performed on samples taken from the human body, such as blood, urine, or tissue, to detect diseases, conditions, or infections.
- Device function: The Medilog Darwin Holter Analysis system analyzes ECG data recorded from a patient's body using an ambulatory recorder. This is a non-invasive measurement of electrical activity of the heart, not an analysis of a biological sample taken from the body.
- Intended Use: The intended use clearly states "replay and analysis of ECG data prerecorded on Medilog series ambulatory recorders" and "analysis, display, editing and report generation of ambulatory ECG data". This focuses on the processing of physiological signals, not the analysis of biological specimens.
Therefore, the Medilog Darwin Holter Analysis system falls under the category of a medical device that analyzes physiological data, not an in vitro diagnostic device.
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
Medilog Darwin Holter Analysis is indicated for the replay and analysis of ECG data prerecorded on Medilog series ambulatory recorders.
It is indicated for use in the analysis, display, editing and report generation of ambulatory ECG data as part of the assessment of cardiac rhythm disturbance and myocardial ischaemia. Typically it is intended for patients requiring analysis of 24 hour ambulatory ECG recordings as determined by a medical practitioner.
Product codes
DQK
Device Description
Medilog Darwin Holter Analysis is designed to acquire, analyse and store data recorded on Medilog series ambulatory ECG recorders. Editing facilities are offered to allow some of the information to be modified. The processed data can be printed in the form of an analysis report. The device is not a life supporting, implanted or otherwise critical device, and it is does not provide on-line warnings or alarms.
Medilog Darwin Holter Analysis is designed to operate on an industry standard PC. Customers purchase the device as a software kit for installation on their own compatible PC.
Mentions image processing
Not Found
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found
Input Imaging Modality
Not Found
Anatomical Site
Not Found
Indicated Patient Age Range
Not Found
Intended User / Care Setting
It is intended that the PC on which the Medilog Darwin Holter Analysis is installed be located in a clinical environment - typically in a hospital cardiology department ~ and be operated by a suitably trained technician. Reports generated by the Medilog Darwin Holter Analysis are to be reviewed and interpreted by a qualified physician providing additional information in the diagnosis of the patient's condition and the determination of suitable treatment.
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
The performance of the candidate device was tested on the AHA, MIT, ESC and NST databases in compliance with ANSI/AAMI EC38:1998 Ambulatory electrocardiographs, and ANSIIAAMI EC57:1998 Testing and reporting performance results of cardiac rhythm and ST segment measurement algorithms.
In addition, parallel tests were performed in which non-paced three-channel Holter recordings from different customers were analysed using both the candidate and predicate devices. The unedited analysis results generated by each device were then compared against manual counts of isolated VEBs, couplets, bigeminy, pauses, bradycardia, tachycardia, etc.
Parallel tests were also performed on paced three-channel Holter recordings from different customers.
Summary of Performance Studies (study type, sample size, AUC, MRMC, standalone performance, key results)
The performance of the candidate device was tested on the AHA, MIT, ESC and NST databases in compliance with ANSI/AAMI EC38:1998 Ambulatory electrocardiographs, and ANSIIAAMI EC57:1998 Testing and reporting performance results of cardiac rhythm and ST segment measurement algorithms. The results obtained for the candidate device were compared against available results for the predicate device. This comparison confirmed that the performance of the candidate device exceeds that of the predicate device.
In addition, parallel tests were performed in which non-paced three-channel Holter recordings from different customers were analysed using both the candidate and predicate devices. The unedited analysis results generated by each device were then compared against manual counts of isolated VEBs, couplets, bigeminy, pauses, bradycardia, tachycardia, etc. The results demonstrated that the candidate device is closer to the manual count in more cases than the predicate device.
Parallel tests were also performed on paced three-channel Holter recordings from different customers, and again the results demonstrated that the candidate device is closer to the manual count in more cases than the predicate device.
The conclusion drawn from the results of the tests described above is that the candidate device is as safe and effective, and performs as well as or better than, the predicate device.
Key Metrics (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, etc.)
Not Found
Predicate Device(s)
Reference Device(s)
Not Found
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information
Not Found
§ 870.1425 Programmable diagnostic computer.
(a)
Identification. A programmable diagnostic computer is a device that can be programmed to compute various physiologic or blood flow parameters based on the output from one or more electrodes, transducers, or measuring devices; this device includes any associated commercially supplied programs.(b)
Classification. Class II (performance standards).
0
Section H Medilog Darwin Holter Analysis 510(k)
DEC 2 2 2005
510(K) SUMMARY
[As required by 21 CFR 807.92]
1. Submitter's name, address, telephone number, and fax number
Huntleigh Healthcare Cardiology Products Division Lion House Oriental Road Woking Surrey GU22 8AP United Kingdom.
Tel: +44 1483 746421 Fax: +44 1483 746426
2. Contact person
Dr J Pardey Research and Development Manager Huntleigh Healthcare - Cardiology Products Division.
3. Date this summary was prepared
23/11/05.
4. Name of the candidate device
Medilog Darwin Holter Analysis.
6. Classification name and number
| Device Classification: | Class II. |
|---|---|
| Regulation Number : | 21 CFR 870.1425 Programmable Diagnostic Computer. |
| Classification Panel: | 74-Cardiovascular. |
| Product Code: | DQK. |
Predicate device(s) to which substantial equivalence is claimed 5.
| Device Name: | Medilog Excel 3 Holter Management System. |
|---|---|
| 510(k) Number: | K002544, approved by FDA on 13th September 2000. |
| Device Classification: | Class II. |
| Regulation Number : | 21 CFR 870.1425 Programmable Diagnostic Computer. |
| Product Code: | DQK. |
1
Description of the candidate device ల్
Medilog Darwin Holter Analysis is designed to acquire, analyse and store data recorded on Medilog series ambulatory ECG recorders. Editing facilities are offered to allow some of the information to be modified. The processed data can be printed in the form of an analysis report. The device is not a life supporting, implanted or otherwise critical device, and it is does not provide on-line warnings or alarms.
Medilog Darwin Holter Analysis is designed to operate on an industry standard PC. Customers purchase the device as a software kit for installation on their own compatible PC.
7. Intended use of the candidate device
The intended use of Medilog Darwin Holter Analysis is for the replay and analysis of data pre-recorded on Medilog series ambulatory ECG recorders.
Medilog Darwin Holter Analysis is indicated for use in the analysis, display, editing and report generation of ambulatory ECG data as part of the assessment of cardiac rhythm disturbance and myocardial ischaemia. Typically it is indicated for patients requiring analysis of 24-hour ambulatory ECG recordings as determined by a medical practioner.
It is intended that the PC on which the Medilog Darwin Holter Analysis is installed be located in a clinical environment - typically in a hospital cardiology department ~ and be operated by a suitably trained technician. Reports generated by the Medilog Darwin Holter Analysis are to be reviewed and interpreted by a qualified physician providing additional information in the diagnosis of the patient's condition and the determination of suitable treatment.
8. Technological characteristics
The candidate device uses a new three-channel ECG analysis algorithm, developed by the manufacturer, to analyse ECG data from Mediloq series ambulatory ECG recorders.
ல் Non-clinical tests performed to demonstrate substantial equivalence
The performance of the candidate device was tested on the AHA, MIT, ESC and NST databases in compliance with ANSI/AAMI EC38:1998 Ambulatory electrocardiographs, and ANSIIAAMI EC57:1998 Testing and reporting performance results of cardiac rhythm and ST segment measurement algorithms. The results obtained for the candidate device were compared against available results for the predicate device. This comparison confirmed that the performance of the candidate device exceeds that of the predicate device.
In addition, parallel tests were performed in which non-paced three-channel Holter recordings from different customers were analysed using both the candidate and predicate devices. The unedited analysis results generated by each device were then
2
Section H Medilog Darwin Holter Analysis 510(k)
compared against manual counts of isolated VEBs, couplets, bigeminy, pauses, bradycardia, tachycardia, etc. The results demonstrated that the candidate device is closer to the manual count in more cases than the predicate device.
Parallel tests were also performed on paced three-channel Holter recordings from different customers, and again the results demonstrated that the candidate device is closer to the manual count in more cases than the predicate device.
The conclusion drawn from the results of the tests described above is that the candidate device is as safe and effective, and performs as well as or better than, the predicate device.
3
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
DEC 2 2 2005
Huntleigh Healthcare c/o Mr. Olaf Teichert TUV America, Inc. Tuv Product Service 1775 Old Highway 8 New Brighton, MN 55112-1891
Re: K053369
Trade/Device Name: Medilog Darwin Holter Analysis Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.1425 Regulation Name: Computer, Diagnostic, Programmable Regulatory Class: II (performance standards) Product Code: DQK Dated: December 1, 2005 Received: December 5, 2005
Dear Mr. Teichert:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
4
Page 2 - Mr. Olaf Teichert
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050. This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Office of Compliance at (240) 276-0120. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrb/industry/support/index.html.
Sincerely vours,
B.Zimmerman for
Bram D. Zuckerman, M.D. Director Division of Cardiovascular Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
5
Section C Medilog Darwin Holter Analysis 510(k)
INDICATIONS FOR USE
510(k) Number (if known):
Device Name:
:
Medilog Darwin Holter Analysis.
Indications for Use:
Medilog Darwin Holter Analysis is indicated for the replay and analysis of ECG data prerecorded on Medilog series ambulatory recorders.
It is indicated for use in the analysis, display, editing and report generation of ambulatory ECG data as part of the assessment of cardiac rhythm disturbance and myocardial ischaemia. Typically it is intended for patients requiring analysis of 24 hour ambulatory ECG recordings as determined by a medical practitioner.
Prescription Use V (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE – CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE OF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Blymmmo
(Division Sign-Off)
Division of Cardiovascular Devices