(68 days)
K-955281, K-924112, K-980447
K-853788, K-852802, K-884845, K-921805
No
The document describes standard dental implants made of titanium or titanium alloy, with optional coatings. There is no mention of software, algorithms, image processing, or any terms related to AI or ML. The focus is on the material, design, and intended use of the physical implant device.
Yes
The device is described as supporting prosthetic devices (artificial teeth) and restoring chewing function, which are therapeutic outcomes.
No
Explanation: The device description clearly states its purpose is to provide support for prosthetic devices and restore chewing function, not to diagnose medical conditions.
No
The device description clearly states it is a system of "permanent post-type implants" and "temporary implants" made of titanium or titanium alloy, which are physical hardware components.
Based on the provided text, this device is not an IVD (In Vitro Diagnostic).
Here's why:
- Intended Use: The intended use clearly states that the implants are surgically placed in the bone to support prosthetic devices and restore chewing function. This is a direct intervention on the patient's body, not a test performed on a sample taken from the body.
- Device Description: The description details the physical characteristics of the implants (post-type, materials, coatings) and their similarity to other dental implants. This aligns with a surgical implant device, not an IVD.
- Lack of IVD Characteristics: The text does not mention any of the typical characteristics of an IVD, such as:
- Analyzing samples (blood, urine, tissue, etc.)
- Detecting or measuring substances in samples
- Providing information for diagnosis, monitoring, or screening of diseases or conditions
Therefore, the ZTI Implants System is a surgical dental implant device, not an In Vitro Diagnostic device.
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
The permanent post-type implants of this system are intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw arches to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, and to restore the patient's chewing function.
The temporary implants are intended to provide immediate transitional splinting stability or fixation of new or existing crown, bridge and denture installations in partially or fully edentulous patients. It is indicated for a maximum of one year.
Product codes (comma separated list FDA assigned to the subject device)
76DZE, DZE
Device Description
The ZTI Implants System implants are post-type endosseous dental implants with design and manufacturing concepts, materials, surgical procedures, and intended uses quite similar to the preamendment device and to others rated substantially equivalent to the preamendment device. The ZTI Implants system is most similar to the Straumann ITI Implants System which received concurrence of substantial equivalence from the Food and Drug Administration in premarket notification submission K-955281 and the ITI TE "" system in general. Like many commercial implants, the ZTI devices are manufactured of high-purity (99+%) titanium, or titanium alloy (ASTM F 136-84 titanium - 6 aluminum - 4 vanadium)..
ZTI Implants also are available in coated form, either hydroxyapatite or titanium plasma spray, These devices are equivalent to various coated endosseous implants on the market, for example the Sabertech implants of Genentech, Inc., which were cleared under K-924112 and the Crystal-Seal Implants of Crystal Technology, cleared under K-980447.
Mentions image processing
Not Found
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found
Input Imaging Modality
Not Found
Anatomical Site
bone of the upper or lower jaw arches
Indicated Patient Age Range
Not Found
Intended User / Care Setting
Not Found
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Summary of Performance Studies (study type, sample size, AUC, MRMC, standalone performance, key results)
Endosseous implants, and especially those of titanium or titanium alloy, in the "post" or "screw" configuration, have been proved safe and effective through the years. The possible adverse effects summarized in this 510(k) cover those listed by the United States classification panel [Federal Register, vol. 45, No. 251, pp 86025-6, Dec. 30, 1980], as well as to those revealed in a recent literature search. Matukas, "Medical Risks Associated with Dental Implants," states, "Little or no hard data could be found on the medical risks associated with [dental] implants." Because of the wide-spread usage of dental implants, Smith and Zarb made a careful review of the literature and proposed criteria for implant success.
A thorough cornputerized Medline literature search produced over 700 review articles. The Journal of Dental Education published a special issue "Proceedings of the Consensus Development Conference on Dental Implants [National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, June 13-15, 1988], Vol. 52, No. 12, pp. 677-831, Dec. 1988. This added to the literature search above, with some especially pertinent reprints from the scientific literature, provide a comprehensive summary of available scientific data.
Zarb completed his report of the detailed Toronto 10-year study by concluding that "the tried and tested Branernark implant technique has revolutionized the treatment options open to the prosthodontist. For the edentulous patient...the prospect for a lifetime of restored oral comfort, function, and appearance have now become predictable and reliable." These results are ample evidence of the safety and effectiveness of these endosseous implants.
Key Metrics (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, etc.)
Not Found
Predicate Device(s): If the device was cleared using the 510(k) pathway, identify the Predicate Device(s) K/DEN number used to claim substantial equivalence and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text. List the primary predicate first in the list.
K-955281, K-924112, K-980447
Reference Device(s): Identify the Reference Device(s) K/DEN number and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text.
K-853788, K-852802, K-884845, K-921805
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information for the subject device only (e.g. presence / absence, what scope was granted / cleared under the PCCP, any restrictions, etc).
Not Found
§ 872.3640 Endosseous dental implant.
(a)
Identification. An endosseous dental implant is a prescription device made of a material such as titanium or titanium alloy that is intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw arches to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, in order to restore a patient's chewing function.(b)
Classification. (1) Class II (special controls). The device is classified as class II if it is a root-form endosseous dental implant. The root-form endosseous dental implant is characterized by four geometrically distinct types: Basket, screw, solid cylinder, and hollow cylinder. The guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Root-Form Endosseous Dental Implants and Endosseous Dental Implant Abutments” will serve as the special control. (See § 872.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.)(2)
Classification. Class II (special controls). The device is classified as class II if it is a blade-form endosseous dental implant. The special controls for this device are:(i) The design characteristics of the device must ensure that the geometry and material composition are consistent with the intended use;
(ii) Mechanical performance (fatigue) testing under simulated physiological conditions to demonstrate maximum load (endurance limit) when the device is subjected to compressive and shear loads;
(iii) Corrosion testing under simulated physiological conditions to demonstrate corrosion potential of each metal or alloy, couple potential for an assembled dissimilar metal implant system, and corrosion rate for an assembled dissimilar metal implant system;
(iv) The device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible;
(v) Sterility testing must demonstrate the sterility of the device;
(vi) Performance testing to evaluate the compatibility of the device in a magnetic resonance (MR) environment;
(vii) Labeling must include a clear description of the technological features, how the device should be used in patients, detailed surgical protocol and restoration procedures, relevant precautions and warnings based on the clinical use of the device, and qualifications and training requirements for device users including technicians and clinicians;
(viii) Patient labeling must contain a description of how the device works, how the device is placed, how the patient needs to care for the implant, possible adverse events and how to report any complications; and
(ix) Documented clinical experience must demonstrate safe and effective use and capture any adverse events observed during clinical use.
0
MAR - 8 2004
XIV. 510(k) SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS DATA. (Separate Page)
A: Submitter: Dr. Samuel Waknine, President, DRM Research Laboratories, Inc., Branford, CT 06405.
I. Classification Name and Number: Endosseous Implant (76DZE),
II. Common/Usual Name: Dental Implant. Endosseous, Post (or screw )-type, titanium or titanium alloy.
III. Proprietary Name: ZTI Implants System
IV. Classification: This device is being finally classified by the Dental Devices Panel (Tiftle 21 CFR 872.3640.
V. Performance standards: None applicable. Materials meet ASTM voluntary standards
VI. Description: The ZTI Implants System implants are post-type endosseous dental implants with design and manufacturing concepts, materials, surgical procedures, and intended uses quite similar to the preamendment device and to others rated substantially equivalent to the preamendment device. The ZTI Implants system is most similar to the Straumann ITI Implants System which received concurrence of substantial equivalence from the Food and Drug Administration in premarket notification submission K-955281 and the ITI TE "" system in general. Like many commercial implants, the ZTI devices are manufactured of high-purity (99+%) titanium, or titanium alloy (ASTM F 136-84 titanium - 6 aluminum - 4 vanadium)..
ZTI Implants also are available in coated form, either hydroxyapatite or titanium plasma spray, These devices are equivalent to various coated endosseous implants on the market, for example the Sabertech implants of Genentech, Inc., which were cleared under K-924112 and the Crystal-Seal Implants of Crystal Technology, cleared under K-980447.
VII. Labels and Instructions for Use are provided, as are labels for competitive products.
VIII. Intended Use: These devices are intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw arches to provide support for prosthetic devices and to restore the patient's chewing function.
VII. Substantial Equivalence: This device is equivalent to devices manufactured and sold before 1976,having a U. S. classification number of 76 DZE, and those described under 21 CFR 872.3640. It is also equivalent to several devices currently on the market that have been determined by the FDA to be substantially equivalent to the above preamendment devices. particularly to the Straumann ITI TE system cleared under K-955281. Some examples of other equivalent products are
1
Driskell Bioengineering, Westerville, OH, K-853788, DB Precision Implant Steri-Oss (Subs. Denar, Anaheim, CA.), Denar Dental Implant, K-852802; Steri-Oss Implant, K-884845.
Stryker Instruments, Kalamazoo, MI, K-921805, Stryker Precision System.In
VIII. Clinical Discussion and Brief Literature Review: Endosseous implants, and especially those of titanium or titanium alloy, in the "post" or "screw" configuration, have been proved safe and effective through the years. The possible adverse effects summarized in this 510(k) cover those listed by the United States classification panel [Federal Register, vol. 45, No. 251, pp 86025-6, Dec. 30, 1980], as well as to those revealed in a recent literature search. Matukas, "Medical Risks Associated with Dental Implants," states, "Little or no hard data could be found on the medical risks associated with [dental] implants." Because of the wide-spread usage of dental implants, Smith and Zarb made a careful review of the literature and proposed criteria for implant success.
A thorough cornputerized Medline literature search produced over 700 review articles. The Journal of Dental Education published a special issue "Proceedings of the Consensus Development Conference on Dental Implants [National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, June 13-15, 1988], Vol. 52, No. 12, pp. 677-831, Dec. 1988. This added to the literature search above, with some especially pertinent reprints from the scientific literature, provide a comprehensive summary of available scientific data.
Zarb completed his report of the detailed Toronto 10-year study by concluding that "the tried and tested Branernark implant technique has revolutionized the treatment options open to the prosthodontist. For the edentulous patient...the prospect for a lifetime of restored oral comfort, function, and appearance have now become predictable and reliable." These results are ample evidence of the safety and effectiveness of these endosseous implants.
END OF 510(k) SUMMARY
2
Image /page/2/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo is circular and contains the words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" around the perimeter. Inside the circle is an abstract symbol that resembles an eagle or bird in flight, composed of three curved lines above a wavy line.
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
MAR - 8 2004
Dr. Samuel Waknine President DRM Research Laboratories. Incorporated 29 Business Park Drive Branford, Connecticut 05405
Re: K034067
Trade/Device Name: ZTI Implant System™ DRM Implant Regulation Number: 872.3640 Regulation Name: Endosseous Implant Regulatory Class: III Product Code: DZE Dated: February 23, 2004 Received: March 3. 2004
Dear Mr. Waknine:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting vour device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21. Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
3
Page 2 - Mr. Waknine
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4613. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/dsmamain.html
Sincerely yours.
Chiu Lin, Ph.D.
Chiu Lin, Ph.D. Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Infection Control and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
4
Indications for Use
510(k) Number): K034067
Device Name: ZTI Implants System™
Indications for Use:
The permanent post-type implants of this system are intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw arches to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, and to restore the patient's chewing function.
The temporary implants are intended to provide immediate transitional splinting stability or fixation of new or existing crown, bridge and denture installations in partially or fully edentulous patients. It is indicated for a maximum of one year.
Prescription Use x AND/OR (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 807 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Susan Quares
510(k) Number: K(34)067
Page 1 of