(37 days)
Augmentation or reconstructive treatment of alveolar ridge Filling of periodontal defects Filing of defects after root resection, apicocctomy, and cystectomy Filing of extraction sockets to enhance preservation of the alveolar ridge Elevation of maxillary sinus floor
Filling of periodontal defects in conjunction with products intended for Guided Tissue Regencration (GTR) and Guided Bone Regencration (GBR).
Filing of peri-implant defects in conjunction with products intended for Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR)
BIO-OSS®, BIO-OSS® Blocks, and BIO-OSS® Collagen are natural non-antigenic, porous bone mineral matrixes. They arc produced by removal of all organic components from bovinc bone. Due to its natural structure, BIO-OSS®, BIO-OSS® Blocks, and BIO-OSS® Collagen are physically and chemically comparable to the mineralized matrix of human bone. It is available as cortical granules and blocks.
The provided text is a 510(k) summary for BIO-OSS devices. It states that the basis for substantial equivalence is that the devices are "substantially equivalent to Geistlich's existing products..." The only difference being an alternative geographic source for the bovine bone. The document “incorporates by reference all of the information on the use of BIO-OSS®, BIO-OSS® Blocks, and BIO-OSS® Collagen in the above referenced 510(k) submissions."
Therefore, the submission does not contain any new acceptance criteria or new study data proving the device meets acceptance criteria. Instead, it relies on the safety and effectiveness demonstrated in previous submissions for the predicate devices. This type of submission, focusing on a change in a non-critical aspect (like the source of raw material, with a demonstrated equivalent safety profile of the new source), typically references prior studies rather than conducting new ones.
Given the information provided in the input, I cannot answer the questions directly as the document does not present a new study with fresh acceptance criteria and device performance evaluation.
However, I can explain why the information isn't present based on the content:
- No new acceptance criteria or reported device performance: The submission is a 510(k) for a change in the bone source (from US to Australia) for an existing product. It claims substantial equivalence to predicate devices and incorporates by reference the information from those previous 510(k)s. This means no new performance criteria or new study results are presented in this specific document.
- No new sample size or data provenance for a test set: Since no new performance study is detailed, there's no new test set, sample size, or data provenance.
- No information on experts for ground truth or adjudication method: These details would be part of a new performance study, which is not included.
- No MRMC comparative effectiveness study: This type of study would be part of a clinical trial or performance evaluation, which is not present in this submission.
- No standalone performance (algorithm only) study: This implies the device is an algorithm or software, which is not the case for BIO-OSS, a bone filling material.
- No new ground truth type: No new ground truth is established as no new performance study is conducted.
- No new training set information: Similarly, no new training set details are provided.
- No new ground truth establishment for the training set: No new ground truth for a training set is established as no new study requiring one is described.
In summary, the provided 510(k) is an administrative update based on a change in raw material source for an already cleared device, not a submission detailing a new performance study.
{0}------------------------------------------------
JAN 1 5 2004
510(k) Summary
BIO-OSS®
BIO-OSS® Blocks
BIO-OSS® Collagen
1. SPONSOR
Geistlich Pharma Ag Bahnhofstrasse 40 CH-6110 Wolhuscn SWITZERLAND
Contact Person: Dr. Susana Wäsch, 011-41-41-49-25-630 Date Prepared: December 5, 2003
2. DEVICE NAME
| Proprietary Name: | BIO-OSS®, BIO-OSS® Blocks, BIO-OSS® Collagen |
|---|---|
| Common/Usual Name: | Anorganic Bovine Bone Filling Material |
| Classification Name: | Bone Filling Material |
3. PREDICATE DEVICES
BIO-OSS® (K871773, K952617, and K970321) BIO-OSS® Blocks (K920508, K952618, and K970569) BIO-OSS® Collagen (K974399)
4. INTENDED USE
BIO-OSS®, BIO-OSS Blocks and BIO-OSS® Collagen are recommended for:
- . Filling of large oral and maxillofacial intra-osseous cavities
ડ. DEVICE DESCRIPTION
BIO-OSS®, BIO-OSS® Blocks, and BIO-OSS® Collagen are natural non-antigenic, porous bone mineral matrixes. They arc produced by removal of all organic components from bovinc bone. Due to its natural structure, BIO-OSS®, BIO-OSS® Blocks, and BIO-OSS® Collagen are physically and chemically comparable to the mineralized matrix of human bone. It is available as cortical granules and blocks.
6. BASIS FOR SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE
BIO-OSS®, BIO-OSS® Blocks, and BIO-OSS® Collagen are substantially equivalent to Geistlich's existing products, BIO-OSS® Anorganic Bovine Bone (K871773, K952617, and K970321), BIO-OSS® Blocks (K920508, K952618, and K970569), and BIO-OSS®
{1}------------------------------------------------
Collagen (K974399). The only difference between the new products and the products previously cleared is that an alternative geographic source for the bovine bone is proposed to be added - Australia. The current source of bone is the United States. The European Union, in its Report on the Assessment of the Geographical BSE-risk of Australia, found Australia to have a level I Geographical BSE-risk ("GBR") - which means that it is highly unlikely that there is the presence of one or more cattle clinically or pre-clinically infected with the BSE agent in Australia. The United States has a level II GBR. It should be noted that Australia is not on the U.S. Department of Agriculture's list of countries affected with BSE. See 9 C.F.R. § 94.18. The company has performed a Risk Assessment per FDA Guidance to address traceability and pedigree of the herds. Therefore, using an alternative source of bovine bone will not negatively impact the products' safety or effectiveness.
With regard to the safety and effectiveness of the anorganic bovine bone used in BIO-OSS®, BIO-OSS® Blocks, and BIO-OSS® Collagen Geistlich incorporates by reference all of the information on the use of BIO-OSS®, BIO-OSS® Blocks, and BIO-OSS® Collagen in the above referenced 510(k) submissions.
BIO-OSS®, BIO-OSS® Blocks, and BIO-OSS® Collagen, as proposed to be sourced are substantially equivalent to the existing BIO-OSS®, BIO-OSS® Blocks, and BIO-OSS® Collagen products, in substance, function and intended use.
Based on the forcgoing, Geistlich believes that the information and data herein submitted demonstrates not only that these versions of BIO-OSS®, BIO-OSS® Blocks, and BIO-OSS® Collagen arc substantially equivalent to existing BIO-OSS®, BIO-OSS® Blocks, and BIO-OSS® Collagen products but also that these products have been shown to be safe and effective for the labeled indications.
{2}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/2/Picture/1 description: The image is a black and white logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features a stylized depiction of a human figure with three overlapping profiles, suggesting a sense of community or interconnectedness. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" is arranged in a circular pattern around the figure.
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
JAN 1 5 2004
Geistlich-Pharma Ag C/O Mr. Peter S. Reichertz Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthall LLP 1301 K Street NW Suite 600, East Tower Washington, D.C. 20005
Re: K033815
Trade/Device Name: BIO-OSS Granules, BIO-OSS Blocks and BIO-OSS Collagen Regulation Number: None Regulation Name: Nonc Regulatory Class: Unclassified Product Code: NPM Dated: December 8, 2003 Received: December 12, 2003
Dear Mr. Reichertz:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of r mondinely of od, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Eederal Register.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 – Mr. Reichertz
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4613. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the maj country of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/dsmamain.html
Sincerely yours,
Chiu Lin, Ph., D.
Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Infection Control and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{4}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known): K033815
Device Name: BIO-OSS Granules, BIO-OSS Blocks and BIO-OSS Collagen
Indications for Use:
Augmentation or reconstructive treatment of alveolar ridge Filling of periodontal defects Filing of defects after root resection, apicocctomy, and cystectomy Filing of extraction sockets to enhance preservation of the alveolar ridge Elevation of maxillary sinus floor
Filling of periodontal defects in conjunction with products intended for Guided Tissue Regencration (GTR) and Guided Bone Regencration (GBR).
Filing of peri-implant defects in conjunction with products intended for Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR)
Over-The-Counter Use レ Prescription Use AND/OR (21 CFR 807 Subpart C) (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) (PI.EASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE OF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Susan Runge
Page 1 of
ivision Sign-Off) vision Sign-Olf/
vision of Anesthesiology, General Hospital Infection Control, Dental Devices
510(k) Number:
25103438\V-1
§ 872.3930 Bone grafting material.
(a)
Identification. Bone grafting material is a material such as hydroxyapatite, tricalcium phosphate, polylactic and polyglycolic acids, or collagen, that is intended to fill, augment, or reconstruct periodontal or bony defects of the oral and maxillofacial region.(b)
Classification. (1) Class II (special controls) for bone grafting materials that do not contain a drug that is a therapeutic biologic. The special control is FDA's “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Dental Bone Grafting Material Devices.” (See § 872.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.)(2) Class III (premarket approval) for bone grafting materials that contain a drug that is a therapeutic biologic. Bone grafting materials that contain a drug that is a therapeutic biologic, such as biological response modifiers, require premarket approval.
(c)
Date premarket approval application (PMA) or notice of product development protocol (PDP) is required. Devices described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section shall have an approved PMA or a declared completed PDP in effect before being placed in commercial distribution.