(193 days)
The AZ-733 Respiratory Gating System is intended to be used with diagnostic x-ray or radiation therapy systems to gate these devices on and off when target points of the patient's respiratory cycle are within preset limits.
The AZ-733 Respiratory Gating System system employs a respiratory sensor which can be fixed directly to or nearly to a patient, and detects the respiratory motion changes according to the type of sensor, a load cell (standard) or laser sensor (optional). The Load Cell detects the mechanical expansion of the thoracic cavity resulting from the respiratory motion as the pressure changes of up/downward movement of the chest and abdomen. The Laser Sensor detects the distance change to the chest surface with the expansion of the thoracic cavity resulting from the respiratory motion of the chest and abdomen. The analog signals from the Respiratory Sensor are detected and transmitted to the Sensor Port. There those signals are amplified, converted into digital form, and then output through a cable to the Wave Deck. The Wave Deck processes the signals, changing them into serial format for transmission to the Personal Computer. The Personal Computer monitors the respiratory signals all the time and commands the Wave Deck to output the gating signals when those respiratory signals reach the preset phase of respiration. Those gating (TTL) signals are transmitted to diagnostic imaging apparatus like X-ray CT or radiation therapy equipment.
Here's an analysis of the provided text regarding the AZ-733-V Respiratory Gating System's acceptance criteria and studies:
Based on the provided 510(k) summary (K031385), the following information can be extracted:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The document does not explicitly state specific acceptance criteria in terms of numerical performance metrics (e.g., accuracy, precision, latency) for the device's respiratory gating functionality. Instead, the substantial equivalence determination is based on the device having "similar, but not identical, indications for use" and "the same technological characteristics" as a predicate device, with some differences in sensors.
The primary proof of equivalence is rooted in the device's design to conform to electrical safety and electromagnetic compatibility standards, rather than performance-based acceptance criteria related to its respiratory gating function.
| Acceptance Criteria (Explicitly Stated in Document) | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|
| Electrical Safety: Conformity to EN-60601-1-1 | Testing currently underway; not marketed until successfully completed. |
| Electromagnetic Compatibility: Conformity to EN-60601-1-2 | Testing currently underway; not marketed until successfully completed. |
| Intended Use Equivalence: Gating diagnostic x-ray or radiation therapy systems based on patient's respiratory cycle. | Considered substantially equivalent to Varian RPM Respiratory Gating System (K983629) with "similar, but not identical, indications for use" and "same technological characteristics." |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
The document does not describe a specific test set, its sample size, or data provenance (e.g., country of origin, retrospective/prospective) for evaluating the core performance of the respiratory gating function. The "Testing" section refers to compliance with electrical safety and EMC standards, not clinical or functional performance.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications
This information is not provided in the given summary. There is no mention of experts establishing a ground truth for a performance test set.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
This information is not provided as there is no described test set or ground truth establishment process.
5. If a Multi Reader Multi Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done
No, a Multi Reader Multi Case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was not done or described. The 510(k) process for this device relies on substantial equivalence to a predicate device, not on proving improved human reader performance with AI assistance. The device is a "Respiratory Gating System," not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool for human interpretation.
6. If a Standalone Performance Study Was Done
No, a standalone (algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) study of the respiratory gating accuracy or effectiveness was not described. The documented testing focuses on electrical safety and EMC. While the system processes signals and commands gating, there's no performance data presented on how accurately it tracks respiration or gates devices.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
Given the absence of a described performance study for respiratory gating, there is no mention of a specific type of ground truth used (e.g., expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data). The "ground truth" for the device's approval seems to be its compliance with regulatory standards (electrical safety, EMC) and its technological similarity to a predicate device, as opposed to a detailed functional performance evaluation.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
The document does not describe a training set for the device. Clinical performance data or machine learning model training is not referenced in the summary.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
As there is no mention of a training set, the method for establishing its ground truth is not provided.
{0}------------------------------------------------
NOV 1 0 2003
510(k) Summary
AZ-733-V Respiratory Gating System
Common/Classification Name: Radiographic ECG/Respiratory Synchronizer 21 CFR 892.1970
Anzai Medical Company, Ltd. 3-6-25 Nishi-Shinagawa Shinagawa-ku Tokyo 141-0033 Japan
Contact: T. Kaneko, Prepared: April 28, 2003
LEGALLY MARKETED PREDICATE DEVICES A.
The AZ-733 Respiratory Gating System is substantially equivalent to the Varian RPM Respiratory Gating System, which was cleared for marketing by FDA on June 8, 1999 under K983629.
DEVICE DESCRIPTION B.
The AZ-733 Respiratory Gating System system employs a respiratory sensor which can be fixed directly to or nearly to a patient, and detects the respiratory motion changes according to the type of sensor, a load cell (standard) or laser sensor (optional).
The Load Cell detects the mechanical expansion of the thoracic cavity resulting from the respiratory motion as the pressure changes of up/downward movement of the chest and abdomen. The Laser Sensor detects the distance change to the chest surface with the expansion of the thoracic cavity resulting from the respiratory motion of the chest and abdomen.
The analog signals from the Respiratory Sensor are detected and transmitted to the Sensor Port. There those signals are amplified, converted into digital form, and then output through a cable to the Wave Deck. The Wave Deck processes the signals, changing them into serial format for transmission to the Personal Computer. The Personal Computer monitors the respiratory signals all the time and commands the Wave Deck to output the gating signals when those respiratory signals reach the preset phase of respiration. Those gating (TTL) signals are transmitted to diagnostic imaging apparatus like X-ray CT or radiation
000036
{1}------------------------------------------------
therapy equipment.
K03/385
C. INTENDED USE
The AZ-733 Respiratory Gating System is intended to be used with diagnostic x-ray or radiation therapy systems to gate these devices on and off when target points of the patient's respiratory cycle are within preset limits.
D. SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE SUMMARY
The AZ-733 Respiratory Gating System has similar, but not identical, indications for use as the currently marketed Varian RPM Respiratory Gating System. The differences relate only to the specific characteristics of each device and do not change the intended diagnostic or therapeutic effect. The devices clearly have the same intended use the gating of radiation therapy devices through analysis of respiratory waveforms from The AZ-733 Respiratory Gating System has the "same the patient. technological characteristics" as the currently marketed Varian RPM device. The descriptive characteristics are sufficiently precise to assure substantial equivalence except in a few cases where performance data are provided. A comparison of these characteristics demonstrates substantial equivalence.1
TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS E.
The technological characteristics of the sensors of the AZ-733 is somewhat different from the predicate device. The processing of the detected signals uses very similar technology.
The sensor of the AZ-733 can be either a strain gauge or a laser sensor. The predicate device uses a video camera and image processing to follow movement.
F. TESTING
The device has been designed to the requirements of the EN-60601-1-1 for electrical safety and EN-60601-1-2 for electromagnetic compatibility. Testing is currently under way and the device will not be marketed in the U.S. until the testing has been successfully completed.
1 The meaning of the terms "substantial equivalence" and "substantially equivalent" as used in this 510(k) is limited to the way they are defined in, and used by FDA in accordance with, Sections 513(f)(1) and 513(l)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
{2}------------------------------------------------
CONCLUSIONS G.
This pre-market notification has demonstrated Substantial Equivalence as defined and understood in Sections 513(f)(1) and 513(i)(1) of the Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act and various guidance documents issued by the Center for Devices and Radiological Health.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image is a black and white logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features a stylized image of an eagle with three lines forming its body and head. The words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES USA" are arranged in a circular pattern around the eagle.
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
NOV 1 0 2003
Anzai Medical Co., Ltd. % T. Whit Athey, Ph.D. Senior Consultant The Health Policy Resources Group, LLC 2305 Gold Mine Road, Suite 200 BROOKVILLE MD 20833-2233
Re: K031385 Trade/Device Name: AZ-733 Respiratory Gating System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.5050 Regulation Name: Medical charged-particle radiation therapy system Regulatory Class: II Product Code: 90 LHN Dated: October 2, 2003 Received: October 2, 2003
Dear Dr. Athey:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA), You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050,
{4}------------------------------------------------
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Office of Compliance at one of the following numbers, based on the regulation number at the top of the letter:
| 8xx. 1xxx | (301) 594-4591 |
|---|---|
| 876.2xxx, 3xxx, 4xxx, 5xxx | (301) 594-4616 |
| 884.2xxx, 3xxx, 4xxx, 5xxx, 6xxx | (301) 594-4616 |
| 892.2xxx, 3xxx, 4xxx, 5xxx | (301) 594-4654 |
| Other | (301) 594-4692 |
Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (2.1CFR Part 807.97) you may obtain. Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/dsmamain.html.
Sincerely yours,
Nancy C. Brogdon
Nancy C. Brogdon Director, Division of Reproductive, Abdominal and Radiological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{5}------------------------------------------------
STATEMENT OF INDICATIONS FOR USE
6031385 510(k) Number (if known): ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Device Name:
Indications For Use:
The AZ-733 Respiratory Gating System is intended to be used with diagnostic x-ray or radiation therapy systems to gate these devices on and off when target points of the patient's respiratory cycle are within preset limits.
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Prescription Use (Per 21 CFR 801.109)
OR
Over-The-Counter Use
Nancy C Brogdon
(Division Sign-Off) Division of Reproductive, and Radiological Devices 510(k) Number
000040
§ 892.5050 Medical charged-particle radiation therapy system.
(a)
Identification. A medical charged-particle radiation therapy system is a device that produces by acceleration high energy charged particles (e.g., electrons and protons) intended for use in radiation therapy. This generic type of device may include signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, treatment planning computer programs, component parts, and accessories.(b)
Classification. Class II. When intended for use as a quality control system, the film dosimetry system (film scanning system) included as an accessory to the device described in paragraph (a) of this section, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 892.9.