The Agfa Film Cassettes are indicated for use during diagnostic x-ray procedures to hold a radiographic film in close contact with an x-ray intensifying screen and to provide a lightproof enclosure for direct exposure of radiographic film.

Device Description

AI/ML Overview

The provided text is a 510(k) summary for Agfa Film Cassettes, focusing on establishing substantial equivalence to previously cleared predicate devices. It does not contain information about a study proving the device meets specific acceptance criteria in the context of imaging performance or diagnostic accuracy. Instead, it describes manufacturing and design standards, and the intended use.

Therefore, many of the requested categories for acceptance criteria and study details cannot be answered from this document.

Here's a breakdown of what can and cannot be answered:

1. Table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance:

Acceptance Criteria Category	Reported Device Performance	Comments
Intended Use	The Agfa Film Cassettes are indicated for use during diagnostic x-ray procedures to hold a radiographic film in close contact with an x-ray intensifying screen and to provide a lightproof enclosure for direct exposure of radiographic film.	This is an intended use statement, not necessarily a quantifiable performance criterion. The document states it is the "same compared to those of the legally marketed predicate devices."
Technological Characteristics	The technological characteristics of the Agfa Film Cassettes are the same as those of the predicate devices.	This is a statement of equivalence, not a specific performance metric.
Standards Compliance	Designed and manufactured to meet the requirements of ANSI/NAPM 1.49-1995, DIN 6832, Parts 2 and 3; and IEC 406.	These are manufacturing and design standards, not direct performance data for diagnostic accuracy or device efficacy. The document implies compliance with these standards serves as an "acceptance criteria" for manufacturing and design.
Radiographic Film Contact	To hold a radiographic film in close contact with an x-ray intensifying screen.	This is part of the intended function and implied as an acceptance criterion for proper cassette design. No quantitative performance is given.
Lightproof Enclosure	To provide a lightproof enclosure for direct exposure of radiographic film.	This is part of the intended function and implied as an acceptance criterion for proper cassette design. No quantitative performance is given.
Substantial Equivalence	Demonstrated Substantial Equivalence as defined and understood in the Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act and various guidance documents issued by the Center for Devices and Radiological Health.	This is the overarching "acceptance criteria" for the 510(k) process, meaning the new device is as safe and effective as a legally marketed device.

2. Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance: Not applicable. No test set involving patient data or images was used for this submission as it focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence for a physical medical device (film cassettes) based on design and standards compliance.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts: Not applicable. No "ground truth" establishment in a diagnostic sense was performed for this 510(k) submission.

4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set: Not applicable. No test set requiring adjudication was performed.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance: Not applicable. This document is about film cassettes and does not involve AI or human reader studies.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done: Not applicable. This document is about film cassettes and does not involve algorithms.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc): Not applicable in the context of diagnostic performance. The "ground truth" for this submission revolved around demonstrating that the physical characteristics and performance (e.g., light-tightness, film contact) of the new cassettes met the same standards and intended use as the predicate devices, likely through engineering tests and compliance with recognized standards.

8. The sample size for the training set: Not applicable. This document does not describe the development or training of an AI algorithm or a diagnostic system.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable.

Summary

{0}------------------------------------------------

KOZ3020

SEP 2 6 2002

510(k) Summary

Agfa Film Cassettes

Common/Classification Name: Radiographic Film Cassette, 21 CFR 892.1850

Agfa Corporation 10 South Academy Street Greenville, SC 29602-9048

Contact: Jeff Jedlicka, Prepared: August 21, 2002

INTRODUCTION A.

There are three product lines of Agfa Film Cassettes covered by the present 510(k): (1) The Mamoray Mammography Cassettes, (2) the metal-bodied CAWO Cassettes, and (3) the ABS Plastic Curix and Lightweight Cassettes. The present submission describes the currently marketed products by cassette type and shows that they are substantially equivalent to cassettes currently marketed in the U.S.

B. PREDICATE DEVICES

The Agfa Mamoray Mammography Cassettes are substantially equivalent to the Agfa Mammography Cassettes, which were cleared for marketing by FDA on March 21, 1979 as K790273. The Agfa Metal-Bodied CAWO Cassette is substantially equivalent to the Kodak X-Omat Cassette, which was cleared for marketing by FDA on March 1, 1989 as K890750. The Plastic Curix and Lightweight Cassettes are also substantially equivalent to the Kodak X-Omat Cassette.

C. INTENDED USE

SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE SUMMARY D.

The Agfa Film Cassettes have the same indications for use statement compared to those of the legally marketed predicate devices. The Agfa Film Cassettes have the same technological characteristics as the predicate devices. This premarket notification will describe the

{1}------------------------------------------------

characteristics of the Agfa Film Cassettes in sufficient detail to assure substantial equivalence.

TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS E.

The technological characteristics of the Agfa Film Cassettes are the same as those of the predicate devices.

F. STANDARDS

The Agfa Film Cassettes are designed and manufactured to meet the requirements of ANSI/NAPM 1.49-1995, DIN 6832, Parts 2 and 3; and IEC 406.

CONCLUSIONS G.

This pre-market submission has demonstrated Substantial Equivalence as defined and understood in the Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act and various guidance documents issued by the Center for Devices and Radiological Health.

{2}------------------------------------------------

Image /page/2/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" arranged around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized design featuring three wavy lines that resemble a human figure or a symbol representing health and well-being.

Public Health Service

Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850

SEP 2 6 2002

Agfa Corporation c/o R. Kent Donohue Underwriters Laboratories, Inc. 6 12 Laboratory Drive P.O. Box 13995 RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK NC 27709-3995

Re: K023020

Trade/Device Name: Agfa Film Cassette Regulation Number: 21 CFR §892.1850 Regulation Name: Radiographic film cassette Regulatory Class: II Product Code: 90 IXA Dated: September 10, 2002 Received: September 11, 2002

Dear Mr. Donohue:

We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.

If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.

Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.

{3}------------------------------------------------

Pape 2

This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.

If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Office of Compliance at one of the following numbers, based on the regulation number at the top of this letter:

8xx.1xxx	(301) 594-4591
876.2xxx, 3xxx, 4xxx, 5xxx	(301) 594-4616
884.2xxx, 3xxx, 4xxx, 5xxx, 6xxx	(301) 594-4616
892.2xxx, 3xxx, 4xxx, 5xxx	(301) 594-4654
Other	(301) 594-4692

Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807,97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/dsmamain.html.

Sincercly yours,

Nancy C Brogdon

Nancy C. Brogdon Director, Division of Reproductive, Abdominal, and Radiological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health

Enclosure

{4}------------------------------------------------

STATEMENT OF INDICATIONS FOR USE

510(k) Number (if known): K1023620

Device Name:

Indications For Use:

(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)

Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)

Prescription Use (Per 21 CFR 801.109)

Over-The-Counter Use ___________

Juil A. begeron

(Division Sign-Off) Division of Reproductive, Al and Radiological Device 510(k) Number

Regulation Number and Section

§ 892.1850 Radiographic film cassette.

(a)
Identification. A radiographic film cassette is a device intended for use during diagnostic x-ray procedures to hold a radiographic film in close contact with an x-ray intensifying screen and to provide a light-proof enclosure for direct exposure of radiographic film.(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 892.9.