(169 days)
K-numbers not explicitly provided in the summary
Not Found
No
The description focuses on the physical principles of Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) and its application in imaging and measuring ocular structures. There is no mention of AI, ML, or any related concepts in the device description, intended use, or performance studies. The performance studies focus on the reproducibility and diagnostic utility of the OCT measurements themselves, not on any automated analysis or interpretation using AI/ML.
No.
The device is described as a diagnostic aid for the detection of ocular conditions, not for treating them, and its function involves viewing and measurement, not therapy.
Yes
The "Intended Use / Indications for Use" section explicitly states, "It is intended for use as a diagnostic aid as well as macular edema, central serous retinopathy and glaucoma." The "Device Description" also mentions its use "in the diagnosis of retinal disorders and diseases."
No
The device description explicitly details hardware components like a Super-Luminescent Diode (SLD), Michelson interferometer, mirrors mounted to galvanometers, and a detector, which are integral to its function of generating images. This is not a software-only device.
Based on the provided information, this device is not an In Vitro Diagnostic (IVD).
Here's why:
- IVDs are used to examine specimens derived from the human body. The description clearly states the device is used for "viewing and axial measurement of posterior ocular structures" and "scanning the retina." This involves direct interaction with the patient's eye, not the analysis of a biological sample taken from the patient.
- The device description focuses on optical principles and scanning technology. It describes how light is used to create images of the retina, which is a physical structure within the body.
- The intended use and performance studies relate to diagnosing conditions based on the structural characteristics of the eye. The examples given (macular edema, central serous retinopathy, glaucoma) are diagnosed by observing and measuring features within the eye itself, not by analyzing substances from the body.
Therefore, the Humphrey OCT3 is an in vivo diagnostic device, meaning it is used to diagnose conditions within a living organism, rather than an in vitro diagnostic device, which is used to diagnose conditions by analyzing samples outside the body.
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
The Humphrey OCT3 is a high resolution tomographic device for Indications I of OSC. The Humpmoy of posterior ocular structures. It is used the viewing and axial 0.000 0000.01.21145. for in VNO integring and model. Still in the detection and in the detection and disk. It is intended for use as a diagnoons as week as macular edema, central serous retinopathy and glaucoma.
Product codes (comma separated list FDA assigned to the subject device)
IYO; HLI
Device Description
The Humphrey Optical Coherence Tomography Scanner measures optical reflectivity to obtain cross sectional tomograms of the eye. The Humphrey OCT employs the principle of low coherence interferometry based upon the Michelson interferometer. In a Michelson interferometer, the light from a source is split into a sample path and a reference path containing a mirror. Light reflected back from the sample path and the reference path will create an interference pattern on a detector if the optical path lengths between the reference and sample are identical. Adjusting the length of the reference path will allow a semi-transparent sample, such as the retina, to be cross-sectionally scanned. The Super-Luminescent Diode (SLD) used in the Humphrey OCT Scanner permits a short coherence length in air. Accounting for the index of refraction of the eye, this translates to an even shorter coherence length within the retina. The SLD emits near infrared light which is scattered by the various interfaces and structures of the retinal tissue. As the reference arm is moved, a depth profile of the retina is produced which is similar to ultrasound A-scan. The profile plots variations in optical reflectivity between the different layers of the retina. Two mirrors mounted to galvanometers deflect the SLD beam within the eye. Scanning the retina in this manner produces cross-sectional images similar to ultrasound Bscan but of much higher resolution.
Mentions image processing
Not Found
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found
Input Imaging Modality
Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)
Anatomical Site
Ocular structures; posterior ocular structures; retina; optic nerve head (ONH)
Indicated Patient Age Range
Not Found
Intended User / Care Setting
Not Found
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Summary of Performance Studies (study type, sample size, AUC, MRMC, standalone performance, key results)
The reproducibility of OCT measurements for RNFL and retinal thickness has been tested by numerous clinical trials.
Konno and Akiba et al (2001) reported the ability of the OCT to reproduce quantitative information on foveal thickness.
Blumenthal et al (2000) reported that RNFL measurements were reproducible for both normal and glaucomatous eyes.
Zangwill (2000) reports that the increased detection of RNFL damage by the OCT, improves early glaucoma detection.
Shuman et al (1995) have reported their use of the OCT for monitoring glaucoma. Circular OCT scans at various radii centered around the optic nerve head (ONH) presented nerve fiber layer (NFL) thickness in the OCT image, which could be measured by analysis of the data. The NFL thickness measurement correlated with the RNFL drop out observed in ONH photographs and with visual field defect documented with visual field tests in glaucoma patients.
In a study of 78 patients, Hoh and Greenfield, et al (2000), correlated retinal nerve fiber layer structural measurements with visual function. They report that they were able to differentiate between non glaucomatous and glaucomatous eyes using the OCT.
Bowd and Zangwill (2001) report the ability to detect early glaucoma by the assessment of retinal nerve fiber layer using the OCT. In the same study, comparing the ability of different methods of detecting early glaucoma by assessment of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, concluded that the OCT was more sensitive than standard automated perimetry or scanning laser polarimetry.
Zangwill and Bowd (2001) studied the ability of the OCT to discriminate between normal healthy eyes and eyes with early to moderate glaucomatous visual field loss. Qualitative assessments of stereo photographs and OCT measurements had no significant differences in sensitivities.
A safety analysis performed by an independent consultant concluded that the device under normal operating circumstances would never exceed the limits for human ocular exposure. The maximum output power of the IR LED is well below the continuous ACGIH/ICNIRP limit of 2mW.
Key Metrics (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, etc.)
Not Found
Predicate Device(s): If the device was cleared using the 510(k) pathway, identify the Predicate Device(s) K/DEN number used to claim substantial equivalence and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text. List the primary predicate first in the list.
The Humphrey Optical Coherence Tomographer, the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph, and the GDx by Laser Diagnostic Technologies. (K-numbers not explicitly provided in the summary)
Reference Device(s): Identify the Reference Device(s) K/DEN number and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text.
Not Found
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information for the subject device only (e.g. presence / absence, what scope was granted / cleared under the PCCP, any restrictions, etc).
Not Found
§ 892.1560 Ultrasonic pulsed echo imaging system.
(a)
Identification. An ultrasonic pulsed echo imaging system is a device intended to project a pulsed sound beam into body tissue to determine the depth or location of the tissue interfaces and to measure the duration of an acoustic pulse from the transmitter to the tissue interface and back to the receiver. This generic type of device may include signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, component parts, and accessories.(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls). A biopsy needle guide kit intended for use with an ultrasonic pulsed echo imaging system only is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 892.9.
0
JAN 3 1 2002
510 k Safety and effectiveness summary
- Carl Zeiss Ophthalmic Systems, Inc. 1. Humphrey Division 5160 Hacienda Dr. Dublin, CA 94568 Contact Person - Melissa R. Horne November 2, 2001
JAN 18 10 31 AM '02
RECEIVED
- Humphrey Optical Coherence Tomographer 3 2.
-
- We are claiming substantial equivalence to the Humphrey Optical Coherence Tomographer, the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph, and the GDx by Laser Diagnostic Technologies.
-
- In order to understand the Humphrey version of the Optical Coherence Tomographer. You must understand how Optical Coherence Tomography works. In general OCT Scanners permit the user to obtain and analyze cross-sectional tomograms of ocular tissue in a non-contact and non-invasive manner. The Humphrey Optical Coherence Tomography Scanner measures optical reflectivity to obtain cross sectional tomograms of the eye.
The Humphrey OCT employs the principle of low coherence interferometry based upon the Michelson interferometer. In a Michelson interferometer, the light from a source is split into a sample path and a reference path containing a mirror. Light reflected back from the sample path and the reference path will create an interference pattern on a detector if the optical path lengths between the reference and sample are identical. Adjusting the length of the reference path will allow a semi-transparent sample, such as the retina, to be cross-sectionally scanned.
The Super-Luminescent Diode (SLD) used in the Humphrey OCT Scanner permits a short coherence length in air. Accounting for the index of refraction of the eye, this translates to an even shorter coherence length within the retina. The SLD emits near infrared light which is scattered by the various interfaces and structures of the retinal tissue. As the reference arm is moved, a depth profile of the retina is produced which is similar to ultrasound A-scan. The profile plots variations in optical reflectivity between the different layers of the retina. Two mirrors mounted to galvanometers deflect the SLD beam within the eye. Scanning the retina in this manner produces cross-sectional images similar to ultrasound Bscan but of much higher resolution. The tomographic images of the retina produced by the OCT scanner provide an important tool in the diagnosis of retinal disorders and diseases that manifest themselves in the posterior pole of the eye.
1
-
- This device will be used in the same manner as all OCT scanner devices. The Humphrey OCT is a safe and effective tool for the imaging and measurement of ocular structures. Previous submissions to the FDA, various publications, and clinical studies from independent researchers have demonstrated the efficacy of the OCT scanner. Independent analysis by an internationally recognized expert is included in this report and previous FDA submissions have demonstrated its safety. The information summarized below refers directly to the ability of the OCT to image and measure ocular structures.
The reproducibility of OCT measurements for RNFL and retinal thickness has been tested by numerous clinical trials. Among them, Konno and Akiba et al (2001) reported the ability of the OCT to reproduce quantitative information on foveal thickness and Blumenthal et al (2000) reported that RNFL measurements were reproducible for both normal and glaucomatous eyes.
- This device will be used in the same manner as all OCT scanner devices. The Humphrey OCT is a safe and effective tool for the imaging and measurement of ocular structures. Previous submissions to the FDA, various publications, and clinical studies from independent researchers have demonstrated the efficacy of the OCT scanner. Independent analysis by an internationally recognized expert is included in this report and previous FDA submissions have demonstrated its safety. The information summarized below refers directly to the ability of the OCT to image and measure ocular structures.
Zangwill (2000) reports that the increased detection of RNFL damage by the OCT, improves early glaucoma detection. Shuman et al (1995) have reported their use of the OCT for monitoring glaucoma. Circular OCT scans at various radii centered around the optic nerve head (ONH) presented nerve fiber layer (NFL) thickness in the OCT image, which could be measured by analysis of the data. The NFL thickness measurement correlated with the RNFL drop out observed in ONH photographs and with visual field defect documented with visual field tests in glaucoma patients.
In a study of 78 patients, Hoh and Greenfield, et al (2000), correlated retinal nerve fiber layer structural measurements with visual function. They report that they were able to differentiate between non glaucomatous and glaucomatous eyes using the OCT. Bowd and Zangwill (2001) report the ability to detect early glaucoma by the assessment of retinal nerve fiber layer using the OCT. In the same study, comparing the ability of different methods of detecting early glaucoma by assessment of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, concluded that the OCT was more sensitive than standard automated perimetry or scanning laser polarimetry.
Reporting in the Archives of Ophthalmology, Zangwill and Bowd (2001), studied the ability of the OCT to discriminate between normal healthy eyes and eyes with early to moderate glaucomatous visual field loss. Qualitative assessments of stereo photographs and OCT measurements had no significant differences in sensitivities.
A safety analysis was performed by an independent consultant, who is an internationally recognized expert in the field of optical radiation hazards and safety, in order to determine if the energy introduced into the eye by the OCT scanner poses any safety risk.
The safety analysis concludes that the device under normal operating circumstances would never exceed the limits for human ocular exposure.
2
The maximum output power of the IR LED is well below the continuous ACGIH/ICNIRP limit of 2mW.
-
- The OCT3 is substantially equivalent to the predicate device. One of the differences between the two devices are that the new OCT combines many of the separate components utilized into one more cohesive unit. The devices are very similar in materials and energy source. The new OCT has an increased scan rate for high resolution scanning.
References
Schuman JS, Hee MR, Puliafito CA, Wong C, Pedut-Kloizman T, Lin CP, Hertsmark E, Izatt JA, Swanson EA, Fujimoto JG. Quantification of nerve fiber thickness in normal and glaucomatous eyes using optical coherence tomography; a pilot study. Archives of Ophthalmology 1995; 1130:586-596
Konno S, Akiba J, Yoshida A. Retinal thickness measurements with optical coherence tomography and the scanning retinal thickness analyzer. Retina 2001; 21(1): 57-61
Blumenthal EZ, Williams JM, Weinreb RN, Girkin CA, Berry CC, Zangwill LM. Reproducibility of nerve fiber layer thickness measurements by optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 2000; Dec; 107(12): 2278-82
Hoh ST, Greenfield DS, Mistlberger A, Liebmenn JM, Ishikawa H, Ritch R. Optical coherence tomography and scanning laser polarimetry in normal, ocular hypertensive, and glaucomatous eyes. American Journal of Ophthalmology 2000; Feb; 129(2):129-35
Bowd C, Zangwill LM, Berry CC, Blumenthal EZ, Vasile C, Sanchez OC, Bosworth CF, Sample PA, Weinreb RN. Detecting early glaucoma by assessment of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and visual function. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2001 Aug;42(9):1993-2003
Zangwill LM, Williams J, Berry CC, Knauer S, Weinreb RN. A comparison of optical coherence tomography and retinal nerve fiber layer photography for detection of nerve fiber layer damage in glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2000 Jul;107(7):1309-15
Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Berry CC, Williams J, Blumenthal EZ, Sanchez-Galena CA, Vasile C, Weinreb RN. Archives of Ophthalmology 2001 Jul;119(7):985-93
3
Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" arranged around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized symbol that resembles three wavy lines or abstract figures, often interpreted as representing the human form or the flow of life.
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
JAN 3 1 2002
Ms. Melissa R. Horne Associate Product Manger, OCT Carl Zeiss Ophthalmic Systems, Inc. 5160 Hacienda Drive Dublin, California 94568
Re: K012727
Trade/Device Name: Optical Coherence Tomography Model 3000 (OCT 3) Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.1560; 886.1570 Regulation Name: Ultrasonic pulsed echo imaging system and Ophthalmoscope Regulatory Class: II Product Code: IYO; HLI Dated: October 31, 2001 Received: November 5, 2001
Dear Ms. Horne:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
4
Page 2 - Ms. Melissa R. Horne
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 21 CFR Part 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4613. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/dsmamain.html
Sincerely yours,
A. Ralph Rosenthal
A. Ralph Rosenthal, M.D. Director Division of Ophthalmic and Ear, Nose and Throat Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
5
Page 1 of 1
510(k) Number (if known): K012727
Device Name: Humphrey OCT 3 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Indications For Use: The Humphrey OCT3 is a high resolution tomographic device for Indications I of OSC. The Humpmoy of posterior ocular structures. It is used the viewing and axial 0.000 0000.01.21145. for in VNO integring and model. Still in the detection and in the detection and disk. It is intended for use as a diagnoons as week as macular edema, central serous retinopathy and glaucoma.
(Please do not WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Duych Hoang
ision of Oohthalmic Ear. Nose and Throat Devises
510(k) Number K012727
(Optional Format 3-10-98)