(91 days)
The implant(s) is designed for use in the edentulous sites in the mandible or maxilla for support of a complete denture prosthesis, a terminal or intermediate abutment for fixed or partial dentures, or a single tooth replacement.
Various Dental Implants
I am sorry, but the provided text does not contain the detailed information necessary to answer your request about acceptance criteria and the study proving the device meets them. The document is a 510(k) clearance letter from the FDA for "Various Dental Implants," confirming their substantial equivalence to previously marketed devices.
This type of document typically focuses on regulatory clearance based on substantial equivalence, rather than detailing the specific performance studies and acceptance criteria that would have been submitted by the manufacturer as part of their 510(k) application.
Therefore, I cannot provide:
- A table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance.
- Sample size for the test set or data provenance.
- Number and qualifications of experts for ground truth.
- Adjudication method.
- Information about an MRMC comparative effectiveness study or effect size.
- Whether a standalone performance study was done.
- The type of ground truth used.
- Sample size for the training set.
- How the ground truth for the training set was established.
The letter only states that the FDA "reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device... and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent... to legally marketed predicate devices." It also lists the "Indications For Use."
{0}------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The logo consists of a stylized eagle with three overlapping wings, representing service to the nation. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" is arranged in a circular pattern around the eagle.
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
SEP 1 5 1998
Mr. William Simmons Vice President, Technical Support Biotech Medical Instruments Corporation 832 Marseilles-Galion Road W Marion, Ohio 43302
Re : K982111 Various Dental Implants Trade Name: Regulatory Class: III Product Code: DZE Dated: June 1, 1998 June 16, 1998 Received:
Dear Mr. Simmons:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to leqally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The qeneral controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Current Good Manufacturing Practice requirements, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (QS) for Medical Devices: General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic QS inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531
{1}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Mr. Simmons
through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or requlations.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510 (k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4692. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR 807.97). Other general "" information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its internet address
"http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/dsmamain.html".
Sincerely yours,
Timothy A. Ulatowski
Timothy A. Ulatowski Director Division of Dental, Infection Control, and General Hospital Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
Page
510(k) Number (if known):
Device Name: Various Dental Implants
Indications For H
Indications For Use:
The implant(s) is designed
for use in the edentulous sites in th
mandible or maxilla for support of a
complete denture prosthesis, a terminal or
intermediate abutment for fixed or
partial dentures, or a single tooth
replacement.
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
| Susar Renner | |
|---|---|
| (Division Sign-Off) | |
| Division of Dental, Infection Control, | |
| and General Hospital Devices | |
| 510(k) Number | 1982111 |
Prescription Use
(Per 21 CFR 801.109)
ଠାର
Over-The-Counter Use
(Optional Format 1-2-96)
§ 872.3640 Endosseous dental implant.
(a)
Identification. An endosseous dental implant is a prescription device made of a material such as titanium or titanium alloy that is intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw arches to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, in order to restore a patient's chewing function.(b)
Classification. (1) Class II (special controls). The device is classified as class II if it is a root-form endosseous dental implant. The root-form endosseous dental implant is characterized by four geometrically distinct types: Basket, screw, solid cylinder, and hollow cylinder. The guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Root-Form Endosseous Dental Implants and Endosseous Dental Implant Abutments” will serve as the special control. (See § 872.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.)(2)
Classification. Class II (special controls). The device is classified as class II if it is a blade-form endosseous dental implant. The special controls for this device are:(i) The design characteristics of the device must ensure that the geometry and material composition are consistent with the intended use;
(ii) Mechanical performance (fatigue) testing under simulated physiological conditions to demonstrate maximum load (endurance limit) when the device is subjected to compressive and shear loads;
(iii) Corrosion testing under simulated physiological conditions to demonstrate corrosion potential of each metal or alloy, couple potential for an assembled dissimilar metal implant system, and corrosion rate for an assembled dissimilar metal implant system;
(iv) The device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible;
(v) Sterility testing must demonstrate the sterility of the device;
(vi) Performance testing to evaluate the compatibility of the device in a magnetic resonance (MR) environment;
(vii) Labeling must include a clear description of the technological features, how the device should be used in patients, detailed surgical protocol and restoration procedures, relevant precautions and warnings based on the clinical use of the device, and qualifications and training requirements for device users including technicians and clinicians;
(viii) Patient labeling must contain a description of how the device works, how the device is placed, how the patient needs to care for the implant, possible adverse events and how to report any complications; and
(ix) Documented clinical experience must demonstrate safe and effective use and capture any adverse events observed during clinical use.