(339 days)
The DSL-9700 Active™ PSA Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) Kit provides materials for the quantitative measurement of Total PSA in human serum to aid in the management (monitoring the reoccurrence of prostate cancer) of prostate cancer patients. This assay is intended for in vitro diagnostic use.
The DSL 10-9700 PSA ELISA kit was developed for the quantitative measurement of Total PSA in human serum. The ELISA format is a non-competitive assay in which the analyte to be measured is "sandwiched" between two antibodies. The first antibody is immobilized to the microtiter plate wells, the other antibody is conjugated the the enzyme horseradish peroxidase for detection. The analyte present is bound by both the antibodies to form a "sandwich" complex. Unbound materials are removed by decanting and washing the microtiter plate. The resultant is analyzed in a spectrophotometer for absorbance. The amount of bound PSA is directly proportional to the concentration of the PSA present in the sample.
The provided text describes the DSL 10-9700 PSA ELISA Kit and its substantial equivalence study. Here's a breakdown of the requested information based on the document:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The document doesn't explicitly state "acceptance criteria" in a numerical or categorical format for the new device itself. Instead, it demonstrates substantial equivalence to a predicate device. The performance criterion implicitly accepted is a strong linear correlation and agreement with the predicate device.
| Performance Metric | Acceptance Criteria (Implicit) | Reported Device Performance (DSL 10-9700 PSA ELISA) |
|---|---|---|
| Correlation with Predicate Device (DPC IMMULITE PSA) | Strong linear correlation | Linear regression: Y = 1.11[DPC IMMULITE] + 0.77 |
| High correlation coefficient | Correlation coefficient (r) = 0.96 |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
- Sample Size for Test Set: 193 human serum samples.
- Data Provenance: The document states "human serum samples (n = 193) were collected." It does not specify the country of origin of the data. The samples were chosen "based on expected PSA levels so that samples with low, intermediate and high levels would be evaluated."
- Retrospective or Prospective: Not explicitly stated, but the description "samples were collected and assayed using both methods" suggests a prospective collection of samples for the purpose of the comparison study, or at least a concurrent analysis of an already collected sample bank. It does not definitively state if these were newly drawn specifically for this study.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts
Not applicable. The study establishes equivalence to a predicate device, not against an independent 'ground truth' established by experts interpreting clinical outcomes or pathology. The "ground truth" in this context is the results obtained from the predicate DPC IMMULITE PSA assay.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
Not applicable. There was no expert adjudication process described, as the comparison was between two assays, not expert interpretations.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done, and Effect Size
No. This is an in vitro diagnostic device for measuring a biomarker, not an imaging or diagnostic device requiring human interpretation of results in the traditional sense of an MRMC study. The comparison is between two laboratory assays.
6. If a Standalone (Algorithm Only Without Human-in-the-Loop Performance) Was Done
Yes, in essence. The DSL 10-9700 PSA ELISA kit is a standalone assay (a laboratory test) that provides a quantitative measurement. Its performance is evaluated intrinsically through its ability to quantify PSA and extrinsically by comparing its results to a legally marketed predicate device. There is no "human-in-the-loop" decision-making component for the device itself; humans operate the device and interpret its quantitative output.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
The "ground truth" for the comparative effectiveness study was the results obtained from the DPC IMMULITE PSA assay, which is itself a legally marketed and presumably validated assay for Total PSA. The study aimed to show that the new device's measurements align closely with the predicate device's measurements.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
The document does not describe a "training set" in the context of an algorithm or AI development. The ELISA kit is a biochemical assay. The 193 samples were used for the equivalence comparison study, which can be considered analogous to a "test set" for validating performance against a standard.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
As there is no "training set" for an algorithm or AI in this context, this question is not applicable. The device is a laboratory assay.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows a logo on the left and the text "AUG 3" on the right. The logo is a stylized design, possibly representing initials or a company symbol. The text "AUG 3" likely refers to a date, specifically August 3rd.
K97324
Diagnostic Systems Laboratories, Inc. 445 Medical Center Boulevard Webster Texas 77598-4217 USA Tel 281.332.9678 Fax 281.554.4220
Customer Assistance Center Tel 800.231.7970 Fax 281.338.1895 Email mkta@dslabs.com
SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS
DSL 10-9700 PSA ELISA Kit Name of Device: Classification Name: Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay for PSA Analyte Code and Name: Prostate Specific Antigen Regulatory Class: 11
- Submitter: John Class Diagnostic Systems Laboratories, Inc. 445 Medical Center Boulevard Webster, Texas 77598 Phone: 281-332-9678
July 28, 1998 Date:
The DSL 10-9700 PSA ELISA kit was developed for the quantitative measurement of Total PSA in human serum. The ELISA format is a non-competitive assay in which the analyte to be measured is "sandwiched" between two antibodies. The first antibody is immobilized to the microtiter plate wells, the other antibody is coniugated the the enzyme horseradish peroxidase for detection. The analyte present is bound by both the antibodies to form a "sandwich" complex. Unbound materials are removed by decanting and washing the microtiter plate. The resultant is analyzed in a spectrophotometer for absorbance. The amount of bound PSA is directly proportional to the concentration of the PSA present in the sample.
The DSL PSA ELISA assay is intended for the quantitative determination of Total PSA in human serum to aid in the management (monitoring the reoccurrence of prostate cancer) of prostate cancer patients.
The DSL 10-9700 PSA ELISA is substantially equivalent to the DPC IMMULITE PSA assay.
To demonstrate substantial equivalence between the two assays, human serum samples (n = 193) were collected and assayed using both methods. Samples were chosen based on expected PSA levels so that samples with low, intermediate and high levels would be evaluated. Linear regression analysis of the results obtained for the comparison gave the equation Y = 1.11[DPC IMMULITE] + 0.77 with a correlation coefficient of (r) = 0.96.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/1/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" arranged around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized image of three human profiles facing right, with flowing lines representing hair or clothing.
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration 2098 Gaither Road Rockville MD 20850
3 1998 AUG
Mr. John Class Diagnostic Systems Laboratories, Inc. 445 Medical Center Boulevard Webster, Texas 77598
K973243/S2 Re : Active™ PSA ELISA (DSL-10-9700) Trade Name: Regulatory Class: II Product Code: LTJ Dated: June 9, 1998 Received: June 9, 1998
Dear Mr. Class:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual reqistration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Requlations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Current Good Manufacturing Practice requirements, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (QS) for Medical Devices : -------General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic QS inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
{2}------------------------------------------------
Page 2
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4588. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597, or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/dsmamain.html".
Sincerely yours,
Steven Toutman
Steven I. Gutman, M.D., M.B.A. Director Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}------------------------------------------------
FDA/CDRH/ODE/DMG
29 Jul 93 0 0
510(k) Number (if known): K973243
Device Name: Active™ PSA ELISA
Indications For Use:
The DSL-9700 Active™ PSA Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) Kit provides materials for the quantitative measurement of Total PSA in human serum to aid in the management (monitoring the reoccurrence of prostate cancer) of prostate cancer patients. This assay is intended for in vitro diagnostic use.
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE. CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (QDE)
Peter E. Maison
(Division Sign-Off)
(División Sign-Olm)
Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices K973243
510(k) Number
Image /page/3/Picture/10 description: The image shows the words "Prescription Use" with a check mark above the words. Underneath the words is the text "(Per 21 CFR 801.109)". The text is black and the background is white. The image appears to be a label or part of a document.
OR
Over-The-Counter Use
§ 866.6010 Tumor-associated antigen immunological test system.
(a)
Identification. A tumor-associated antigen immunological test system is a device that consists of reagents used to qualitatively or quantitatively measure, by immunochemical techniques, tumor-associated antigens in serum, plasma, urine, or other body fluids. This device is intended as an aid in monitoring patients for disease progress or response to therapy or for the detection of recurrent or residual disease.(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls). Tumor markers must comply with the following special controls: (1) A guidance document entitled “Guidance Document for the Submission of Tumor Associated Antigen Premarket Notifications (510(k)s) to FDA,” and (2) voluntary assay performance standards issued by the National Committee on Clinical Laboratory Standards.