(88 days)
The Indications for Use for the Signa Profile 9 Inch Diameter Coil and Kinematic Positioner Options expands the capability of the Signa Profile System. The Kinematic Positioner accommodates and improves imaging of the knee and surrounding structures. The 9 inch Coil is intended for imaging of the cervical spine, shoulder, knee and surrounding structures.
Profile 9 Inch Coil consists of a linear solenoid coil. The lt is a split two part design that has a base and a removable top to facilitate patient positioning. It is designed for use with a vertical magnetic field MR imaging system.
The Kinematic Positioner provides support for the legs for MR scanning. It has two usages. One is for a scan when the scanned leg is fixed, and the other is while the scanned leg is moving down.
The provided text describes a 510(k) premarket notification for the GE Signa Profile 9 Inch Coil and Kinematic Positioner Options. It focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device rather than providing detailed performance studies with acceptance criteria in the manner one might expect for a novel AI device.
Here's an analysis based on the information provided:
1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
| Acceptance Criteria Category | Specific Criteria | Reported Device Performance | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | NEMA performance standards | "The 9 Inch Surface Coil was evaluated to the appropriate NEMA performance standards." | The specific NEMA standards (e.g., spatial resolution, signal-to-noise ratio, uniformity) and the actual numerical results are not provided. The statement only indicates compliance with appropriate standards. |
| Safety | International safety standards IEC 601-1 and IEC 601-2-33 | "Both options were evaluated to the International safety standards IEC 601-1 and IEC 601-2-33." | Similar to performance, the specific tests and detailed results are not provided, only compliance with the standards. |
| Functional | Stated specifications | "Both options performed to stated specifications." | The specific "stated specifications" are not detailed in the document. |
| Substantial Equivalence | Comparison to predicate device (Signa Profile System and Signa Profile Extremity Coil) | "The Profile 9 Inch Surface Coil is similar to the Profile Extremity Coil except that the Extremity coil is a quadrature receive only coil while the 9 inch coil is a linear receive only coil." and "It is the opinion of GE that the Signa Profile System with the 9 Inch Surface Coil and Kinematic Positioner options are substantially equivalent to the presently marketed Signa Profile System and the Signa Profile Extremity Coil." | This is the primary "acceptance criterion" for a 510(k) submission, and the manufacturer concludes it is met. |
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)
The document does not specify a "test set" in the context of clinical data or image samples for performance evaluation. The evaluation appears to be based on engineering and laboratory testing against NEMA and IEC standards, and direct comparison of specifications with the predicate device.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)
Not applicable. The evaluation described is for physical medical devices (MRI coil and positioner) against technical standards, not for an AI algorithm requiring expert ground truth for interpretation.
4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set
Not applicable. There is no mention of a human expert adjudication process for image interpretation or diagnosis.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
Not applicable. This submission concerns hardware components (an MRI coil and a positioner), not an AI-powered diagnostic or assistive tool. Therefore, an MRMC study comparing human reader performance with and without AI assistance is irrelevant to this device.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
Not applicable. This is not an algorithm.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)
Not applicable. The "ground truth" here would be measurements and tests against established engineering and safety standards (NEMA, IEC) and the specifications of the predicate device.
8. The sample size for the training set
Not applicable. This is not an AI/machine learning device.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
Not applicable. This is not an AI/machine learning device.
Summary of the Study:
The "study" described in this 510(k) summary is primarily an engineering and regulatory compliance exercise. GE Medical Systems evaluated the Signa Profile 9 Inch Coil and Kinematic Positioner Options against:
- NEMA performance standards: To ensure the coil performs adequately from a technical imaging perspective. Specific NEMA standards (e.g., for RF coils) would have been used.
- International safety standards IEC 601-1 and IEC 601-2-33: To ensure electrical and mechanical safety of the medical devices.
- Manufacturer's stated specifications: To confirm manufacturing quality and functionality.
- Comparison to a predicate device: The Signa Profile Extremity Coil (for the 9-inch coil) and the existing Signa Profile System (for both options). This comparison focused on identifying similarities and differences and demonstrating that any differences do not raise new safety or effectiveness concerns.
The conclusion is that these options are substantially equivalent to currently marketed devices and do not introduce new hazards, allowing them to expand the capabilities of the Signa Profile System for imaging various anatomical regions like the cervical spine, shoulder, and knee.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the GE logo at the top left corner. Below the logo, the text "age 1 of 2" is visible. The text indicates that this is the first page of a two-page document. The image is a black and white scan of a document.
K972296
GE Medical Systems
SEP 1 5 1097
P.O. Box 414. Milwaukee, WI 53 USA
SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS
- This 510(k) summary of safety and effectiveness information is O submitted in accordance with the requirements of 21 CFR Part 807.87(h).
- 0 Identification of Submitter Larry A. Kroger, Ph.D., 414-544-3894, June 11, 1997
- o Identification of the Product Signa Profile 9 Inch Coil and Kinematic Positioner Options
Manufacturer Address:
GE Yokogawa Medical Systems, Ltd. 4-7-127, Asahigaoka, Hino-Shi Tokyo, 191 Japan
- O Marketed Devices
The Signa Profile MR System with the 9 Inch Coil and the Kinematic Positioner Options are substantially equivalent to the currently marketed Signa Profile System (software and electronics) and the Signa Profile Extremity Coil.
o Device Description
Profile 9 Inch Coil consists of a linear solenoid coil. The lt is a split two part design that has a base and a removable top to facilitate patient positioning. It is designed for use with a vertical magnetic field MR imaging system.
The Kinematic Positioner provides support for the legs for MR scanning. It has two usages. One is for a scan when the scanned leg is fixed, and the other is while the scanned leg is moving down.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/1/Picture/0 description: The image contains the text "GE Medical Systems". The text is in a bold, sans-serif font. The text is black and is on a white background. The text is centered in the image.
Image /page/1/Picture/1 description: The image shows the General Electric (GE) logo. The logo consists of the letters "GE" in a stylized script, enclosed within a circular frame. The letters are connected and have a flowing, cursive appearance. The logo is black and white.
age 2 of 2
P.O. Box 414, W-709 Milwaukee, WI 53201 USA
SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS
- o Indications_for_Use
The Indications for Use for the Signa Profile 9 Inch Diameter Coil and Kinematic Positioner Options expands the capability of the Signa Profile System. The Kinematic Positioner accommodates and improves imaging of the knee and surrounding structures. The 9 inch Coil is intended for imaging of the cervical spine, shoulder, knee and surrounding structures.
0 Comparison with Predicate
The Profile 9 Inch Surface Coil is similar to the Profile Extremity Coil except that the Extremity coil is a quadrature receive only coil while the 9 inch coil is a linear receive only coil.
Summary of Studies o
The 9 Inch Surface Coil was evaluated to the appropriate NEMA performance standards. Both options were evaluated to the International safety standards IEC 601-1 and IEC 601-2-33. Both options performed to stated specifications.
O Conclusions
It is the opinion of GE that the Signa Profile System with the 9 Inch Surface Coil and Kinematic Positioner options are substantially equivalent to the presently marketed Signa Profile System and the Signa Profile Extremity Coil. These options do not result in any new potential hazards.
{2}------------------------------------------------
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
Image /page/2/Picture/3 description: The image shows a partial view of a logo or emblem, featuring three stylized, curved lines stacked vertically. These lines appear to be thicker at the top and taper slightly as they descend. To the left of these lines, a portion of text is visible, arranged in a curved, vertical orientation, suggesting it is part of a circular design. The text is cut off, making it difficult to read, but it seems to be a word or phrase associated with the emblem.
SEP 1 5 1997
Larry A. Kroger, Ph.D. Regulatory Programs Manager GE Medical Systems P.O. Box 414, W-709 Milwaukee, WI 53201
Re: K972296 Signa Profile 9-Inch Coil and Kinematic Positioner Dated: June 11, 1997 Received: June 19, 1997 Regulatory Class: II 21 CFR 892.1000/Procode: 90 MOS
Dear Dr. Kroger:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Current Good Manufacturing Practice requirement, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (QS) for Medical Devices: General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic QS inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4613. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled. "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsmamain.html".
Sincerely yours,
h. William Yui
Lillian Yin, Ph.D. Director, Division of Reproductive, Abdominal, Ear, Nose and Throat, and Radiological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
{3}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Number (if known):_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
972296
Device Name: Signa Profile 9 Inch Diameter Coil and Kinematic Positioner Options Indications For Use:
The Indications for Use for the Signa Profile 9 Inch Diameter Coil and Kinematic Positioner Options expands the capability of the Signa Profile System. The Kinematic Positioner accommodates and improves imaging of the knee and surrounding structures. The 9 inch Coil is intended for imaging of the cervical spine, shoulder, knee and surrounding structures.
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
David A. Beynon
(Division Sign-Off)
Division of Reproductive, Abdominal, ENT, and Radiological Devices 510(k) Number
Prescription Use
(Per 21 CFR 801.109)
OR
Over-The-Counter Use
§ 892.1000 Magnetic resonance diagnostic device.
(a)
Identification. A magnetic resonance diagnostic device is intended for general diagnostic use to present images which reflect the spatial distribution and/or magnetic resonance spectra which reflect frequency and distribution of nuclei exhibiting nuclear magnetic resonance. Other physical parameters derived from the images and/or spectra may also be produced. The device includes hydrogen-1 (proton) imaging, sodium-23 imaging, hydrogen-1 spectroscopy, phosphorus-31 spectroscopy, and chemical shift imaging (preserving simultaneous frequency and spatial information).(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls). A magnetic resonance imaging disposable kit intended for use with a magnetic resonance diagnostic device only is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 892.9.