K Number
K242206
Device Name
ACTIVO
Date Cleared
2024-09-27

(60 days)

Product Code
Regulation Number
878.4810
Reference & Predicate Devices
Predicate For
N/A
AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
Intended Use

Incision, excision, ablation, vaporization of soft tissue for general dermatology (1064 mm) Tattoo Removal: Dark ink (blue and black) (1064 nm) Tattoo Removal: light ink (red, sky blue, green) (532 nm) telangiectasias (532 nm) spider nevi (532 nm) solar lentiginos, senile lentiginos, becker's nevi, freckles (532 nm) nevus of ota (1064 nm)

Device Description

The ACTIVO is based on the Nd:YAG(1064nm) and KTP Nd: YAG(532nm) laser technology. It is indicated for the incision, ablation, vaporization of soft tissues for general dermatology. Three basic elements of operations are as follows: 1) A Nd:YAG crystal is used as a gain medium which produces a laser beam. 2) A resonator then amplifies the beam. 3) A lamp that contains Xe gas is used, as a pumping light source. The lamp requires a high-pressure power source device for operation. When the electric energy generated from the high-pressure power source is induced into the electrode of the lamp, it converts into light energy(1064nm). This converted light energy pumps the Nd: YAG crystal - a gain medium - and the light exhausted from the crystal is amplified into a specific wavelength light(532nm). As it passes between the resonant gases, laser beam radiates to an output unit. The regulation of laser output and repetition rate can be set by the user via GUI (Graphic User Interface) and controlled by microprocessor, which interfaces with the power supply.

AI/ML Overview

This FDA 510(k) summary is for the ACTIVO laser surgical instrument. It relies on non-clinical testing for substantial equivalence, as no clinical testing was performed or required. Therefore, the device does not have acceptance criteria defined by an effectiveness study that proves its performance against clinical endpoints. Instead, its acceptance criteria are based on meeting design specifications and demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device through non-clinical performance and safety standards.

Here's a breakdown of the requested information based on the provided document:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

Since this filing is based on substantial equivalence through non-clinical testing, the "acceptance criteria" are the standards and design specifications met by the device, and the "reported device performance" is that it successfully met these standards.

Acceptance Criteria CategorySpecific Criteria / Standard MetReported Device Performance
BiocompatibilityISO 10993-1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management processMet (cytotoxicity, sensitization, irritation tests passed)
ISO 10993-5:2009 Tests for in vitro cytotoxicityPassed
ISO 10993-10:2021 Tests for skin sensitization (Guinea pig maximization test)Passed
ISO 10993-23:2021 Tests for irritation (Animal irritation test by skin exposure)Passed
Electrical SafetyIEC 60601-1: 2005+A2:2020 Medical electrical equipment - General requirements for basic safety and essential performanceCompliant
EMCIEC 60601-1-2:2014+A1:2020 Medical electrical equipment - Electromagnetic disturbances - Requirements and testsCompliant
Laser SafetyIEC 60825-1:2014 Safety of laser products - Equipment classification and requirementsCompliant
Particular PerformanceIEC 60601-2-22:2019 Medical electrical equipment - Particular requirements for basic safety and essential performance of surgical, cosmetic, therapeutic and diagnostic laser equipmentCompliant
Software V&VFDA's Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, "Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices" (Moderate level of concern)Successfully conducted and documentation provided
Accuracy TestingMax. energy, stability of energy, spot size, wavelength, and pulse duration do not deviate from tolerance of setting/fixed valueVerified
Substantial EquivalenceSimilar indications, design, technology, functions, and principle of operation to predicate device. Differences do not affect safety or effectiveness.Determined to be Substantially Equivalent (SE)

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g., country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)

  • Sample Size for Test Set: Not applicable. No clinical test set involving human or animal subjects was used as the submission relies solely on non-clinical testing and comparison to a predicate device.
  • Data Provenance: Not applicable for clinical data. For non-clinical testing, the tests were conducted at facilities presumably in the country of manufacture or a certified testing laboratory, but this specific detail is not provided. The device manufacturer is DAEJU MEDITECH ENGINEERING CO., LTD. in Seoul, Republic of Korea.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g., radiologist with 10 years of experience)

  • Not applicable. There was no clinical test set requiring expert ground truth establishment. The document refers to compliance with international standards and internal verification for non-clinical aspects.

4. Adjudication method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

  • Not applicable. No clinical test set requiring adjudication was used.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

  • Not applicable. No MRMC study was conducted. This device is a laser surgical instrument, not an AI-assisted diagnostic or treatment planning system that would involve human readers.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

  • Not applicable. This is a physical medical device (laser surgical instrument), not a standalone algorithm.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.)

  • Not applicable for clinical ground truth. For non-clinical testing, the "ground truth" equivalent would be the established specifications and parameter tolerances of the device, and the established limits and requirements of the referenced international standards (e.g., IEC 60601-1, ISO 10993).

8. The sample size for the training set

  • Not applicable. This device is a physical laser instrument, not an AI/ML-based device that requires a training set.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

  • Not applicable. No training set was used.

{0}------------------------------------------------

Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left side of the logo is the Department of Health and Human Services seal. To the right of the seal is the FDA logo, which consists of the letters "FDA" in a blue square, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG" in blue, and the word "ADMINISTRATION" in a smaller font size below.

September 27, 2024

Daeju Meditech Engineering Co., Ltd. % Lee April Consultant Withus Group Inc 106 Superior Irvine, California 92620

Re: K242206

Trade/Device Name: Activo Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.4810 Regulation Name: Laser Surgical Instrument For Use In General And Plastic Surgery And In Dermatology Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: GEX Dated: July 25, 2024 Received: July 29, 2024

Dear Lee April:

We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/ofdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.

If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.

{1}------------------------------------------------

Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).

Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.70) and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).

Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.

All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advicecomprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.

Also, please note the regulation entitled. "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.

For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn).

{2}------------------------------------------------

Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/deviceadvice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@;tda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).

Sincerely,

Digitally signed by TANISHA TANISHA L. HITHE -S L. HITHE -> 23:43:55 -04'00'

Tanisha Hithe Assistant Director DHT4A: Division of General Surgery Devices OHT4: Office of Surgical & Infection Control Devices, Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health

Enclosure

{3}------------------------------------------------

Indications for Use

510(k) Number (if known) K242206

Device Name ACTIVO

Indications for Use (Describe) Incision, excision, ablation, vaporization of soft tissue for general dermatology (1064 mm) Tattoo Removal: Dark ink (blue and black) (1064 nm) Tattoo Removal: light ink (red, sky blue, green) (532 nm) telangiectasias (532 nm) spider nevi (532 nm) solar lentiginos, senile lentiginos, becker's nevi, freckles (532 nm) nevus of ota (1064 nm)

Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)

X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)

| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)

CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.

This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.

The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:

Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov

"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."

{4}------------------------------------------------

510(k) Summary K242206

Submitter

DAEJU MEDITECH ENGINEERING CO., LTD. SEONGUN KIN #501-504, HausD Sejong Tower, 26, Seongsu-il-ro 10-gil, Seongdong-gu Seoul, Republic of Korea 04793 Email: globalsales@daejumedi.co.kr Phone: +82-2-2208-0905

Device Information

  • Trade Name: ACTIVO ●
  • Common Name: Laser Surgical Instrument
  • Regulation Name: Laser surgical instrument for use in general and plastic surgery and in dermatology ●
  • Product Code: GEX
  • Panel: General & Plastic Surgery ●
  • Regulation Number: 21 CFR §878.4810 ●
  • Device Class: Class II
  • Date prepared: 08/28/2024 .

Predicate Device

Primary Predicate K152856, Helios III manufactured by Laseroptek Co., Ltd.

Indications for use

Incision, excision, ablation, vaporization of soft tissue for general dermatology (1064 nm) Tattoo Removal: Dark ink (blue and black) (1064 nm) Tattoo Removal: light ink (red, sky blue, green) (532 nm) telangiectasias (532 nm) spider nevi (532 nm) solar lentiginos, senile lentiginos, becker's nevi, freckles (532 nm) nevus of ota (1064 nm)

Device Description

The ACTIVO is based on the Nd:YAG(1064nm) and KTP Nd: YAG(532nm) laser technology. It is indicated for the incision, ablation, vaporization of soft tissues for general dermatology. Three basic elements of operations are as follows:

  1. A Nd:YAG crystal is used as a gain medium which produces a laser beam.

  2. A resonator then amplifies the beam.

  3. A lamp that contains Xe gas is used, as a pumping light source. The lamp requires a high-pressure power source device for operation. When the electric energy generated from the high-pressure power source is induced into the electrode of the lamp, it converts into light energy(1064nm). This converted light energy pumps the Nd: YAG crystal - a gain medium - and the light exhausted from the crystal is amplified into a specific wavelength light(532nm). As it passes between the resonant gases, laser beam radiates to an output unit.

The regulation of laser output and repetition rate can be set by the user via GUI (Graphic User Interface) and controlled by microprocessor, which interfaces with the power supply.

Official Correspondent

Withus Group Inc. April Lee 106 Superior. Irvine. CA USA 92620 Email: withus6664@gmail.com Phone: +1-909-274-9971

{5}------------------------------------------------

Summary of Technological Characteristics

ITEMPROPOSED DEVICEPREDICATE DEVICERemark
ACTIVOHelios III
K numberNAK152856SE
Product CodeGEXGEXSE
Regulation21 CFR 878.481021 CFR 878.4810SE
Indications forUseIncision, excision, ablation,vaporization of soft tissue forgeneral dermatology (1064 nm)Tattoo Removal: Dark ink (blueand black) (1064 nm)Tattoo Removal: light ink (red,sky blue, green) (532 nm)telangiectasias (532 nm)spider nevi (532 nm)solar lentiginos, senilelentiginos, becker's nevi, freckles(532 nm)nevus of ota (1064 nm)Incision, excision, ablation,vaporization of soft tissue forgeneral dermatology(1064 nm)Removal or lightening ofunwanted hair with or withoutadjuvant preparation (1064nm)Tattoo Removal: Dark ink (blueand black) (1064 nm)Tattoo Removal: light ink (red,sky blue, green) (532 nm)port wine birthmarks (532 nm)telangiectasias (532 nm)spider angioma (532 nm)cherry angioma (532 nm)spider nevi (532 nm)cafe-au-lait birthmarks (532 nm)solar lentiginos, senile lentiginos,becker's nevi, freckles, nevusspilus (532 nm)nevus of ota (1064 nm)Analysis 1
Laser MediumNd:YAGNd:YAGSE
OperatingParametersQ-SwitchedQ-SwitchedSE
Wavelength1064nm / 532 nm1064 nm / 532 nmSE
Pulse Characteristics:
Maximum PulseDuration10 ns10 nsSE
Energy Delivered1.0 J (0.4J @ 532 nm) / pulse1.3 J (0.5J @ 532 nm) / pulseAnalysis 2
Fluence0.06-8J/cm2 @ 2 to 10 mm spotsize1 – 8 J/cm2 @ 1 to 8 mm spotsizeAnalysis 3
Spot Sizes(Zoom, MLA) 2~10mm(1064) 5 mm(532) 4 mm(Collimator) 8 mm(Zoom) 1~7 mmAnalysis 4
Repetition RateSingle Shot, 1-10 HzSingle Shot, 1 – 10 HzSE
Physical Characteristics:
SystemDimensions40.2"(H) X 12.4"(W) X 32.5"(D)36.8"(H) X 11.7"(W) X 32.2" (D)Analysis 5
System Weight198.4lbs176 lbs.
ElectricalRequirements110/220VAC, 50/60 HzAC 230 V, 50/60 Hz
ITEMPROPOSED DEVICEPREDICATE DEVICERemark
Performance Specification Comparison
Electrical safetyIEC 60601-1IEC 60601-1SE
EMCIEC 60601-1-2IEC 60601-1-2SE
PerformanceIEC 60601-2-22IEC 60601-2-22SE

{6}------------------------------------------------

The subject and primary predicate device (K152856) are similar in indications, design, technology, functions, and principle of operation.

The differences between the subject and primary predicate are discussed as below:

Analysis 1 - Indications for Use

The indications for Use for both subject and predicate devices are not exactly same, however, indications of the subject device is in range of the indications of the predicate device; therefore, it does not affect the safety and effectiveness. They are substantially equivalent.

Analysis 2 - Energy Delivered

The Energy Delivered of the subject device is less than the predicate device. Energy Delivered is a key factor in Q-switched Nd: YAG laser therapy. The clinical parameters of ACTIVO we suggest are 50 - 750 mJ. Since this is covered by a maximum energy of 1,000mJ, it does not affect the effectiveness of the proposed device. Therefore, the difference on Energy Delivered is considered would not raise any issues in effectiveness.

Analysis 3 – Fluence

The minimum power is different.

The Fluence of the subject device is different from predicate device. The value is calculated as Energy Delivered/Spot size.

  • Calculating the minimum power of the proposed device (based on maximum Spot size is 10 mm), 0.06 J/cm2 = 0.05/(0.50.53.14), 50 mJ is minimum Energy Delivered.

The minimum power of the subject device is lower than that of the predicate device.

The Fluence value is nothing more than a calculation of how much laser energy is per unit area.

For laser instrument, safety may be affected when the maximum power output. But the maximum power for the both devices are the same. Therefore, the difference is considered would not raise any issues in safety and effectiveness.

Analysis 4 – Spot size

The Spot size of the subject device is larger than the Spot size of the predicate device. The difference on Spot size would not impact the safety and effectiveness, because the final safety and effectiveness about clinical indications will depends on the amount of energy output.

The Maximum laser output of the subject device is within the Maximum laser output of the predicate device. Therefore, the difference in Laser radiation range is considered would not raise any issues in safety and effectiveness.

Analysis 5 - System Dimension, System Weight and Electrical Requirements

The Weight, Dimensions and Electrical Requirements for the subject device is different from predicate device. However, the difference is just in electrical and physical specification and this difference will not raise any issues in safety and effectiveness. Thus, the difference is considered would not raise any issues in safety and effectiveness. And the proposed device has passed the IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-2-22, IEC 60825-1 test and performance test in IEC 60601-1 test, the safety and performance of the product can be ensured.

{7}------------------------------------------------

Non-clinical Testing

Non-clinical tests were conducted to verify that the proposed device met all design specifications as was substantially equivalent (SE) to the predicate device.

Biocompatibility Testing

The biocompatibility evaluation for the subject device was conducted in accordance with the guidance "Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1, Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process" as recognized by FDA. The biocompatible testing including cytotoxicity, Sensitization and Irritation are conducted according to the ISO 10993-1: 2009 Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process.

Biocompatibility testing of ACTIVO is as below:

  • a) ISO 10993-5:2009 Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices Part 5: Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity
  • b) ISO 10993-10:2021 Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices Part 10: Tests for skin sensitization, 6.5 Guinea pig maximization test(GPMT)
  • c) ISO 10993-23:2021 Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices Part 23: Tests for irritation, 7.2 Animal irritation test by skin exposure

Electrical Safety and electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC)

Electrical safety and EMC testing were conducted on Laser Surgical Instrument. The device complies with the following standards

  • IEC 60601-1: 2005+A2:2020 Medical electrical equipment Part 1: General requirements for basic . safety and essential performance.
  • IEC 60601-1-2:2014+A1:2020 Medical electrical equipment Part 1-2: General requirements for . basic safety and essential performance - Collateral Standard: Electromagnetic disturbances -Requirements and tests
  • . IEC 60825-1:2014 Safety of laser products - Part 1: Equipment classification and requirements

Particular Performance Testing

Performance testing was conducted on the device according to the following standard:

  • IEC 60601-2-22:2019 Medical electrical equipment Part 2-22: Particular requirements for basic . safety and essential performance of surgical, cosmetic, therapeutic and diagnostic laser equipment

Software Verification and Validation Testing

The software for this device was considered as a "Moderate" level of concern. Software verification and validation testing were conducted and documentation was provided as recommended by FDA's Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, "Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices".

Accuracy Testing

The accuracy test was conducted to verify that the max. energy, stability of energy, spot size, wavelength, and pulse duration of the proposed laser system do not deviate from the tolerance of the setting value or fixed value.

The non-clinical testing results demonstrate that the subject device is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.

Clinical Testing

Not applicable.

{8}------------------------------------------------

Conclusion

Based on the comparison and analysis above, the proposed device is determined to be Substantially Equivalent (SE) to the predicate devices.

§ 878.4810 Laser surgical instrument for use in general and plastic surgery and in dermatology.

(a)
Identification. (1) A carbon dioxide laser for use in general surgery and in dermatology is a laser device intended to cut, destroy, or remove tissue by light energy emitted by carbon dioxide.(2) An argon laser for use in dermatology is a laser device intended to destroy or coagulate tissue by light energy emitted by argon.
(b)
Classification. (1) Class II.(2) Class I for special laser gas mixtures used as a lasing medium for this class of lasers. The devices subject to this paragraph (b)(2) are exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 878.9.