The Edison System is indicated for the non-invasive destruction of liver tumors, including unresectable liver tumors, using a non-thermal, mechanical process of focused ultrasound.

Device Description

The HistoSonics Edison System (the "System") provides users with a means to identify, target and destroy liver tumors entirely non-invasively using histotripsy, a non-ionizing, nonthermal, mechanical process of focused ultrasound. Histotripsy is created by delivering high amplitude, very short (microsecond), focused ultrasound pulses designed to induce controlled acoustic cavitation at a known focal location in the form of a "bubble cloud". The bubble cloud is a cluster of microbubbles that form, rapidly expand and collapse, imparting significant stress and strain on soft tissue, including liver tissue. After an adequate number of pulses (less than a few seconds at each bubble cloud location), liver tissue within the bubble cloud is mechanically destroyed, resulting in an acellular lysate with limited to no recognizable cellular structures. Acoustic cavitation (and bubble cloud formation) is only created when there is sufficient negative pressure to exceed the cavitation threshold, making it a threshold phenomenon.

The System is comprised of reusable medical equipment and disposable, single-patient use components intended for use in a professional healthcare environment. Reusable portions of the system include the Treatment Cart and a Support Arm and frame that is used to contain ultrasound medium (degassed water) that acoustically couples the system to the patient. Disposable aspects of the system include a clear, acoustically transparent and deformable membrane that holds the ultrasound medium as well as various non-active accessories used during patient set up. The Treatment Cart includes a Treatment Arm/Micropositioning System which is comprised of a six degree of freedom (6 DOF), dual encoded robotic arm. At the end of the arm is the Treatment Head which contains the histotripsy therapy transducer and a coaxially aligned diagnostic ultrasound probe. System software controls the Treatment Arm to direct the bubble cloud through the planned treatment volume.

The System is functionally integrated with a GE LOGIQ E10s ultrasound system (K231989), which is provided by HistoSonics with each Edison System.

AI/ML Overview

The provided text is a 510(k) Summary for the HistoSonics Edison System, indicating FDA clearance. It describes the device, its intended use, and compares it to a predicate device. However, it does not explicitly detail the acceptance criteria for a study or the specific "reported device performance" against those criteria in a table format as requested.

The document states that a GLP compliant preclinical study was conducted in a porcine model utilizing the reference device and modified Edison System, and "All acceptance criteria were met." However, it does not provide the specific numerical acceptance criteria themselves or the detailed results demonstrating how they were met.

Therefore, many of the requested details about the study that proves the device meets acceptance criteria are not present in this document.

Here's a breakdown of what can and cannot be answered based on the provided text:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

Cannot be fully provided. The document states that "All acceptance criteria were met" in an animal study, but it does not explicitly list the acceptance criteria or the specific reported device performance against them. It only generally states that the study demonstrated the modified system meets its intended use and does not raise different safety and effectiveness concerns.

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)

Sample Size for Test Set: Not specified. The document mentions "a porcine model" for an animal study, but not the number of animals.
Data Provenance: Not specified, other than "a porcine model." It's a preclinical study. The document does not mention the country of origin of the data or whether it was retrospective or prospective, though preclinical studies are typically prospective.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts

Not specified. The document does not mention experts establishing ground truth for the animal study.

4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

Not specified.

5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

No, an MRMC study was not done. This device is a focused ultrasound system for mechanical tissue ablation, not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool for human readers. The performance data mentioned relates to engineering and biological compliance, and a preclinical animal study for the device's physical effects.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

The performance data refers to various engineering and biological tests for the device itself (e.g., electrical safety, electromagnetic disturbance, acoustic characterization, software testing, system/sub-system verification, cybersecurity, and an animal study). This is testing of the device's standalone performance, though "algorithm only" is not entirely applicable as it's an electromechanical system with software. The device's software is tested according to ISO 62304.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)

For the animal study, while not explicitly stated, the ground truth would likely be pathology or direct observation of the tissue ablation results in the porcine model, as it aims to demonstrate the "destruction of liver tumors" and the mechanical process.

8. The sample size for the training set

Not specified. This document does not refer to a "training set" in the context of machine learning, which would have a distinct sample size. The device itself is an ablation system, and its development likely involved iterative testing and refinement rather than a single training set.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

Not applicable. As above, the concept of a "training set" with established ground truth in the context of machine learning for an ablation device is not directly addressed in this type of 510(k) summary. Device development involves engineering specifications and verification/validation, not typically machine learning model training in the sense implied by this question.

Summary

{0}------------------------------------------------

Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health and Human Services logo on the left and the FDA acronym followed by the full name of the agency on the right. The FDA part of the logo is in blue, with the acronym in a square and the full name written out in a sans-serif font below it. The Department of Health and Human Services logo is a stylized human figure.

October 30, 2024

HistoSonics, Inc. Leeanne Swiridow Sr. Manager. Regulatory Affairs 16305 36th Avenue N Suite 300 Plymouth, Minnesota 55446

Re: K241902

Trade/Device Name: Edison System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.4405 Regulation Name: Focused Ultrasound System For Non0thermal, Mechanical Tissue Ablation Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: QGM Dated: October 1, 2024 Received: October 1, 2024

Dear Leeanne Swiridow:

We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.

If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.

{1}------------------------------------------------

Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).

Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30. Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90. Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).

Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.

All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advicecomprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.

Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.

For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory

{2}------------------------------------------------

assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).

Sincerely,

Digitally signed by Long H. Chen
Long H. Chen -S -s
Date: 2024.10.30 09:27:31 -04'00'

Long Chen, Ph.D. Assistant Director DHT4A: Division of General Surgery Devices OHT4: Office of Surgical and Infection Control Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health

Enclosure

{3}------------------------------------------------

Indications for Use

Submission Number (if known)

K241902

Device Name

Edison System

Indications for Use (Describe)

The Edison System is indicated for the non-invasive destruction of liver tumors, including unresectable liver tumors, using a non-thermal, mechanical process of focused ultrasound.

Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)

| Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)

Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)

CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.

This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.

The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:

Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov

"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."

{4}------------------------------------------------

Image /page/4/Picture/2 description: The image shows the logo for Histosonics. The logo features a stylized "H" symbol to the left of the word "HISTOSONICS" in a sans-serif font. A registered trademark symbol is located to the upper right of the word "HISTOSONICS".

510(k) Summary

HistoSonics, Inc. Traditional 510(k) Edison® System

1. Submitter

510(k) Submitter:

HistoSonics, Inc. 16305 36th Avenue N, Suite 300 Plymouth, MN 55446 U.S.A.

Contact Person:

LeeAnne Swiridow Sr. Manager, Regulatory Affairs Phone: 612-803-8508 Fax: 734-929-9020 Email: leeanne.swiridow@histosonics.com

Date Prepared: June 28, 2024

2. Subject Device

Trade Name:	Edison® System
Classification Name:	Focused ultrasound system for non-thermal, mechanical tissue ablation
Regulation Number:	21 CFR Part 878.4405
Product code:	QGM

3. Predicate Device

Device Name:	Edison System
510(k) Number:	K233466
Reference Device:	Edison System
De Novo:	DEN220087
Classification Name:	Focused ultrasound system for non-thermal, mech
Regulation Number:	21 CFR Part 878.4405

nanical tissue ablation 21 CFR Part 878.4405 QGM

4. Indications for Use

Product code:

The Edison® System is indicated for the non-invasive destruction of liver tumors, including unresectable liver tumors, using a non-thermal, mechanical process of focused ultrasound.

{5}------------------------------------------------

5. Device Description

The System is functionally integrated with a GE LOGIQ E10s ultrasound system (K231989), which is provided by HistoSonics with each Edison System.

6. Summary of Characteristics Compared to Predicate Devices

The Edison System under review is substantially equivalent to the Edison System cleared under K233466. The Edison System has the same technological characteristics as the predicates, that is, they operate in the same manner through the non-thermal, mechanical destruction of liver tumors by using non-invasive focused ultrasound.

Overall, the subject and primary predicate devices are all based on the same technological aspects as follows:

equivalent core histotripsy parameters or dose

{6}------------------------------------------------

. no increase in the level or amount of focused ultrasound energy delivered
. same thermal cooling table applied

The following primary technological differences exist between the subject and predicate devices:

Larger bubble cloud volume of ~4x4x8mm (subject device) versus a ~3x3x11mm (predicate device) via the use of rapid electronic micro-steering.
. 3cm diameter sphere treated with the predicate device would take a minimum of 13 minutes while the subject device will take a minimum of approximately 10-12 minutes.
. The above enhancements are enabled through the implementation of a 128 channel therapy transducer and corresponding generator.

Characteristic	Edison System(Predicate Device)K233466	Edison System(Subject Device)
Product Name	Edison System	Same
Device Classification	Class II	Same
FDA Product Code	QGM	Same
Indication for Use	The Edison System is indicatedfor the non-invasive destructionof liver tumors, includingunresectable liver tumors usinga non-thermal, mechanicalprocess of focused ultrasound.	Same
Anatomical Site	Liver	Same
Use Environment	Professional HealthcareEnvironment	Same
Software Version	2.1.2	3.0.1
IntegratedDiagnosticUltrasound System	GE LOGIQ E10s (K211524)	GE LOGIQ E10s (K231989)
Treatment Cart
Generator	64-channel amplifier	128-channel amplifier
High Voltage PowerSupply	10 amp max current (3.5 ampaverage draw) power supply	Same
Power DistributionBox	1U Rackmount, 12V powersupply	Same
UninterruptablePower Supply (UPS)	1U Rackmount, 770 Watt outputwith 120V AC input	Same
Characteristic	Edison System(Predicate Device)K233466	Edison System(Subject Device)
Required Workflow
System Setup	Required steps include Log-in,Position Treatment Arm,Attach/Select Treatment Head,Position Imaging Probe,Submerge Treatment Head,Calibrate Crosshairs, and PatientRegistration	Same
Patient Preparation(Localize)	Required steps include PatientPreparation, Patient Coupling,Wheel Lock and CalibrateResistance Detection	Same
Plan	Required steps include PositionContours, Verify Set-up bysurveying the plan to assurethat the resistance isacceptable, Mark Muscle Layerand Verify Plan	Same
Treat	Required steps include CalibrateCrosshairs In Vivo, EstablishVoltage Settings and AutomatedTreatment	Same
System Shutdown	Required steps include RemoveTreatment Head and MoveTreatment Arm to Storageposition	Same
Optional Workflow
DICOM ImageViewer	IMFusion Software v2.45.15	IMFusion Software v2.45.34
Image FusionWorkflow	Workflow steps include BreathHold and Image Sweep,Review/Trim recording,Establish Registration Points,Fuse and Review/Accept Results	Same
Characteristic	Edison System(Predicate Device)K233466	Edison System(Subject Device)
Treatment Head
Treatment HeadsAvailable	2 – 52 element and 56 element(2 depths – 12cm and 14cm maxtreatment depths)	2 – both are 128 element, 2depths (12cm and 14cm maxtreatment depths)
IntegratedDiagnosticUltrasound ImagingProbe	GE C1-6VN-D	Same
Imaging ProbeRotation	+/- 180 degrees in X/Y	Same
Imaging ProbeTranslation	+ 5cm translation in Z	Same
Imaging ProbeMounting	Coaxial	Same
Imaging refreshrate	Continuous, Live stream	Same
Histotripsy Therapy Parameters
Bubble Cloud Size	~3x3x11mm	~4x4x8mm
Treatment plan sizerange	• no more than a 1.5:1 ratiofrom largest to smallestdiameter• no less than 20 mm in anydiameter (X, Y, Z)• no more than 40 mm in anydiameter (X, Y, Z)	• no more than a 2:1 ratiofrom largest to smallestdiameter.• no less than 15 mm in anydiameter (X, Y, Z).• no more than 40 mm in anydiameter (X, Y, Z).
Focal Steering -Static Focus	Static Focal Steering to achieve1 cm to 2 cm extended depthfrom natural focus	Not utilized
Focal Steering -Rapid electronicmicro-steering	Automated Focal micro-steeringto achieve larger bubble cloud	Same
Thermal Profile	Thermally-safe treatmentprotocol embedded in software	Same
Minimumtreatment time for3cm DiameterSphere	~13 min	~10-12 min
Characteristic	Edison System(Predicate Device)K233466	Edison System(Subject Device)
Accessories / Patient Coupling Solution
Support Arm withattached bedrailclamp andupper/lower frame	3DOF, multi-joint arm1′ bedrail clampMolded Frame components	Same
Patient membrane	Proprietary Styrene-ethylene-butylene-styrene (SEBS)membrane overmolded onmolded polypropylene frame	Same
Patient/MembraneCoupling Oil	Castor Oil	Same
Membrane Cradle	Silicone web	Same
Bubble EvacuationTool	Custom molded bulb and tubedesign	Same
Inspection Mirror	Included	Same
UltrasoundCoupling Media	Degassed Water	Same

See table below for a detailed summary of the characteristics compared to the predicate device.

{7}------------------------------------------------

{8}------------------------------------------------

{9}------------------------------------------------

The bench and in-vivo animal study conducted demonstrate that the minor technological differences do not raise any different questions of safety and effectiveness and the subject device is as safe and effective as the predicate devices. In conclusion, the Edison System under review is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.

7. Performance Data

In accordance with the required device Special Controls, non-clinical performance testing was performed on the modified Edison System which demonstrates compliance with the following International and FDA-recognized consensus standards and FDA guidance documents. The following performance data was provided in support of the substantial equivalence determination.

Design Verification and Validation Testing Data:

Design verification and validation testing was conducted and demonstrated that the Edison System meets defined product specification and its intended use. The design verification and validation testing included:

. Electrical Safety testing in accordance with IEC 60601-1:2020 Medical electrical equipment - Part 1: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance.

{10}------------------------------------------------

. Electromagnetic disturbance testing in accordance with IEC 60601-1-2:2020 Medical electrical equipment – Part 1-2: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance - Collateral standard: Electromagnetic disturbances - Requirements and tests.
. Acoustic Characterization in accordance with IEC 60601-2-62:2013 Medical electrical equipment- Part 2-62: Particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of high intensity therapeutic ultrasound (HITU) equipment.
. Software Testing in accordance with ISO 62304:2015 Medical device software – Software life cycle processes.
. System and Sub-system Verification Testing

Cybersecurity Compliance Information:

Information demonstrating compliance with section 525B of the FD&C Action per current "FDA Guidance: Cybersecurity in Medical Devices - Quality System Considerations and Content of Premarket Submissions" is provided in this submission.

Animal Study Data:

A GLP compliant preclinical study was conducted in a porcine model undergoing histotripsy procedure utilizing the reference device and modified Edison System. All acceptance criteria were met. Therefore, the design of the modified Edison System meets the intended use. The results from the testing demonstrate that the subject device does not raise any different questions of safety and effectiveness.

Additional Considerations Specific to Special Controls:

There have been no device changes that impacted the critical tasks associated with the modified Edison System and therefore the previously conducted usability testing in accordance with ISO 62366-1:2020 Medical devices – Part 1: Application of usability engineering to medical devices is still applicable.

Finally, there have no changes to the patient contacting accessories that would impact the devices compliance with the following standards:

. ISO 10993-1:2018 Biological evaluation of medical devices – Part 1: Evaluation and testing;
ISO 10993-5:2009 Biological evaluation of medical devices -- Part 5: Tests for in vitro ● cytotoxicity;
. ISO 10993-10:2021 Biological evaluation of medical devices -- Part 10: Tests for skin sensitization;

{11}------------------------------------------------

. ISO 10993-23:2021 Biological evaluation of medical devices -- Part 23: Tests for irritation; and
. FDA Guidance Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1, "Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process" September 8, 2023.

8. Substantial Equivalence Discussion

The Edison System under review has the same intended use, indications for use, anatomical site, and principle of operation, and equivalent technological characteristics as the predicate device identified in this submission.

Furthermore, the design verification and validation testing performed demonstrate the subject device meets defined product specification and intended use. In addition, the bench and GLP animal comparison testing with the reference device demonstrate that the subject device has comparable performance to the predicate device and the minor technological characteristic differences do not raise any different questions of safety and effectiveness.

Based on the indications for use, technological characteristics, performance testing, and comparison to the predicate device, the Edison System has been shown to be substantially equivalent to the predicate device identified in this submission.

Regulation Number and Section

N/A