(112 days)
The Nerivio is indicated for acute and/or preventive treatment of migraine with or without aura in patients 8 years of age or older. It is a prescription use, self-administered device for use in the home environment at the onset of migraine headache or aura for acute treatment, or every other day for preventive treatment.
The Neriviolnfinity is indicated for acute and/or preventive treatment of migraine with or without aura in patients 8 years of age or older. It is a prescription use, self-administered device for use in the home environment at the onset of migraine headache or aura for acute treatment, or every other day for preventive treatment.
The Nerivio and NerivioInfinity are wearable, battery-powered, Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN) devices that are controlled by a mobile application. The systems deliver low energy electrical pulses to the upper arm for 45 minutes per treatment, after which the device turns off automatically.
The devices are composed of:
- A pair of UltraStim® electrodes (K130987) covered with hydrogel and removable protective . film. In NerivioInfinity, the electrodes are embedded in a disposable, replaceable pad. In Nerivio, the electrodes are not disposable or replaceable,
- An electronic circuitry that includes microcontroller with firmware, LED indicator, a power button for activating the device, and Bluetooth radio for wireless connection to Android and iOS mobile platforms. The circuitry also includes a battery, which is rechargeable in NerivioInfinity and not rechargeable in Nerivio.
- An armband that is wrapped over the device to secure the device position on the user's arm is also included.
The devices are operated and controlled via mobile application software that is installed and run on the user's personal mobile device, such as a mobile phone or tablet. The device's hardware communicates with the mobile application through Bluetooth protocol. This mobile application software allows the user to control the stimulation intensity from 0 to 100% (representing intensity levels of 0-40mA), to start, pause or stop the stimulation program, and to view device status such as the device's connection state, stimulation, battery level (when connected to NerivioInfinity), remaining number of treatments (when connected to Nerivio), and user notifications.
The user is instructed to adjust the intensity to the strongest stimulation level just below the perceived pain level. Treatments with Nerivio and NerivioInfinity are intended to be self-administered by the user immediately after the onset of migraine headache or aura or every other day for migraine prevention.
Here's a breakdown of the acceptance criteria and the study proving the device meets them, based on the provided FDA 510(k) summary:
The core of this submission is to expand the indicated age range of the Nerivio and NerivioInfinity devices to include children aged 8-11. Therefore, the acceptance criteria and study focus on demonstrating the safety and effectiveness of the device in this younger population, showing it is comparable to its performance in the previously cleared adolescent and adult populations.
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
Since this is an age range expansion for an already cleared device, the "acceptance criteria" are implicitly demonstrating comparable safety and effectiveness in the new age group (8-11 years old) to the previously cleared age group (12 years and older). The performance metrics align with what would be expected for a migraine treatment device.
Implicit Acceptance Criteria (for the 8-11 age group) and Reported Device Performance:
| Acceptance Criteria (Implicit) | Reported Device Performance (6-11 years old*) |
|---|---|
| Safety: No new or increased safety concerns/adverse events. | No adverse events reported through customer service complaints and other product issue reports. |
| Acute Treatment Effectiveness: | |
| Consistent headache relief. | 72.2% of patients with available data (13/18) reported consistent headache relief. (Compared to prior adolescent data from K223169). |
| Consistent freedom from headache. | 36.0% of patients (9/25) reported consistent freedom from headache. (Compared to prior adolescent data from K223169). |
| Consistent functional disability relief. | 83.3% of patients with available data (15/18) reported consistent functional disability relief. (Compared to prior adolescent data from K223169). |
| Consistent functional disability freedom. | 38.9% of patients (7/18) reported consistent functional disability freedom. (Compared to prior adolescent data from K223169). |
| Consistent disappearance of nausea/vomiting. | 70.0% of patients (7/10) achieved consistent freedom from nausea/vomiting. (Compared to prior adolescent data from K223169). |
| Consistent disappearance of phonophobia. | 50.0% of patients (4/8) achieved consistent freedom from phonophobia. (Compared to prior adolescent data from K223169). |
| Consistent disappearance of photophobia. | 22.2% of patients (2/9) achieved consistent freedom from photophobia. (Compared to prior adolescent data from K223169). |
| Preventive Treatment Effectiveness: | Device use patterns over time are similar to effective use in the previously studied adolescent cohort. |
| Usability: Device can be safely and effectively used by the expanded age group. | Human Factors Testing: All critical tasks successfully performed with no use errors or close calls by 100% of child patients and their parents. All knowledge tasks successfully answered by 100% of participant parents. This validated that the devices can be used as intended by the expanded patient population (8-11 years old, with and without assistance of a parent). |
*Note: The study population included patients aged 6-11 years old. The device indication sought and granted in the 510(k) is for 8 years of age or older. The use of data from 6-7 year olds in the study would further support the safety and effectiveness for 8-11 year olds, as younger children might present more challenges in terms of compliance or adverse events.
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
- Sample Size: The clinical investigation included n=293 patients aged 6-11 at their first use of Nerivio (for safety and overall usage patterns in the real world). For effectiveness endpoints (acute treatment), analyses were performed on a subset of patients who completed voluntary pre- and post-treatment surveys, with the number of patients varying for each specific outcome (e.g., 18 for headache relief, 25 for headache freedom, 18 for functional disability, 10 for nausea/vomiting, 8 for phonophobia, 9 for photophobia).
- Data Provenance: The study consisted of a retrospective analysis of prospectively-collected real-world data for children in the United States. The data was collected between May 2020 to October 2023.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts
This type of study does not involve expert readers establishing ground truth in the traditional sense (e.g., for image interpretation). The "ground truth" for effectiveness is patient-reported outcomes of migraine symptoms, consistent with how efficacy trials for migraine treatments are typically conducted. Safety data is collected via customer service reports, which are also patient-reported or initiated.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
Not applicable in this context. Adjudication methods (e.g., 2+1, 3+1) are typically used in studies where multiple expert readers interpret subjective data (like medical images) and their disagreements need to be resolved to establish ground truth. This study relies on patient-reported outcomes for effectiveness and adverse event reporting for safety.
5. If a Multi Reader Multi Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
Not applicable. This device is a standalone therapeutic device for migraine treatment, not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool that would involve human "readers" interpreting cases.
6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
This is a device that directly treats a condition; it's not an AI algorithm that provides a diagnosis or analysis. Therefore, a "standalone algorithm performance" evaluation is not relevant in the same way it would be for an AI diagnostic device. The device's performance is its direct therapeutic effect, not its output as an algorithm.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
The ground truth for effectiveness was patient-reported outcomes (PROs) on migraine symptoms (headache pain, functional disability, nausea/vomiting, phonophobia, photophobia) via voluntary pre- and post-treatment surveys. For safety, the ground truth was based on reported adverse events through customer service complaints and other product issue reports.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
Not applicable. This is not a study validating an AI model that requires a distinct training set. The clinical investigation is a real-world study assessing the device's performance in a new age group. The "knowledge" or "training" for the device itself comes from its prior development and existing clinical data which supported its previous clearances for older populations.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set was Established
Not applicable, as there is no "training set" in the context of an AI/ML model for this specific submission. The established efficacy and safety data from prior clinical trials in adolescents and adults (e.g., K223169 and K232152) serve as the benchmark against which the performance in the 8-11 age group is compared for equivalence.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. Underneath the square are the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
October 08, 2024
Theranica Bio-Electronics Ltd % Janice Hogan Partner Hogan Lovells US LLP 1735 Market St. Floor 23 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103
Re: K241756
Trade/Device Name: Nerivio; NerivioInfinity Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.5899 Regulation Name: Trunk And Limb Electrical Stimulator To Treat Headache Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: QGT Dated: June 18, 2024 Received: June 18, 2024
Dear Janice Hogan:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
{1}------------------------------------------------
Page
2
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review. the OS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advicecomprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Jitendra
{2}------------------------------------------------
CDR Jitendra Virani Assistant Director DHT5B: Division of Neuromodulation and Rehabilitation Devices OHT5: Office of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: 07/31/2026 See PRA Statement below.
Submission Number (if known)
Device Name
Nerivio:
NerivioInfinity
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Nerivio is indicated for acute and/or preventive treatment of migraine with or without aura in patients 8 years of age or older. It is a prescription use, self-administered device for use in the home environment at the onset of migraine headache or aura for acute treatment, or every other day for preventive treatment.
The Neriviolnfinity is indicated for acute and/or preventive treatment of migraine with or without aura in patients 8 years of age or older. It is a prescription use, self-administered device for use in the home environment at the onset of migraine headache or aura for acute treatment, or every other day for preventive treatment.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{4}------------------------------------------------
510(k) SUMMARY
Theranica Bio-Electronics LTD.'s NerivioInfinity and Nerivio
Submitter
Theranica Bio-Electronics LTD. 4 Ha-Omanut St. Netanva. ISRAEL. 4250438 Phone: +972-72-3909755 Facsimile: +972-72-3909762 Contact Person: Dagan Harris
Date Prepared: October 8, 2024
Name of Device: Nerivio (NerivioInfinity)
Common or Usual Name: Nerivio (NerivioInfinity)
Regulation Name: Trunk and limb electrical stimulator to treat headache
Regulatory Class: Class II
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.5899
Product Code: QGT
Predicate Devices
Primary predicate: NerivioInfinity, Theranica Bio-Electronics LTD. (K232152)
Secondary predicate: Nerivio, Theranica Bio-Electronics LTD. (K223169)
Device Description
The Nerivio and NerivioInfinity are wearable, battery-powered, Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN) devices that are controlled by a mobile application. The systems deliver low energy electrical pulses to the upper arm for 45 minutes per treatment, after which the device turns off automatically.
The devices are composed of:
- A pair of UltraStim® electrodes (K130987) covered with hydrogel and removable protective . film. In NerivioInfinity, the electrodes are embedded in a disposable, replaceable pad. In Nerivio, the electrodes are not disposable or replaceable,
- An electronic circuitry that includes microcontroller with firmware, LED indicator, a power button for activating the device, and Bluetooth radio for wireless connection to Android and iOS mobile platforms. The circuitry also includes a battery, which is rechargeable in NerivioInfinity and not rechargeable in Nerivio.
- An armband that is wrapped over the device to secure the device position on the user's arm is also included.
{5}------------------------------------------------
The devices are operated and controlled via mobile application software that is installed and run on the user's personal mobile device, such as a mobile phone or tablet. The device's hardware communicates with the mobile application through Bluetooth protocol. This mobile application software allows the user to control the stimulation intensity from 0 to 100% (representing intensity levels of 0-40mA), to start, pause or stop the stimulation program, and to view device status such as the device's connection state, stimulation, battery level (when connected to NerivioInfinity), remaining number of treatments (when connected to Nerivio), and user notifications.
The user is instructed to adjust the intensity to the strongest stimulation level just below the perceived pain level. Treatments with Nerivio and NerivioInfinity are intended to be self-administered by the user immediately after the onset of migraine headache or aura or every other day for migraine prevention.
Intended Use / Indications for Use
NerivioInfinity is indicated for acute and/or preventive treatment of migraine with or without aura in patients 8 years of age or older. It is a prescription use, self-administered device for use in the home environment at the onset of migraine headache or aura for acute treatment, or every other day for preventive treatment.
Nerivio is indicated for acute and/or preventive treatment of migraine with or without aura in patients 8 years of age or older. It is a prescription use, self-administered device for use in the home environment at the onset of migraine headache or aura for acute treatment, or every other day for preventive treatment.
The subject devices' indications for use are identical to the predicate devices except for the addition of children aged 8-11 to the indicated age range. This modification does not change the device's overall intended use of treating and preventing migraines through electrical stimulation of the trunk or limb.
Summary of Technological Characteristics
The technological characteristics of the subject Nerivio are identical to those of the predicate NerivioInfinity (K232152) and Nerivio (K223169), respectively. Both the subject devices and the predicate devices function as remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) devices that utilize electrostimulation that relieves migraine headache, and/or reduces the number of migraine days (depends on the treatment regime), using equivalent output parameters. The basic pulse structure is biphasic, with symmetrical interleaving phases and rectangular shape. The amplitude shift signal alternates between a nominal maximum and a nominal minimum of the amplitude signal. The maximal output current is 40mA. The assumed impedance is 1K ohm +/- 500 ohms.
The Nerivio app has been updated since the prior clearance (K223169) so that it integrates the functionality of the NerivioInfinity app as cleared under K232152. Both the NerivioInfinity are now operated by the same mobile app, with only minor differences compared to the predicates to address this integration which do not raise different questions of safety or effectiveness.
Table 1 provides a comparison between the key functional features of the subject devices and predicate devices.
{6}------------------------------------------------
| Characteristic | NerivioInfinity | Nerivio | Comparison | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subject Device | Predicate Device(K232152) | Subject Device | Predicate Device(K223169) | ||
| Indications for Use | NerivioInfinity isindicated for acuteand/or preventivetreatment of migrainewith or without aura inpatients 8 years ofage or older. It is aprescription use, self-administered devicefor use in the homeenvironment at theonset of migraineheadache or aura foracute treatment, orevery other day forpreventive treatment. | NerivioInfinity isindicated for acuteand/or preventivetreatment of migrainewith or without aura inpatients 12 years ofage or older. It is aprescription use, self-administered devicefor use in the homeenvironment at theonset of migraineheadache or aura foracute treatment, orevery other day forpreventive treatment. | Nerivio is indicatedfor acute and/orpreventive treatmentof migraine with orwithout aura inpatients 8 years ofage or older. It is aprescription use, self-administered devicefor use in the homeenvironment at theonset of migraineheadache or aura foracute treatment, orevery other day forpreventive treatment. | Nerivio is indicatedfor acute and/orpreventive treatmentof migraine with orwithout aura inpatients 12 years ofage or older. It is aprescription use, self-administered devicefor use in the homeenvironment at theonset of migraineheadache or aura foracute treatment, orevery other day forpreventive treatment. | Modified –minimum agelimit insubjectdevices is 8years of age,versus 12years of agein thepredicatedevices. |
| Prescription or OTC | Prescription | Prescription | Prescription | Prescription | Same |
| Number of channels | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Same |
| Electrical waveform | Biphasic rectangular,modulated | Biphasic rectangular,modulated | Biphasic rectangular,modulated | Biphasic rectangular,modulated | Same |
| Max output voltage | Same | ||||
| 500 Ω | 20V (measured) | 20V (measured) | 20V (measured) | 20V (measured) | |
| 2 KΩ | 60V (measured) | 60V (measured) | 60V (measured) | 60V (measured) | |
| 10 KΩ | 60V (measured) | 60V (measured) | 60V (measured) | 60V (measured) | |
| Characteristic | NerivioInfinity | Nerivio | Comparison | ||
| Subject Device | Predicate Device(K232152) | Subject Device | Predicate Device(K223169) | ||
| Max output current | Same | ||||
| 500 Ω | 40 mA | 40 mA | 40 mA | 40 mA | |
| 2 KΩ | 30 mA | 30 mA | 30 mA | 30 mA | |
| 10 ΚΩ | 6 mA | 6 mA | 6 mA | 6 mA | |
| Maximum phase | 8 µC | 8 µC | 8 µC | 8 µC | Same |
| charge (500Ω) | |||||
| Maximum average | 1.76 mA | 1.76 mA | 1.76 mA | 1.76 mA | Same |
| current (500Ω) | |||||
| Maximum current | 1.6 mA/cm² | 1.6 mA/cm² | 1.6 mA/cm² | 1.6 mA/cm² | Same |
| density (peak) (500Ω) | |||||
| Maximum current | 0.34 mA/cm | 0.34 mA/cm | 0.34 mA/cm | 0.34 mA/cm | Same |
| density (r.m.s) (500Ω) | |||||
| Maximum average | 0.07 mA/cm² | 0.07 mA/cm² | 0.07 mA/cm² | 0.07 mA/cm² | Same |
| current density (abs | |||||
| value) (500Ω) | |||||
| Maximum average | 1.41 mW/cm² | 1.41 mW/cm² | 1.41 mW/cm² | 1.41 mW/cm² | Same |
| power density (500Ω) | |||||
| Frequency | Range: 100-120 Hz | Range: 100-120 Hz | Range: 100-120 Hz | Range: 100-120 Hz | Same |
| Average: 110 Hz | Average: 110 Hz | Average: 110 Hz | Average: 110 Hz | ||
| (measured) | (measured) | (measured) | (measured) | ||
| Primary phase | 200 µSec | 200 µSec | 200 µSec | 200 µSec | Same |
| duration | |||||
| Pulse duration | 400 µSec | 400 µSec | 400 µSec | 400 µSec | Same |
| Electrode area | 25 cm² | 25 cm² | 25 cm² | 25 cm² | Same |
| Treatment location | Upper arm | Upper arm | Upper arm | Upper arm | Same |
| Treatment duration | 45 min. | 45 min. | 45 min. | 45 min. | Same |
| Reusable | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Same |
| # of treatments per | Up to 18 treatments | Up to 18 treatments | 18 treatments per one | 18 treatments per one | Same |
| one device | for each disposable | for each disposable | entire device. | entire device. | |
| electrodes pad. No | electrodes pad. No | ||||
| Characteristic | NerivioInfinity | Nerivio | Comparison | ||
| Subject Device | Predicate Device(K232152) | Subject Device | Predicate Device(K223169) | ||
| limitation for devicebody unit | limitation for devicebody unit | ||||
| Power source | Li-Ion cell battery -rechargeable | Li-Ion cell battery -rechargeable | LiMnO2 cell battery –non-rechargeable | LiMnO2 cell battery –non-rechargeable | Same |
| On/off button | Power push-button | Power push-button | Power push-button | Power push-button | Same |
| Dimensions | Device –7.9x3.5x1.7cmElectrodes pad –13.7x7.6x5.3cmArmband –48.0x10.0x0.3 cm | Device –7.9x3.5x1.7cmElectrodes pad –13.7x7.6x5.3cmArmband –48.0x10.0x0.3 cm | Device (electrodesincluded) –12.0x7.5x1.5 cmArmband –48.0x10.0x0.3 cm | Device (electrodesincluded) –12.0x7.5x1.5 cmArmband –48.0x10.0x0.3 cm | Same |
| Weight | Device – 38 grElectrodes pad - 15 grArmband - 33 gr | Device – 38 grElectrodes pad - 15 grArmband - 33 gr | Device (including anembedded pair ofelectrodes) – 50 grArmband - 33 gr | Device (including anembedded pair ofelectrodes) – 50 grArmband - 33 gr | Same |
| Mobile applicationsoftware | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Same |
| Biocompatibility | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Same |
| Sterile | No | No | No | No | Same |
| Processor control | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Same |
| Wireless control | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Same |
| Automatic overloadtrip | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Same |
| Automatic no loadtrip | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Same |
| Automatic shut off | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Same |
| Mobile applicationtreatment control | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Same |
| Remote (over-the-air)FW update option | Yes | Yes | No | No | Same |
Table 1. Comparison between Subject and Predicate Devices
{7}------------------------------------------------
{8}------------------------------------------------
{9}------------------------------------------------
Performance Data
Non-Clinical Tests:
Software testing was performed for the minor modifications made to the mobile application for the Nerivio device. The test results demonstrated that the device meets all design requirements and functions as intended.
Human factors testing was performed to evaluate use of the Nerivio and NerivioInfinity by representative patients aged 8-11, with and without assistance of a parent. For both devices, all critical tasks were successfully performed with no use errors or close calls by 100% of the child patients and their parents, and all knowledge tasks were successfully answered by 100% of participant parents. Therefore, the human factors testing successfully validated that the devices can be used as intended by the expanded patient population.
Clinical Investigation:
Theranica conducted a clinical study to evaluate Nerivio's safety and efficacy in the acute treatment of migraine in children in a real-world setting. The study consisted of a retrospective analysis of prospectively-collected real-world data for children in the United States who were prescribed Nerivio to treat migraine and used the device at least once between May 2020 to October 2023. The study population included n=293 patients, aged 6-11 at their first use of the Nerivio.
Safety data, collected primarily via customer service complaints and other reports of product issues, showed no adverse events. Effectiveness for acute treatment of migraine was evaluated in patients who completed the voluntary pre- and post-treatment surveys. Among these patients, rates of consistent relief or freedom from headache pain, functional disability, and specific migraine-associated symptoms were comparable to the results from prior clinical testing of the Nerivio in adolescent patients (aged 12 to 17) reported for the predicate device, K223169.
Consistent headache relief was reported by 72.2% of patients with available data (13/18), and consistent freedom from headache was reported by 36.0% (9/25). Consistent functional disability relief was reported by 83.3% (15/18) of patients with available data, and consistent functional disability freedom was reported by 38.9% (7/18). With respect to consistent disappearance of migraine associated symptoms, 70.0% (7/10) of patients achieved from nausea/vomiting, 50.0% (4/8) were from phonophobia, and 22.2% (2/9) were free from photophobia. Nerivio's effects on pain, disability and migraine symptoms in children aged 6-11 years old showed no significant differences from the results reported for adolescents in prior clinical testing statistically equivalent performance in both age groups.
Effectiveness for preventive treatment of migraine was evaluated in patients who used the device in a manner similar to that of the prevention treatment regime showing frequent use of the device in month one, suggestive of preventative treatments. In these patients, device use over time (change from Month 1 to Months 2 and 3) was similar to that of the previously reported adolescent cohort where device usage was more infrequent in subsequent months,
These data, in conjunction with prior studies of the Nerivio device, support the use of the device for the listed indications.
{10}------------------------------------------------
Conclusions
The Nerivio and NerivioInfinity have the same intended use and indications for use as the predicate devices, except for the addition of children aged 8-11 years old to the indicated patient population. The addition of these patients does not alter the intended therapeutic use of the device, nor does it raise different questions of safety or effectiveness. Software testing, usability validation, and real-world clinical data demonstrate that NerivioInfinity are as safe and effective as the predicate devices.
§ 882.5899 Trunk and limb electrical stimulator to treat headache.
(a)
Identification. A trunk and limb electrical stimulator to treat headache is a device intended to treat headache through the application of electrical stimulation anywhere on the body of the patient apart from the patient's head or neck through electrodes placed on the skin. The stimulation may be provided transcutaneously or percutaneously.(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are:(1) Non-clinical performance testing must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. This testing must include:
(i) Characterization of the electrical stimulation, including the following: Waveforms; output modes; maximum output voltage and maximum output current (at 500Ω, 2kΩ, and 10kΩ loads); pulse duration; frequency; net charge per pulse; and maximum phase charge, maximum current density, maximum average current, and maximum average power density (at 500Ω);
(ii) Characterization of the impedance monitoring system; and
(iii) Characterization of the electrode performance including the electrical performance, adhesive integrity, shelf-life, reusability, and current distribution of the electrode surface area.
(2) The patient-contacting components of the device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(3) Performance testing must demonstrate electromagnetic compatibility and electrical, mechanical, and thermal safety in the intended use environment.
(4) Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis must be performed.
(5) Labeling must include the following:
(i) Instructions for use, including the typical sensations experienced during treatment;
(ii) A detailed summary of the electrical stimulation output, and the device technical parameters, including any wireless specifications;
(iii) A shelf life for the electrodes and reuse information; and
(iv) Instructions on care and cleaning of the device.