(257 days)
The Electrosurgical Generator is used to deliver RF energy via an assortment of surgical devices to cut and coagulate different kinds of tissue.
The ES-100 and ES-300 Electrosurgical Generator are advanced high-frequency surgical devices designed to provide versatility and safety in various surgical procedures. Both models offer a range of operating modes, including monopolar electrosurgical excision modes, monopolar electrocoagulation modes, and bipolar modes, catering to the diverse needs of surgeons. The maximum output power of the ES-100 is 100 W, while the ES-300 offers increased output power of up to 300 W, providing surgeons with enhanced capabilities for cutting and coagulation in various surgical procedures. Both models are equipped with manual and foot switch controls, allowing for seamless operation during surgeries. They feature volume control for adjusting the device's audio output, memory functions for storing recent settings, and built-in return electrode monitor systems for real-time safety monitoring.
This document is a 510(k) summary for an Electrosurgical Generator, not a study evaluating an AI/ML device. Therefore, the requested information regarding acceptance criteria, study design, and performance metrics for an AI/ML powered device cannot be extracted from this document.
The document describes the regulatory submission for electrosurgical generators (ES-100 and ES-300 models) and compares them to a predicate device (Bovie IDS-310 High Frequency Electrosurgical Generator). The core of the submission is to demonstrate "substantial equivalence" to the predicate device, not to prove performance against specific acceptance criteria for an AI/ML algorithm.
Here's how each of your requested points relates to the provided document:
-
A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance: This document does not specify "acceptance criteria" in the context of an AI/ML study. Instead, it presents a comparison table of technical characteristics between the subject device and the predicate device (pages 7-8). The "performance" mentioned refers to electrical safety, electromagnetic compatibility, output performance, and thermal damage characteristics of the electrosurgical unit itself, not an AI/ML algorithm's diagnostic performance.
-
Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective): Not applicable. This document is about hardware medical devices and their electrical/thermal performance, not an AI/ML algorithm that processes data.
-
Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience): Not applicable. "Ground truth" in the context of expert consensus for AI/ML validation is not a component of this submission.
-
Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set: Not applicable.
-
If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance: Not applicable.
-
If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done: Not applicable.
-
The type of ground truth used (expert concensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc): Not applicable. The "ground truth" for electrosurgical generators would be physical measurements of electrical output and thermal effects, verified through accredited testing, not expert consensus on medical images or patient outcomes data.
-
The sample size for the training set: Not applicable. This is for an electrosurgical hardware device, not an AI/ML model.
-
How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable.
In summary, the provided document is a 510(k) premarket notification for electrosurgical generators, demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device through non-clinical testing (electrical safety, EMC, bench testing for output performance, and preclinical thermal damage assessment). It does not contain any information related to AI/ML device validation.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health and Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
December 23, 2024
Beijing Taktvoll Technology Co., Ltd. Fan Dan Vice General Manager 302 Room, 10A, Lian dong U village, Jing Sheng Nan fourth Street, Jin Qiao Chan Ye Ji Di, Tong Zhou district Beijing, Beijing 101102 China
RE: K240975
Trade/Device Name: Electrosurgical Generator (ES-100); Electrosurgical Generator (ES-300) Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.4400 Regulation Name: Electrosurgical Cutting and Coagulation Device and Accessories Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: GEI Dated: April 9, 2024 Received: April 10, 2024
Dear Fan Dan:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30. Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90. Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advicecomprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory
{2}------------------------------------------------
assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Image /page/2/Picture/3 description: The image contains text that appears to be a timestamp and name. The name is "Francisco Delgado -S". The timestamp is "12:27:01 2024.12.23 '00'05-". There is a faint FDA logo in the background.
for Long Chen, Ph.D. Assistant Director DHT4A: Division of General Surgery Devices OHT4: Office of Surgical and Infection Control Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K240975
Device Name Electrosurgical Generator
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Electrosurgical Generator is used to deliver RF energy via an assortment of surgical devices to cut and coagulate different kinds of tissue.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|---|---|
| ------------------------------------------------- | -- |
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{4}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Summary - K240975
Submitter -
| Company: | Beijing Taktvoll Technology Co., Ltd. |
|---|---|
| 302 Room, 10A, Lian dong U village , Jing Sheng Nan fourth Street, | |
| Jin Qiao Chan Ye Ji Di, Tong Zhou district, Beijing, China. | |
| Contact Person: | Dan Fan |
| Vice General Manager | |
| Phone: +8613811958375 | |
| E-mail: sophiaf@taktvoll.com.cn |
Date Prepared: December 19, 2024
II Device
| Trade Name of Device: | Electrosurgical Generator |
|---|---|
| Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 878.4400 |
| Regulation Name: | Electrosurgical cutting and coagulation device and accessories |
| Regulatory Class: | Class II |
| Product Code: | GEI |
| Review Panel: | General and Plastic Surgery |
III Predicate Devices
| Trade Name: | Bovie IDS-310 High Frequency Electrosurgical Generator |
|---|---|
| Common Name: | Electrosurgical Generator (ESU) |
| Regulation Number: | Class II, 21 CFR 878.4400 |
| Product Code: | GEI |
| Premarket Notification: | K134054 |
| Company Name: | Bovie Medical Corporation |
IV Device Description
The ES-100 and ES-300 Electrosurgical Generator are advanced high-frequency surgical devices designed to provide versatility and safety in various surgical procedures. Both models offer a range of operating modes, including monopolar electrosurgical excision modes, monopolar electrocoagulation modes, and bipolar modes, catering to the diverse needs of surgeons. The maximum output power of the ES-100 is 100 W, while the ES-300 offers increased output power of up to 300 W, providing surgeons with enhanced capabilities for cutting and coagulation in various surgical procedures. Both models are equipped with
{5}------------------------------------------------
manual and foot switch controls, allowing for seamless operation during surgeries. They feature volume control for adjusting the device's audio output, memory functions for storing recent settings, and built-in return electrode monitor systems for real-time safety monitoring.
Unique Features
ES-100 Electrosurgical Generator:
The ES-100 offers three monopolar electrosurgical excision modes: pure cut, blend cut 1, and blend cut 2, along with two monopolar electrocoagulation modes: spray coagulation and forced coagulation. It also includes a standard bipolar mode for various applications and is designed for comprehensive surgical use.
ES-300 Electrosurgical Generator:
The ES-300 features four monopolar electrosurgical excision modes: pure cut, blend cut 1, blend cut 2, and blend cut 3, along with three monopolar electrocoagulation modes: spray coagulation, forced coagulation, and soft coagulation. It also includes three bipolar modes: macro mode, standard mode, and precise mode, providing versatility in bipolar applications. Additionally, the ES-300 is equipped with the TAKTVOLL REM system for enhanced safety monitoring and features a memorization function for quick access to settings during surgeries.
V Indications for Use
The Electrosurgical Generator is used to deliver RF energy via an assortment of surgical devices to cut and coaqulate different kinds of tissue.
VI Comparison of Technological Characteristics with the Predicate Device
The subject device (Electrosurgical Generator) has the same Indications for Use, and similar technological characteristics, design, and performance specifications, as the predicate device. The differences between the subject and predicate devices do not raise new or different questions of safety and effectiveness.
{6}------------------------------------------------
| Device feature | Electrosurgical Generator(subject device) | Bovie IDS-310 HighFrequencyElectrosurgicalGenerator K134054(predicate device) | 510(k) SummaryDiscussion | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ES-100 | ES-300 | |||
| Intended Use | The ElectrosurgicalGenerator is used to deliverRF energy via anassortment of surgicaldevices to cut andcoagulate different kinds oftissue. | The Bovie IDS-310 isintended for cutting,coagulation, and bipolarcoagulation of tissue ingeneral surgeryprocedures. | Identical | |
| MajorFunctions | Bipolar,Monopolar,TemperatureSensors,ImpedanceMonitor | Bipolar,Monopolar,TemperatureSensors,ImpedanceMonitor,ContinuityMonitor | Bipolar, Monopolar,Temperature Sensors,Impedance Monitor,Continuity Monitor | Similar |
| OperatingModes | 6 modesincludingcutting,blend,coagulationmodes andbipolar. | 10 modesincludingcutting,blend,coagulationmodes andbipolar. | Multiple modes includingcut, blend, coagulation,and bipolar functionality. | Identical |
| OutputFrequency | 416 kHz | 416 kHz | 350 kHz to 450 kHz490 kHz ± 4.9 kHz | Similar |
| Waveforms | Various waveformsavailable for different modesin both devices | Various waveformsavailable for differentmodes | Similar | |
| Power Output | Up to 100 W | Up to 300 W | Up to 300 W | Identical |
| Voltage Output | Up to 4800 V | Up to 4800 V | Up to 4000 V | Similar |
| Crest Factor | 6.3 | 6.3 | 6.0 ± 20% | Similar |
| Modulation | Up to 25 kHz | Up to 25 kHz | 30 kHz ± 5 kHz | Different |
| Device feature | Electrosurgical Generator(subject device) | Bovie IDS-310 HighFrequencyElectrosurgicalGenerator K134054(predicate device) | Discussion | |
| ES-100 | ES-300 | |||
| frequency | ||||
| Input Power | AC 100 -240 V, 50/60Hz1100 VA | AC 110 V -120 V, 60 Hz1100 VA | 100 – 240 V ± 10%50 – 60 Hz504 VA6.3 A (slow blow) | Different |
| PhysicalSpecifications | Compact design, touchinterface, lightweight | Compact design, touchinterface, lightweight | Identical | |
| Energy Type | High Frequency (RF) | High Frequency (RF) | Identical |
{7}------------------------------------------------
Discussion:
- -Indications for Use: The Indications for Use of the subject device are the same as those of the predicate device.
- -Technology: Both devices utilize the same technology to achieve the intended use. The main difference is in some of the performance specifications. Our performance test report provides detailed comparisons of the output power curves of ES-100 and ES-300 across various modes against the Bovie IDS-310. The key findings indicate that the output parameters of ES-100 and ES-300 in each mode meet the technical specifications, and when compared with Bovie IDS-310, the trends in output curves for each mode are consistent, demonstrating comparable output power. This evidence supports the conclusion that ES-100 and ES-300 are substantially equivalent to the Bovie IDS-310 in terms of performance.
VII Performance Data
Non-Clinical Testing
A battery of tests for electrical safety and electromagnetic compatibility was performed to verify that the proposed device met all design specification. The test result demonstrated that the proposed device complies with the following standards:
- A IEC 60601-1:2005+A1:2012+A2:2020 Medical electrical equipment - Part 1: General
{8}------------------------------------------------
requirements for basic safety and essential performance
-
IEC 60601-1-2:2014 Medical electrical equipment -Part 1-2: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance-Collateral Standard: Electromagnetic disturbances - Requirements and tests
- A IEC 60601-2-2:2017 Medical electrical equipment - Part 2-2: Particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of high frequency surgical equipment and high frequency surgical accessories
Bench testing assessed the output performance of the ES-300 and ES-100 electrosurgical units across multiple modes, focusing on waveform characteristics and power delivery. Comparisons with the predicate device confirmed consistent performance, ensuring reliability, safety and effectiveness for clinical use.
Pre-clinical test rigorously evaluated the thermal damage induced by the ES-100, ES-300, and IDS-310 electrosurgical units, comparing their performance in terms of thermal injury dimensions and edge carbonization across different tissues and settings, to ensure safety and effectiveness in clinical applications.
VIII Clinical Data
Clinical testing was not conducted to support a substantial equivalence determination.
IX Conclusion
The Electrosurgical Generator is substantially equivalent to the predicate device (Bovie IDS-310 High Frequency Electrosurgical Generator). The non-clinical testing demonstrates that the differences between the subject and predicate device do not raise new or different questions of safety and effectiveness.
§ 878.4400 Electrosurgical cutting and coagulation device and accessories.
(a)
Identification. An electrosurgical cutting and coagulation device and accessories is a device intended to remove tissue and control bleeding by use of high-frequency electrical current.(b)
Classification. Class II.