(239 days)
The Acro Composites Interbody System is intended for interbody fusion. The devices are designed for use with autogenous and/or allogeneic bone graft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone and/or demineralized allograft bone with bone marrow aspirate to facilitate fusion and are to be used with supplemental fixation cleared for the implanted level.
The Acro Composites cervical devices are intended for anterior interbody fusion in skeletally mature patients who have had at least six weeks of non-operative treatment. The cervical devices are indicated to treat cervical disc degeneration and/or cervical spinal instability, as confirmed by imaging studies (radiographs, CT, MRI), that results in radiculopathy, myelopathy, and/or pain at multiple contiguous levels from C2-T1. The hyperlordotic implants (≥ 10°) are required to be used with an anterior cervical plate.
The Acro Composites lumbar devices are indicated for use at one or two contiguous levels in the lumbar spine from L2-S1, in skeletally mature patients who have had at least six months of non-operative treatment. The lumbar devices are indicated to treat lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD) with up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved spinal level(s). DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by imaging studies (radiographs, CT, MRI). Additionally, the lumbar devices can be used as an adjunct to fusion in patients diagnosed with degenerative scoliosis. The hyperlordotic implants (≥ 20°) should be used with anterior supplemental fixation.
The Acro Composites Interbody System includes interbody fusion devices for cervical and lumbar implantation manufactured from AcroPek – a carbon fiber reinforced PEKEKK polymer (CFRP) material. The implants are designed as a solid frame to provide surgical stabilization of the spine. Each interbody incorporates a central cavity that can be packed bone graft material. The implants are available in a variety of height, length, width and lordotic angulation combinations to accommodate the patient specific anatomy and clinical circumstances. The implants are sold sterile.
The provided document is a 510(k) summary for the Acro Composites Interbody System, a medical device for spinal fusion. It details the device's indications for use, materials, and a declaration of substantial equivalence to predicate devices. However, this document does not describe an AI or software device study. It describes the mechanical performance testing of an intervertebral fusion device to demonstrate its safety and effectiveness.
Therefore, most of the information requested in your prompt, which pertains to AI/software device studies (e.g., acceptance criteria for diagnostic performance, sample sizes for test/training sets, expert adjudication, MRMC studies, standalone performance, ground truth for AI), is not present in the provided text.
Based on the information provided, here's what can be extracted:
1. Table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance:
| Acceptance Criteria (from predicate device comparison) | Reported Device Performance (Acro Composites Interbody System) |
|---|---|
| Static and Dynamic axial compression (ASTM F2077) | Meet requirements of ASTM F2077 |
| Static and Dynamic compression-shear (ASTM F2077) | Meet requirements of ASTM F2077 |
| Static and Dynamic torsion (ASTM F2077) | Meet requirements of ASTM F2077 |
| Subsidence (ASTM F2267) | Meet requirements of ASTM F2267 |
Note: The reported device performance is stated as "The mechanical test results demonstrate that the Acro Composites Interbody System performance is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices" and that it aligns with the specified ASTM standards. Specific numerical values for acceptance criteria or performance are not provided in this summary.
2. Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)
- Sample Size: Not specified in the document. Mechanical testing typically involves a specific number of samples for each test type (e.g., several devices for compression, shear, and torsion).
- Data Provenance: Not specified. These are laboratory-based mechanical tests, not clinical data from patients.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)
- Not applicable. This is not an AI/software device and does not involve human expert interpretation for "ground truth". The "ground truth" here is compliance with engineering standards (ASTM).
4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set
- Not applicable. (See answer to point 3).
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
- Not applicable. This is not an AI/software device.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
- Not applicable. This is not an AI/software device.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)
- The "ground truth" in this context is compliance with established engineering and biocompatibility standards, specifically:
- ASTM F2077 (Standard Test Methods for Static and Dynamic Axial Compression, Compression-Shear, and Torsion Testing of Spinal Implants)
- ASTM F2267 (Standard Test Method for Measuring Load Between Parallel Platens for Intervertebral Body Fusion Devices)
- ASTM F1876 (PEKEKK resin material standard)
- ASTM B562 (Gold wire material standard)
- ASTM F899 (Medical grade stainless steel material standard)
8. The sample size for the training set
- Not applicable. This is not an AI/software device and does not involve a "training set."
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
- Not applicable. (See answer to point 8).
Summary of what the document IS about:
The document describes the submission of a 510(k) premarket notification for the Acro Composites Interbody System. The intent is to demonstrate "substantial equivalence" to existing, legally marketed predicate devices. This equivalence is primarily shown through:
- Identical Intended Use: Interbody fusion for cervical and lumbar spine.
- Similar Technological Characteristics: Basic design (structural column), material (reinforced polymer), and sizes comparable to predicate systems.
- Performance Data: Mechanical testing (static & dynamic axial compression, compression-shear, torsion, and subsidence) was performed according to ASTM F2077 and F2267 standards. The results demonstrate that the device's performance is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices and meets these standards.
{0}------------------------------------------------
October 19, 2023
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which consists of a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG" in blue, and the word "ADMINISTRATION" in a smaller font size below that.
Acro Composites, LLC % Karen Warden President BackRoads Consulting Inc. PO Box 566 Chesterland, Ohio 44026
Re: K230478
Trade/Device Name: Acro Composites Interbody System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3080 Regulation Name: Intervertebral Body Fusion Device Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: MAX, ODP Dated: August 29, 2023 Received: August 30, 2023
Dear Karen Warden:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
{1}------------------------------------------------
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review. the OS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Katherine D. Kavlock -S
for
Brent Showalter, Ph.D. Assistant Director DHT6B: Division of Spinal Devices OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration
Indications for Use
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: 06/30/2023 See PRA Statement below.
510(k) Number (if known) K230478
Device Name
Acro Composites Interbody System
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Acro Composites Interbody System is interbody fusion. The devices are designed for use with autogenous and/or allogeneic bone graft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone and/or demineralized allograft bone with bone marrow aspirate to facilitate fusion and are to be used with supplemental fixation cleared for the implanted level.
The Acro Composites cervical devices are interior interbody fusion in skeletally mature patients who have had at least six weeks of non-operative treatment. The cervical devices are indicated to treat cervical disc degeneration and/or cervical spinal instability, as confirmed by imaging studies (radiographs, CT, MRI), that results in radioulopathy, myelopathy, and/or pain at multiple contiguous levels from C2-T1. The hyperlordotic implants (≥ 10°) are required to be used with an anterior cervical plate.
The Acro Composites lumbar devices are indicated for use at one or two contiguous levels in the lumbar spine from L2-S1, in skeletally mature patients who have had at least six months of non-operative treatment. The lumbar devices are indicated to treat lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD) with up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis at the involved spinal level(s). DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by imaging studies (radiographs, CT, MRI). Additionally, the lumbar devices can be used as an adjunct to fusion in patients diagnosed with degenerative scoliosis. The hyperlordotic implants (≥ 20°) should be used with anterior supplemental fixation.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|---|---|
| ☒ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the
time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete
and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect
of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services
Food and Drug Administration
Office of Chief Information Officer
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Summary
| Date: | 21 February 2023 |
|---|---|
| Sponsor: | Acro Composites, LLC6950 W Snowville RoadBrecksville, OH 44141 |
| Sponsor Contact: | Mitchell Bass, President |
| 510(k) Contact: | Karen E. Warden, PhDBackRoads Consulting Inc.PO Box 566Chesterland, OH 44026Office: 440.729.8457 |
| Proposed Trade Name: | Acro Composites Interbody System |
| Common Name: | Cervical and lumbar interbody fusion devices |
| Device Classification: | Class II |
| Regulation Name,Classification Number,Product Code: | Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, cervical, 888.3080, ODPIntervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar, 888.3080, MAX |
| Device Description: | The Acro Composites Interbody System includes interbody fusion devicesfor cervical and lumbar implantation manufactured from AcroPek – a carbonfiber reinforced PEKEKK polymer (CFRP) material. The implants aredesigned as a solid frame to provide surgical stabilization of the spine. Eachinterbody incorporates a central cavity that can be packed bone graftmaterial. The implants are available in a variety of height, length, width andlordotic angulation combinations to accommodate the patient specificanatomy and clinical circumstances. The implants are sold sterile. |
| Indications for Use: | The Acro Composites Interbody System is intended for interbody fusion.The devices are designed for use with autogenous and/or allogeneic bonegraft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone and/ordemineralized allograft bone with bone marrow aspirate to facilitate fusionand are to be used with supplemental fixation cleared for the implantedlevel.The Acro Composites cervical devices are intended for anterior interbodyfusion in skeletally mature patients who have had at least six weeks of non-operative treatment. The cervical devices are indicated to treat cervical discdegeneration and/or cervical spinal instability, as confirmed by imagingstudies (radiographs, CT, MRI), that results in radiculopathy, myelopathy,and/or pain at multiple contiguous levels from C2-T1. The hyperlordoticimplants (≥ 10°) are required to be used with an anterior cervical plate.The Acro Composites lumbar devices are indicated for use at one or twocontiguous levels in the lumbar spine from L2-S1, in skeletally maturepatients who have had at least six months of non-operative treatment. Thelumbar devices are indicated to treat lumbar degenerative disc disease(DDD) with up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involvedspinal level(s). DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin withdegeneration of the disc confirmed by imaging studies (radiographs, CT,MRI). Additionally, the lumbar devices can be used as an adjunct to fusionin patients diagnosed with degenerative scoliosis. The hyperlordoticimplants (≥ 20°) should be used with anterior supplemental fixation. |
| Materials: | The Acro Composites Interbody System implants are manufactured fromPEKEKK resin (ASTM F1876) and carbon fiber filaments. Integral markersare manufactured from gold wire (per ASTM B562). The Acro Compositesinstruments are manufactured from medical grade stainless steel per ASTMF899; some of which include silicone handles. |
| Primary Predicate: | eCarbon IBDs (Back 2 Basics Direct, LLC – K191537) |
| Additional Predicates: | ostaPek Interbody Fusion Cages (coLigne, AG – K173148 & K181963),Cascadia Interbody System (K2M, Inc. – K160125 & K172009) |
| Performance Data: | Mechanical testing of the worst case Acro Composites Interbody Systemimplants included static and dynamic axial compression, static anddynamic compression-shear, and static and dynamic torsion according toASTM F2077. In addition, subsidence tests according to ASTM F2267 wereperformed.The mechanical test results demonstrate that the Acro CompositesInterbody System performance is substantially equivalent to the predicatedevices. |
| TechnologicalCharacteristics: | The Acro Composites Interbody System possesses the same technologicalcharacteristics as one or more of the predicate devices. These include:• basic design (structural column),• material (reinforced polymer) and• sizes (dimensions are comparable to those offered by the predicatesystems) |
| Conclusion: | Therefore the fundamental scientific technology of the Acro CompositesInterbody System is the same as previously cleared devices.The Acro Composites Interbody System possesses the same intended useand technological characteristics as the predicate devices. Therefore theAcro Composites Interbody System is substantially equivalent for itsintended use. |
{4}------------------------------------------------
§ 888.3080 Intervertebral body fusion device.
(a)
Identification. An intervertebral body fusion device is an implanted single or multiple component spinal device made from a variety of materials, including titanium and polymers. The device is inserted into the intervertebral body space of the cervical or lumbosacral spine, and is intended for intervertebral body fusion.(b)
Classification. (1) Class II (special controls) for intervertebral body fusion devices that contain bone grafting material. The special control is the FDA guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Intervertebral Body Fusion Device.” See § 888.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.(2) Class III (premarket approval) for intervertebral body fusion devices that include any therapeutic biologic (e.g., bone morphogenic protein). Intervertebral body fusion devices that contain any therapeutic biologic require premarket approval.
(c)
Date premarket approval application (PMA) or notice of product development protocol (PDP) is required. Devices described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section shall have an approved PMA or a declared completed PDP in effect before being placed in commercial distribution.