K Number
K223068
Date Cleared
2022-11-23

(54 days)

Product Code
Regulation Number
878.4040
Reference & Predicate Devices
Predicate For
N/A
AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
Intended Use

The Medical Protective Mask is intended to be worn to protect both the patient and healthcare personnel from transfer of microorganisms, body fluids, and particulate material. These masks are intended for use in infection control practices to reduce the potential exposure to blood and body fluids. This is a single-use, disposable device, provide non-sterile.

Device Description

The subject device is a four-layer, single-use, flat-folded shape mask. The inner and outer layers of the mask are made of polypropylene spunbonded nonwoven, and the filter (2 layers) is made of polypropylene melt-blown nonwoven. The proposed devices are available in two types, ear loop and headband. The ear loops and headband are made of polyester. The nose clip is made of polypropylene and wire, user can adjust the nose clip according to the shape of the nose, and fix the mask on the bridge of the nose to prevent the mask from falling off.

AI/ML Overview

This document describes the acceptance criteria and the study results for the Guangdong Golden Leaves Technology Development Co., LTD's Medical Protective Mask (models 8862, 8862A, 8862B, 8862C, 8862D, 8862E), as presented in their 510(k) Summary (K223068).

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

The device is evaluated against the ASTM F2100 standard for Medical Face Mask Materials. All models (Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3) of the Medical Protective Mask are stated to meet the performance requirements of all three levels.

Test ItemTest MethodAcceptance Criteria (Level 1)Reported Performance (Level 1)Acceptance Criteria (Level 2)Reported Performance (Level 2)Acceptance Criteria (Level 3)Reported Performance (Level 3)Verdict
Bacterial Filtration EfficiencyASTM F2101-19≥ 95%Pass≥ 98%Pass≥ 98%PassPass
Differential Pressure (Delta-P)EN 14683: 2019, Annex C< 5.0 mm H2O/cm²Pass< 6.0 mm H2O/cm²Pass< 6.0 mm H2O/cm²PassPass
Particulate Filtration Efficiency (0.1 µm)ASTM F2299≥ 95%Pass≥ 98%Pass≥ 98%PassPass
Resistance to Synthetic Blood PenetrationASTM F1862/F1862M-17Pass at 80 mmHgPassPass at 120 mmHgPassPass at 160 mmHgPassPass
Flammability16 CFR Part 1610Class 1PassClass 1PassClass 1PassPass

Biocompatibility Testing

Title of the testReference for Test methodAcceptance CriteriaTest Results
In vitro Cytotoxicity TestISO 10993-5:2009Under the conditions of the study, the subject device extract was determined to be non-cytotoxic.Pass
Skin Sensitization TestISO 10993-10:2010Under the conditions of the study, the subject device non-polar and polar extracts were determined to be non-sensitizing.Pass
Skin Irritation TestISO 10993-10:2010 (Part 23: Tests for irritation and skin sensitization)Under the conditions of the study, the subject device non-polar and polar extracts were determined to be non-irritating.Pass

2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

The document does not explicitly state the sample sizes used for each performance and biocompatibility test. It indicates that the tests were conducted according to the specified ASTM and ISO standards, which would implicitly define minimum sample sizes for valid results. The provenance of the data is not explicitly stated in terms of country of origin or whether it was retrospective or prospective, but it's generated for the purpose of this 510(k) submission.

3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts

Not applicable. The "ground truth" for this device is based on standardized performance and biocompatibility testing according to recognized international standards (ASTM, ISO, EN, 16 CFR). These standards define specific methodologies and criteria, rather than relying on expert consensus for interpreting test results.

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

Not applicable. The assessment relies on objective measurements against predefined thresholds as per the referenced standards, not on an adjudication process involving human reviewers for interpretation.

5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done

No, a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was not done. This type of study is typically used for diagnostic devices that involve human interpretation of images or other data. The Medical Protective Mask is a physical barrier device, and its effectiveness is determined by its material properties and physical performance as measured by objective tests.

6. If a Standalone Study (Algorithm Only Without Human-in-the-Loop Performance) Was Done

Yes, the studies conducted were standalone performance tests of the device itself, without human-in-the-loop performance evaluation. The performance criteria (e.g., filtration efficiency, fluid resistance) are objective measurements of the mask's physical characteristics.

7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

The ground truth used for evaluating the Medical Protective Mask's performance is based on established international standards and testing methodologies. For example:

  • Performance data: Directly measured physical properties (e.g., filtration rates, pressure differential, fluid penetration, flammability) against the numerical thresholds defined by ASTM F2100:2019, EN 14683: 2019, and 16 CFR Part 1610.
  • Biocompatibility data: Laboratory test results (cytotoxicity, sensitization, irritation) against the criteria defined by ISO 10993-5:2009 and ISO 10993-10:2010.

8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

Not applicable. This device is a medical mask evaluated by its physical properties and biocompatibility. There is no "training set" in the context of machine learning or AI models. The testing described is for the final product's performance validation.

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

Not applicable, as there is no training set for this device. The regulatory submission focuses on demonstrating that the physical device meets established performance and safety standards through non-clinical testing.

{0}------------------------------------------------

November 23, 2022

Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.

Guangdong Golden Leaves Technology Development Co., LTD % Cassie Lee Manager Share Info (Guangzhou) Medical Consultant Ltd. No. 1919-1920, Building D3, Minjie Plaza, Shuixi Road Huangpu District Guangzhou, Guangdong 523000 China

Re: K223068

Trade/Device Name: Medical Protective Mask (model: 8862, 8862B, 8862C, 8862D, 8862E) Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.4040 Regulation Name: Surgical Apparel Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: FXX Dated: September 28, 2022 Received: September 30, 2022

Dear Cassie Lee:

We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.

If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.

Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal

{1}------------------------------------------------

statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.

Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.

For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).

Sincerely,

Anne D. Talley -S
for

Brent Showalter, Ph.D. Assistant Director DHT6B: Division of Spinal Devices OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health

Enclosure

{2}------------------------------------------------

Indications for Use

510(k) Number (if known) K223068

Device Name

Medical Protective Mask (model: 8862, 8862A, 8862C, 8862C, 8862D, 8862E)

Indications for Use (Describe)

The Medical Protective Mask is intended to be worn to protect both the patient and healthcare personnel from transfer of microorganisms, body fluids, and particulate material. These masks are intended for use in infection control practices to reduce the potential exposure to blood and body fluids. This is a single-use, disposable device, provide non-sterile.

Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
-------------------------------------------------

For activities where HUD funding is NOT being directly obligated or expended

For activities where HUD funding IS being directly obligated or expended
| | Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)

|X | Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)

CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.

This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.

The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:

Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov

"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."

{3}------------------------------------------------

510(k) Summary of K223068

This summary of 510(k) safety and effectiveness information is being submitted in accordance with the requirement of 21 CFR 807.92.

1. Submitter's Information

Sponsor Name: Guangdong Golden Leaves Technology Development Co., Ltd. Address: 5F, BLDG 2, #8, Qiaolonghe East Rd, Tangxia Town, Dongguan, Guangdong, 523730, China Post Code: 523730 Contact name: Wenhong Zhou Tel: +86-13416994806 E-mail: info@gdgoldenleaves.com

Application Correspondent:

Contact Person: Ms. Cassie Lee Company: Share Info (Guangzhou) Medical Consultant Ltd. Address: No. 1919-1920, Building D3, Minjie Plaza, Shuixi Road, Huangpu District, Guangzhou, China Tel: +86 20 8266 2446 Email: regulatory@share-info.com

2. Date of the summary prepared: Jun 26, 2022

3. Subject Device Information

Type of 510(k): Traditional Classification Name: Mask, Surgical Trade Name: Medical Protective Mask Model Name: 8862, 8862A, 8862B, 8862C, 8862D, 8862E Review Panel: General Hospital Product Code: FXX Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.4040 Regulatory Class: II

4. Predicate Device Information

Predicate Device:

Sponsor: Jiangxi Hongda Medical Equipment Group Co., Ltd. Trade Name: Single-Use Medical Face Mask Classification Name: Mask, Surgical

{4}------------------------------------------------

510(K) Number: K210622 Review Panel: General Hospital Product Code: FXX Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.4040 Regulation Class: II

5. Device Description

The subject device is a four-layer, single-use, flat-folded shape mask. The inner and outer layers of the mask are made of polypropylene spunbonded nonwoven, and the filter (2 layers) is made of polypropylene melt-blown nonwoven. The proposed devices are available in two types, ear loop and headband. The ear loops and headband are made of polyester. The nose clip is made of polypropylene and wire, user can adjust the nose clip according to the shape of the nose, and fix the mask on the bridge of the nose to prevent the mask from falling off.

TypeLevelEar LoopHeadband
Level 18862B8862E
Level 28862A8862D
Level 388628862C

Both the ear loop and headband masks are available in level 1, level 2 and level 3:

All models are made of the same material and have identical performance, meeting the performance requirements of three levels at the same time.

The device is provided non-sterile.

6. Intended Use / Indications for Use

The Medical Protective Mask is intended to be worn to protect both the patient and healthcare personnel from transfer of microorganisms, body fluids, and particulate material. These masks are intended for use in infection control practices to reduce the potential exposure to blood and body fluids. This is a single-use, disposable device, provide non-sterile.

7. Comparison to predicate device and conclusion

The differences between the subject device and predicate devices do not raise new issues of safety or effectiveness.

Elements ofComparisonSubject DevicePredicate Device 1Verdict
CompanyGuangdong Golden LeavesTechnology Development Co.,Jiangxi Hongda MedicalEquipment Group Co., Ltd.--
Elements ofComparisonSubject DevicePredicate Device 1Verdict
Ltd.
510 (k)K223068K210622--
Trade NameMedical Protective MaskSingle-Use Medical Face Mask--
ClassificationNameMask, SurgicalMask, SurgicalSame
ClassificationClass IIClass IISame
Product CodeFXXFXXSame
Intended useThe Medical Protective Maskis intended to be worn toprotect both the patient andhealthcare personnel fromtransfer of microorganisms,body fluids, and particulatematerial. These masks areintended for use in infectioncontrol practices to reduce thepotential exposure to bloodand body fluids. This is asingle-use, disposable device,provide non-sterile.The single-use medical facemasks are intended to be worn toprotect both the patient andhealthcare personnel fromtransfer of microorganisms, bodyfluids, and particulate material.These face masks are intendedfor use in infection controlpractices to reduce the potentialexposure to blood and bodyfluids. This is a single-use,disposable device,provided sterile and non-sterile.Same
Mask styleFlat-foldedFlat-pleatedSame
Design featureEar loop, headbandEar loop or tie-onSimilarNote 1
ColorGreenWhiteDifferentNote 1
DimensionMask body: 205x80mmNose clip: 100mmEar loop: 150mmHeadband: 350mmMask body: 175x95mmNose Clip: 80105mmEar loop: 140150mmTies: 330~400mmSimilarNote 1
UseSingle Use, DisposableSingle Use, DisposableSame
Materials
Outer facing layerPolypropylene SpunbondedNonwovenPolypropylene SpunbondedNonwovenSame
Elements ofComparisonSubject DevicePredicate Device 1Verdict
Filter layerPolypropylene Melt-blownNonwovenPolypropylene Melt-blownNonwovenSame
Inner facing layerPolypropylene SpunbondedNonwovenPolypropylene SpunbondedNonwovenSame
Nose ClipPolypropylene and wirePolypropylene and ironSimilarNote 1
Earloops/headbandPolyesterPolyester and spandexSimilarNote 1
Performance Characteristics
ASTM F2100LevelLevel 1, Level 2, Level 3Level 1, Level 2, Level 3Same
Fluid resistanceLevel 1: Pass at 80 mmHgLevel 2: Pass at 120 mmHgLevel 3: Pass at 160 mmHgLevel 1: Pass at 80 mmHgLevel 2: Pass at 120 mmHgLevel 3: Pass at 160 mmHgSame
ParticulatefiltrationefficiencyLevel 1: ≥95%Level 2: ≥98%Level 3: ≥98%Level 1:Ear loop (Non-sterile): ≥95%Level 2:Ear loop (Non-sterile): ≥98%Level 3:Ear loop (Non-sterile): ≥98%Same
Bacterial filtrationefficiencyLevel 1: ≥95%Level 2: ≥98%Level 3: ≥98%Level 1:Ear loop (Non-sterile): ≥95%Level 2:Ear loop (Non-sterile): ≥98%Level 3:Ear loop (Non-sterile): ≥98%Same
DifferentialpressureLevel 1: <5 mmH2O/cm²Level 2: <6 mmH2O/cm²Level 3: <6 mmH2O/cm²Level 1:Ear loop (Non-sterile): <5 mmH2O/cm²Level 2:Ear loop (Non-sterile): <6 mmH2O/cm²Level 3:Same
Elements ofComparisonSubject DevicePredicate Device 1Verdict
Fluid resistanceLevel 1: Pass at 80 mmHgLevel 2: Pass at 120 mmHgLevel 3: Pass at 160 mmHgmmH2O/cm2Level 1: Pass at 80 mmHgLevel 2: Pass at 120 mmHgLevel 3: Pass at 160 mmHgSame
FlammabilityClass IClass ISame
SterilityNon-sterileNon sterile/SterileSame
Label/LabelingComplied with 21 CFR part 801Complied with 21 CFR part 801Same
Shelf Life2 years3 yearsDifferentNote 2
Biocompatibility
CytotoxicityUnder the conditions of thestudy, the proposeddevice was non-cytotoxic.Under the conditions of the study,the proposeddevice was non-cytotoxic.Same
SensitizationUnder the conditions of thestudy, the proposeddevice was non-sensitizing.Under the conditions of the study,the proposeddevice was non-sensitizing.Same
IrritationUnder the conditions of thestudy, the proposeddevice was non-irritating.Under the conditions of the study,the proposeddevice was non-irritating.Same

{5}------------------------------------------------

{6}------------------------------------------------

{7}------------------------------------------------

Comparison in Detail(s):

Note 1:

Although there are a few differences in "Design feature", "Dimension", materials of "Ear loops/headband" and "Nose Clip" of the subject device and predicate device, they all met the ASTM F2100 and ISO 10993 standards required. So, the differences between the subject device and the predicate devices will not affect the safety and effectiveness.

Note 2:

Although the "Shelf life" of the subject device is a little different from the predicate device, the performance testing of the subject device after accelerated aging has been conducted and the test results show that the subject device after the aging meets the all-performance requirements of ASTM F2100. So, the differences between the subject device and predicate device will not affect the safety and effectiveness.

{8}------------------------------------------------

8. Summary of Non-Clinical Performance Testing

Performance Testing summary

Pass criteriaTest
Test itemTest methodForLevel 1For Level2ForLevel 3results/Verdict
BacterialfiltrationefficiencyASTM F2101-19 StandardTest Method for Evaluatingthe Bacterial FiltrationEfficiency (BFE) of MedicalFace Mask Materials, Usinga Biological Aerosol ofStaphylococcus aureusaccording to ASTM F2100:2019≥ 95%≥ 98%≥ 98%Pass
Differentialpressure(Delta-P)EN 14683: 2019, Annex CMedical face masks -Requirements and testmethods according toASTM F2100: 2019<5.0 mmH2O/cm²<6.0 mmH2O/cm²<6.0 mmH2O/cm²Pass
Sub-micronparticulatefiltrationefficiency at0.1 µm ofPolystyreneLatex SpheresASTM F2299 Standard TestMethod for Determining theInitial Efficiency of MaterialsUsed in Medical FaceMasks to Penetration byParticulates Using LatexSpheres according to ASTMF2100: 2019≥ 95%≥ 98%≥ 98%Pass
Resistance topenetration bysyntheticblood,minimumpressure inmm Hg forpass resultASTM F1862/F1862M-17Standard Test Method forResistance of Medical FaceMasks to Penetration bySynthetic Blood (HorizontalProjection of Fixed Volume ata Known Velocity) accordingto ASTM F2100:2019Pass at80 mmHgPass at120 mmHgPass at160 mmHgPass
16 CFR Part 1610 Standardfor the Flammability ofClothing according to ASTMF2100:2019
FlamespreadClass 1Class 1Class 1Pass

{9}------------------------------------------------

Biocompatibility Testing

According to ISO 10993-1: 2018, the nature of body contact for the subject device is Surface Device category, Skin Contact and duration of contact is B-prolonged (>24 h to 30 d). The following tests for the subject device were conducted to demonstrate that the subject device is biocompatible and safe for its intended use:

Title of the testPurpose of thetestReferenceforTest methodAcceptancecriteriaTestresults
In vitroCytotoxicity TestUnder the researchconditions.determine whetherthe target deviceextract is cytotoxic.ISO 10993-5:2009Biological evaluationof medical devices-Part 5: Tests for invitro cytotoxicityUnder theconditions of thestudy, the subjectdevice extract wasdetermined to benon-cytotoxic.Pass
SkinSensitizationTestUnder the researchconditions,determine whetherthe non-polar andpolar extracts ofthe target deviceare sensitive.ISO 10993-10:2010Biological evaluationof medical devices-Part 10: Tests forirritation and skinsensitizationUnder theconditions of thestudy, the subjectdevice non-polarand polar extractswere determined tobe non-sensitizing.Pass
Skin IrritationTestUnder the researchconditions,determine whetherthe non-polar andpolar extracts ofthe target deviceare irritating.ISO 10993-10:2010Biological evaluationof medical devices-Part 23: Tests forirritation and skinsensitizationUnder theconditions of thestudy, the subjectdevice non-polarand polar extractswere determined tobe non-irritating.Pass

9. Summary of Clinical Performance Test

{10}------------------------------------------------

No clinical study is included in this submission.

10. Final Conclusion

The subject device is as safe, as effective, and performs as well as the legally marketed predicate device K210622.

§ 878.4040 Surgical apparel.

(a)
Identification. Surgical apparel are devices that are intended to be worn by operating room personnel during surgical procedures to protect both the surgical patient and the operating room personnel from transfer of microorganisms, body fluids, and particulate material. Examples include surgical caps, hoods, masks, gowns, operating room shoes and shoe covers, and isolation masks and gowns. Surgical suits and dresses, commonly known as scrub suits, are excluded.(b)
Classification. (1) Class II (special controls) for surgical gowns and surgical masks. A surgical N95 respirator or N95 filtering facepiece respirator is not exempt if it is intended to prevent specific diseases or infections, or it is labeled or otherwise represented as filtering surgical smoke or plumes, filtering specific amounts of viruses or bacteria, reducing the amount of and/or killing viruses, bacteria, or fungi, or affecting allergenicity, or it contains coating technologies unrelated to filtration (e.g., to reduce and or kill microorganisms). Surgical N95 respirators and N95 filtering facepiece respirators are exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 878.9, and the following conditions for exemption:(i) The user contacting components of the device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(ii) Analysis and nonclinical testing must:
(A) Characterize flammability and be demonstrated to be appropriate for the intended environment of use; and
(B) Demonstrate the ability of the device to resist penetration by fluids, such as blood and body fluids, at a velocity consistent with the intended use of the device.
(iii) NIOSH approved under its regulation.
(2) Class I (general controls) for surgical apparel other than surgical gowns and surgical masks. The class I device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 878.9.