K Number
K192251
Manufacturer
Date Cleared
2020-01-15

(148 days)

Product Code
Regulation Number
872.6660
Panel
Dental
Reference & Predicate Devices
Predicate For
N/A
AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
Intended Use

The indications for use for Livento® press, Soprano® 10 and Soprano® are:

-Veneers

-Inlays and onlays

-Partial crowns

-Anterior and posterior tooth crowns

-Hybrid abutment crown

  • -3-pontic bridge in anterior tooth region
    -3-pontic bridge in the premolar region up to max. 2nd premolar as a permanent abutment
Device Description

The Livento/Soprano dental ceramic system comprise pressable ingots and compatible layering ceramic powders used in dental laboratories by the dental technician to create all ceramic restorations.

Livento® press is a pressable lithium disilicate glass-ceramic supplied in ingots of 3 grams. The material is supplied in different levels of translucency (MT, LT, ET, HQ, Opal and Bleach) each in different dental shades of Vita A, B, C and D.

Soprano® 10 is a layering fluorapatite glass-ceramic supplied as powder suitable for veneering substructures made from Livento® press lithium disilicate glass-ceramic and zirconium oxide. It has a range of different translucency levels (Frame Modifier, Opaque Dentine, Incisal/Enamel, Transparent, Clear) and is available in the Vita classic colors A, B, C and D as well as Bleach shades and Modifiers.

Soprano® shades, stains and glaze are glass ceramic dental porcelain material. They are intended to finish dental restorations and are offered in a variety of shades.

All Livento/Soprano dental ceramics meet the requirements of ISO 6872:2015.

AI/ML Overview

The provided text describes a 510(k) premarket notification for a dental ceramic system (Livento® press, Soprano® 10, and Soprano®). The notification aims to demonstrate substantial equivalence to a predicate device, the DCceram System (K141400). The "acceptance criteria" and "study that proves the device meets the acceptance criteria" in this context refer to the performance data presented to show compliance with relevant standards and justify substantial equivalence.

Here's a breakdown of the requested information based on the provided document:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

The document states that the Livento/Soprano dental ceramic system meets the requirements of ISO 6872:2015. This standard sets the acceptance criteria for dental ceramic materials. While specific numerical acceptance criteria from ISO 6872:2015 are not explicitly listed in the document, the tested parameters and the general statement of compliance serve as the reported performance against those criteria.

Acceptance Criteria (Set by ISO 6872:2015)Reported Device Performance (Compliance Statement)
Flexural strength requirementsThe results show product compliance to the requirements of ISO 6872:2015.
Chemical solubility requirementsThe results show product compliance to the requirements of ISO 6872:2015.
Coefficient of Thermal Expansion requirementsThe results show product compliance to the requirements of ISO 6872:2015.
Glass Transition Temperature requirementsThe results show product compliance to the requirements of ISO 6872:2015.
Radioactivity of 238U requirementsThe results show product compliance to the requirements of ISO 6872:2015.

The document explicitly states: "The results show product compliance to the requirements of ISO 6872:2015."

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)

The document mentions testing was done on "a representative sample of the products." However, it does not specify the exact sample size used for the performance testing.

Regarding data provenance:

  • Country of Origin: Not explicitly stated, but the submitter (Cendres+Metaux SA) is located in Biel/Bienne, Switzerland. The testing would logically be conducted by or for a company based in Switzerland, or a contract lab.
  • Retrospective or Prospective: This is a performance testing study, not a clinical study on patients. It's a laboratory study to characterize the material, so these terms (retrospective/prospective clinical data) do not directly apply. It's a prospective laboratory evaluation of material properties.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)

This type of information (experts establishing ground truth) is typically relevant for studies involving human interpretation (e.g., medical imaging AI). For this submission, which focuses on the material properties of dental ceramics tested against a recognized international standard (ISO 6872:2015), the "ground truth" is defined by the physical and chemical properties of the material as measured by standardized laboratory methods, not by expert consensus. Therefore, this question is not applicable in the context of this device and submission.

4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

As this is a laboratory performance study of material properties, not a study involving human readers or interpretations needing adjudication, the concept of an adjudication method is not applicable. The "ground truth" is established by the measurements themselves, evaluated against the specified criteria of ISO 6872:2015.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

No, an MRMC comparative effectiveness study was not done. This type of study is relevant for medical image analysis devices, particularly those involving Artificial Intelligence (AI) to assist human readers. The device in question is a dental ceramic material used by dental technicians to create restorations, not a diagnostic imaging device or an AI application. Therefore, this question is not applicable.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

No, a standalone performance study (in the context of AI algorithms) was not done. As stated, this is a material property evaluation, not an AI or software device. Therefore, this question is not applicable.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)

The "ground truth" for this device is the physical and chemical properties of the dental ceramic materials, as measured and characterized by standardized laboratory testing methods in accordance with ISO 6872:2015. This is a material science "ground truth."

8. The sample size for the training set

This question is typically relevant for AI/machine learning models where data is used to train an algorithm. Since this is a submission for a physical dental material with performance verified through adherence to an international standard, there is no "training set" in the sense of machine learning. The testing performed is for verification and validation of the product's physical properties.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

As there is no "training set" in the context of this device submission, this question is not applicable.

{0}------------------------------------------------

Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, with the letters "FDA" in a blue square. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.

January 15, 2020

Cendres+Metaux SA Andrea Sparti Regulatory Affairs Manager Rue de Boujean 122 Biel/Bienne, 2501 SWITZERLAND

Re: K192251

Trade/Device Name: Livento© Press, Soprano 10©, Soprano© Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.6660 Regulation Name: Porcelain Powder for Clinical Use Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: EIH Dated: September 27, 2019 Received: October 17, 2019

Dear Andrea Sparti:

We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.

If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.

Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's

{1}------------------------------------------------

requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.

Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.

For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).

Sincerely,

for Srinivas 'Nandu' Nandkumar, Ph.D. Director DHT1B: Division of Dental Devices OHT1: Office of Ophthalmic, Anesthesia, Respiratory, ENT and Dental Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Ouality Center for Devices and Radiological Health

Enclosure

{2}------------------------------------------------

Indications for Use

510(k) Number (if known) K192251

Device Name

Livento® press, Soprano® 10, Soprano®

Indications for Use (Describe)

The indications for use for Livento® press, Soprano® 10 and Soprano® are:

-Veneers

-Inlays and onlays

-Partial crowns

-Anterior and posterior tooth crowns

-Hybrid abutment crown

  • -3-pontic bridge in anterior tooth region
    -3-pontic bridge in the premolar region up to max. 2nd premolar as a permanent abutment

Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)

Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)

| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)

CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.

This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.

The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:

Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov

"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."

{3}------------------------------------------------

Image /page/3/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Cendres+Metaux. The logo consists of a stylized letter "M" on the left, followed by the text "CENDRES+" on the top line and "MÉTAUX" on the bottom line. The text is in a simple, sans-serif font, and the plus sign is slightly raised.

510(k) Summarv

510(k) number: K192251

Submitter

CENDRES+METAUX SA Rue de Boujean 122 CH-2501 Biel / Bienne Switzerland

Phone : +41 58 360 20 00 Fax :+41 58 360 20 10

Contact Person: Andrea Sparti Date prepared: 15 January 2020

Device

Trade Name: Livento® press, Soprano® 10 and Soprano® Common Name: Dental ceramic Classification Name: Porcelain powder for clinical use Regulatory Class: II Product Code: EIH Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.6660

Primary Predicate Device

DCceram System 510(k) number: K141400

Device Description

The Livento/Soprano dental ceramic system comprise pressable ingots and compatible layering ceramic powders used in dental laboratories by the dental technician to create all ceramic restorations.

Livento® press is a pressable lithium disilicate glass-ceramic supplied in ingots of 3 grams. The material is supplied in different levels of translucency (MT, LT, ET, HQ, Opal and Bleach) each in different dental shades of Vita A, B, C and D.

Soprano® 10 is a layering fluorapatite glass-ceramic supplied as powder suitable for veneering substructures made from Livento® press lithium disilicate glass-ceramic and zirconium oxide. It has a range of different translucency levels (Frame Modifier, Opaque Dentine, Incisal/Enamel, Transparent, Clear) and is available in the Vita classic colors A, B, C and D as well as Bleach shades and Modifiers.

Soprano® shades, stains and glaze are glass ceramic dental porcelain material. They are intended to finish dental restorations and are offered in a variety of shades.

All Livento/Soprano dental ceramics meet the requirements of ISO 6872:2015.

{4}------------------------------------------------

Image /page/4/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Cendres+Metaux. The logo consists of a stylized letter "C" on the left, followed by the text "CENDRES+" on the top line and "MÉTAUX" on the bottom line. The text is in a simple, sans-serif font, and the entire logo is in black against a white background.

Indication for Use

  • Veneers ●
  • Inlays and onlays ●
  • Partial crowns ●
  • Anterior and posterior tooth crowns
  • Hybrid abutment crown ●
  • 3-pontic bridge in anterior tooth region .
  • 3-pontic bridge in the premolar region up to max. 2nd premolar as a permanent abutment .

Comparison of Technological Characteristics with the Primary Predicate Device

The legally marketed device to which CENDRES+METAUX SA is claiming equivalence is identified as DCceram System, K141400, manufactured by Ceramay GmbH & Co. KG. The DCceram System is comprised of pressable silica-based ceramic pellets and compatible layering porcelains powders used to create all-ceramic restorations.

Specifically, equivalence is claimed between the following products:

  • DCceram Concept press & Livento® press ●
  • DCceram 9.2 & Soprano® 10 .
  • . DCceram Concept Art stains, shades and glazes & Soprano® Flu-Stains, Flu-Shades and Glazes.

Substantial equivalence is based on indications for use, technological characteristics, material composition, and conformity with consensus standards.

The comparison of the candidate device to the predicate device shows that, when looking at comparable constituents, the devices have the same intended use:

  • Manufacture of all-ceramic crowns and bridges by the press technique for DCceram -Concept press and Livento® press
  • । Layering the pressed ceramic crown or bridge or a zirconium oxide framework for DCceram 9.2 and Soprano® 10
  • Staining lithium disilicate glass ceramic or zirconium oxide in its final shades for -ConceptArt and Soprano® Stains, shades and glazes

The indications are comparable, including veneers, inlays and onlays, partial and full crowns and 3-unit bridges in the anterior and premolar regions with the same limitations of including the second pre-molar as a terminal abutment.

The devices are made of the same materials:

  • Silicate glass ceramic mainly composed of SiO2, Al2O3, Li2O, P2O5, K2O, CaO, B2O3 -
    The measured parameters according to ISO 6872 show slight differences between the subject device and the predicate. However, none are of clinical significance. Both devices conform to the consensus standard ISO 6872, which provides performance specifications satisfied by both the predicate and the candidate device.

{5}------------------------------------------------

Image /page/5/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Cendres+Metaux. The logo consists of a stylized letter "C" on the left, followed by the words "CENDRES+" on the top line and "MÉTAUX" on the bottom line. The text is in a simple, sans-serif font and is all black.

Performance Data

This 510(k) submission includes the results of performance testing supporting compliance to International Standard ISO 6872:20015 as recognized by FDA. Measured parameters in a representative sample of the products included:

  • Flexural strength, ●
  • Chemical Solubility, .
  • Coefficient of Thermal Expansion, .
  • Glass Transition Temperature, and ●
  • Radioactivity of 238U. .

The results show product compliance to the requirements of ISO 6872:2015.

The Livento/Soprano dental ceramics are surface contacting materials with contact with the oral mucosa with contact duration of more than 30 days (permanent contact). Biocompatibility evaluation was based on the similarity with the predicate device.

Conclusions

Based on the above, we conclude that Livento/Soprano dental ceramics are substantially equivalent to the predicate device DCceram System.

§ 872.6660 Porcelain powder for clinical use.

(a)
Identification. Porcelain powder for clinical use is a device consisting of a mixture of kaolin, felspar, quartz, or other substances intended for use in the production of artificial teeth in fixed or removable dentures, of jacket crowns, facings, and veneers. The device is used in prosthetic dentistry by heating the powder mixture to a high temperature in an oven to produce a hard prosthesis with a glass-like finish.(b)
Classification. Class II.