K Number
K180549
Device Name
ZED Link
Manufacturer
Date Cleared
2018-04-12

(42 days)

Product Code
Regulation Number
892.2050
Reference & Predicate Devices
Predicate For
N/A
AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
Intended Use

ZED LINK™, is an image management system whose intended use is to provide scalable DICOM compatible PACS solutions for hospitals and related institutions and sites, which will archive, retrieve and display images and data from all image modalities (such as CR, CT, DR, MR, and other devices) and information systems. This also includes the display of structured reports and mammography images that have been created according to DICOM "For Presentation" and will include standard features and other tools for analyzing mammography images. Only pre-processed DICOM for presentation images can be interpreted for primary image diagnosis in mammography. Lossy compressed mammographic images and digitized film screen images must not be reviewed for primary image interpretations. Mammographic images may only be interpreted using a monitor that meets technical specification identified by FDA. ZED LINK™, is not intended for diagnostic image review on mobile devices. Typical users of this system are doctors and health care professionals.

Device Description

ZED LINK™ has four main uses:

  • Hard copy replacement: Replaces hard-copy media for managing medical images, such as film archives.
  • Remote access: Expands the possibilities of conventional systems by providing capabilities of off-site viewing and reporting (distance education, tele review). It enables practitioners in different physical locations to access the same information simultaneously for teleradiology.
  • Electronic image integration platform: Provides the electronic platform for radiology images interfacing with other medical automation systems such as Hospital Information System (HIS), Electronic Medical Record (EMR), Practice Management Software, and Radiology Information System (RIS).
  • Radiology Workflow Management: Used by radiology personnel to manage the workflow of patient exams.
AI/ML Overview

The provided text describes a 510(k) premarket notification for a medical device called "ZED LINK™", which is an image management system (PACS). However, the document does not contain specific acceptance criteria, reported device performance metrics, or details of a study that proves the device meets such criteria.

Instead, the document focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device (BOX DICOM Viewer K151957) based on technological characteristics and functional comparisons. It generally states that nonclinical testing was performed and that predetermined acceptance criteria were met, but does not provide the details of these criteria or the test results.

Here's an breakdown based on the information available and not available in the provided text:


1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

Acceptance CriteriaReported Device Performance
Not specified in the document. The document states that "all pre-determined testing criteria" were passed and "predetermined acceptance criteria were met," but it does not list these criteria or detailed performance results.Not specified in the document. The document generally states that the device is "equivalent in performance to existing legally marketed devices" and "as safe, as effective, and performs as well as the predicate device," but no specific performance metrics are reported.

2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

  • Sample Size (Test Set): Not specified.
  • Data Provenance: Not specified. The document only mentions that the system and configuration were assessed and tested at "ZED Technologies PTY. LTD."

3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Experts

Not applicable. The document does not describe a study involving expert-established ground truth for a test set. The focus is on demonstrating functional equivalence to a predicate device without reference to diagnostic performance metrics requiring such ground truth.

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

Not applicable, as no study involving expert interpretation or adjudication is described.

5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study

No. The document makes no mention of a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study, nor any assessment of human reader improvement with or without AI assistance. The ZED LINK™ is described as an image management system, not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool.

6. Standalone (Algorithm Only Without Human-in-the-Loop Performance) Study

No. The document presents the ZED LINK™ as an image management system, not a standalone diagnostic algorithm. Therefore, a standalone performance study in the context of an algorithm's diagnostic accuracy is not relevant to the information provided.

7. Type of Ground Truth Used

Not applicable. No ground truth is described, as the evaluation focuses on functional equivalence and passing nonclinical technical tests, rather than diagnostic accuracy.

8. Sample Size for the Training Set

Not applicable. The ZED LINK™ is an image management system, and the document does not describe an AI or machine learning component that would require a "training set" in the context of diagnostic algorithm development.

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

Not applicable, as no training set or associated ground truth is mentioned.


Summary of Device Evaluation in the Document:

The provided 510(k) summary focuses on demonstrating that ZED LINK™ is substantially equivalent to its predicate device (BOX DICOM Viewer K151957) by comparing their technological characteristics and intended uses. The evaluation primarily involved nonclinical testing to ensure the system's functionality, safety, and effectiveness. The document states that "predetermined acceptance criteria were met" and that "all verification and validation activities" were performed, but it lacks the specific details of these criteria, the tests conducted, and the quantitative results that would typically be included in a study proving performance against defined acceptance criteria. The differences noted between the predicate and subject devices (e.g., supported web browsers, absence of clockwise/counter-clockwise rotate and area measurement annotation, presence of MPR) were assessed and deemed to have no impact on safety or efficacy.

{0}------------------------------------------------

Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.

Zed Technologies % Mr. Carl Alletto Consultant OTech Inc. 8317 Belew Drive MCKINNEY TX 75071 April 12, 2018

Re: K180549

Trade/Device Name: ZED LINK™ Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.2050 Regulation Name: Picture archiving and communications system Regulatory Class: II Product Code: LLZ Dated: February 21, 2018 Received: March 1, 2018

Dear Mr. Alletto:

We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.

If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.

Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.

{1}------------------------------------------------

Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.

For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).

Sincerely,

Michael D. O'Hara For

Robert Ochs. Ph.D Director Division of Radiological Health Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health Center for Devices and Radiological Health

Enclosure

{2}------------------------------------------------

Indications for Use

510(k) Number (if known) K180549

Device Name ZED LINK™

Indications for Use (Describe)

ZED LINK™, is an image management system whose intended use is to provide scalable DICOM compatible PACS solutions for hospitals and related institutions and sites, which will archive, retrieve and display images and data from all image modalities (such as CR, CT, DR, MR, and other devices) and information systems. This also includes the display of structured reports and mammography images that have been created according to DICOM "For Presentation" and will include standard features and other tools for analyzing mammography images. Only pre-processed DICOM for presentation images can be interpreted for primary image diagnosis in mammography. Lossy compressed mammographic images and digitized film screen images must not be reviewed for primary image interpretations. Mammographic images may only be interpreted using a monitor that meets technical specification identified by FDA. ZED LINK™, is not intended for diagnostic image review on mobile devices. Typical users of this system are doctors and health care professionals.

Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)

CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.

This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.

The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:

Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov

"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."

{3}------------------------------------------------

This 510(k) summary of safety and effectiveness information is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of SMDA 1990.

Date Prepared:

March 30, 2018

Submitter's Information: 21 CFR 807.92(a)(1)

Mr. Ronald Li, Co-Founder and CTO Zed Technologies, Office 105, 12 Yarra St South Yarra VIC 3141 Australia Tel +61 1300 662 980 Email: ronald@zedtechnologies.com

Trade Name, Common Name and Classification: 21 CFR 807.92(a)(2)

Trade Name:ZED LINK™
Common Name:Picture, archive and communications system
Classification Name:System, Image Processing, Radiological
Product Code:LLZ

Predicate Device: 21 CFR 807. 92(a)(3)

Device Classification Namesystem, image processing, radiological
510(k) NumberK151957
Device NameBOX DICOM Viewer
Regulation Number892.2050
Classification Product CodeLLZ
Date Received07/16/2015
Decision Date09/01/2015
Decisionsubstantially equivalent (SE)
Regulation Medical SpecialtyRadiology
510k Review PanelRadiology
summarysummary
Reviewed by Third PartyNo
Combination ProductNo

Device Description: 21 CFR 807 92(a)(4)

ZED LINK™ has four main uses:

  • . Hard copy replacement: Replaces hard-copy media for managing medical images, such as film archives.
  • Remote access: Expands the possibilities of conventional systems by providing . capabilities of off-site viewing and reporting (distance education, tele review). It enables practitioners in different physical locations to access the same information simultaneously for teleradiology.
  • . Electronic image integration platform: Provides the electronic platform for radiology images interfacing with other medical automation systems such as Hospital Information System (HIS), Electronic Medical Record (EMR), Practice Management Software, and Radiology Information System (RIS).

{4}------------------------------------------------

  • . Radiology Workflow Management: Used by radiology personnel to manage the workflow of patient exams.

Typical Workflow

  • The typical Workflow starts when a patient arrives at the Medical Institution: Hospital or ● diagnostic center to get a radiological exam.
  • The Medical Institution could have a modality, like an MRI Machine or X-Ray and start by . registering the patient information like name and date of birth.
  • Once the patient information is registered, the Modality User (not part of ZED LINK™) . can start the acquisition of the images.
  • After taking the images, images are on the network and the radiologist can view images . using ZED LINK™, add annotations, and write a report.
  • . Finally, exam can be forwarded, and/or the report viewed by others.
  • The figure below shows the typical workflow diagram. ●

Cyber Security/Web-Based Deployment/Smart Update

The ZED LINK™, is a web-based solution that gives easy accessibility through a web browser and a software update can be automatically performed whenever a user logs in. Therefore, the User will access the latest version of ZED LINK™, with every log-on and reduces the risk of cyber security issues Also, if cyber security issues are found or suspected, the software can be modification is available the next time the User logs into the system.

Image Distribution & Viewing

  • Users can access image data and Viewer tools via Internet at any time. ●
  • . Provides user-defined application profile for technicians, radiologists, and outpatient physicians with customized tools for each user type.
  • . Users can access HIS / RIS data through HL7 interface.
  • Provides advanced hanging protocol and worklist tools preset to suit each user; optimal Viewer environment is guaranteed for convenient usage experience.
  • . With ZED LINK™, roaming profile, users can access PACS Viewer from anywhere and find their personal settings intact.
  • Instant, effective communication tool for technicians, radiologists, and emergency ● physicians, is provided to ensure smoother, quicker treatment process.
  • . Provides DICOM-compatible Grayscale Softcopy Presentation State [GSPS] which enables important dictation data to be stored and shared in DICOM format without any data loss.
  • . Automatic updates of name labels on both current and related exams allow for easier analysis.
  • . Automatic marking of scout lines on selected images; users can quickly and intuitively select scout images.
  • . Users can easily save and re-access worked images in their current states, using Demo Folder and 2D Job Save function.

Security and Privacy

  • . TLS DICOM.
  • Digital signature.
  • Control by user accounts, authority and modality authority.
  • . Provides accurate inspection information through 6-Level Log Reinforcement & Audit Trail.

{5}------------------------------------------------

  • . Detailed logs about invalid DICOM IOD.
  • . Safe and coded web protocol: 128 bit and SSL code available.
  • . Creates a reliable event log to patient information through user authentication that is compliant with the IHE security profile.
  • Through role-based access controls, administrators can define specific permissions . and access levels for users and user groups.
  • . Manages log-in and password to internal and external access.
  • Managers can make limitations to every user level via the auto-logoff function. ●
  • Provides inspection, report and statistics compliant with HIPAA security to every . record.

Indications for Use: 21 CFR 807 92(a)(5)

ZED LINK™, is an image management system whose intended use is to provide scalable DICOM compatible PACS solutions for hospitals and related institutions and sites, which will archive, distribute, retrieve and display images and data from all image modalities (such as CR, CT, DR, MR, and other devices) and information systems. This also includes the display of structured reports and mammography images that have been created according to DICOM "For Presentation" and will include standard features and other tools for analyzing mammography images. Only pre-processed DICOM for presentation images can be interpreted for primary image diagnosis in mammography. Lossy compressed mammographic images and digitized film screen images must not be reviewed for primary image interpretations. Mammographic images may only be interpreted using a monitor that meets technical specification identified by FDA. ZED LINK™, is not intended for diagnostic image review on mobile devices. Typical users of this system are doctors and health care professionals.

Technological Characteristics: 21 CFR 807 92(a)(6)

ZED LINK™, is a software application that handles medical digital images. The device does not contact the patient, nor does it control any life sustaining devices.

A physician, providing ample opportunity for competent human intervention interprets images and information being displayed and printed. The universal format for PACS image storage and transfer is DICOM, (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine). Non-image data, such as scanned documents, may be incorporated using consumer industry standard formats like PDF (Portable Document Format), once encapsulated in DICOM. The new device and predicate devices are substantially equivalent in the areas of technical characteristics, general function, application, and intended use.

The new device does not raise any new potential safety risks and is equivalent in performance to the existing legally marketed devices. Both systems have been developed to replace traditional film handling in radiology. The 2 devices are substantially equivalent in the areas of design, architecture, general function, application, and intended use.

The following table compares the predicate device and new device. Any differences between the predicate and the new device has no impact on safety or efficacy of the new device and does not raise any new potential safety risks and is equivalent in performance to existing legally marketed devices.

Ref#FunctionalityPredicate: BOX DICOMViewer K151957Subject Device: ZEDLINKTMIf different, Impact on Safetyand or Efficacy
1Web BrowserGoogle Chrome for allfeatures.Microsoft InternetOur viewer supportsMicrosoft InternetExplorer, MicrosoftYes, there are differences. Thedifference is that the subjectdevice covers additional Web
Ref#FunctionalityPredicate: BOX DICOMViewer K151957Subject Device: ZEDLINK TMIf different, Impact on Safetyand or Efficacy
1Explorer &Mozilla Firefox forfeatures except theDICOM ViewerEdge, Mozilla Firefox,Google Chrome, AppleSafari and Opera forall features.Browsers and they can be usedfor all device features.
2Intended useAcquiring, viewing,editing and storingradiographs and relatedpatient's imagesSame as predicateNo difference
3Intended userRadiologist & qualifiedmedical personnelSame as predicateNo difference
4Network10/100/100 EthernetSame as predicateNo difference
5MonitorAbove 19inch monitor(Using 1280x1024)Same as predicateNo difference
6Userinteraction/inputSame, Using 1280x1024Same as predicateNo difference
7Import / exportimagesYesSame as predicateNo difference
8AcquisitiondevicesCT, MR, US, PETSame as predicateNo difference
9ImageorganizationPatient ID, Name, studyinstance UIDSame as predicateNo difference
10Image searchavailableSameSame as predicateNo difference
11Image storageYesSame as predicateNo difference
12DatabasesoftwareMySQLMS SQLNo difference
13GreyscaleImageRenderingYesSame as predicateNo difference
14RGB ImageRenderingYesSame as predicateNo difference
15Localizer LinesYesSame as predicateNo difference
16Localizer PointYesSame as predicateNo difference
17OrientationMarkersYesSame as predicateNo difference
18DistanceMarkersYesSame as predicateNo difference
Ref#FunctionalityPredicate: BOX DICOMViewer K151957Subject Device: ZEDLINK TMIf different, Impact on Safetyand or Efficacy
19Study DataOverlaysYesSame as predicateNo difference
20StackNavigationYesSame as predicateNo difference
21Window LevelYesSame as predicateNo difference
22Zoom in onimagesYesSame as predicateNo difference
23PanningYesSame as predicateNo difference
24Horizontal/Vertical FlipYesSame as predicateNo difference
25Clockwise/CounterclockwiserotateYesNoYes, there is a difference. Thedifference does not raise anynew potential safety risks andtherefore, there is no impact onsafety or efficacy for thesubject device.
26Invert imageYesSame as predicateNo difference
27Text AnnotationYesSame as predicateNo difference
28AreameasurementannotationYesNoYes, there is a difference. Thedifference does not raise anynew potential safety risks andtherefore, there is no impact onsafety or efficacy for the subjectdevice.
29AnglemeasurementannotationYesSame as predicateNo difference
30Cobb AngleMeasurementAnnotationYesSame as predicateNo difference
31ImageannotationYesSame as predicateNo difference
32SecurityYesSame as predicateNo difference
33DICOM 3.0conformanceYesSame as predicateNo difference
34WorklistYesSame as predicateNo difference
Ref#FunctionalityPredicate: BOX DICOMViewer K151957Subject Device: ZEDLINK TMIf different, Impact on Safetyand or Efficacy
35ThumbnailviewingYes, thumbnails onpreview, small, mediumand largeSame as predicateNo difference
36LoginYesSame as predicateNo difference
37AuditYes, a tool to viewaccess logs in real time.Same as predicateNo difference
38WebGLrenderingoptimizationsNo hardwareacceleration.Same as predicateNo difference
39Support for highresolutionRetina displaysPixelated display onhigh-DPI displays only(i.e., "Retina Displays").Same as predicateNo difference
40Keyboardshortcuts fortools and allannotation typesLimited keyboardshortcut support.NoneYes, there is a difference. Thedifference does not raise anynew potential safety risks andtherefore, there is no impact onsafety or efficacy for the subjectdevice.
41Multi-PlanarReconstruction(MPR)NoneYes, there is a Multi-Planar Reconstruction(MPR) feature. MRP isa technique used intwo-dimensionaltomographic imaging(computed tomographyYes, there is a difference. Thepredicate device does not havethe MPR feature. Thedifference has been reviewedas part of the Hazard Analysisand the mitigations weretested. The difference does notraise any new potential safetyrisks and therefore, there is noimpact on safety or efficacy forthe subject device.

{6}------------------------------------------------

{7}------------------------------------------------

{8}------------------------------------------------

510(k) Summary

Nonclinical Testing:

The ZED LINK™ , system and configuration has been assessed and tested at ZED Technologies PTY. LTD. and has passed all pre-determined testing criteria. The Verification & Validation Test Plan was designed to evaluate input functions, output functions, and actions performed by the ZED LINK™, software in each operational mode and followed the process documented in the Validation Test Plan.

Nonclinical testing results are provided in the 510(k). Validation testing indicated, that as required by the risk analysis, designated individuals performed all verification and validation activities and that the results demonstrated that the predetermined acceptance criteria were met. If the device is installed by ZED Technologies, integration and installations verification tests are conducted against acceptance criteria prior to release to the client.

Conclusion: 21 CFR 807 92(b)(1)

The 510(k) Pre-Market Notification for the ZED LINK™, contains adequate information, data, and nonclinical test results to enable FDA - CDRH to determine substantial equivalence to the predicate device.

{9}------------------------------------------------

510(k) Summary

The subject device will be manufactured in accordance with the voluntary standards listed in the enclosed voluntary standard survey. The subject and predicate devices are substantially equivalent in the areas of technical characteristics, general function, application, and intended use. The modification to the subject device does not raise any new potential safety risks and is equivalent in performance to existing legally marketed devices.

Nonclinical tests demonstrate that the device is as safe, as effective, and performs as well as the predicate device.

Therefore, the ZED LINK™, device is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.

§ 892.2050 Medical image management and processing system.

(a)
Identification. A medical image management and processing system is a device that provides one or more capabilities relating to the review and digital processing of medical images for the purposes of interpretation by a trained practitioner of disease detection, diagnosis, or patient management. The software components may provide advanced or complex image processing functions for image manipulation, enhancement, or quantification that are intended for use in the interpretation and analysis of medical images. Advanced image manipulation functions may include image segmentation, multimodality image registration, or 3D visualization. Complex quantitative functions may include semi-automated measurements or time-series measurements.(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls; voluntary standards—Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Std., Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) Std., Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) Test Pattern).