(331 days)
GenNarino is an electrical salivary stimulator system, indicated for use in patients with xerostomia (dry mouth), under prescription of a dental practitioner or physician.
GenNarino is an electrical salivary system device. It is comprised of two units: a mouthpiece shaped to the contour of the lower dental arch and an infra-red remote control to turn the stimulation On or Off. The mouthpiece comprises of two dental grade plastic sheets. GenNarino embed an electronic module hermetically sealed between both sheets and a power source of two 3V small coin batteries. Two electrodes made of biocompatible materials are connected to the electronic module, protrude from the plastic sheet and contact the mucosa of the lower dental arch, at the lingual side. The electronic circuit allows switching the stimulation "On" and "Off" by an external remote control. The user pushes the remote control's "ON" button to turn the electronic circuit on and afterwards places the device on his/her lower dental arch. Typically after up to five minutes of use, the user removes the device from his/her mouth and deactivates the stimulation by pushing the remote control's "OFF" button. The device is used on "as need" base (i.e. when the users feels oral dryness) but not more than 5 times per day. The device and replacement devices are allowed for a cumulative use of up to 50 months.
The provided text describes the GenNarino electrical salivary stimulator system and its clinical performance evaluation to demonstrate substantial equivalence to a predicate device, the Salitron System. However, it does not explicitly state specific acceptance criteria in a quantifiable manner for the device performance itself, nor does it present the data in a table format with "device performance" separate from "acceptance criteria" as requested. Instead, it presents clinical study results that show positive outcomes.
Therefore, I will extract relevant performance metrics from the clinical studies and present them as "reported device performance." Since explicit acceptance criteria are not provided, I will infer them as generally requiring a statistically significant improvement in the measured parameters.
Here's an attempt to structure the information based on your request, acknowledging the limitations of the provided text:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
| Performance Metric (Implied Acceptance Criteria) | Reported Device Performance (GenNarino) |
|---|---|
| Short-term Oral Dryness Relief | Significant decrease in oral dryness (measured by wetness sensors) with p<0.0001 for mechanical-electrical stimulation vs. mechanical stimulation alone. |
| Long-term Patient-Reported Oral Moisture Improvement (Mechanical Mode) | 18% improvement in patient-reported degree of oral moisture. |
| Long-term Patient-Reported Oral Moisture Improvement (Mechanical-Electrical Mode) | 26% improvement in patient-reported degree of oral moisture. |
| Long-term Patient-Reported Xerostomia Frequency Decrease (Mechanical Mode) | 12% decrease in xerostomia frequency. |
| Long-term Patient-Reported Xerostomia Frequency Decrease (Mechanical-Electrical Mode) | 18% decrease in xerostomia frequency. |
| Statistical Significance for Long-term Xerostomia Severity | p<0.002 for the difference between mechanical-electrical and mechanical modes. |
| Statistical Significance for Long-term Xerostomia Frequency | p<0.05 for the difference between mechanical-electrical and mechanical modes. |
| Overall Improvement (End of Stage II for Oral Moisture) | 34% improvement (p<0.001) in self-perceived oral moisture. |
| Overall Improvement (End of Stage II for Xerostomia Frequency) | 17% improvement (p<0.002) in xerostomia frequency. |
| Increase in Resting Saliva Production (End of Stage II) | 25% increase (p<0.001) in collected saliva under resting conditions. |
| Increase in Masticatory Stimulated Saliva Production (End of Stage II) | 18% increase (p<0.02) in collected saliva under masticatory stimulation. |
| Restoration of Salivary Flow in Aptyalic Patients | Salivary flow could be collected on follow-up examinations in 7 out of 8 patients with no salivary flow at the start of the study. |
| Safety | No significant side-effects observed in short-term study. No severe or irreversible systemic or local adverse effects unequivocally attributed to GenNarino usage in long-term study. |
2. Sample Size and Data Provenance for Test Set (Clinical Studies)
- First Clinical Trial (Short-term):
- Sample Size: Not explicitly stated, but indicated as a "controlled, short-term usage, double-blinded study."
- Data Provenance: Multi-national; performed in three medical centers in Europe. Retrospective or prospective is not explicitly stated, but the description of "performed" suggests prospective.
- Second Clinical Trial (Long-term):
- Sample Size:
- Stage I: 96 patients completed.
- Stage II: 56 patients completed.
- Data Provenance: Multi-national; performed in 14 institutions in 13 countries, including the US and countries in Europe and the Americas. The description of "performed" suggests prospective.
- Sample Size:
3. Number of Experts and Qualifications for Ground Truth
The document does not specify the number of experts or their qualifications used to establish ground truth for the clinical studies. The results rely on "patient-reported degree of oral moisture" and "xerostomia symptoms changes," as well as objective measurements such as "wetness sensors" and "amount of collected saliva."
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
The document does not describe a specific adjudication method. The studies were described as "double-blinded" for parts of their design, meaning neither the patients nor the clinicians administering the intervention knew whether the device was in mechanical-only or mechanical-electrical mode.
5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study
No MRMC comparative effectiveness study is mentioned. This device is an electrical salivary stimulator system, not an imaging or diagnostic device that typically employs MRMC studies to evaluate human reader performance with or without AI assistance.
6. Standalone (Algorithm Only) Performance Study
Not applicable. The GenNarino is a physical medical device (an electrical salivary stimulator system), not an AI algorithm or software-only device. Its performance is inherent to its physical function and electrical stimulation, not an algorithm running independently.
7. Type of Ground Truth Used
The ground truth used appears to be a combination of:
- Patient-reported outcomes: Subjective assessment of oral dryness, xerostomia symptoms, oral moisture, and xerostomia frequency.
- Objective physiological measurements: Wetness sensors and collected saliva volume.
- Observation of clinical effects: Restoration of salivary flow in previously aptyalic patients.
8. Sample Size for the Training Set
The document does not mention a "training set" in the context of an AI algorithm. The clinical trials described are for the evaluation of the device itself.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
Not applicable, as no AI algorithm training set is referenced.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features the department's name encircling a symbol. The symbol consists of three stylized human profiles stacked on top of each other. The profiles are rendered in a dark color, contrasting with the white background.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
February 15, 2017
Saliwell Ltd. Ben Beiski CEO 65 Hatamar St. 60917 Harutzim, Israel
Re: K160799
Trade/Device Name: GenNarino Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.5560 Regulation Name: Electrical Salivary Stimulatory System Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: LTF Dated: November 23, 2016 Received: November 23, 2016
Dear Ben Beiski:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices. good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical devicerelated adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
{1}------------------------------------------------
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Susan Runno, DDS, MA
for Tina Kiang, Ph.D. Acting Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Respiratory, Infection Control, and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known)
Device Name GenNarino
Indications for Use (Describe)
GenNarino is an electrical salivary stimulator system, indicated for use in patients with xerostomia (dry mouth), under prescription of a dental practitioner or physician.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) |
|---|
| ------------------------------------------------- |
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
_ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Druq Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Saliwell LTD. Medical Systems. The logo features a blue triangle with a stylized "S" inside, made up of a series of blue circles. The text "Saliwell LTD. Medical Systems" is written in blue and black to the right of the triangle.
Date: 14 November 2016
510(k) Summary
510(k) owners's name:
Saliwell Ltd., 65 Hatamar St., Harutzim 60917, Israel Phone: +972-3-534-7592 Fax: +972-77-353-4338
Contact person:
Ben Z. Beiski, MSc. Phone: +972-3-534-7592 Mobile: +972-50-725-6338 e-mail: bbeiski@saliwell.com Fax: +972-77-353-4338 Date of Summary preparation: December 22nd, 2015
Trade name: GenNarino
Common name: Electrical salivary stimulator system
Classification name: not known
Legally marketed devices to which a new device is compared for a determination regarding substantial equivalence:
The legally marketed device to which GenNarino is compared for a determination regarding substantial equivalence is Salitron System, PMA Number P860067. This device is an electrical salivary stimulator system, recently classified as Class II (Federal Register /Vol. 80, No. 224 / Friday, November 20, 2015 /Rules and Regulations, page 72585).
Description of the device:
GenNarino is an electrical salivary system device. It is comprised of two units: a mouthpiece shaped to the contour of the lower dental arch and an infra-red remote control to turn the stimulation On or Off.
The mouthpiece comprises of two dental grade plastic sheets. GenNarino embed an electronic module hermetically sealed between both sheets and a power source of two 3V small coin batteries. Two electrodes made of biocompatible materials are connected to the electronic module, protrude from the plastic sheet and contact the mucosa of the lower dental arch, at the lingual side.
The electronic circuit allows switching the stimulation "On" and "Off" by an external remote control. The user pushes the remote control's "ON" button to turn the electronic circuit on and afterwards places the device on his/her lower dental arch. Typically after up to five minutes of use, the user removes the device from his/her mouth and deactivates the stimulation by pushing the remote control's "OFF" button. The device is used on "as need" base (i.e. when the users feels oral dryness) but not more than 5 times per day. The device and replacement devices are allowed for a cumulative use of up to 50 months.
Clinical trial showed that GenNarino usage increases relative saliva production, resulting in more oral lubrication, due to the mechanical and electrical stimulation (both well-known techniques to increase salivary secretion and to relieve symptoms of dry mouth).
Mechanical stimulation is executed by the contact of the mouthpiece with the oral mucosa. Electrical stimulation is achieved by the delivery of low-power, low voltage, biphasic pulses from the electrodes to the oral mucosa, with the aim of stimulating the lingual nerve. The GenNarino electrodes are positioned at the inferior third molar (wisdom tooth) area in
Saliwell Ltd., 65 Hatamar St., 60917 Harutzim, Israel. Ph: +972-3-534-7592, Fax: +972-77-353.4338. www.saliwell.com
{4}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/4/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Saliwell LTD. The logo consists of a blue triangle with a stylized "S" inside, followed by the text "SALIWELL LTD." in blue. To the right of "SALIWELL LTD." is the text "MEDICAL SYSTEMS" in black.
proximity to the linqual nerve, the preferred site of electrostimulation, because this nerve is known to control to a great extent the salivary glands secretion. The selected stimulating parameters provide effective stimulation, yet are well below the sensation thresholds, and definitely the pain threshold.
Intended use:
GenNarino is an electrical salivary stimulator system, and is identified as a prescription intraoral device intended to electrically stimulate a relative increase in saliva production.
Indications for use:
GenNarino is an electrical salivary stimulator system, indicated for use in patients with xerostomia (dry mouth), under prescription of a dental practitioner or physician.
Contraindications:
GenNarino shouldn't be used by:
- Children and adolescents (persons under 18 years of age). .
- Persons that are allergic to the surface materials of the device: ●
- Electrodes: made of platinum/iridium.
- o Body: made of the plastic materials polyurethane and polycarbonate.
Summary of the technological characteristics of GenNarino compared to the predicate devices:
The table below compares the intended use and technological characteristics of the GenNarino and the Salitron System (P860067).
| Feature being compared | PROPOSED DEVICEGenNarino | PREDICATE DEVICESalitron System(P860067) |
|---|---|---|
| Intended Use | GenNarino is intended toelectrically stimulate arelative increase in salivaproduction. | The device is intended tostimulate salivary productionfrom existing glandulartissue. |
| TechnologicalCharacteristics | ||
| Mechanism of action | Promote salivary function bymechanical and electricalstimulation of nerves that areinvolved in the salivaryreflex. | Promote salivary function bymechanical and electricalstimulation of nerves that areinvolved in the salivaryreflex. |
| Placement of electrodes | Fixed-positioned on the oralmucosa in vicinity to thelingual nerve. | Manually positioned betweenthe tongue and the palate invicinity to nerves involved insalivary gland stimulation. |
| Electronics | Digital. | Traditional. |
| Anatomical adaptation to theoral cavity | Yes. | No. |
| Frequency of use | Up to 5 times per day, 5minutes at a time. | Three times a day. |
| External control | Yes, wireless. | Yes, with cord. |
{5}------------------------------------------------
IWELL UTDb MEDICAL SYSTEMS
Image /page/5/Picture/1 description: The image shows a logo with a blue triangle pointing to the right. Inside the triangle, there is a stylized "S" shape formed by a series of light blue circles. The circles create a path that curves through the triangle, giving the impression of a flow or a connection.
The subject device and predicate have slightly different Intended Use language. However, the difference in language does not change the intended use or substantial equivalence. No "different questions of safety or effectiveness" may be raised by the technological characteristics of GenNarino that were not applicable to Salitron System, and thus may pose a significant safety or effectiveness concern for GenNarino.
Non clinical performance equivalence:
Assessment of non-clinical performance data was performed, and supports a determination of substantial equivalence. In addition, GenNarino was tested by independent laboratories and found to be in compliance with the required international standards.
Clinical performance evaluation:
Throuqhout the development of GenNarino, two multi-national clinical trials have been performed. The first one was a controlled, short-term usage, double-blinded study performed in three medical centers in Europe. The study compared mechanical-electrical stimulation (i.e., stimulating with electrical pulses) vs. mechanical stimulation alone (i.e., no electrical stimulation), both delivered to the oral mucosa of dry mouth patients during 10 minutes. The study's primary outcome, measured oral dryness and xerostomia symptoms changes as a result of device wearing were assessed, and compared between mechanical vs. mechanicalelectrical modes.
Mechanical-electrical stimulation resulted in a significant decrease in oral dryness (as measured by the wetness sensors) with statistical significance of p<0.0001, leading to a beneficial effect on patients' subjective condition. No siqnificant side-effects were observed.
A second, long-term randomized multi-national clinical trial has been performed in 14 institutions in 13 countries, including the US and countries in Europe and the Americas. The use of GenNarino was compared between mechanical stimulation vs. mechanical-electrical stimulation mode for one month each in a double-blind design (Stage I). Thereafter, at Stage II the xerostomia relievinq effect of the mechanical-electrically stimulating ('active' device) was assessed in an open label design for additional 3 periods of 3 months each. Ninety six patients have finished Stage I, and 56 patients have completed Stage II. No severe or irreversible systemic or local adverse effects that could be unequivocally attributed to GenNarino usage were observed.
In Stage I, patient-reported degree of oral moisture improved 18% on mechanical mode and 26% on mechanical-electrical mode, and frequency of xerostomia decreased 12% upon mechanical stimulation and 18% due to mechanical-electrical stimulation (with statistical significance level of the difference between mechanical-electrical modes of p<0.002 for xerostomia severity and p<0.05 for xerostomia frequency).
At the end of Stage II, the level and frequency of self-perceived oral moisture improved 34% (p<0.001) and 17% (p<0.002), respectively. The amount of collected saliva increased 25% (p<0.001) under resting conditions, and 18% (p<0.02) under masticatory stimulation. Among 7 out of 8 patients with no salivary flow at the study, salivary flow could be collected on follow-up examinations.
The above results support a determination of substantial equivalence. The subjects upon whom the GenNarino was tested, was composed of a mixed xerostomia patient sample, including xerostomia secondary to Sjögren's Syndrome, radiotherapy, medication, graft vs. host diseases and idiopathic xerostomia as well. The safety or effectiveness data obtained from the testing (as reported above) support a determination of substantial equivalence.
Conclusions:
Conclusions drawn from the nonclinical and clinical test demonstrate that GenNarino is substantially equivalent to Salitron System.
§ 872.5560 Electrical salivary stimulatory system.
(a)
Identification. An electrical salivary stimulatory system is a prescription intraoral device that is intended to electrically stimulate a relative increase in saliva production.(b)
Classification —Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are:(1) The design characteristics of the device must ensure that the device design, material composition, and electrical output characteristics are consistent with the intended use;
(2) Any element of the device that contacts the patient must be demonstrated to be biocompatible;
(3) Appropriate analysis and/or testing must validate electromagnetic compatibility and electrical safety, including the safety of any battery used in the device;
(4) Software validation, verification, and hazard testing must be performed; and
(5) Documented clinical experience must demonstrate safe and effective use for stimulating saliva production by addressing the risks of damage to intraoral tissue and of ineffective treatment and must capture any adverse events observed during clinical use.