(132 days)
The Angel® Catheter is intended to provide the combined functions of an inferior vena cava (IVC) filter and a multilumen central venous catheter.
The Angel® Catheter is intended for short term use for the prevention of clinically significant pulmonary embolism (PE) in critically ill patients at high risk for PE or recognized contraindications to standard pharmacological thromboprophylaxis therapy.
The Angel® Catheter is also intended to provide access to the central venous system.
The Angel® Catheter is a retrievable vena cava filter permanently attached to a central venous access catheter. The conical, self-expanding, Nitinol filter has wide proximal openings that allow the capture of clots in the distal end of the filter. The filter is 50 mm long at its maximum expanded/unconstrained diameter of 30 mm. The distal end of the filter is free floating on the central venous catheter so that the filter can expand to the diameter of the vena cava.
The catheter is designed to constrain the IVC filter component in an unexpanded state for delivery to the IVC and to function as the sheath for retrieval of the IVC filter. It has '1 cm' depth markers indicating the depth the catheter has been inserted into the patient. For ease of placement, the catheter has a hydrophilic coating applied to the outer diameter up to the 24 cm depth marker.
The filter is permanently attached to the multi-lumen catheter to ensure secure positioning, while simultaneously providing access to the central venous system for administration of medications, fluids, or blood products; blood sampling; and monitoring of central venous pressure. The multi-lumen catheter and sheath connections are standard color-coded luer fittings, compatible with current ICU pressure monitoring equipment and other accessories. The Distal Tip Port and Proximal Sheath Port may be used for power injection of contrast media, and these luers contain specific pad printing indicating the maximum power injection rates.
The provided text describes the Angel® Catheter, a device integrating an inferior vena cava (IVC) filter and a multi-lumen central venous catheter. The document summarizes the performance data, including biocompatibility testing, bench testing, animal studies, and clinical studies, to demonstrate substantial equivalence to predicate devices.
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The document does not explicitly state acceptance criteria in a structured table for all performance measures. However, it indicates that the device met "applicable design and performance requirements" and that "performance bench testing for the Angel® Catheter conformed to the product specifications and met the applicable acceptance criteria."
Based on the clinical study results, the primary effectiveness endpoint was:
| Acceptance Criteria | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|
| Freedom from clinically significant PE or fatal PE | 100% (no clinically significant or fatal PEs reported) |
For secondary safety endpoints, the document reports incidence rates:
| Secondary Safety Endpoints | Reported Device Performance (ITT Population) |
|---|---|
| Incidence of acute proximal DVT | 18.40% (30/163) |
| Incidence of catheter-related thrombosis | 12.27% (20/163) |
| Incidence of catheter-related blood stream infections | 0.00% (0/163) |
| Incidence of major bleeding event | 3.07% (5/163) |
| Incidence of PEs averted | 8.59% (14/163) |
| Filter fracture, migration, or embolization | 0 events |
| Serious adverse events during insertion | 0 events |
| Infectious complications associated with device use | 0 events |
| Device-related SAEs during insertion or removal | 0 events |
| Unanticipated Adverse Device Effects | 0 events |
| Serious Angel® Catheter-related clinically significant PEs | 0 events |
| Serious Angel® Catheter-related deaths | 0 events |
| Serious Angel® Catheter-related CRBSIs | 0 events |
| Serious Angel® Catheter-related major bleeding | 0 events |
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance
The "test set" in this context refers to the subjects in the Pivotal Study.
- Sample Size: 163 eligible subjects (intention-to-treat (ITT) population). 151 subjects had the device in place for at least 48 hours (per-protocol (PP) population). The study had a goal of 150 evaluable subjects.
- Data Provenance: The document states "Multiple clinical studies were performed with the Angel® Catheter including a First in Man (FIM) Pilot Study, a European Post-Market Registry Study, an Early Feasibility Study under FDA's Early Feasibility Program (EFP), and a Pivotal Study." This indicates that the data comes from prospective clinical studies involving human subjects. The locations are not explicitly detailed as "country of origin" for the Pivotal Study, but mention of a "European Post-Market Registry Study" suggests international data, while the Early Feasibility Study under FDA's EFP points to US data.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts
The document mentions that the primary endpoint (freedom from clinically significant PE or fatal PE) was "determined by the CEC" (Clinical Events Committee). However, it does not specify:
- The exact number of experts on the CEC.
- The qualifications of those experts (e.g., "radiologist with 10 years of experience").
4. Adjudication method for the test set
The document mentions a "Clinical Events Committee (CEC)" determined the primary effectiveness endpoint. This implies an adjudication process was in place. However, the specific adjudication method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1, none) is not detailed.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
No, a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study focusing on human readers improving with or without AI assistance was not described in this document. The device is a physical medical device (catheter with filter), not an AI-based diagnostic or assistive technology.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
No, this question is not applicable. The Angel® Catheter is a physical medical device. It is not an algorithm, and the concept of "standalone" performance for an algorithm without human involvement does not apply here. The device's performance is inherently tied to its use by medical professionals.
7. The type of ground truth used
For the safety and effectiveness endpoints in the clinical study, the ground truth was established by clinical observation and assessment by a Clinical Events Committee (CEC). This involves diagnosis of conditions like PE, DVT, infections, and bleeding events based on clinical guidelines and diagnostic procedures. The document mentions "clinically significant PE or fatal PE... as determined by the CEC."
8. The sample size for the training set
The document does not mention a training set as this device is a physical medical device, not a machine learning model that typically requires a training set. The "training" of the device is through its design, manufacturing processes, and rigorous pre-clinical (biocompatibility, bench, animal studies) and clinical testing.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
Not applicable, as there is no mention of a "training set" in the context of a machine learning model. For the pre-clinical studies, "ground truth" refers to the established scientific methods and accepted standards for biocompatibility, mechanical performance, and animal responses.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a stylized depiction of a bird or eagle in flight, composed of three overlapping profiles facing to the right. The words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" are arranged in a circular fashion around the bird symbol.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
September 19, 2016
Bio2 Medical, Inc. Ms. Julie Ross Director, Quality Assurance and Regulatory Affairs 4670 Table Mountain Drive Golden, CO 80403
Re: K160747
Trade/Device Name: Angel Catheter Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.3375 Regulation Name: Cardiovascular Intravascular Filter Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: PNS Dated: June 24, 2016 Received: June 27, 2016
Dear Ms. Ross:
This letter corrects our substantially equivalent letter of July 28, 2016.
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical devicerelated adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in
{1}------------------------------------------------
the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Carmen G. Johnson -S
for Bram D. Zuckerman, M.D. Director Division of Cardiovascular Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K160747/S001
Device Name Angel® Catheter
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Angel® Catheter is intended to provide the combined functions of an inferior vena cava (IVC) filter and a multilumen central venous catheter.
The Angel® Catheter is intended for short term use for the prevention of clinically significant pulmonary embolism (PE) in critically ill patients at high risk for PE or recognized contraindications to standard pharmacological thromboprophylaxis therapy.
The Angel® Catheter is also intended to provide access to the central venous system.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
| Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) |
|---|
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
| X | Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| | Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
Angel® Catheter 510(k) Notification (K160747)
Bio2 Medical, Inc.
Image /page/3/Picture/2 description: The image shows the logo for Bio2 Medical. The logo has the word "BIO2" on the top line, with the "BIO" in black and the "2" in blue. The word "MEDICAL" is on the second line in gray, with the registered trademark symbol to the right of the word.
510(k) Summary - Page 1 of 11
SUBMITTER l.
| Applicant Name: | Bio2 Medical, Inc. |
|---|---|
| Address: | 4670 Table Mountain DriveGolden, CO 80403 |
| Phone: | (720) 833-5660 |
| Fax: | (303) 422-4182 |
| Contact Person: | Christopher E. Banas |
II. DEVICE
| Trade Name: | Angel® Catheter |
|---|---|
| Catalog Number: | AC3930A |
| Common or Usual Name: | Inferior Vena Cava Filter and Central Venous Catheter |
| Classification: | Short-Term Intravascular Filter Catheter (21 CFR 870.3375) |
| Device Class: | II |
| Product Code: | PNS |
III. PREDICATE DEVICES
The Angel® Catheter combines the functions of a retrievable inferior vena cava (IVC) filter and a multi-lumen central venous catheter (CVC). These functions have not been previously combined in a single device. Therefore, there are separate predicate devices identified with each function.
The Angel® Catheter legally marketed predicates, to which Bio2 Medical, Inc. is claiming equivalence, are listed below.
{4}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Summary - Page 2 of 11
| Predicate Devices for the Angel® Catheter | ||
|---|---|---|
| Predicate Device Name | FDA 510(k) Number | |
| Inferior Vena Cava(IVC) Filters | Cook® Celect® Vena Cava Filter | K073374 |
| Bard Eclipse™ Vena Cava Filter | K093659 | |
| Central Venous(CVC) Catheters | Edwards Multi-Med Central Venous Catheter | K091709 |
| ARROWG+ARD Blue Quad-Lumen CentralVenous Catheter | K962577 |
IV. DEVICE DESCRIPTION
The Angel® Catheter is a retrievable vena cava filter permanently attached to a central venous access catheter. The conical, self-expanding, Nitinol filter has wide proximal openings that allow the capture of clots in the distal end of the filter. The filter is 50 mm long at its maximum expanded/unconstrained diameter of 30 mm. The distal end of the filter is free floating on the central venous catheter so that the filter can expand to the diameter of the vena cava.
The catheter is designed to constrain the IVC filter component in an unexpanded state for delivery to the IVC and to function as the sheath for retrieval of the IVC filter. It has '1 cm' depth markers indicating the depth the catheter has been inserted into the patient. For ease of placement, the catheter has a hydrophilic coating applied to the outer diameter up to the 24 cm depth marker.
The filter is permanently attached to the multi-lumen catheter to ensure secure positioning, while simultaneously providing access to the central venous system for administration of medications, fluids, or blood products; blood sampling; and monitoring of central venous pressure. The multi-lumen catheter and sheath connections are standard color-coded luer fittings, compatible with current ICU pressure monitoring equipment and other accessories. The Distal Tip Port and Proximal Sheath Port may be used for power injection of contrast media, and these luers contain specific pad printing indicating the maximum power injection rates.
{5}------------------------------------------------
Bio2 Medical, Inc.
510(k) Summary - Page 3 of 11
Performance and Principle of Operation
The Angel® Catheter combines the functions of an inferior vena cava (IVC) filter and a multi-lumen central venous access catheter (CVC). It is designed for bedside percutaneous placement in the inferior vena cava, via the femoral vein, for the prevention of pulmonary embolism. Placement of the device is similar to a standard central venous catheter, followed by an abdominal radiograph to assess proper position of the catheter and filter. While in place, the catheter is maintained using the same techniques as a central venous catheter. When the indications for IVC filtration and/or central venous access are no longer present. the permanent attachment of the filter to the catheter ensures that the filter will be retrieved with the catheter at the time of removal. The Angel® Catheter is intended for short term use (less than 30 days).
V. INDICATIONS FOR USE
The Angel® Catheter is intended to provide the combined functions of an inferior vena cava (IVC) filter and a multi-lumen central venous catheter.
The Angel® Catheter is intended for short term use for the prevention of clinically significant pulmonary embolism (PE) in critically ill patients at high risk for PE or recurrent PE, and recognized contraindications to standard pharmacological thromboprophylaxis therapy.
The Angel® Catheter is also intended to provide access to the central venous system.
{6}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Summary - Page 4 of 11
VI. COMPARISON OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS WITH THE PREDICATE DEVICES
The Angel® Catheter is substantially equivalent to both the vena cava filter and central venous catheter predicate devices identified with regard to the indications for use, technological characteristics, and performance characteristics. The major technological similarities and differences are summarized below:
| Technological Comparison of Angel® Catheter to Predicate Devices | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inferior Vena Cava (IVC)Filters | Central Venous Catheters(CVC) | ||||
| Angel®Catheter | Cook®Celect®Vena CavaFilter | Bard Eclipse™Vena CavaFilter | EdwardsMulti-MedCentralVenousCatheter | ARROWG+ARDBlue Quad-Lumen CentralVenousCatheter | |
| FDA 510(k)Number | - | K073374 | K093659 | K091709 | K962577 |
| Indicationsfor use | Per Section V | Similar | Similar | Similar | Similar |
| PlacementDuration | <30 Days | OptionalRetrieval | OptionalRetrieval | Identical | Identical |
| Principle ofOperation | BedsidePlacement | UnderFluoroscopicGuidance | UnderFluoroscopicGuidance | Similar | Similar |
| VenousAccess Site | Femoral | Femoral/Jugular | Femoral/Jugular/Subclavian | Jugular/Subclavian | Femoral/Jugular/Subclavian |
| IndicatedCavalDiameter | 15 mm - 30mm | Similar | Similar | NA | NA |
| Filter Material | Nitinol(Laser Cutfrom NiTiTube) | Conichrome | Nitinol(NiTi Wire) | NA | NA |
| FilterDimensions | 30 mmdiameter x 50mm length | Similar | Similar | NA | NA |
| Continued on next page |
{7}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Summary - Page 5 of 11
| Inferior Vena Cava (IVC)Filters | Central Venous Catheters(CVC) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angel®Catheter | Cook®Celect®Vena CavaFilter | Bard Eclipse™Vena CavaFilter | EdwardsMulti-MedCentralVenousCatheter | ARROWG+ARDBlue Quad-Lumen CentralVenousCatheter | |
| FilterSecurement | PermanentlyAttached toCatheter | Hooks | Hooks | NA | NA |
| CatheterSecurement | StandardSuture Wing/Overclamp | NA | NA | Identical | Identical |
| CatheterLumen | 3 | NA | NA | 4 | 4 |
| Catheter/DeliverySystemProfile | 9.0F | 8.5F | Femoral: 7.0FJugular/Subclavian:10.0F | 8.5F | 8.5F |
| UseableLength | 30 cm | NotSpecified | Not Specified | 20 cm | 30 cm |
| SterilizationMethod | EtO | Identical | Identical | Identical | Identical |
| Device Usage | Single Useonly | Identical | Identical | Identical | Identical |
VII. PERFORMANCE DATA
The following performance testing was completed to demonstrate that the Angel® Catheter met applicable design and performance requirements, and is therefore equivalent to predicate devices.
Biocompatibility Testing
All blood contacting materials for the Angel® Catheter were identified. The following list summarizes the biocompatibility testing performed for the device:
{8}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Summary - Page 6 of 11
| Biocompatibility Testing |
|---|
| Two week Systemic Toxicity Study in the Rat, Repeated Parenteral Administration of Two Extracts |
| Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay - Extracts |
| Mouse Peripheral Blood Micronucleus Study |
| Genotoxicity: Mouse Lymphoma Assay - Extract |
| ISO Guinea Pig Maximization Sensitization Test - Extract |
| Cytotoxicity Study Using the ISO Elution Method |
| ASTM Hemolysis Study |
| USP Rabbit Pyrogen Study-Material Mediated |
| ASTM Partial Thromboplastin Time-1 |
| ASTM Partial Thromboplastin Time-2 |
| SC5b-9 Complement Activation Assay-1 |
| SC5b-9 Complement Activation Assay-2 |
| ISO Systemic Toxicity Study in Mice |
| ISO Intracutaneous Study in Rabbits |
| C3a Complement Activation Assay-1 |
| C3a Complement Activation Assay-2 |
In conclusion, the biocompatibility evaluation of the Angel® Catheter met the applicable ISO 10993 and ASTM test standards.
Performance Bench Testing
The following list summarizes the performance bench testing completed for the Angel® Catheter:
{9}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Summary - Page 7 of 11
| Performance Testing |
|---|
| Dimensional, Visual, and Compatibility |
| Lumen Flow Rate |
| Tensile Testing |
| Pressure Monitoring |
| Aspiration |
| Multilumen Leakage |
| Catheter Burst/Hemostasis |
| Particulate |
| Power Injection Capability |
| Force to Deploy/Retrieve |
| Simulated Use - Pre-Clinical GLP Animal Study |
| Catheter Stiffness |
| Catheter Flexural Fatigue Tolerance |
| Catheter Coating Lubricity and Durability |
| Catheter Coating Coverage and Adhesion |
| Clot Trapping/Filter Efficiency |
| Filter Migration Resistance |
| Filter Durability (Fatigue) |
| Corrosion |
| Filter FEA |
| Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Compatibility |
| Radial Force |
| Active Af (BFR) |
| Nickel Leaching |
In conclusion, the performance bench testing for the Angel® Catheter conformed to the product specifications and met the applicable acceptance criteria.
Animal Studies
Multiple Non-GLP and GLP studies were conducted for the Angel® Catheter on porcine and ovine animal models. The results from these studies supported the safety and performance of the Angel® Catheter for use in human clinical studies.
{10}------------------------------------------------
Bio2 Medical, Inc.
510(k) Summary - Page 8 of 11
Clinical Studies
Multiple clinical studies were performed with the Angel® Catheter including a First in Man (FIM) Pilot Study, a European Post-Market Registry Study, an Early Feasibility Study under FDA's Early Feasibility Program (EFP), and a Pivotal Study.
The primary objective of the Pivotal Study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Angel® Catheter in critically ill subjects at high risk for PE, and with recognized contraindications to standard pharmacological therapy. This study followed the Early Feasibility Study that was conducted to obtain initial insights into the safety of the Angel® Catheter in critically ill subjects with high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) disease and not receiving pharmacological thromboprophylaxis.
With a Pivotal Study goal of 150 evaluable subjects, the primary endpoint was freedom from clinically significant PE or fatal PE at the time of discharge or up to 72 hours post device removal, whichever was first. Secondary safety endpoints were: 1) Incidence of acute proximal deep vein thrombosis; 2) Incidence of catheter related thrombosis; 3) Incidence of catheter related blood stream infections: 4) Incidence of major bleeding event; and 5) Incidence of PEs averted.
The device was successfully placed in 163 eligible subjects [intention-to-treat (ITT) population], 151 of these subjects had the device in place for at least 48 hours [per-protocol (PP) population]. The most common indication for placement of the device was recognized contraindication to the use of anticoagulation in 160/163 (98.2%) of subjects. Refer to the list below.
{11}------------------------------------------------
| Indications for Angel® Catheter Placement | ||
|---|---|---|
| Subject Characteristics | ITT Population(N=163) | PP Population(N=151) |
| Subject has recognized contraindications to standardpharmacological thromboprophylaxis including | 98.2% (160/163) | 98.0% (148/151) |
| Active bleeding or at high risk for bleeding | 95.6% (153/160) | 95.3% (141/148) |
| Hypersensitivity to pharmacological thromboprophylaxis | 0.0% (0/160) | 0.0% (0/148) |
| History of severe heparin induced thrombocytopenia | 0.0% (0/160) | 0.0% (0/148) |
| Severe thrombocytopenia | 0.6% (1/160) | 0.7% (1/148) |
| Other | 6.9% (11/160) | 7.4% (11/148) |
| Subject has a confirmed acute proximal lower extremity DVT or aconfirmed acute PE as diagnosed by site with recognizedcontraindication to anticoagulation | 4.9% (8/163) | 5.3% (8/151) |
| Subject requires a temporary interruption (>24 hours from lastdose) of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis for a surgical ormedical procedure | 6.2% (10/162) | 6.7% (10/150) |
| Prophylactic use of the Angel® Catheter* | 98.2% (160/163) | 98.0% (148/151) |
| * Defined as subjects without a confirmed ongoing PE. |
510(k) Summary - Page 9 of 11
Freedom from clinically significant PE and fatal PE were reported for all subjects (i.e., no clinically significant or fatal PEs were reported in any of the study subjects as determined by the CEC). Thus, the primary effectiveness endpoint of the study was met. Of the secondary safety endpoints, there were 30/163; 18.40% ITT (30/151; 19.87% PP) acute proximal DVT including the 20/163; 12.27% ITT (20/151; 13.25% PP) catheter-related DVTs, 0/163; 0.00% ITT (0/151; 0.00% PP) catheter-related blood stream infection, and 5/163; 3.07% ITT (4/151; 2.65% PP) rate of major bleeding events. In addition, the averted PE rate was 14/163; 8.59% ITT (14/151; 9.27% PP). The study device had no reported events related to filter fracture, migration or embolization. There were no serious adverse events (SAE) reported as a result of the device insertion. There were no infectious complications associated with the use of the Angel® Catheter and no devicerelated SAEs occurred during the insertion or removal of the device.
There were no Unanticipated Adverse Device Effects reported. No serious Angel® Catheter-related clinically significant PEs, deaths, CRBSIs, or major bleeding occurred in any subjects during the study period. All SAEs are discussed below.
{12}------------------------------------------------
| System Organ Class/Preferred Term | Number of Events, ITT Population | Number of Subjects, ITT Population (N= 163 ) |
|---|---|---|
| Any Serious Adverse Event | 66 | 49 (30.1%) |
| Cardiac Disorders | 5 | 5 (3.1%) |
| Cardiac Arrest | 4 | 4 (2.5%) |
| Supraventricular Tachycardia | 1 | 1 (0.6%) |
| General Disorders And Administration SiteConditions | 5 | 5 (3.1%) |
| Brain Death | 2 | 2 (1.2%) |
| Multi-Organ Failure | 3 | 3 (1.8%) |
| Hepatobiliary Disorders | 1 | 1 (0.6%) |
| Chronic Hepatic Failure | 1 | 1 (0.6%) |
| Infections And Infestations | 11 | 8 (4.9%) |
| Abdominal Sepsis | 1 | 1 (0.6%) |
| Lobar Pneumonia | 1 | 1 (0.6%) |
| Pneumonia | 6 | 6 (3.7%) |
| Sepsis | 2 | 2 (1.2%) |
| Septic Shock | 1 | 1 (0.6%) |
| Injury, Poisoning And Procedural Complications | 7 | 7 (4.3%) |
| Craniocerebral Injury | 4 | 4 (2.5%) |
| Post Procedural Haemorrhage | 1 | 1 (0.6%) |
| Subdural Haematoma | 1 | 1 (0.6%) |
| Subdural Haemorrhage | 1 | 1 (0.6%) |
| Nervous System Disorders | 9 | 9 (5.5%) |
| Brain Hypoxia | 1 | 1 (0.6%) |
| Brain Oedema | 1 | 1 (0.6%) |
| Cerebrovascular Accident | 1 | 1 (0.6%) |
| Haemorrhage Intracranial | 1 | 1 (0.6%) |
| Intracranial Pressure Increased | 5 | 5 (3.1%) |
| Renal And Urinary Disorders | 2 | 2 (1.2%) |
| Renal Failure | 1 | 1 (0.6%) |
| Renal Failure Acute | 1 | 1 (0.6%) |
| Respiratory, Thoracic And Mediastinal Disorders | 9 | 9 (5.5%) |
| Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome | 1 | 1 (0.6%) |
| Pleural Effusion | 1 | 1 (0.6%) |
| Pulmonary Embolism | 1 | 1 (0.6%) |
| Respiratory Failure | 6 | 6 (3.7%) |
| Vascular Disorders | 17 | 17 (10.4%) |
| Deep Vein Thrombosis | 10 | 10 (6.1%) |
| Haemodynamic Instability | 1 | 1 (0.6%) |
| Hypotension | 1 | 1 (0.6%) |
| Pelvic Venous Thrombosis | 2 | 2 (1.2%) |
| Vena Cava Thrombosis | 3 | 3 (1.8%) |
510(k) Summary - Page 10 of 11
Numbers are % (counts/sample size).
{13}------------------------------------------------
Bio2 Medical, Inc.
Angel® Catheter 510(k) Notification (K160747)
510(k) Summary - Page 11 of 11
In conclusion, the Pivotal Study demonstrated that the bedside insertion of the Angel® Catheter is safe and that this device is an effective alternative for the prevention of clinically significant PEs in a high risk population of critically ill patients with contraindications to anticoagulation.
The use of the device for an average of 6.79 days provided protection from PE in this population that was similar to that reported with the use of anticoagulation in the PROTECT study in critically ill subjects with no contraindications to anticoagulation, providing protection for the period with the highest risk of thromboembolic events. There were no clinically significant PEs reported in the study, which is lower than the anticipated rate of these events in this critically ill population with high rates of DVTs and contraindications to anticoagulation.
The Angel® Catheter was not associated with any catheter related blood stream infections. The number of acute lower extremities DVTs as well as the number of catheter related thrombosis (CRT) are within the expected frequency of these events in critically ill patients with central venous catheters. The device malfunctions were mostly related to the non-functionality of one of the access ports and none of them resulted in a serious adverse event.
Thus, this Pivotal Study successfully met all pre-specified primary and secondary endpoints of the clinical trial, and demonstrated an acceptable safety profile for the Angel® Catheter.
VIII. CONCLUSIONS
Based on clinical data, performance testing, and similarities in indications for use, materials, technological characteristics, principle of operation and design features, Bio2 Medical, Inc. considers the Angel® Catheter performance to be substantially equivalent to the legally marketed predicate devices listed above in terms of safety and performance. Device differences do not raise any new issues of safety or effectiveness.
§ 870.3375 Cardiovascular intravascular filter.
(a)
Identification. A cardiovascular intravascular filter is an implant that is placed in the inferior vena cava for the purpose of preventing pulmonary thromboemboli (blood clots generated in the lower limbs and broken loose into the blood stream) from flowing into the right side of the heart and the pulmonary circulation.(b)
Classification. Class II. The special controls for this device are:(1) “Use of International Standards Organization's ISO 10993 ‘Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices Part I: Evaluation and Testing,’ ” and
(2) FDA's:
(i) “510(k) Sterility Review Guidance and Revision of 2/12/90 (K90-1)” and
(ii) “Guidance for Cardiovascular Intravascular Filter 510(k) Submissions.”